BEMF current reversal.

[Allen Burgess]

The characters inside the brackets [ and ] are the units, not variables or constants in the equation.

[Webers] are units of flux.

[A] are units of Ni. (or [amperes] are units of mmf, magnetomotive force, Ampere turns)

[H^-1] are units of reluctance. The unit for reluctance is the inverse henry.

The units are not part of the equation which is why they are set in the brackets [ and ]. The units are not part of the arithmetic.

@bistander,

You're telling us Ohms are not part of the resistance formula arithmetic. This amounts to nothing more then ridiculous crap and I'm getting fed up with it. You are now officially on my "Ignore List".

[bistander]

Not

@bistander,

Look again on the bottem left you'll see Reluctance times H-1. This means Reluctance multiplied by "Inverse Henries". Look at the right for the equivalent and you see Resistance multiplied by Ohms!

"Magnetic reluctance, or magnetic resistance, is a concept used in the analysis of magnetic circuits. It is analogous to resistance in an electrical circuit, but rather than dissipating electric energy it stores magnetic energy".

What are the units of stored magnetic energy?

The units are Teslas and Gauss! Therefore the (Reluctance is the product of the stored magnetic energy). The "Inverse Henry" is a measure of stored magnetic energy that factors into Tesla and Gauss.

The stored magnetic energy is similar to numbers of Ohms in the resistance formula. Both in brackets [ ].

@bistander,

This is at least the tenth time you made me repeat myself and I'm getting tired of it!

The tesla and the gauss are units of magnetic flux density or B field, not energy. The unit for energy is joule.

[SlickDick]

@bistander,

You're telling us Ohms are not part of the resistance formula arithmetic. This amounts to nothing more then ridiculous crap and I'm getting fed up with it.

bi basically explains how to properly read the formulas. This is important because if you can't, you're cleuless.

Granted bi's way of sharing his knowledge is not the best way of handling things socially. I am sure he means well though...

[bistander]

Thanks

bi basically explains how to properly read the formulas. This is important because if you can't, you're cleuless.

Granted bi's way of sharing his knowledge is not the best way of handling things socially. I am sure he means well though...

Slick,

Thank you, I think.

bi

[Allen Burgess]

Negative Inductance.

bi basically explains how to properly read the formulas. This is important because if you can't, you're cleuless.

Granted bi's way of sharing his knowledge is not the best way of handling things socially. I am sure he means well though...

@Slickdick,

Re: what is the physical meaning of "Negative Inductance"?

"The most fundamental reason is that the electric energy stored in this element is more than the magnetic energy stored. Circuit designers interpret it as a capacitor".

Here's what I've gathered: Increased inductor field strength creates a reluctance to changing current, but some current that fails to pass is stored in the inductor along with the magnetic field. Now, this is referred to as "Positive Capacitance" except the frequency reactance is reversed. The amount of positive capacitance in an inductor of charged magnetic field strength is measured in 'Negative Henries" of inductance, and has to be proportional to the intensity of the flux field.

[citfta]

It is absolutely amazing how mixed up a person can get when they let their ego over-ride their common sense. All these silly things you keep bringing up Allen have already been explained to you over and over again but you keep insisting you are the only one right and everyone else is wrong. At least 10 different people have told you that you are not correct in your use of electronic terms, your are not correct in your understanding of basic algebra and you are not correct in your understanding of electronics. But your ego will not let you admit you might be wrong and everyone else correct. You can continue posting another thousand posts with you mistaken ideas and all you will accomplish is to prove to more and more people you don't have a clue what you are posting about. Instead of wasting all that time why don't you actually study some real electronics books or online classes and try to really learn something. The things you have learned from DumbTube or wherever have not helped you to understand electronics.

[Allen Burgess]

Law Suit

It is absolutely amazing how mixed up a person can get when they let their ego over-ride their common sense. All these silly things you keep bringing up Allen have already been explained to you over and over again but you keep insisting you are the only one right and everyone else is wrong. At least 10 different people have told you that you are not correct in your use of electronic terms, your are not correct in your understanding of basic algebra and you are not correct in your understanding of electronics. But your ego will not let you admit you might be wrong and everyone else correct. You can continue posting another thousand posts with you mistaken ideas and all you will accomplish is to prove to more and more people you don't have a clue what you are posting about. Instead of wasting all that time why don't you actually study some real electronics books or online classes and try to really learn something. The things you have learned from DumbTube or wherever have not helped you to understand electronics.

@Citfa,

I'm awaiting service here in Costa Rica for calling you a liar. I'm doubling down on that insult.

[bistander]

Clueless

Re: what is the physical meaning of "Negative Inductance"?

"The most fundamental reason is that the electric energy stored in this element is more than the magnetic energy stored. Circuit designers interpret it as a capacitor".

Here's what I've gathered: Increased inductor field strength creates a reluctance to changing current, but some current that fails to pass is stored in the inductor along with the magnetic field. Now, this is referred to as "Positive Capacitance" except the frequency reactance is reversed. The amount of positive capacitance in an inductor of charged magnetic field strength is measured in 'Negative Henries" of inductance, and has to be proportional to the intensity of the flux field.

