An Inquiry in to the Alien Reproduction Vehicle

[spacecase0]

so, I ran a test today,
I have 2 oppositely spinning disks set up with conductive segments on them and a ground plane between the 2 disks
I have it set up to charge each disk opposite polarity. (+/- 9KV)
when I charge the segments on the disks it changes my G force sensor output, when I discharge the segments it also changes the output, but the other direction.
if I turn off the high voltage supply, it still has capacitors charged at that point, and then I discharge one disk, it moves the G force sensor one direction till all the segments are discharged (one turn), when I discharge the other disk, it changes the other direction till all the segments are discharged (leaving no charge in the device at all.
when it is stable state running fully charged there is no change at all on the sensor.
all results were unchanged by putting a quite large magnetic field in line with the spinning shafts.

[Sputins]

It seems the first requirement, is to throw Einstein and his theories of relativity out of the room. One can also investigate Stephen J Crothers reasoning on the problems with Einstein. – One can also hear Stephens story of being expelled from the University of New South Wales (Australia) for simply challenging Einstein’s conception of the gravitational field…

Wheeler’s concepts on Dielectricity and Magnetism seems to help explain what’s going on, once you learn the language.. Magnetism being caused from the loss of inertia of the Dielectric inertial plane / /Counterspace / The Aether, according to Wheeler.

Ken says “Gravity is an incoherent dielectric acceleration” and (there is no such thing as “anti-gravity)”. And to counter act gravity you need an “Omni-directional coherent field array” (OCFA).

Or a vector-less coherent field array…

So how do you make such an array? – Apparently there is a design?


Also FYI, given that a Pythagorean triangle of 36 –108– 36 degrees, shown on Plato’s divided line, which is also the same angles that of the water molecule. Which seems to tie into a whacky theory that says: Everything in the Universe is Water, or a frequency or memory of Water. (But that’s another story)…

[Gambeir]

It seems the first requirement, is to throw Einstein and his theories of relativity out of the room. One can also investigate Stephen J Crothers reasoning on the problems with Einstein. – One can also hear Stephens story of being expelled from the University of New South Wales (Australia) for simply challenging Einstein’s conception of the gravitational field…

Wheeler’s concepts on Dielectricity and Magnetism seems to help explain what’s going on, once you learn the language.. Magnetism being caused from the loss of inertia of the Dielectric inertial plane / /Counterspace / The Aether, according to Wheeler.

Ken says “Gravity is an incoherent dielectric acceleration” and (there is no such thing as “anti-gravity)”. And to counter act gravity you need an “Omni-directional coherent field array” (OCFA).

Or a vector-less coherent field array…

So how do you make such an array? – Apparently there is a design?


Also FYI, given that a Pythagorean triangle of 36 –108– 36 degrees, shown on Plato’s divided line, which is also the same angles that of the water molecule. Which seems to tie into a whacky theory that says: Everything in the Universe is Water, or a frequency or memory of Water. (But that’s another story)…

Albert started out life as a clerk in the patent office. He was a rich kid whereas Telsa was a poor kid. Supposedly he purchased a number of Telsa patents. He also formed a small discussion group where supposedly, so I'm told, one of the primary areas of discussion was Mach's Principle; a highly interesting coincidence in my view.

The liars of the Einsteinian physics club will tell you many falsehoods, one of which they are found of telling is that the the theory of the Aether was proven wrong, and here the assumptions supposedly used to dis~prove the Aether Theory were wrong, and then there's an outright lie where these people like to claim that the Aether theory involved a motionless state, and nothing could be further from the truth.

Refer back to Stevens here and the reference to the dual levels of education guised under national security; wherein there is the conventional Einsteinian (brainwashing) and then there is the officially denied (Aether): Einstein and Telsa. Who shall rule?

Now people like Walter Russell thought that the creation of gravity came about at the intersection point of what Russell called dark light. I think I have that right, feel free to correct me on that, going by memory here. Again, as a footnote to evil, notice how they steal and pervert Russells work, re~labeling it as dark energy, dark matter, black holes. A big joke I'm sure if you're in the right circles I'd imagine. Pisses me off to know that's really the product of Walter Russell's thoughts on the Aether and then to listen to some brainwashed (educated drone) blab about dark energy, and all the while mindless of it's true meaning and origins. If confronted they will deny any associations and steal all credit thereby establishing their code of ethics are the same as those of all other criminals.

Walter Russell's thoughts are interesting because Aether theory outlined in this PDF on Superlight is very similar if one applies the conventional rules of reactive physics taking place a right angles, or perhaps more correctly vectors; such that logic says any unknown energies must have a resultant effect only when these unknown energies intersect known energies/matter in the correct planes. We know this is how it must work just by simple electromagnetism. For example a magnetic field and a conductor need to be in the proper orientation to generate a current, so any other gravitational creating energies must also work in a similar manner.

