Originally posted by Ufopolitics
View Post
Where is the quote that the reporter actually SAW the machine in operation. There is no eyewitness report of such a fact. Re-read the last 5 paragraphs of the report.
I understand very well we all want to believe all these stories are true, however we need to be careful not to add events where they don't exist.
His patent might of been filed to secure his intellectual property, and that's it. Did anyone else know that he had a bother as an assistant? Because the reporter claims his sister-in-law was the assistant and the biography claims his brother was.
-Core
Comment