*FYI. I have put countless and selfless hours in to researching and writing to produce this thread. I am not doing this because it's fun, nor because I enjoy dealing with those wonderful persons whom show up here to wreck havock, to wall paper over days of labor with complete idiocy and self interest. I'm doing this because I am positive that this technology is being put to use for horrific purposes: Any other conclusion is self denial.
Anyone whom is not actively working to expose this technology, whom isn't contributing in a meaningful way, whom is after personal gain, who comes here with gibberish papering over days of labor, then they are a participant in crimes which I am positive are real and involved abductions for the express purposes of human experimentation. In other words, crimes against humanity, any other explanation for this technology to be hidden is a lie.
Considering the photographic and eyewitness reports from the 1930's through 1960's I can see no other propulsive scheme which would explain the visible attributes captured on film and in testimony of early UFO's. I conclude that what I've presented is a fundamentally sound hypothesis of the propulsion system employed by 1st generation flying saucers.
This Virl design is the introduction, the beginning, not the end all be all. It has the highly desirable qualities of being fundamentally simple. However it should be seen as a crude but apparently successful proof of concept design. One which apparently did work but one which isn't a stable design. A single centrally located levitator seems to have produced a wobbly and difficult to control vehicle, and judging by subsequent designs these all seem to feature a triangular tripod arrangement using 3 levitators and which are visible in nearly all early UFO images.
Now if you're thinking this scheme is just too improbable to work it's only because you're not seeing how this leads on to more advanced machines. You notice here in this design one of the main points involves the creation of a high frequency vibration. More on this later if I can keep myself from deleting this thread out of digust and leaving you all to the likes of these concerned citizens.
https://www.sott.net/article/438888-...f-Billionaires
https://www.sott.net/article/438937-...ay-of-Action-2
Anyone whom is not actively working to expose this technology, whom isn't contributing in a meaningful way, whom is after personal gain, who comes here with gibberish papering over days of labor, then they are a participant in crimes which I am positive are real and involved abductions for the express purposes of human experimentation. In other words, crimes against humanity, any other explanation for this technology to be hidden is a lie.
Considering the photographic and eyewitness reports from the 1930's through 1960's I can see no other propulsive scheme which would explain the visible attributes captured on film and in testimony of early UFO's. I conclude that what I've presented is a fundamentally sound hypothesis of the propulsion system employed by 1st generation flying saucers.
This Virl design is the introduction, the beginning, not the end all be all. It has the highly desirable qualities of being fundamentally simple. However it should be seen as a crude but apparently successful proof of concept design. One which apparently did work but one which isn't a stable design. A single centrally located levitator seems to have produced a wobbly and difficult to control vehicle, and judging by subsequent designs these all seem to feature a triangular tripod arrangement using 3 levitators and which are visible in nearly all early UFO images.
Now if you're thinking this scheme is just too improbable to work it's only because you're not seeing how this leads on to more advanced machines. You notice here in this design one of the main points involves the creation of a high frequency vibration. More on this later if I can keep myself from deleting this thread out of digust and leaving you all to the likes of these concerned citizens.
https://www.sott.net/article/438888-...f-Billionaires
https://www.sott.net/article/438937-...ay-of-Action-2
Comment