OK, well so now that I've gotten that out of my system I can move along to actually being helpful. So to begin with read this. No, I mean really read this because everything suggests this idea is fundamentally correct, whereas three generations of failings with Einsteinian Physics is certain to be the wrong path. After all, wasn't it Einstein himself that said; "the definition of insanity is to repeat the same thing over and over expecting a different outcome?" So please, lets realize Albert was brilliant and so lets follow his advice and try something else for a change.
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/Superlight.pdf

"Milewski Describes Magneto-Electric Radiation and Super Light."
"Dr John Milewski is an engineer and scientist who has been researching advanced materials. He has invented a process for growing single crystal fibers of various materials which could - once available in quantity - revolutionize many technical applications, from light bulbs to energy production. Physical healing and regeneration of living organisms may be a major effect of the new technology as well."
Milewski Describes Magneto-Electric Radiation and Super Light - Sepp Hasslberger

Remember this one?
https://rense.com/general54/babalc.htm

How about this one? Remember how Mark McCandlish said he thought that the ring which surrounds the ARV's spherical crew compartment and which forms the walkway around the hatch could be an antenna? "You do not need to run current thru a wire to develop a magnetic field."
https://web.archive.org/web/20030410...view/index.htm


An antenna to receive frequencies might involve the entire shape of vehicle, as in the human body might itself be such a kind of antenna, with the brain being the capacitors and diodes of a receiver. Something to remember is all.

A new antenna to replace existing shipboard high-frequency (HF) receive antennas has been designed, manufactured, installed, and successfully tested on several ships by SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego. The mast-clamp current probe (MCCP) antenna is a ferrite-core current probe device which is designed to couple to existing ship structures, especially the mast, to form an antenna to receive radio frequencies (RF)

https://www.researchgate.net/publica...operates_at_HF [accessed Aug 08 2018].


Now where did I leave that post about Superluminal Radio Frequencies? Hmm....

[Gambeir]

I don't want people to think I'm an Einstein hater because I'm not. I mean lets give the man some credit, like who for example in 1905 is wandering around wondering about bicycles traveling at the speed of light. Hell most people only knew two kinds of light at that time; candle and whale fat oil lamps and the Sun: OK, well maybe gas lamps too.

I also don't want people to think I'm Christian by making the following suggestion, but I do find this site and the work in it to be open minded with alternative explanations for Einsteinian Physics. The work is very well written being clear and concise in terms which are mostly understandable.

Beyond Einstein: non-local physics
Copyright 2015 by Brian Fraser. "This article may be freely distributed for non-commercial purposes, provided the copyright notice is included and the author’s rights to maintain the document are respected."
http://scripturalphysics.org/4v4a/BeyondEinstein.pdf

The site is called Scriptural Physics and some may want to take a look at the material. Scriptural Physics


One of my favorite pieces from this site is his project "Whitefire"
Project Whitefire

This piece is especially worthy of attention: How many people recall the black lines/dark shadow lines in the sky? I do, and I also remember the make believe explanations for those dark lines, and believe me after 60+ years of sky watching those were a completely new development never before seen, so any statement to the contrary is a bald faced lie. A truth denier statement waving those lines off as weather balloons and swamp gas: Everything is completely normal, there is nothing to concern yourselves with, go back to sleep ~ that kind of thing. Well maybe not so much...

Here you're going to find this PDF on "Non~Contact Levitation."
Piggott's experiments in “Electro-Gravitation”
Copyright © 2016 by Brian Fraser
http://scripturalphysics.org/4v4a/Pr...Levitation.pdf

Related to the aforementioned is George Piggots patent for "Space Telegraphy" SPACE TELEGRAPHY.

[Gambeir]

So now to return to Aether Theory of John V. Milewski and why we should care.

Well for one thing John is a retired from Los Alamos National Labs. He also worked previously as a scientific member at Exxon Research Center and before that he worked at Thiokol Chemical Rocket Engine Divison. Milewski also did some pioneering work on monatomically rearranged matter. I'm sure this information is posted in Energetic Forums from way back, so this isn't anything really new, but the idea is to link material so that there is a line of consistent thought which links the Milewski material together over time. You're talking here about someone whose spent their life examining primary states of matter and energy: Where it comes from, what it is, how it is created, where it get's it energy from, and so on.
John V MILEWSKI : ORMUS Gold from Glass
Robert Nelson: My Science Fair Project -- How To Make Gold ... Methods for transmutation of silver to gold
Parts one & two
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZBC...eature=related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNPJOZj08-U
On Ormus
In Milewski's model, Ormus elements behave like gases, and are found throughout nature and as components in other materials normally believed to be "chemically pure". Thus, heating of certain elements may release Ormus, which he claims can be reconstituted back into it's original atomic state.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efZ_661eXiQ

Business Data
https://nz.linkedin.com/in/john-milewski-6a30491a
https://www.zoominfo.com/p/John-Milewski/200452639



https://steemit.com/technology/@gree...-light-squared

[Gambeir]

Dr. John's now defunct website can be located here>Probably gone dark.
https://web.archive.org/web/20090130...w/milewski.htm

Superlight Home Page on Youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY8...3MV2OhQCr5-TTA

SUPERLIGHT PART 1 - ANTENNAS
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=115&v=0QKve_cw82k[/VIDEO]

Magnetricity
https://www.newscientist.com/article...or-first-time/

I want to point out something to those whom check these things out. In the above linked article the topic is ostensively about, of all things, improving computer data storage. Now you want to understand that the way things work is that R&D (Research & Development) is hidden underneath otherwise unrelated maters, such as say improving computer data storage with magnetic monopoles, which by the way monopoles is the key word we are looking for here. Now check out the closing part to this article.

