Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Splitting The Positive

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The block magnets I am using are 30lb and are weak ones.
    It is important to note that pull force measurements offered by
    suppliers is way higher than when used with core material in
    motors or generators and here is why.With my cores block I max
    out at 11.6lbs metal to magnet. So with gap is 5lbs


    Comment


    • Field

      Your latest observation is exactly why I said to go with cylinder magnets on the rotor that are the same diameter as the coil core, or smaller, but as LONG as you can get them. This gives you a MUCH thicker rotor, which is more stable. It is the MASS of the magnet that provides the attraction. And the tighter you can focus it the better, within the parameters of your build.
      Last edited by Turion; 09-14-2019, 04:06 PM.
      “Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
      —Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Turion View Post
        Your latest observation is exactly why I said....


        ...... the tighter you can focus it the better......,.
        Sounds like you made an improvement and can see new results. I am
        working on shielding of the small repulsion magnet. This will give me the
        smoother transition I am hoping for by matching the the approach and
        departure flux density to both sides. Adjustable of course on the fly.
        How is your new rotor performing? Or maybe you have not used it just yet.

        It should be interesting. If this small dia rotor doesn't do well I have plans
        to use this same platform using bigger magnets and a larger rotor.

        Also can make the the width larger down the road as needed. The tiny
        cylinder repulsion magnet is just enough at TDC but the peripheral
        fields on either side of TDC are much much much stronger than the
        attraction to core side. Gotta think.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by BroMikey
          Home School Update

          At the end I say it is LOOSER then I said WAY LOOSER. That's my
          favorite HILLBILLY jargon.


          [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1knUwWNI3s&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]
          More video demo's coming. In this video without the opposition magnet
          the meter registered a whopping .8 lbs to break the lock. With the
          opposing magnet in place the force to break the lock is .2lbs

          This next video we are getting it down to .1 lbs

          That's 8X less energy required to over come the drag.

          Comment


          • Here we have it
            down to .04 from .8lbs this is a 20X reduction. Also I might add that on the
            stop watch the number of magnet passes per 10 seconds without the
            opposition magnet running on a controlled voltage of 14.7vdc is 24.

            With the opposing magnet in place where the lock is broken at 20X less
            the number of times that a magnet passes the core block increases to 31.

            The greater number represents a reduced drag and lowering of amp
            draw.



            [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwh3k64TD0o&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]
            Last edited by BroMikey; 09-28-2019, 03:52 AM.

            Comment


            • To understand "splitting the Positive" one needs to know just what Positive and Negative is...

              Most will say Positive comes from the Positive of the Battery Terminal and similarly the Negative from the Negative Terminal.

              But even at the Electric Universe Forum, they know NOT what electricity is...
              And it AINT electrons.

              Many have had to make the Trek to Down Under Oz Outback to watch fresh runny concrete pumped through a Ferrite Ring Magnet and exit as pure fresh water... Transmutation (Electro-magnetically restructuring) at it Finest. It is also done with a NEGATIVE NORTH Pole Center Field of an electric 12V DC car battery powering a Joecell too. Same cell as in the water into oil, only the electrodes are reversed.
              see..... https://www.magneticwaterscience.com/?page_id=46 use the password wizzzard777

              So anything that can be done with the Electric Cell can be done with the In-Line Magnetic Cell too.

              Positive is SOUTH POLE Energy. Negative is North Pole Energy.

              So how does one split it? Electricity is a Wave Form. It has FOUR Phases.

              Imagine the Sine Wave with a high and a low dip in the wave. At the half way points where the SPLIT Phase exists as in there are 4 POLES to EVERY Magnet and each of the 4 phases or the two splits plus the 2 poles will give a different result in an Electric Cell.

              A Car Battery is a CELL. Try this experiment to understand the USAGE of the Split Phases. Leave the Lights on in the car. Flatten the Battery. Try starting the car to make sure the battery is flat.
              THEN take the lead off the battery (Not the Ground lead) and place a COIL between the battery terminal and the lead making a circuit. Start your car on the OTHER HALF of the Battery. Until you do this one just hasnt a clue of the 4 phases of MAGNETIC CURRENT. or Neg Neg Neg Pos Pos Neg Pos Pos


              Now I know you will have trouble with this Mike, but with some appropriate questions its not hard to learn...

