Barbosa and Leal Developed as a Bionic Device

[Vinyasi]

Neon Bulb Placement is Predicated on its Role as a Negative Resistor

This applies to any overunity circuit whose behavior depends on the contribution which a gas discharge tube can impart to some or another part of the circuit to which this component is included.

I'm thinking of the Earth Captor of Barbosa and Leal. We want the Earth to become one gigantic negative resistor so that it will yield more amperage per increased resistance arising from additional demands made by a load (of appliances ;-). This, the neon bulb, or other appropriate sparking gap, can induce somehow within other components of the circuit to which it is attached including the load as well. But in the case of B&L, we especially want the volume of Earth in between the two sets of grounding rods to behave as a negative resistor so that whenever the load induces an increased resistance upon the Electric Keeper, in turn a demand for more amperage is imposed upon the Earth provided that the Earth can respond with a greater supply of amperage to the grounding rods. This will not happen if there is not enough grounding rods among the greater set of rods directly connected to the Captor Loop. But also if there is not enough geomagnetism in the area, or both. For we want the Earth to behave like the gas inside of the neon bulb. And we want the two sets of grounding rods to behave like the two electrodes inside of the neon bulb. The neon bulb can't provide abundant free energy on its own. Neither can the Earth. But the two together make for a splendid team work. And if the Lenz effect is neutralized between the two toroidal transformers flanking both sides of the Electric Keeper and loosely coupled to it, then only amperage will flow inside of the Electric Keeper. And since only amperage is being collected by the greater of the two sets of grounding rods, this whole system of enhancing a tiny input of power is very well designed by two excellent inventors, Nilson Barbosa and Cleriston Leal as successfully replicated by Clarence of Carolina, USA.

Neon Bulb Placement is Predicated on its Role as a Negative Resistor - a YouTube video

[Vinyasi]

Nascent Arc Welder Explains the Negative Resistance of a Gas Discharge Tube, W. Lyne

William Lyne has an explanation for the operation of a hydrogen arc welder that is directly relevant to why a little bitty neon bulb should give more amperage per additional resistance applied to a fixed voltage via leveraging from somewhere else other than the gas inside the neon bulb and other than the electric arc jumping across the two electrodes: energy from the environment.

If B&L can induce this characteristic in its entire circuit via oscillating voltage accumulation (conforming the entire circuit to the neon bulb's behavior under its pressure of coercion), including the volume of Earth between the two sets of grounding rods, then the additional energy is not coming from the Earth - according to Mr. Lyne, but because of it.

So, I guess there's no way around Eric Dollard's counter-space, complex numbers, version of explaining this overunity phenomenon involving negative resistors? In other words, there's no conventional explanation possible.

Negative Resistance of a Gas Discharge Tube is Explained by Nascent Arc Welders - William Lyne - a YouTube video

Atomic Hydrogen (Arc Welding)

Energy in Air

[Vinyasi]

How do we explain the manifestation of free energy?

How do we explain the manifestation of free energy? By separating voltage from an AC sine wave and take its square root only when the voltage is most negative. Mother Nature will counter-balance that action by squaring a preexisting imaginary component of a complex value of aetheric amperage. The net result, for all intents and purposes, will appear as if the amperage materialized from out of nowhere! Voila! Free Energy!

And where do we find examples of this? In the characteristics of a neon bulb. Its ON state of resistance is the square root of its OFF state of resistance.

For example,
To simulate a neon bulb in the simulator of Paul Falstad and Iain Sharp, I enter the following values:

Strike Voltage = 65 volts
Holding Current = 3m Amps
ON Resistance = 3k Ohms
OFF Resistance = 10M Ohms

10M = 10,000,000
3k = 3,000

3,162 x 3,162 = 9,998,244

3k is the approximate square root of 10M. Hence, I suspect this is how the neon bulb dematerializes negative voltage: by taking its square root. Mother Nature, then, makes up the difference by manifesting an equivalent value of amperage from the complex world of counter-space. {See the works of Eric Dollard.}

How do we explain the manifestation of free energy? - a YouTube video

[Vinyasi]

Results of Charting 19 Possible Switching Combinations

Here is the circuit I used for these experiments...
https://is.gd/3lamp_LMD5

And here is its slight modification based on these experiments...
https://is.gd/3lamp_LMD6

But before I finished my chart...
https://is.gd/chart_LMD5

...I played around with this little circuit...
https://is.gd/linear_LMD

Here is my simple LMD with shunt circuit...