Shrinking memory
Data is stored on computer hard discs by magnetising their surfaces in patterns that represent 1s and 0s. Bramwell speculates that monopoles could one day be used as a much more compact form of memory than anything available today, given that the monopoles are only about the size of an atom.

“It is in the early stages, but who knows what the applications of magnetricity could be in 100 years time,” he says.

The monopoles in the spin ice are not the same as cosmic monopoles, fundamental magnetic particles theorised to have been forged in the big bang that have never been observed.
https://www.newscientist.com/article...or-first-time/

So these stories are just like the ARV and it's supposed propulsion platform, where according to conventional wisdom these supposed lofty goals are all hundred's of years off...cough...yea right; don't you believe it for one second. Now maybe the ARV is using a similar arrangement as that proposed by Harold Puthoff, but even if that is true, as I've shown there is plenty of energy to taken freely from the atmosphere with the correct technology, and probably is being used for that purpose.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2184

Here's more of the same just to make sure you believe it when they tell you how far off in the future such things just have to be....
https://www.wired.com/2011/02/magnetricity-spin-ice/

Measurement of the charge and current of magnetic monopoles in spin ice: With 30 Additional References in Google Scholar
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature08500

[Gambeir]

So now we find that this so~called Spin Ice (Cloaking Physics in Linguistics) is actually all about Geometry and the Sacred Cult of the Tetrahedron Worshiping Pedophiles~Snort> A joke I hope but not entirely sure to be honest about it what with considering all the missing young people in Iowa alone this past month.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_ice

So anyways. This Tetrahedron Motif is something to pay attention to when you see it crop up. It's in cartoons, it's around, it's a symbol that's also been hijacked and can implicate other nefarious matters. One should be aware of it's possible implications depending on the material being examined.

By Firesquall at the English language Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5526359

Now of course reviewing something like the Schapeller Device one can see the similarities to the supposedly theoretical magnetic monopole

Here's another supposed new discovery along those lines. This is interesting since it was known that Frozen Helium 3 or 4 became a solid matter but more over, it then behaves as a superfluid and which becomes even more interesting given this statement from the below linked article.

"a particular sequence of changing external magnetic fields could lead to the creation of the synthetic monopole."

https://phys.org/news/2014-01-physic...ole-years.html

Now believe when I tell you that you have to read these kinds of articles while wearing your hazmat suit an gas mask: Be careful OK? Don't be gulping down this stuff like "I'm so Amazed!~" This thing is chocked full, stuffed like a thanksgiving turkey with propaganda shilling.

For example;
He added that creation of synthetic electric and magnetic fields is a new and rapidly expanding branch of physics that may lead to the development and understanding of entirely new materials, such as higher-temperature superconductors for the lossless transmission of electricity.
https://phys.org/news/2014-01-physic...years.html#jCp

OK, look people this isn't a mystery. Lossless power transmission is called superconduction, and maybe you're not aware of it but living beings are superconductive, not too sure about the lossless part, but that doesn't really matter because in this case the idea here is about shilling for money. Never mind that Schappeller may have already succeeded 8 decades ago. This is mostly aimed at assuring the public that creations like CERN are worthy and that your support is needed for these supposed scientific studies, as well as your donations to the educational crime network and whoever else pretends to be studying science for the benefit of humanity instead of their own jobs.

Please give us more money and maybe someday power will be free, or something like that, but more money is needed. Pick up your phones and call now~ But Wait~ There's More!

So I'm drawing your attention to the idea that "if you look" there is a building going on here around the idea of magnetic mono~poles. Everywhere you look it's magnetic monopoles, an now a rather new creation of a new word; "Magnetricity."

[Gambeir]

As it turns out, there actually is a very highly developed tetrahedron shaped model which has been developed as a Unified Field Theory Of Physics. Right now I'm just passing this information on. I've only scratched a tiny portion of the work produced by John A. Gowan. There is nothing in this which is outside of the mainstream of physics. It's design is to produce a unified field theory. It could easily be a PHD Thesis but is instead a gift which is the product of a curious and intelligent mind. This is certain to be valuable material. I shouldn't want to comment too much what with the limited reading I've accomplished but I do recommend taking a good look at this material.