              One might find it easy to understand this 4 Phases of Electricity by studying Light. Tesla said "Everything is the Light" that means no electrons or protons or even elements.... just Light... Now Keshe whom I dislike immensely only because he does CULT his science and makes it diffiCULT to understand but his book The Structure of Light does state there are OTHER Poles around the Structure of Light Bar magnet. This is a good place to start to understand what splitting of the Fields or Poles or what we term Positive and Negative.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by MerLynn View Post
                To understand "splitting the Positive" one needs to know just what Positive and Negative is...

                Most will say Positive comes from the Positive of the Battery Terminal and similarly the Negative from the Negative Terminal.

                But even at the Electric Universe Forum, they know NOT what electricity is...
                And it AINT electrons.

                Many have had to make the Trek to Down Under Oz Outback to watch fresh runny concrete pumped through a Ferrite Ring Magnet and exit as pure fresh water... Transmutation (Electro-magnetically restructuring) at it Finest. It is also done with a NEGATIVE NORTH Pole Center Field of an electric 12V DC car battery powering a Joecell too. Same cell as in the water into oil, only the electrodes are reversed.
                see..... https://www.magneticwaterscience.com/?page_id=46 use the password wizzzard777

                So anything that can be done with the Electric Cell can be done with the In-Line Magnetic Cell too.

                Positive is SOUTH POLE Energy. Negative is North Pole Energy.

                So how does one split it? Electricity is a Wave Form. It has FOUR Phases.

                Imagine the Sine Wave with a high and a low dip in the wave. At the half way points where the SPLIT Phase exists as in there are 4 POLES to EVERY Magnet and each of the 4 phases or the two splits plus the 2 poles will give a different result in an Electric Cell.

                A Car Battery is a CELL. Try this experiment to understand the USAGE of the Split Phases. Leave the Lights on in the car. Flatten the Battery. Try starting the car to make sure the battery is flat.
                THEN take the lead off the battery (Not the Ground lead) and place a COIL between the battery terminal and the lead making a circuit. Start your car on the OTHER HALF of the Battery. Until you do this one just hasnt a clue of the 4 phases of MAGNETIC CURRENT. or Neg Neg Neg Pos Pos Neg Pos Pos


                Now I know you will have trouble with this Mike, but with some appropriate questions its not hard to learn...

                One might find it easy to understand this 4 Phases of Electricity by studying Light. Tesla said "Everything is the Light" that means no electrons or protons or even elements.... just Light... Now Keshe whom I dislike immensely only because he does CULT his science and makes it diffiCULT to understand but his book The Structure of Light does state there are OTHER Poles around the Structure of Light Bar magnet. This is a good place to start to understand what splitting of the Fields or Poles or what we term Positive and Negative.
                Thank you Merlynn I have no problem with your discourse here. Just
                stick to hard science, I agree with you here to your surprise. Everything
                you have said is good stuff, very refreshing.

                Don't be overly concerned about the crack on the jaw, it's my way of
                finding out who I'm dealing with. Now.

                What should I do in experimental form to execute? Give me something
                to try. I like talk too.

                I guess you are a real man after all.

                Comment


                • Progress on magnetic cancellation.

                  [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Q-CXfQy6ws&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]

                  Comment


                  • Neutralization

                    Looks good.

                    Once I get my big machine back together, I will show the motor running turning the rotor with no coils in place. Then with coils. Finally with neutralizing magnets in place. You can see that with the neutralizing magnets in place the amp draw is a BIT more than with just the rotor in place, but nowhere NEAR what it is with the coils and no neutralizing magnets. If I had the shielding in place it would do much better, and I also know you can get it dead on if you spend enough time. But just getting the amp draw way down is enough to prove the point.
                    “Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
                    —Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist

                    Comment


                    • Hi all, good stuff bromikey, thanks for sharing.

                      Hi turion, do you know if placing neutralizing magnets at the back of a drive coil/core can cause any issues.
                      As I'm using that method on the heavy flywheel, bedini type motor/generator I'm working on still.
                      It seems to work very well, though will be testing air coils for the generator coils around rotor and drive coils will have the cores.
                      peace love light

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by SkyWatcher View Post
                        Hi all, good stuff bromikey, thanks for sharing.

