Originally posted by Ufopolitics
View Post
Originally posted by Ufopolitics
View Post
I look forward to reading your link.
My contention has always been that by application of criminal investigative techniques, and applied to a historical path would reveal the path and the technology, and there is a traceable path, logically deduced, which leads to the beginnings of Saucer Technology.
A thumbnail sketch of the historical outline follows.
Of course it begins with electrostatics and the means to develop high voltage currents from simple devices. As for how that fits in with astrophysics here's what I have as thumbnail sketch.
We have CRT's by the late 1800's, and we know that the ether theory was conjectured to be a fluid before 1900 and lead to one of the first early technological pushes to create liquid helium and then later 3 &4 superfluids and then the push to develop more and more powerful electromagnets eventually moving into liquid cooling.
Radio replaced wireless and by 1920 we had the Cockcroft–Walton (CW) generator, or multiplier, and at the same time we also had development of the Barkhausen–Kurz tube, which by 1931 this system had transmitted over 40 miles across the English channel with superior results in a compact system, later forming the foundations for radar. The Barkhausen-Kurz tube generated radio waves at microwave frequencies. In the same year we get the development of low powerd cyclotron, and in 1937 high powered Klystrons.
https://gerryliyana.weebly.com/uploa...6009910--1.pdf
These are all the basics we need for fairly advanced saucers. The theoretical had been formed with ether physics, and it is apparent to me that there then came a realization from somewhere that the understanding of this would lead to the destruction of the power supply free meal ticket of the ubber rich and the probable inability to continue to control the flow of goods and services, to manipulate resources and people in short, and so began the re-education with a corrupted science.
Could this have all started with alien technology? Why not? I don't think it was living alien, but it might have been dead alien. Especially considering the lengthy time it took to figure it out, and which later seems to have been validated with the work of Joe Parr.
Remember that I've already cited the work of Joe Parr and of the now scrubbed information about the lost snowshoe traveler's in Antarctica, circa 1964 or thereabouts, and whom purportedly made a discovery of vases filled with some kind of written documents. Unfortunately I have not yet been able to locate another reference to this even though it was covered in the newspapers of that time. Google scrubbs information and or puts it so for off the beaten path that it's virtually lost.
Now I will have to read your material.
I leave you with this UFO Politics...good friend>think Alexey.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_deflection
Comment