A General Systems Approach to a Theory of Everything. Papers & Essays on Fractals, Cosmology, Unified Field Theory, Symmetry, Time, Entropy, Weak and Strong Forces, Science and Religion, Life, the Human Condition. By John A. Gowan
index page






Tetrahedron Model Diagrams

The Symmetry Groups of Light

The Leptonic Spectrum
http://www.johnagowan.org/tetratoe.pdf

Leptoquarks
http://www.johnagowan.org/tetralq.pdf

Strong Force "Flavor" Charges.
http://www.johnagowan.org/tetrahadrons.pdf

Sub-atomic Particles of the 'Standard Model'"
http://www.johnagowan.org/tetrapart.pdf

Diagram of the Universe of Light
http://www.johnagowan.org/lightcosmos.pdf

Diagram of the Universe of Matter
http://www.johnagowan.org/mattercosmos.pdf

SYNOPSIS OF THE "TETRAHEDRON MODEL" OF THE UNIFIED FIELD THEORY
http://www.johnagowan.org/trintxtcut.html

[Ufopolitics]

Hello Gambeir, it is great to see you back again!!

I've been following all post here...like always, excellent material.

On this past Saturday night I saw a UFO...a simple and quick sighting, but as always, it kind of recharges my beliefs...we went dinning out, a nice clear night, no clouds, no winds but just a nice breeze...I looked up to the skies (like I always do, day and night) then I saw this "bright star" and very quickly by referencing to another near by smaller star, I realized it was slowly moving right above my head, smoothly and very silently "cruising" the black skies...no noise from any fuel farting machine turbines, which we could hear even if the planes are very, very high above...absolutely no blinking red-green-blue FAA required lights...just a very comfortable smooth white shine just like any bright star and traveling at the speed any high plane would do.

It traveled for a bit describing a short curved path heading west...and right in front of my eyes...it just "faded away" very fast but not so fast as to see how this shiny moving star was diminishing, shrinking to finally disappear completely.

The spot where it "disappeared" was still above my head...so it did not just flew away and across the earth skies following its curvature, far away from our sight, like we normally see a plane fade away into the horizon...nope...all this took less than 1 minute.

I remembered about this Thread here...and I meant to come by and share it before...but had not the time to seat down to write down.

I have seen so many UFO's Sightings on my lifetime...and this late one is one of the shortest one.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

On this past Saturday night I saw a UFO...a simple and quick sighting, but as always, it kind of recharges my beliefs...we went dinning out, a nice clear night, no clouds, no winds but just a nice breeze...I looked up to the skies (like I always do, day and night) then I saw this "bright star" and very quickly by referencing to another near by smaller star, I realized it was slowly moving right above my head, smoothly and very silently "cruising" the black skies...no noise from any fuel farting machine turbines, which we could hear even if the planes are very, very high above...absolutely no blinking red-green-blue FAA required lights...just a very comfortable smooth white shine just like any bright star and traveling at the speed any high plane would do.

It traveled for a bit describing a short curved path heading west...and right in front of my eyes...it just "faded away" very fast but not so fast as to see how this shiny moving star was diminishing, shrinking to finally disappear completely.

The spot where it "disappeared" was still above my head...so it did not just flew away and across the earth skies following its curvature, far away from our sight, like we normally see a plane fade away into the horizon...nope...all this took less than 1 minute.

I remembered about this Thread here...and I meant to come by and share it before...but had not the time to seat down to write down.

I have seen so many UFO's Sightings on my lifetime...and this late one is one of the shortest one.


Regards


Ufopolitics

ANALYSIS:

It only takes a moderately intelligent brain to discern the above simple and short timed UFO sighting, to understand this craft behaved from STAGE 1 in an EXTRATERRESTRIAL FASHION, traveling at a moderated/regulated speed, not dependable -at all- upon any explosive/farting, fuel burning technology, further on...flying above our environment here on Earth, and NOT following any flying old establishment regulations-rules from FAA.

Further on, at STAGE 2; EXITING FROM OUR PLANET, it developed an acceleration which would have killed, instantaneously, all passengers onboard. This VANISHING POINT, took only fractions of seconds to completely disappear from a normal big star moving moderately to a zero-no sight in Space.

This is the more refined, cleanest visible manifestation of FREE ENERGY We are ever going to witness...and available to anyone who just looks up plus have some minimal and rational knowledge...

Free Energy is NOT just about "A Machine" itself, demonstrating it, BUT about a WHOLE DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGY, which not only would bring Us Free Energy, BUT, ANTIGRAVITY as well as many other "Fantasies", which our Dogmatic Science (with an interest of course) do not want to accept-recognize.

This TECH is very simple...not needed any fancy materials, nor liquids running through "pipes" LOL...circling the craft.

All we need to do is STIR THE AETHER in the proper SPATIAL SHAPE, after we concentrate it at the required DENSITY...then it is a matter of ACCELERATION-DECELERATIONS as WIDENING-NARROWING our SPATIAL CONFIGURATION.