Circuit...
https://is.gd/LMD_v1

I added a snubber circuit across each switch to protect against potential surges...
https://is.gd/LMD_v2

Download any of these simulator files and save them to your computer, then load them into this simulator...
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

The results of charting 19 possible switching combinations along with my conclusions. a YouTube video

[Vinyasi]

Energy IN vs Energy OUT does not tell the whole story, Recycling tells the other half

Electricity is not the same as force, nor the same as substance. Once spent, force - like mass - is gone. But electricity is not a force; nor is it mass - yet, it is a property of mass. Since the mass of wire is not consumed upon the use of the electrical phenomena within the wire, that electricity can be reused again and again as an oscillating phenomena. The only caveat is the loss due to inefficiency of the wire (in this example).

No negative resistance need be invoked. No energy from the vacuum. Recycling limited resources is a sign of maturity, not a sign of depravity.

Energy IN vs Energy OUT does not tell the whole story whenever Electrical Recycling is involved. -- a YouTube video

[Vinyasi]

Off Duty Cycle equals OverUnity for Pulsed DC.

The next step in developing a free energy device is a pulsed D.C. version - a YouTube video

Lewis Carrol's "Through the Looking Glass" comes to mind whenever I think about how to describe my study of electrical overunity - nothing is as it seems. I turn a circuit off thinking how I'll stop it from continuing to climb upwards toward infinity of putting out far more watts than it takes into itself, and all I've managed to do is accelerate its ascension. If I add more resistance to the load - thinking that this will slow down overunity, all I've managed to do is speed it up yet again. Weird.

https://is.gd/normal_behavior
https://is.gd/pulse_DC_LMD
https://is.gd/pulse_DC_LMD2
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

Off Duty Cycle equals OverUnity for Pulsed DC - a YouTube video

[Vinyasi]

Capping Overunity of Giga Amperage Appearing at the Output of the 555 Timer

Despite the claim that a shorter duty cycle results in greater overunity, I discovered this is not true for higher voltages feeding the 555 timer chip. A 50/50 duty cycle gives greater overunity over a wider range of voltages by comparison to a shorter duty cycle.

Yet, I still had a problem with giga amps appearing at the output of the 555 timer and climbing to apparent infinity without limit! So, I put a 4 nano Ohm resistor between the 555 timer's output and the switch separating it from the LMD circuit. {LMD - Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric of Eric Dollard's analog computer. See, his Borderland video.} This froze the over-amperage at a steady state and at a maximal value for the two central lamps of the LMD module to light up - and remain lit - at a minimum temperature for white brilliance. By raising the resistance of this little resistor ever so slightly can effectively snub the magical appearance of giga, or mega, amperage at the 555 timer's output.

I removed one lamp (that I had been using for dumping excess buildup of energy from within the LMD whenever the switch is opened after running the circuit for any length of time), because it wasn't doing much good (where it was positioned) while the switch is closed (or, at least this seemed to me). So, I added two more lamps in a different position in parallel flanking the overall design (where the spark gaps - neon bulbs - used to be in prior designs; see earlier posts).

BTW, the ten volt lamps and power source is arbitrary. It can be anything; yet, the outcome will remain the same! Just be sure and match the lamp's Nominal Voltage with the voltage of the power source to prevent irregularities from arising (which I have been steadfastly trying my best to prevent!).

Including the two central capacitors within the LMD loop (what would have been the Electric Keeper of B&L) makes the grounding rods and neon bulb (GDT: gas discharge tube) of Barbosa and Leal obsolete. But it introduces a new problem of regulating this device's abundant overunity.

Download this binary text file and save it onto your computer, or other device (Android, iPhone, et cetera)...
https://is.gd/pulse_DC_LMD3

Then load it into this JavaScript Simulator for designing and bench testing electronic circuits...
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

[Vinyasi]

Continuous and Manually Pulsed DC in Eric Dollard's LMD

When I first began to experiment with Eric Dollard's analog computer in Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric mode using only one module powered by a DC source, I tried manually pulsing the DC source ON and OFF to induce overunity...

But I also tried leaving the switch ON without pulsing it for a milder gain in overunity...

Download this binary text file and save it onto your computer, iPhone, whatever...
https://is.gd/manual_pulse_LMD

And load it into this JavaScripted Simulator...
https://is.gd/blankcanvas

[Vinyasi]

From where does Free Energy come?

