Tweet
Sometimes I think I should delete everything up to this point as it seems so diversionary, and of course I'm sure it will provide endless amusement for future readers, especially as time moves forwards, but humor has a value in desperate times and if you think you've seen the worst, boy Oh boy, are you in for one hell of a rude surprise. Ya all better chinch up yer britches and tighten up you're belt's a notch or two, things haven't even begun to get interesting just yet.
I was re-thinking my idea's about the Vril Levitator and realized that I was probably wrong, and that the machine wasn't likely to be inducting an incoherent dielectric field, but rather cloaking inside one and acting much like a meta material. I wanted to present the idea so that those more familiar with crystal tuning could use it.
What drove my thinking earlier was the work of the Late Joe Parr, which is unique and probably gives a rare insight to a more advanced machine. I'm thinking about Joe's work because unlike any other information it is the only reference where it clearly states that these pyramids on his test platforms vanished in to hyperspace, having been torn off their mounts with an explosive bang. Joe also tells us there are direct cross correlations to forces in the universe and our location in space.
Floating around in the air was sort of the original idea behind this thread, but I realize that this levitation business has vastly more important potential for humanity when you add in Joe Parr's work, which is directly cross correlated to these illustrations in my opinion. I think that what Parr was studying is a Star Gate system. Anyone who thinks they are going to run off and patent this stuff and live is probably insane to begin with, and besides which this stuff isn't worth patenting because it's all doable in workshops and not factories. Might even be the only way that they can be built.
Besides which humanity is running out of time. It seems we are just now breaking the edge of the next mini-ice age. We can't wait on fools in government and industry, not if we want to survive, not if we want any part of civilization to survive.
About the above illustration: All I can really say is there is logic here in these Vril illustrations. There is also a progression of thought stemming from experimentation which leads from one drawing to the next with increasing complexity. Again, I urge you re-visit Joe Parr's work for deep thinking.
Schumann wasn't credited with the discovery of the Schumann Resonance until 1952, but if these drawing do predate World War II, then this understanding of the Schumann Resonance was obviously understood at least 10 to 20 prior. That actually fits well with the hypothesis of development of Nazi Saucer Technology.
The tetrahedrons/pyramids are clearly artificial crystals (* I would lay money down that these artificial crystals are where the term quasi-crystal originated out of that's been recycled by the cult of quantum, which is obviously another fascist mind control plan foisted off into the world of academic's, and as yet another delaying tactic which is obviously being done on purpose with the specific intent on keeping humanity bottled up in quantum idiocy for another couple hundred years).
As far as construction and material wise I cannot say. If the ARV and Mr. McCandlish is correct than we could surmise these shapes could have been produced by using a binder and quartz crystals, but that's just off he cuff and needs deeper investigation. Given the supposed epoch of time of creation it is very hard to say what that binder would have been, I'm thinking bakelite off hand, but who knows. Today we would use something else, something which would be resistant to heat is what I'm thinking. Any conductive material moving through a powerful EM field would or could quickly induct a lot of heat.
You all will have to decide how these things work and to do that it's probably going to take some physical experimentation. It looks to me now like the quasi-crystals are designed to induce a shattering of the electromagnetic fields. Keep in mind this could still be working the opposite way and inducting a fractured incoherent dielectric field as previously hypothesized in an earlier post. Maybe it can do both? However, I now do think that the way this works is akin to cloaking, and it's using an artificial crystalline shape and sonic vibrations. I think that makes the most sense and really this should be doable.
*Long time readers may remember the Italian Antenna Aeroplane. The so-called Aero Radio Balistique
(*page 15) http://www.energeticforum.com/forum/energetic-forum-discussion/renewable-energy/14469-an-inquiry-into-alexey-chekurkov%C2%92s-flying-discs-and-replications/page15
https://wikirota.org/en/Aero_Radio_Balistique
http://www.rexresearch.com/rotarb/rotarb.htm
Another thought in regards to all this concerns the report of the 14 year old in Norway during WWII. So if we keep in mind the aforegoing, what you had was a device hovering somewhere near or over a German Radar Station, and which could have been providing power to sustain prolonged flight because why else would it be hovering right around a microwave broadcasting station? It could be that the ground station was providing power to this vehicle and thus the machine might have had a limited range of operation without ground support. Just a thought I wanted to pass along.
Finally, the bottom line here is that these drawings are showing a device which has a basis in theory and established knowledge. If these were somehow laid out decades ago as disinformation, something I've always considered as a possibility, then they would have had to have come from some very forward thinking person/s, but I would have to ask why? To what ends? As far as I know no one has ever attempted to decipher these illustrations and that's because the physics behind them is officially denied. Don't ya find that a little suspicious? * Believe what ever you want but any flat foot worth a plug nickle would put all their money on Ken Wheeler's dielectricy theory. It's patently obvious that Ken is right and everyone else is either completely wrong or mostly wrong.
I think these drawing are good place to start experimentally speaking because of their relative simplicity. Not saying you should try to replicate one but that would be a sensible way to proceed, but you might just look at them and re-imagine a different vehicle, and I think if you look at those navy patents you should see the same/similar cause and effect going on. Only of course in those patents the cause and effect are re-described to obfuscate what is actually happening; unless of course you actually believe the whole cult of quantum witch doctor schooling that goes into the bamboozling scamming description.