A MAGNETIC FIELD DOES EXACTLY THAT...HOWEVER, it is very limited and too dependable upon MASS-CURRENTS. We do not need MASS, NOR HEAVY CURRENTS to stir the AETHER, in whichever concentration we CONDENSE IT, depending on the "SOURCE"...It could be "ions", Electrons or even "Light" whatever...will do...the "formula" is simple:

SOURCE>>CONDENSATION/COMPRESSIONS>>STIRRING>>PROJECTING>>AMPLIFICATION/REDUCTION (MODULATION).

All of the above EXCEPT the PROPER STIRRING of AETHER...We could find it in a PARTICLE ACCELERATOR.

We have them all over our Planet...but if you search what they are good for...they would say for "STUDY" plus "SCIENCE DEVELOPMENTS"....LOL

Do you wanna find out something very interesting?

type on Google Search: How a Particle Accelerator works

Then, one of the first hits would be a link to DOE.GOV...Department Of Energy?...WHY?!!

Why would this government department care for "teaching" about a machine which is only good for Scientific research and Studies...MORE SPECIFICALLY, Finding out how our Galaxy - Universe was formed?...Or trying to reproduce the "Big-Bang" Theory" through particle collisions analysis?

...or looking for the GOD PARTICLE...Studying Black Holes...etc,etc...

BUT IN ABSOLUTELY ANY "USES/APPLICATIONS" OF A PARTICLE ACCELERATOR, WE WOULD FIND THAT IT GENERATES ENERGY?!

HOWEVER DOE, WANTS TO MAKE SURE TO "TEACH US ALL" LOL...HOW IT WORKS!!

Isn't it funny?

The Particle Accelerator "beam" could carry so much energy...beyond our imagination, accelerated by Electric Fields and modulated/Guided by Magnetic Fields....but these beams all...run/travel in a "LINEAR" Fashion...which does Not, NEVER would "STIR" the AETHER in the required SPATIAL SHAPE to Induce even one volt of energy....


Regards to All



Ufopolitics

[Gambeir]

Hello Gambeir, it is great to see you back again!!

I've been following all post here...like always, excellent material.

On this past Saturday night I saw a UFO...a simple and quick sighting, but as always, it kind of recharges my beliefs...we went dinning out, a nice clear night, no clouds, no winds but just a nice breeze...I looked up to the skies (like I always do, day and night) then I saw this "bright star" and very quickly by referencing to another near by smaller star, I realized it was slowly moving right above my head, smoothly and very silently "cruising" the black skies...no noise from any fuel farting machine turbines, which we could hear even if the planes are very, very high above...absolutely no blinking red-green-blue FAA required lights...just a very comfortable smooth white shine just like any bright star and traveling at the speed any high plane would do.

It traveled for a bit describing a short curved path heading west...and right in front of my eyes...it just "faded away" very fast but not so fast as to see how this shiny moving star was diminishing, shrinking to finally disappear completely.

The spot where it "disappeared" was still above my head...so it did not just flew away and across the earth skies following its curvature, far away from our sight, like we normally see a plane fade away into the horizon...nope...all this took less than 1 minute.

I remembered about this Thread here...and I meant to come by and share it before...but had not the time to seat down to write down.

I have seen so many UFO's Sightings on my lifetime...and this late one is one of the shortest one.


Regards


Ufopolitics

Thanks for the compliments Ufopolotics. I have been waiting for you to weigh back in and am glad to see you've done so. I'm like you in that I've been very lucky to see so many UFO's, and in two cases these were clear sightings of machines. However it is fairly routine to see plasma ball shaped vehicles moving over the local area. So much so that these have become almost routine. Thanks for bringing your own story back here as well.

I'm reading your second comment now and will reply to it in a while.

[Gambeir]

ANALYSIS:

It only takes a moderately intelligent brain to discern the above simple and short timed UFO sighting, to understand this craft behaved from STAGE 1 in an EXTRATERRESTRIAL FASHION, traveling at a moderated/regulated speed, not dependable -at all- upon any explosive/farting, fuel burning technology, further on...flying above our environment here on Earth, and NOT following any flying old establishment regulations-rules from FAA.

Further on, at STAGE 2; EXITING FROM OUR PLANET, it developed an acceleration which would have killed, instantaneously, all passengers onboard. This VANISHING POINT, took only fractions of seconds to completely disappear from a normal big star moving moderately to a zero-no sight in Space.

This is the more refined, cleanest visible manifestation of FREE ENERGY We are ever going to witness...and available to anyone who just looks up plus have some minimal and rational knowledge...

Free Energy is NOT just about "A Machine" itself, demonstrating it, BUT about a WHOLE DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGY, which not only would bring Us Free Energy, BUT, ANTIGRAVITY as well as many other "Fantasies", which our Dogmatic Science (with an interest of course) do not want to accept-recognize.

We can be 100% positive that our science has been intentionally distorted, so that what is presented is a twisted path with a thousand dead ends, and as with all criminally designed explanations it is a combination of truths mixed with deceptions and planted evidence. What passes for physics today is a place where one can become lost forever and contribute nothing; which is of course the whole idea.