Whirlpools of Oscillating Power Create their own Rules

A load is a resistor; it creates voltage as a consequence of its resistance. A power source is a negative resistor; it creates amperage as a consequence of its negative resistance.

A load is a resistor only so long as it resists. It ceases to be a load the instant it stops resisting.

A source of power is a negative resistor so long as it negatively resists. It ceases to be a source of power the instant it stops negatively resisting.

A battery is not a source of power, because it is not a negative resistor. It is a load with an internal resistance based on its change of state. It cannot supply amperage; the wire connecting its two terminals supplies that.

A battery is like a capacitor in that it is capable of storing energy - not supplying it. The difference between the two is that the dielectric material between the two capacitor plates is equivalent to the electrolyte within the battery; both store energy - they do not supply it. Ultimately, energy has to come from somewhere else.

From where does it come? It comes from negative resistance.

What is a negative resistor? A negative resistor is a situation in which it takes less energy to maintain its status as a negative resistor than it takes to induce a change of state within another resistor.

Resistors possess inertia; they don't like to have their status as a resistor altered without a definitive cost. This cost - we have come to know - is the cost of supplying power to its resistance acting as a load. And if we make the mistake of supplying too much power to a load, the load retaliates with heat or - worse – sudden breakdown.

But in the case of an LMD module acting as an intermediate source of power for a load, it merely intermediates its supply of power to a load through other whirlpools of reactive power who have to interact with loads directly. Yet, if merely one whirlpool stands aloof from having to deal with the real world of positive resistors, and merely induce kinetic motion to other whirlpools who directly deal with positively resistive loads, then its own kinetic inertia is preserved while periodically boosting the waning inertia of other whirlpools.

Amperage knows no resistance. That's the job of voltage. Voltage knows no motion. That's the job of amperage. Whirlpools of reactive power can specialize in whether they want to focus on setting forces to move in the real world of matter, heat and light, or else they can remain aloof and exclusively deal with other whirlpools of reactive power at very little – if any – cost to themselves, because it takes very little – if any – energy to transfer its own reactive power to another whirlpool wanting more reactive power. The funny thing about isolated whirlpools is that they get a kick out of demands made upon themselves to serve up more energy to other whirlpools whose task is to lose that power by way of dissipation. This kick amplifies the aloof whirlpool, rather than slowing it down, since it knows no resistance – hence, it knows no voltage, either. Without a voltage drop, amperage can wildly escalate itself; heal itself of having spent itself in service towards other whirlpools who can't possibly heal themselves who have been wound down in direct service towards the outside world of non-reactive power.

[Vinyasi]

How does my free energy device induce a force without expending it?

By dividing up a circuit into multiple forces in which at least one force need not interact with anything other than another force - but not with the inertia of matter. Thus, these multiple forces can specialize themselves : one force can specialize on harboring the speed of amperage while another force can specialize on harboring the pressure of voltage. Thus, the "speedster's" job (positioned near the power source) will be to resist any attempt made by the power source to spend any amperage when it contributes voltage to the circuit by engulfing (smothering) the power source with a tremendous surge of its own accumulated amperage. The "torquester's" job will be to resist any attempt made by the load to lose any voltage to the circuit by engulfing (smothering) the load with a tremendous surge of its own accumulated voltage. These two separate tasks are created (subdivided) by the central whirlpool of electricity circulating within the confines of the Electric Keeper. This Electric Keeper is the analog computer in longitudinal magneto-dielectric mode of Eric Dollard composed of two toroidal transformers facing each other with two capacitors situated between them. By orienting the transformer's primary and secondary windings in such a way as to induce a step up of voltage away from the power source towards the load, the load is prevented from expending any voltage while the power source is prevented from expending any amperage. Thus, there's no appearance of any wattage at the source despite the pervasive presence of amperage throughout the circuit soliciting the appearance of wattage at the load. It's much easier to fight voltage than it is to fight amperage - in this special case, because the load is not contributing any voltage of its own. The load must merely conserve its voltage by transferring it away from the circuit - not towards it.

Editor's note - this last statement reads confused. And my video keeps repeating the notion that I need to pulse a dc source. I have learned a lot since two days ago when I taped this. Pulses are not needed. The initial kick off turning off the power is sufficient to initiate oscillations. And oscillations are sufficient to maintain themselves under the right circumstances. And the kinetic frequency of the filament within a glowing light bulb is sufficient to drive an overunity device to infinity and self-destruction from meltdown or explosion.

