Mechanical Magnetic Torque Amplifier

[Allen Burgess]

AA battery neutralization test.

The AA batteries are not working together. The tolerances are too wide. I'm giving up on them.

I just ordered a 12 volt 500 newton electro-magnet. The conventional electro-magnet delivers the same efficiency ratio of Inductance per watt. This allows for simple same simple build configuration as the last.

This should operate at a much higher frequency and conform to industrial tolerances.

Look at this video of a MOT electro-magnet powered by a AA battery, 50 lbs of force:

The high inductance of this transformer core electro-magnet yields the same copper mass to unit of input ratio as Hob Nilre's electro-magnets.

The 500 Newton pull force electro-magnet coil consumes the same amount of power as the 100 Newton magnet coil 1/5 th it's size. 5 times the force per unit of power!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGoOu8cPmeM

It's possible to go overunity with the Magnet Pump simply by increasing the neutralization pulse coil's core inductance.

[Allen Burgess]

Solid state GAP

Art's 41 % overunity with this neutralization pulse. This is around the difference in output between the two pulses.

The 500N electro-magnet is 10 times the force of the 50N electro-magnet of half it's diameter.

[Allen Burgess]

Counter EMF.

Here's a video of the attraction neutralization coil generating output:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipxavFNTsh4

Here's a schematic of the reed switch trigger magnet configuration: One switch channels the output to storage.

[Allen Burgess]

Negative Inductance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTMQFvWkS9s

The topic of this comment is "Negative Inductance and Magnetic Force". JLN's first Orbo test demonstrates a drop in ferrite toroid coil inductance from 235 micro Henrys to 167 micro Henrys when the magnets are attached to the toroid by attraction. That's a nearly a 30% drop in efficiency. That means it will require 30% more current to unlock the magnets.

The "Electro-Magnet", with a high inductance "Samarium-Nickel-Cobalt" core is practically impervious to inductance loss from the attachment of permanent magnets; Thus millions of times times more efficient as a masking magnet shunt then the ferrite. The Electro-Magnet's inductance measured 73 milli Henrys with no magnets, and a loss of one mico Henry with the attachment of the backing magnets and an additional one micro Henry loss with the rotor magnet is at TDC. That's two "Millionths" of a Henry. That amount of inductance loss is barely noticeable by contrast to the ferrite!

Here's a short video demonstrating the EM attraction masking:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSKG...ature=youtu.be

[Allen Burgess]

500 Newton EM coil neutralization strength.

Here's a new video of my 500 Newton Electromagnet masking attraction:

https://youtu.be/K1aQQhiViig

[Allen Burgess]

Newman motor.

Hob Nilre demonstrated how magnet field attraction strength is directly proportional to copper mass. Twice the copper mass yields the same magnet strength for half the input or twice the magnet strength for the same input. Joe Newman took full advantage of this principle when he built "Big Eureka". The problem with Newman's motor design is firstly; The rotor magnet size is restricted by the space inside the coil core.

The masking strength of a neutralization coil has the same ratio of copper mass to input and magnet strength, however, the external solenoid piston can be any size!

Generating output from a separate solenoid coil with a larger then "Newman Rotor" dimension stack of magnets piston in a masking oscillator could be any size. Secondly, the output would be pure sine wave A.C. with no need for a commutator with "Back Spike Gap".

[Allen Burgess]

Magnets.

This picture is of an attraction masking oscillator. On the right is a commutator for the electro magnet, and on the left, a bifilar output coil for the jumping stack of ceramic rings beneath.

The commutator needs a gap of 18% on the loop back trigger magnets to separate the "Back Spike" from the requaging output. The two outputs go back to the source capacitor through rectifying diodes.

[Allen Burgess]

Attraction motor.

Here's a picture of an attraction motor rotor from PVC plumbing fixtures on the commutator fan: The elongated rotor arm gives me time to pulse the coil by hand to help gauge the attraction strength.

[Allen Burgess]

Adams motor generator.

The 800% Adams "Attraction Masking" motor generator. There's a link to this highly informative PDF in the first comment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2bPDDWqSvM

The latching Reed switch commutator D.C. fan combination pictured in comment #203 above, substitutes for both Adams' output coils and his optic-utter commutator.

[Allen Burgess]

Adams motor generator.

I plan to add a four way cross connector to the rotor, shorten the arms and double the reed switch trigger magnets along with a second magnet backed masking coil. Connecting the two coils through the commutator would complete this improved and modified "Adams Attraction Motor Generator". The extra torque and output is a result of the backing magnets, and the D.C. fan is a Tesla induction motor that acts as a very efficient generator when powered. The other feature is the monococque latching reed switch commutator. These three simple construction improvements add increased power and efficiency to the Adams design. A well designed motor generator. Plus look at all the test results we're supplied by Adams to help.


One other point; The electro-magnet is only good for the oscillator because the metal rim of the pot transformer is magnetic and cogs the rotor. The oscillator power source needs to run the D.C. fan as a commutator, but the basic timing design would be identical.

[Allen Burgess]

Adams schematic.

This schematic shows how simple the wiring is; A diode and capacitor in parallel with the battery:

[Allen Burgess]

Four magnet rotor.

Here's the four magnet rotor half finished.

[Allen Burgess]

Robert Adams produced a formula for coil dimension coupled with a strength test for his rotor magnet. Placing a magnet behind the masking coil core would require more weight in coil copper to generate an eqivilent magnetic strength. This would require a larger dimension coil.

The advantage to increasing attraction strength this way is that the additional strength comes at no increased cost to input power. The commutator and circuit would remain nearly identical to Adams' motor.

This novel motor design is a "GAP Adams". This motor has limitless potential.

[Allen Burgess]

Four magnet rotor.

Here's a picture of the finished four magnet rotor on the D.C. fan commutator: The 1-1/8" Radio Shack ceramic ring magnets are a perfect fit for the 1-3/8" OD PVC plumbing fixtures.

[Allen Burgess]

Adams motor generator.

Here's an excellent window Adams motor configuration video. The output coils are built and positioned to generate "Lenz Acceleration". The D.C. fan generator may accelerate the rotor regenerativly under load the same way.

My GAP Adams uses the Art Porter commutator not the single contact of Robert Adams. The backspike cancels the re-gauging output and needs to be side tracked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GflQEMrS5Fk