A ray does not mean, nor was ever intended to imply a stream of particles, but as a descriptor on #2D space as a point is to the end of a line. Ignorance of descriptive geometry has concluded that a point is a particle, when it could be the point of a ray a billion miles long and you could instead be standing in the intersection of ray and look either way180 degrees apart and still see only two points, never seeing that you're observing the centerline of a ray.
What we do know is that when a rotating force has an exterior force applied a resultant reflex vectored force is the subsequent response by the original rotating force. Such that any imagined particle could instead be a point on a ray.
I'm just not too sure we can actually trust the ideas which have preceded us.
FALSE! �� New 'FIFTH FORCE' discovery. ATOMISM AT WORK!
@4:50 graviton particles
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAwJQrRlTTM[/VIDEO]
What we do know is that when a rotating force has an exterior force applied a resultant reflex vectored force is the subsequent response by the original rotating force. Such that any imagined particle could instead be a point on a ray.
I'm just not too sure we can actually trust the ideas which have preceded us.
FALSE! �� New 'FIFTH FORCE' discovery. ATOMISM AT WORK!
@4:50 graviton particles
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAwJQrRlTTM[/VIDEO]
Comment