How does my free energy device induce a force without expending it? a YouTube video

[Vinyasi]

Color Index = Kinetic Frequency = A Filament Bulb is a new type of Energy Storage ...

... and Reactance.

Just like a capacitor will discharge with a surge of reversed electric polarity, and just like a coiled inductor will discharge with a surge of reversed magnetic polarity, a filament bulb releases what? Heat? Or, thermionic induction to the circuit? There's something about a lamp, a filament bulb - not a gas discharge tube, that retains memory of its prior state and also has the ability to respond to change of state with the memory of its former state, namely: it hasn't stopped illuminating. The rest of the circuit's oscillations may be momentarily slowing down, but just when I think the circuit will die it surprises me and renews itself with another surge of abundance. From where did that renewal arise? From the lamp taking a very long time spending its kinetic frequency by reducing its color index (rated in Kelvins of all things!). Instead of losing - dissipating - that kinetic frequency, instead, it retained it for a long enough duration so that it might have it to share with the rest of the circuit when the circuit would be most receptive to assistance: when the circuit is about to die from having exhausted all of its other electric and magnetic resources.

Color Index = Kinetic Frequency = A Filament Bulb is a new type of Energy Storage and Reactance. - a YouTube video

[Vinyasi]

From where does Free Energy come? Wrong question! How can we conserve the energy ...

... that we spend?

By segregating energy into a hierarchy of some energy being central to other energy happily performing all the grunge work, and by reserving the privilege of allowing only the central aristocratic energy to have most of the liability for feeding the grunge workers. This occurs as a two step process of accumulating energy among the aristocrats (a whirlpool of energy situated in the center of the LMD module of the circuit which I'm studying) and distributing among the aristocrats and the grunge workers. By distributing energy is this manner, energy is conserved. It takes less energy to serve one's self up as a role model than it takes to dissipate the performance of grunge work.

We all enjoy hearing physicists describe the discrete energy states of an electron, but do we ever hear about the influence the neutron has in determining the energy states of an electron? And is the expense of the neutron's job equivalent to the expense of the electron's job? Yet, if the neutron uses only one unit of influence to commandeer the electron into performing ten units of service, that's a gain of ten to one - a coefficient of performance of 1,000%!

From where does Free Energy come? Wrong question! How can we conserve the energy that we spend? - a YouTube video

[Vinyasi]

Parasitic oscillators have their own rule of thumb for transferring or moving energy-

... unrelated to the Conservation of Energy Law in physics.

Also covered in this video is the illusion of energy transfer or conversion or movement based on a transverse wave pattern that we recognize making movement or transfer or conversion irrelevant to what has actually happened.

Parasitic oscillators have their own rule of thumb for transferring or moving energy unrelated to the Conservation of Energy Law in physics. - a YouTube video

[Vinyasi]

Curbing vagrant out-of-control overunity oscillations with high frequency pulses.

Funnily enough, the best way to control and put the brakes on free energy is by applying a frequency higher than the oscillations themselves. Continuous D.C. is worse! It allows for auto-induced oscillations and their rapid escalation. And allowing a device to self-run, by connecting the output with the input, is just as bad as applying continuous DC, because in both situations, liberty to oscillate becomes the norm rather than the exception.

Curbing vagrant out-of-control overunity oscillations with high frequency pulses. - a YouTube video

[Vinyasi]

Updates on completing my first series of simulations of Eric Dollard's LMD with ...

... Filament Lamps.

I'm at the point, now, in my research that it's beginning to look like a circuit which undergoes phases between a few alternate switching states in order to mimic balance between overunity and conventional underunity since neither of these two states can linger forever without killing the circuit either through lack of energy or spontaneous combustion resulting from too much energy. Since my goal was always to see if I can simulate a free energy device which could extend the range per charge on my electric car, or else make the range infinite, it's starting to look like I will also have to pulse the motor since the circuit won't be available, continuously, to provide power without switching the connection between the motor and the circuit ON and OFF while I alternate the circuit's internal switching arrangements. Thus, it's also starting to look like an EV Gray motor. For this, I am indebted to the analysis of Mark McKay...

Mark-McKay-analysis-of-EV-Gray-motor.zip - Google Drive

Updates on completing my first series of simulations of Eric Dollard's LMD with Filament Lamps. - a YouTube video