Moving that "Massless, Weightless" Magnetic Field - PART 1

[Ufopolitics]

EMF Flow...

Hi UFO,

There are 2 different types of voltage.

The first is voltage potential - that is the measurement you get at the terminals. I consider it a gas pressure reading of the polarized aether.

The second voltage is EMF or electromotive force, which flows from the positive terminal over the wire towards the negative terminal only when there is a path for it to travel to the lower potential. This flow is also considered the "Heaviside Flow".

The EMF potentializes the electrons in the copper conductor itself to start moving towards the positive terminal.

So the EMF is a very real flow and I see all the time in common electrical references that there is no distinction about what current is, which seems crazy.

Bearden's diagram here shows it perfectly:



When discussing "current", it should only apply to the electron flow from electrons in the conductor moving towards the positive terminal.

And EMF is not just voltage (pressure reading), but the actual flow of that organized source potential that potentializes the electrons.

You can see in the diagram that the Poynting Flow is only a small nearly insignificant amount of the Heaviside Flow that makes it into the conductor and attracts the electrons out of orbit so that they start jiggling down the wire in the opposite direction.

The Heaviside Flow is nearly at light speed being restricted by the drag of the Poynting component going into the conductor getting electrons to move. The electrons are moving a few inches power hour in the opposite direction.

If you can transmit that EMF across the conductor (wave guide) without instigating the flow of electrons, then it is transmitted extraluminally, or virtually instantaneously.

Hello Aaron,


Thanks!, very enlightening post above!!


I agree 100% with this "EMF FLOW DIRECTION", and yes, it takes place exactly from Positive to Negative (+) >>> (-) terminals.


What I want to do following is to show, display a REAL relation between this FLOW and the Generation of a Magnetic Field Orientation (We could call it B Field Vector to simplify it)...as "Step 1"...


Thanks again for your post Aaron!


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Please, let's Unify our Concepts...

Hello to All,

First, thanks for all your comments here...all of them very useful!!

And unfortunately I know many here does not agree with Field Spin (like Bistander and Citfta)...sorry but I do, and in order to prove that fact I need to back up my claims through a very simple and very useful tool...a cheap, old, small Black and White CRT TV, which I have set to only project a Flat, Horizontal ELECTRON BEAM SCANLINE...or also called "RASTERED LINE", this line would be considered the ZERO LINE, as this is the RESET LINE when there is no Magnetic Field PRESENCE...and for more info, please refer to my latest video related to CRT-Magnetic Fields :

And you can go directly to TIME= 17:35 (Link will take you directly to that Time...) to see only SCANLINE-FIELD INTERACTIONS

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7OzMURRU_k[/VIDEO]

CRT REVEALING MAGNETIC FIELD VORTEXES

NOW BACK TO MAIN DISCUSSION...

Ok, I have put together a simple Graph-CAD, in order to UNIFY our Concepts...

[IMG][/IMG]

We have a "CLOCK" at the end of the Coil Iron Core to indicate "Clockwise Rotation Reference Point PLANE".

We have a "Right Hand Rule" painted as showing there are no conflicts with it either...Thumb points out the B FIELD DIRECTION, or also the NORTH POLE. As our fingers "wrapped" around coil indicate "CURRENT FLOW DIRECTION".

And finally, my CRT SCANLINE showing the NORTH SPIN DIRECTION, by a Positive Left Upper Quadrant Sine...plus a Right Lower Quadrant Negative Sine...very clearly INDICATING NORTH SPIN DIRECTION.

Completely Opposite Sine as that of a SOUTH POLE PROJECTION ON SAME CRT SCREEN VIEW WITH HORIZONTAL SCANLINE...(Please watch Video for details)

I believe this simple Image Unifies the whole Concept about this "ELECTRIC FLOW" from Positive to Negative Terminals of Coil, being CW, and ALSO, COINCIDING EXACTLY WITH NORTH POLE SPIN DIRECTION...

Note that, of course, the Coil Wire, winding direction, viewed from this angle...is also A CW WINDING DIRECTION considering we have STARTED TO WIND FROM THE POSITIVE TERMINAL.

This will get more complicated further on... since we will have in real life several layers of winding on that same coil...Above Image is just one layer for sake of simplicity and clear understanding of the whole deal.

Hope we All reach an agreement here...


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

A General Rule I would like to keep here...

Welcome to All ...and:

A General Rule I would like to keep here...

I would like to keep here a HAPPY ENVIRONMENT, so, please, no need to end our discussions in Insults or any disrespectful, nor minimizing the other capabilities or expertise related comments about absolutely ANYONE participating on this Thread.

So, please...Let's get together as ONE TEAM, helping each others out...since absolutely NO ONE have the final truth about all this LIFE TIME confusing concepts...that have not lead Us so far to finding the REAL WAYS TO OBTAIN ENERGY based on SIMPLE METHODS...which would not require Complex and Powerful Mechanical Movements to get what we are all searching for in so many years...and so many Generations that have died without seen this magnificent developments.


Sincerely


Ufopolitics

[wheatbelt.radio]

Re ufo

Hello,

RE, a few posts ago, -//?..

am i too understand that you have found an answer too the under unity problem from the concept of recycling backemf ?, ,- if no- which is what i suspect, where have you found your answer too this problem ?, ?

and AARon, well put, and i love your sister,

[Ufopolitics]

Hello,

RE, a few posts ago, -//?..

am i too understand that you have found an answer too the under unity problem from the concept of recycling backemf ?, ,- if no- which is what i suspect, where have you found your answer too this problem ?, ?

and AARon, well put, and i love your sister,

Hello Wheatbelt,

Just follow this Thread and it will gradually evolve...eventually to answer your questions...in time.