As Stevens accurately points out, at least three entire generations have now wasted their lives following the magical flute of the educated, and it is disturbing to me personally to witness how extreme their unethical behavior truly is because knowingly or not these are the agents of deception.

Humans have a great weakness, we are all lazy and we follow the same basic laws of physics as any other piece of matter, we will take the path of least resistance 99 times out of 100. The powers that be know this. They provide the path and it seems so logical, it's so well explained, you don't have to think and we all know how painful it is for the soft bare feet to tread a new path for the first time, so they offer shoes and a glittering carpet to walk upon and this is where most go.



https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilant...e-predictions/
"The presence of the Pied Piper on this 2015-themed cover is downright unsettling. The Pied Piper of Hamelin is a German legend about a man who used his magical flute to lure away the children of the city of Hamelin, never to be seen again."

It isn't widely known, certainly not publicised, that many leading scientists were very uncomfortable with the physics of Einstein and privately held differing opinions. Probably many could not understand the promotion of his ideas at the time but did understand that challenging them was a path not to be taken: The evident punishments were manifest for taking an opposing path, whilst the rewards for praising them could be great.

If we listen to the words of Dr. Joseph Farrell then what we really discover is that this science is a greater failure than previously imagined. A place where the atomic bomb project was a failure. A place where the US might have only had success by way of recovered Nazi Atomic Weapons and which it then presented as it's own. A place where it is almost certain that even if the US was able to create a bomb they were only able to field such a weapon by way of captured Nazi Germany detonators. Those are powerful indictments right there of massive failure on an epic scale.

In that line of historical detective work, which Dr. Farrell is probably the reigning expert, the lies of the corporate industrial dictatorships which rule over all of us are partly revealed. Inside of that story is the story of the unknown secrets of thermonuclear weapons and how only a handful of people have the keys to make such devices work. This knowledge being contrary to their own beliefs based upon what is, then, a manifestly corrupted knowledge base.

Beyond Isaac Newton there is Michael Faraday and afterwards Nikola Tesla. Now I think that if one were to look for signs of ethics then likely you're going to conclude that Tesla's ethics were far and away above those of others, Tesla being one of the few whom refused to work on the atomic bomb, and in the case of Michael Faraday there are also examples of his own ethics such as coming to the defense of a man being ridiculed for suggesting that spontaneous life could take place.

What I put to the reader then is this proposition. Whatever failings one individual might have, the better course is always going to be to follow the failings of an ethical man over that of a deceiver, whom obviously is out to screw you from the get go, whereas the honest man whom may be in error will always attempt to set the error straight.

This TECH is very simple...not needed any fancy materials, nor liquids running through "pipes" LOL...circling the craft.

This is interesting since there is "now" another re~introduction of stories about UFO's having pipes hanging down and attached to them. I find this a very odd sort of description. Possibly loaded, that is deceptive, because it may have some elements of which involve notions of superfulids circulating in these pipes.

In the Schappeller Device we have such pipes internal to the design.
http://free-energy-info.co.uk/Stevens.pdf

In thinking about this device I have considered two avenues in regards to the material in the pipes. My first thought is conventional: That the tubes may have a liquid helium in them. Alternatively, since it is a vacuum chamber then the ability to bring the helium to a possible solid state might exist, which does then create a solid superfluid. Helium 4 does become a solid superfluid at near absolute zero. A vacuum chamber, such as this device is, does then facilitate that objective. It is also noteworthy to recall the story of how the TR#B's supposedly used a pressure chamber pressurized to 250 thousand atmosphere's. Now if we reverse this to a vacuum of 250 thousand atmosphere's we might have something a little more sensible and possibly physically doable. After all, Edgar Foche was just another human with good intentions and maybe he got pressurization mixed up or it was explained to him with this sort of twist just to see if any monkey out there could see the problems and conclude the more obvious reality that the reverse was more likely; that is, rather than pressurized it was instead a vacuum chamber.

However, this idea is at odds with the description and not mentioned in the account by Davson who physically held and studied the device for <three years>~! I'm tempted by the idea of a solid superfluid (see previous posts in this thread) but I think that this also introduces a complexity, and also may be leading away from successful replication.

The reason for this comes from the really odd and strange description of what is, evidently, the motive force contained inside the tubes inside the vacuum chamber. This material is said to be of the odd mixture of bee's wax and carnauba wax and resin (*unknown) and baked until it became a solidified.

That sounds absolutely bonkers until one realizes that the connection here goes back to what little we understand of a potential link to some unknown energy, dark light, via the work of Phillip Callahan, and then the whole of the device begins to take on a kind of "new light" as some kind of possible antenna which accomplishes what you yourself say below, and it's also note worthy to remember that the Schappeller Device is a both a vacuum and dark, at least to begin with, and these may both be critical elements.

All we need to do is STIR THE AETHER in the proper SPATIAL SHAPE, after we concentrate it at the required DENSITY...then it is a matter of ACCELERATION-DECELERATIONS as WIDENING-NARROWING our SPATIAL CONFIGURATION.