                        Hi turion, do you know if placing neutralizing magnets at the back of a drive coil/core can cause any issues.
                        As I'm using that method on the heavy flywheel, bedini type motor/generator I'm working on still.
                        It seems to work very well, though will be testing air coils for the generator coils around rotor and drive coils will have the cores.
                        peace love light
                        Introducing strong magnetic flux to any core and coil will alter it's response
                        curve, you know that cause you are good with electronics. A strong
                        magnet stuck to any core material will magnetize it that might cause
                        heat due to saturation. Not sure why and what you are doing there,
                        better show us. You know what they say? A picture is worth a thousand
                        words.

                        Comment


                        • Neutralizing

                          Originally posted by Turion View Post
                          Looks good.

                          Once I get my big machine back together, I will show the motor running..

                          If I had the shielding in place it would do much better,

                          and I also know you can get it dead on if you spend enough time.

                          Yes it is amazing how much difference it makes having the adjustable
                          shielding so a better balance can be achieved. Getting the travel distance
                          matched exactly for the going and coming of the poles at TDC for
                          both attraction and repulsion will take some doing.

                          If one set of poles is not bad enough when 12 sets are in place will be
                          harder especially when magnetic fields vary so much from magnet to
                          magnet.

                          It may be possible to shield in other ways redirecting the fields to suit.
                          For instance having shields on the rotor magnets is a test I want to make.
                          From there other shielding experiments could follow.

                          Comment


                          • Hi bromikey, still working on it, when It comes along further, I'll share it.
                            In the meantime, was thinking about the multifilar, lenz reduction coils, shouldn't it be possible to create a solid state version, for starters, just place a coil in front of another coil, one is powered with adjustable ac or dc pulses and the other coil/core is the induction multifilar coil/core.
                            Getting the right frequencies would be easy then and just tune it until our input stays the same, while taking power from the induction coil.
                            Why hasn't anyone talked about doing this.

                            peace love light

                            Comment


                            • Hey Sky

                              i am sure there are many ways to get new ideas to produce extra, yes I
                              have and others have also. See Thane Heins "Bi Toroid" it uses
                              5X the amount of wire just like our coils for rotors with magnets.

                              A standard MOT primary 150-180ft of wire now multiple by 5 and what
                              do you get? Yes close to 1000 ft. The Bi Toroid uses the delay like
                              the generator coils use the delay also.

                              Now you need to look more at power factor. Another way was created
                              by Bill Alek by turning up the AC hz to 3000. Using metglas he builds
                              self charging boxes for his 3 wheel trikes. It looks like he was bought off
                              tho. Look up "phase congregate" there he explains.

                              Thane used 60hz which shows the principle but HF AC speeds up output
                              production. He uses a pc controlled sine wave oscillator then runs
                              that to an audio amplifier then to his transformer.
                              Last edited by BroMikey; 10-08-2019, 05:05 AM.

                              Comment


                              • Potential Difference

                                For about 12 years now I have been saying that understanding how to use the potential difference was absolutely the key to free energy. The more time goes by and the more research that is done, the more dramatic the results become. Because of BS from people on this forum we are no longer sharing our work, but that doesn’t mean we haven’t continued. Some day you will all look back at this and think “If I had only listened.”

                                I cannot emphasize strongly enough how incredibly important the simple potential difference circuit is. You need to build it. You need to truly understand how it works, and then you need to start thinking outside the box to modify it and, most importantly, apply it. None of it is rocket science.

                                Bro Mikey, you did great work showing that there are no gains in the circuit running a light as a load between batteries. For two reasons. No pulse and the voltage hitting the battery is not high enough to overcome the impedance to charging in the battery. Too much wasted energy. The modified Matt motor and the boost module solve those problems and you get the mechanical work of the motor for free. Which is where the generator comes into play. You can prove the worth of the system with only a coil or two if you remember ONE thing. The output from the coil is a high voltage source, and you should run it THROUGH the load back to the battery. Always, always, always run your loads on a potential difference. You need that engraved on your brain. Boost the voltage, Buck the voltage, rectify the voltage. LEARN what is possible.
                                “Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
                                —Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X