Originally posted by Ufopolitics
View Post
Yes, I don't want to be too critical of the build on this device, I've seen worse and it is all metal from scraps, but you're right about there being a certain leeway here.
OK, so now the issues with two motors, and here I question if there even needs to be two motors, or even two spinning plates. What do you think? Aren't we just trying to re~vector the dielectric plane from the HV field? He hasn't even got magnets on the later models upper disk. I think this is just a kind of a hold over because he doesn't yet understand what is actually taking place. Not that we are ourselves are fully clued in but I think we have some fairly solid theory about the general reason this works and how it works.
Now assuming we need two motors and I doubt this, but so long as you can keep motors in sync then that is a simpler solution, and it may be a necessary solution for a single engine model like this one. Meaning that logically we would want three of these for control at the very least. However this idea of three assumes that variations in energy to the HV field and or speed of rotation of the magnetic plate can change the motive force acting on the local area. We don't really know that just yet.
Sputin's needs to work a hell of a lot faster is what I'm saying. Specially if he is serious about winning the prize, just saying is all..
snort...
The only thing that's important here is balancing the magnetic plate. The gyroscopic forces on an out of balanced spinning plate will lead to some rude untimely demise for the motor, and you can be 100% certain that this will happen while in demonstration, and if it can kill it will choose that precise time to do so. That's how it always happen ya know. I can see the headlines already: Antigravity demonstration leads to decapitation. Inventor arrested after Flying magnet sends 5 year old to hospital; safety concerns lead to banning demonstrations. You get the idea.
This is what we call dark humor BTW. Just balance the disk as much as possible. Otherwise I'm largely in agreement with your observations.
Comment