Any thoughts you might have are appreciated as always Ufopolitics. A parting thought somewhat unrelated and going back to Chemtrails and ARV type energy systems. The Schappeller Device suggests that the wireless grounding is called for, and possibly we are seeing a form of conductive lead in the chemtrails which enables a ground to space energy. Point is the concept of wireless links and the use of conductive particles along with wireless power transmission and reception linked to chemtrails is a path others more suited might consider examining as this is well outside of my own knowledge base.

Thanks also for this learning tip ~ Like where to go to know thingy
Ever so helpful to know our tax dollars are being spent wisely.
Learning is so important; here let me help you....Lol~

A MAGNETIC FIELD DOES EXACTLY THAT...HOWEVER, it is very limited and too dependable upon MASS-CURRENTS. We do not need MASS, NOR HEAVY CURRENTS to stir the AETHER, in whichever concentration we CONDENSE IT, depending on the "SOURCE"...It could be "ions", Electrons or even "Light" whatever...will do...the "formula" is simple:

SOURCE>>CONDENSATION/COMPRESSIONS>>STIRRING>>PROJECTING>>AMPLIFICATION/REDUCTION (MODULATION).

All of the above EXCEPT the PROPER STIRRING of AETHER...We could find it in a PARTICLE ACCELERATOR.

We have them all over our Planet...but if you search what they are good for...they would say for "STUDY" plus "SCIENCE DEVELOPMENTS"....LOL

Do you wanna find out something very interesting?

type on Google Search: How a Particle Accelerator works

Then, one of the first hits would be a link to DOE.GOV...Department Of Energy?...WHY?!!

Why would this government department care for "teaching" about a machine which is only good for Scientific research and Studies...MORE SPECIFICALLY, Finding out how our Galaxy - Universe was formed?...Or trying to reproduce the "Big-Bang" Theory" through particle collisions analysis?

BUT IN ABSOLUTELY ANY "USES/APPLICATIONS" OF A PARTICLE ACCELERATOR, WE WOULD FIND THAT IT GENERATES ENERGY?!

HOWEVER DOE, WANTS TO MAKE SURE TO "TEACH US ALL" LOL...HOW IT WORKS!!

Isn't it funny?

The Particle Accelerator "beam" could carry so much energy...beyond our imagination, accelerated by Electric Fields and modulated/Guided by Magnetic Fields....but these beams all...run/travel in a "LINEAR" Fashion...which does Not, NEVER would "STIR" the AETHER in the required SPATIAL SHAPE to Induce even one volt of energy....

Regards to All

Ufopolitics

[Gambeir]

I would like to add another conceptual idea on to something I said previously, and which may be useful for others thinking about the origins of reality. First I said the following;

Using a comparative analysis I think we can see commonalities beginning with the words of Telsa and stretching forward to Ken Wheeler; where counterspace is the opposite pole of a magnetic field. Meaning we are living in a monopole of a total magnetic field, and which would then define Universe as we know it right now, and with the other side (counterspace) being the other magnetic pole of Universe. (not to be confused with the hyperspace of John Qunicy St. Clair; which is only the factual movement through a vortex pinch point between these monopoles which is otherwise referred to as a wormhole).

Counterspace is the other monopole, and the wormhole that that leads from our space to counterspace is in reality a bloch wall. In other words, a magnetic field is a manifestation of hole, or natural bloch wall, between our own magnetic monopolar space and that of another monopolar space: Both spaces effectively being magnetic monopoles. The wormhole being a Bloch Wall between the two. A wormhole is then factually a Bloch Wall and which is bleeding the polar field from the other side and thus creating a complete magnetic field in our own space. If this is correct than counterspace is factually a more accurate description of this field and not hyperspace which would be the resultant of moving through and with in the bloch wall, and presumably then returning back inside our own monopole field. Movement in the constriction of the vortex pinch point of the bloch wall is hyperspace specifically.

Now another approach to this is to consider a sort of mirror image approach, and ya know mirrors are really strange things when you think about them, and so if realities exist opposite one another then there may be no direct links to one another. The connections may not be as simple as two vortex's connected by a cosmic string.
Buzz Blog: Falaco Solitons: Particles at the Pool

Instead we may be a shadow soliton or the shadows of other soliton's may bleed through. Perhaps the basis for the idea of "dark light" springs from an understanding similar to the statement by Ufopolitics and our reality is the product of condensed shadows drawn out of Universe.

In this image you see there are shadows of the connected soliton's reflected in the bottom of the swimming pool. Are we nothing but the shadows of another world? Is this where life comes from? I'm reminded greatly of "The Allegory of the Cave." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_Cave

I'm also reminded of Tesla's statement that gravity hides in the shadows.




https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cbd...1d6ef3f37f.pdf

[Gambeir]

Reviewing just this last page is almost overwhelming. I wanted to go back to Sputins comment for a moment however.