I was re-thinking my idea's about the Vril Levitator and realized that I was probably wrong, and that the machine wasn't likely to be inducting an incoherent dielectric field, but rather cloaking inside one and acting much like a meta material. I wanted to present the idea so that those more familiar with crystal tuning could use it.
What drove my thinking earlier was the work of the Late Joe Parr, which is unique and probably gives a rare insight to a more advanced machine. I'm thinking about Joe's work because unlike any other information it is the only reference where it clearly states that these pyramids on his test platforms vanished in to hyperspace, having been torn off their mounts with an explosive bang. Joe also tells us there are direct cross correlations to forces in the universe and our location in space.
Floating around in the air was sort of the original idea behind this thread, but I realize that this levitation business has vastly more important potential for humanity when you add in Joe Parr's work, which is directly cross correlated to these illustrations in my opinion. I think that what Parr was studying is a Star Gate system. Anyone who thinks they are going to run off and patent this stuff and live is probably insane to begin with, and besides which this stuff isn't worth patenting because it's all doable in workshops and not factories. Might even be the only way that they can be built.
Besides which humanity is running out of time. It seems we are just now breaking the edge of the next mini-ice age. We can't wait on fools in government and industry, not if we want to survive, not if we want any part of civilization to survive.
About the above illustration: All I can really say is there is logic here in these Vril illustrations. There is also a progression of thought stemming from experimentation which leads from one drawing to the next with increasing complexity. Again, I urge you re-visit Joe Parr's work for deep thinking.
Schumann wasn't credited with the discovery of the Schumann Resonance until 1952, but if these drawing do predate World War II, then this understanding of the Schumann Resonance was obviously understood at least 10 to 20 prior. That actually fits well with the hypothesis of development of Nazi Saucer Technology.
The tetrahedrons/pyramids are clearly artificial crystals (* I would lay money down that these artificial crystals are where the term quasi-crystal originated out of that's been recycled by the cult of quantum, which is obviously another fascist mind control plan foisted off into the world of academic's, and as yet another delaying tactic which is obviously being done on purpose with the specific intent on keeping humanity bottled up in quantum idiocy for another couple hundred years).
As far as construction and material wise I cannot say. If the ARV and Mr. McCandlish is correct than we could surmise these shapes could have been produced by using a binder and quartz crystals, but that's just off he cuff and needs deeper investigation. Given the supposed epoch of time of creation it is very hard to say what that binder would have been, I'm thinking bakelite off hand, but who knows. Today we would use something else, something which would be resistant to heat is what I'm thinking. Any conductive material moving through a powerful EM field would or could quickly induct a lot of heat.
You all will have to decide how these things work and to do that it's probably going to take some physical experimentation. It looks to me now like the quasi-crystals are designed to induce a shattering of the electromagnetic fields. Keep in mind this could still be working the opposite way and inducting a fractured incoherent dielectric field as previously hypothesized in an earlier post. Maybe it can do both? However, I now do think that the way this works is akin to cloaking, and it's using an artificial crystalline shape and sonic vibrations. I think that makes the most sense and really this should be doable.
*Long time readers may remember the Italian Antenna Aeroplane. The so-called Aero Radio Balistique
(*page 15) http://www.energeticforum.com/forum/energetic-forum-discussion/renewable-energy/14469-an-inquiry-into-alexey-chekurkov%C2%92s-flying-discs-and-replications/page15
https://wikirota.org/en/Aero_Radio_Balistique
http://www.rexresearch.com/rotarb/rotarb.htm
Another thought in regards to all this concerns the report of the 14 year old in Norway during WWII. So if we keep in mind the aforegoing, what you had was a device hovering somewhere near or over a German Radar Station, and which could have been providing power to sustain prolonged flight because why else would it be hovering right around a microwave broadcasting station? It could be that the ground station was providing power to this vehicle and thus the machine might have had a limited range of operation without ground support. Just a thought I wanted to pass along.
Finally, the bottom line here is that these drawings are showing a device which has a basis in theory and established knowledge. If these were somehow laid out decades ago as disinformation, something I've always considered as a possibility, then they would have had to have come from some very forward thinking person/s, but I would have to ask why? To what ends? As far as I know no one has ever attempted to decipher these illustrations and that's because the physics behind them is officially denied. Don't ya find that a little suspicious? * Believe what ever you want but any flat foot worth a plug nickle would put all their money on Ken Wheeler's dielectricy theory. It's patently obvious that Ken is right and everyone else is either completely wrong or mostly wrong.
I think these drawing are good place to start experimentally speaking because of their relative simplicity. Not saying you should try to replicate one but that would be a sensible way to proceed, but you might just look at them and re-imagine a different vehicle, and I think if you look at those navy patents you should see the same/similar cause and effect going on. Only of course in those patents the cause and effect are re-described to obfuscate what is actually happening; unless of course you actually believe the whole cult of quantum witch doctor schooling that goes into the bamboozling scamming description.
Comment