Hi citfta,

I agree with your post which follows the one from Allen which I quoted above. It is sad how he misuses the terms and draws invalid conclusions. It's obvious to those familiar with the science that he doesn't have a clue. Must be his ego as to why he wastes opportunities to learn the facts and truth. His loss.

bi

[admin]

@Citfa,

I'm awaiting service here in Costa Rica for calling you a liar. I'm doubling down on that insult.

We hope this can be resolved peacefully as it is against forum rules to insult other members here.

You've stated your case and probably can't add anything to your claims so if valid, should speak for themselves.

You did start this thread so you can request in your first post what topics you would like to cover and any disagreements can be made respectfully.

[BroMikey]

Quote from Tinselkoala:

"A negative correlation has nothing to do with "negative Henry" nor does it imply that one or the other of the correlated variables is "negative". By posting what you have posted you reveal that you do not understand correlation or inverse relationships".

Tinselkoala can not find a correlation between the "Inverse Henry" term of magnetic reluctance, and the minus sign that appears before the number on the inductance meter when set to read in Henries. He always couples his misstatements with some kind of personal insult. (He's revealing his stupidity again) to help make his malarkey stick.

TK has been known to disagree with any extra energy thinking and is
stuck like so many on the conventional theories. I like what you say
Allen and you give a great explanation rather than doing what so many
other do, just one liner body slams. Your words are an alternative view
so many of us enjoy.

Stay cool and keep up the good work.

Allen specifically said meters. I have a very nice DSO. It will show a positive or negative current but only my training has taught me how to interpret that as a current direction. And Allen doesn't seem to believe the dozen or so scope shots he has been shown that clearly show NO reversal of current when the power is removed from an inductor.

Let's see some scope shots and meter readings to prove that theory. A video demonstrating this idea would be even better. Making up stuff is good for fairy tales but in the real world most of us want to see some proven facts demonstrated, not fantasy ideas.

[Allen Burgess]

Negative Inductance

The inductor's "B" field, or magnetic field, stores a tiny "H' field, or electric charge. This charge is measured by our inductance meters and is converted into "Negative Henries".

The question remains: Is the tiny "H" field in direct proportion to the coil's magnetic field strength? I maintain it is and can prove it.

[bistander]

H field

The inductor's "B" field, or magnetic field, stores a tiny "H' field, or electric charge. This charge is measured by our inductance meters and is converted into "Negative Henries".

The question remains: Is the tiny "H" field in direct proportion to the coil's magnetic field strength? I maintain it is and can prove it.

In the magnetic field, B and H are always proportional and that proportion is defined as the permability.

The H field is the magnetic driving force and is measured in ampere turns per meter where the length refers to the magnetic circuit of the coil.

Allen continues to confuse physical variables with units. H represents the vector quantity magnetic field whereas H is the abbreviation for henries, the units of inductance.

[Allen Burgess]

Induction kills flyback.

This is an 8 1/2 year old video by "Fusionchip" AKA "Gadgetmall": It's a low quality video. Fusionchip disconnects the power battery and runs the pulse motor from a storage capacitor while the capacitor stores an increasing charge:

He accomplishes this with a "Piggyback Coil" that's attached to the rear end of a ferrite core that passes through the power coil and extends out the back. The "Flyback" from the power coil is sublimated to output current through induction to the piggyback coil. This results in an Overunity "Looped" self runner

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LczzeeyfFoA

Let's compare "Fusionchip's SSG" to Gotoluc's flyback secondary:

This video's from Woppyjump who's easier to understand:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tag5OlvPi54

The question is: Which approach is a more efficient use of this return energy from the inductor?

[RAMSET]

a loud round of applause

Admin QUOTE
We hope this can be resolved peacefully as it is against forum rules to insult other members here.

You've stated your case and probably can't add anything to your claims so if valid, should speak for themselves.

You did start this thread so you can request in your first post what topics you would like to cover and any disagreements can be made respectfully.

[/QUOTE]
end quote
-------------------------------------------------------------------


I wish other forums would have such attention to TOS agreements from membership .

this would make a forum grow for sure...

Bro
your comments on Tinsel are in error ...he actively seeks these anomalies
on a daily basis ..pondering or experimenting.

but it is not appropriate to discuss a member who cannot defend or interact here [TinselKoala?

perhaps the conversation should just rally around Allen's results .

they seem to have gotten lost in other issues ?

just one mans opinion

respectfully
Chet K

[Allen Burgess]

Induction kills flyback

"Fusionchip's" SSG primary induction coil receives a power pulse from the source battery. Next, the induction coil stores the power in a magnetic field and drives the magnet rotor.

The magnetic field collapses and a "Negative Current" pulse passes into the ferrite core and generates a magnetic field in the core through induction. This magnetic core field is now bi-polar.

The magnet field passes through the core to the "Piggyback Coil" as a wave. The "Piggyback Coil" needs to be positioned on the ferrite core rod where the magnetic wave peak forms.

This magnet wave first generates a "Positive Current" in the "Piggyback Secondary" then when the magnetic field in the ferrite core collapses, another "Negative Current" is generated. These two opposing currents couple to generate an "Alternating Current" from the "Piggyback Output Coil" and this current is directed to a (Full Wave Bridge Rectifier) FWBR where it's rectified to D.C. and stored in the capacitor.

The SSG efficiency is very high; Coupled with the collected return current from the power coil, Fusionchip's COP is OU!