It seems the first requirement, is to throw Einstein and his theories of relativity out of the room. One can also investigate Stephen J Crothers reasoning on the problems with Einstein. – One can also hear Stephens story of being expelled from the University of New South Wales (Australia) for simply challenging Einstein’s conception of the gravitational field…

Again, this is just more and more modern evidence a controlled academia, one which once more is demonstrating it is a manifestly corrupt system since where ever questioning is verboten and punishable then deception and evil must reside, for this is their native habitat and unquestionable authority is the most desired of comfort zone of absolute power.

Wheeler’s concepts on Dielectricity and Magnetism seems to help explain what’s going on, once you learn the language.. Magnetism being caused from the loss of inertia of the Dielectric inertial plane / /Counterspace / The Aether, according to Wheeler.

Ken says “Gravity is an incoherent dielectric acceleration” and (there is no such thing as “anti-gravity)”. And to counter act gravity you need an “Omni-directional coherent field array” (OCFA).

Or a vector-less coherent field array…

So how do you make such an array? – Apparently there is a design?

What Wheeler seems to be doing is assigning a dielectric plane to the Aether. So I ask does it make sense and the answer is that yes it makes sense.

However in my mind the dielectric plane would itself not be counter space precisely, because the dielectric plane would actually be the Aether, and which is space itself, and space is like a partition which separate the mono~poles of a falaco soliton like Universe. So the way I'm envisioning counter~space is that it is actually an opposite mono~pole, and where the dielectric plane is space itself, and which then acts as the divisor between the two planes. This would then naturally have to be a dielectric by nature. So Wheeler's ideas makes sense in my mind..

Falaco Solitons
https://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0101/0101098.pdf


Next, the Aether as described by Steven's writings fulfills the description of instantaneous action across space, as outer~space consists of a frozen warehouse (space is itself this warehouse) of vast galactic power reserves due to the nature of superconductivity (frozen/super~cold outer~space) to forever seize and store forever any energy emitted in to it, and this space is described by Aether Theory as a super super~fluid exhibiting a super~fluidity which penetrates all forms and which is thus a push/pressure emitted from the galactic core, and again because of it's composition is actually moving billions of times faster than light speed as described by Dr. John Milewski as a kind of superlight.
https://web.archive.org/web/20090130...w/milewski.htm


So now we also have Aether Theory supported by superlight theory, and both describe gravity as result of pressure or pushing; only mass provides some shielding or shadowing effect and earth is surrounded by billions and billions of large bits of matter.


Wheeler says[B] “Gravity is an incoherent dielectric acceleration.”
Incoherent because of shadowing effect from countless bodies in universe, and creating an incoherent shadowing pattern of pressure fronts, so Wheeler is supportive and also assigns the dielectric plane to this super superfluidity of super light.


*Note from previous posts that accretion disks are proven to intake this super~cooled medium and exhaust cosmic energy jets of plasma. Demonstrating that vast reserves of galactic energy reside in the super cold recesses of space. The release of this energy evidently involves a cyclonic vortex of counter~rotating accretion disks sucking in surround space and breaking the dielectric medium which otherwise prevents the combination of assembly.


Paul Dirac predicted in 1931 that the north and south poles of a magnet could exist independently and behave like electric charges.

Scientists Create Synthetic Dirac Monopole (pub 2014)
Scientists Create Synthetic Dirac Monopole | Physics | Sci-News.com
Synthetic electromagnetic knot in a three-dimensional skyrmion
Synthetic electromagnetic knot in a three-dimensional skyrmion | Science Advances

Also FYI, given that a Pythagorean triangle of 36 –108– 36 degrees, shown on Plato’s divided line, which is also the same angles that of the water molecule. Which seems to tie into a whacky theory that says: Everything in the Universe is Water, or a frequency or memory of Water. (But that’s another story)…

[spacecase0]

Ufopolitics,
I think you have it with the particle accelerator being the starting point.
ever seen the magvid idea ?
http://blog.lege.net/Mathias_Bage/GL...-annotated.pdf
it is basically an open air particle accelerator
I built a small one that runs in the 70cm radio band,
did not see anything from it, but then I only can put about 30W of energy into the RF field, and that is likely way way to little power.
I chose that band because it would make the device small enough to build with what I already had on hand, and if energy density was an issue, it is not much space to fill with power. so guess I will be trying another size here next, but I don't have a larger DC electro magnet, and funding will likely stop me there, but maybe someone has some wire lying around that I can use, I am still asking around.

what gets me about the idea of the particle accelerator moving ether, is that the ARV should do the same thing, but with electrostatic energy and not magnetic energy, and it really should not matter what one you use to get there if you set it up correct.

I tried the electrostatic method, but only have 19.5KV to play with at the moment, and that was not enough voltage to see any effect.
in the past I had got a slight gravity effect from tests run at about 50KV.

the only common element I have seen in my tests lately is that they seem to need more power into the field than I seem to have. it strikes me as something that does not work well on a small scale with low power.
then again I could be shaping the filed poorly.