Take care


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Boost converter

Hello Bistander,

Well, then we both could just use the term "Electrical Flow" as a general concept...which according to Electricity, Voltage is not a displacement of Electrons or about any kind of flow at all, right?...but just the Differential between charged terminals correct?

Hi Ufo,

I don't understand "Electrical Flow". So I don't use the term. I use current which is the flow of electric charge usually, but not necessarily, through a conductor. And voltage which is the difference in EMF between two points in space, usually between two nodes on a circuit.

I am pretty sure you are very familiar with the example I have cited before:

Inductors based switching power converters...remember that when the inductor is Off (collapsing field)...the electric flow passes the diode to the end of circuit cap?

While when it is On, Diode blocks flow to charge inductor.

Yes I know you would tell me voltage terminals reversed, reason why diode allowed flow...so, what is it that went through the diode to the converter output Capacitor then?...Voltage with no current?

At the end it is a simple concept...a "Current Ramp" Up and then down, due to the Voltage rise at the end output of the circuit when flow passes diode:




Regards


Ufopolitics

You refer to the inductor being "off". That terminology may be misleading because the inductor is always conducting current as long as there is a load on the converter. The inductor charges when the switch is closed and discharges when the switch is opened.

The diode is forward biased (conducts) when the switch is open so has inductor current thru it and the forward junction drop across it (~0.7V). When the switch is closed it pulls the node between the inductor and diode to ground (0V) thereby reverse biasing the diode causing diode current = 0A and voltage across the diode = the capacitor voltage (which is the load voltage (Vout)).

Regards,

bi

[Cadman]

Quiet Please

What's that you're saying Ufo?

I can't hear you, there are too many people yakking on this party line.

.

[Ufopolitics]

What's that you're saying Ufo?

I can't hear you, there are too many people yakking on this party line.

.

Hey Cadman...

What did you say??!!

Can't hear you either...

Regards friend, & glad 2 C U around here again!!


Ufopolitics

[boguslaw]

Hello Bistander,

Well, then we both could just use the term "Electrical Flow" as a general concept...which according to Electricity, Voltage is not a displacement of Electrons or about any kind of flow at all, right?...but just the Differential between charged terminals correct?

I am pretty sure you are very familiar with the example I have cited before:

Inductors based switching power converters...remember that when the inductor is Off (collapsing field)...the electric flow passes the diode to the end of circuit cap?

While when it is On, Diode blocks flow to charge inductor.

Yes I know you would tell me voltage terminals reversed, reason why diode allowed flow...so, what is it that went through the diode to the converter output Capacitor then?...Voltage with no current?

At the end it is a simple concept...a "Current Ramp" Up and then down, due to the Voltage rise at the end output of the circuit when flow passes diode:




Regards


Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,

I don't understand "Electrical Flow". So I don't use the term. I use current which is the flow of electric charge usually, but not necessarily, through a conductor. And voltage which is the difference in EMF between two points in space, usually between two nodes on a circuit.



You refer to the inductor being "off". That terminology may be misleading because the inductor is always conducting current as long as there is a load on the converter. The inductor charges when the switch is closed and discharges when the switch is opened.

The diode is forward biased (conducts) when the switch is open so has inductor current thru it and the forward junction drop across it (~0.7V). When the switch is closed it pulls the node between the inductor and diode to ground (0V) thereby reverse biasing the diode causing diode current = 0A and voltage across the diode = the capacitor voltage (which is the load voltage (Vout)).

Regards,

bi

That's why I created another thread ,because this CAN be solved with experiment, though I don't know when I could be able to perform such one.
Move the discussion about boost converter there.

[Gambeir]

Hello to All,

First, thanks for all your comments here...all of them very useful!!

And unfortunately I know many here does not agree with Field Spin (like Bistander and Citfta)...sorry but I do, and in order to prove that fact I need to back up my claims through a very simple and very useful tool...a cheap, old, small Black and White CRT TV, which I have set to only project a Flat, Horizontal ELECTRON BEAM SCANLINE...or also called "RASTERED LINE", this line would be considered the ZERO LINE, as this is the RESET LINE when there is no Magnetic Field PRESENCE...and for more info, please refer to my latest video related to CRT-Magnetic Fields :

And you can go directly to TIME= 17:35 (Link will take you directly to that Time...) to see only SCANLINE-FIELD INTERACTIONS

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7OzMURRU_k[/VIDEO]

CRT REVEALING MAGNETIC FIELD VORTEXES

NOW BACK TO MAIN DISCUSSION...

Ok, I have put together a simple Graph-CAD, in order to UNIFY our Concepts...

[IMG][/IMG]

We have a "CLOCK" at the end of the Coil Iron Core to indicate "Clockwise Rotation Reference Point PLANE".

We have a "Right Hand Rule" painted as showing there are no conflicts with it either...Thumb points out the B FIELD DIRECTION, or also the NORTH POLE. As our fingers "wrapped" around coil indicate "CURRENT FLOW DIRECTION".

And finally, my CRT SCANLINE showing the NORTH SPIN DIRECTION, by a Positive Left Upper Quadrant Sine...plus a Right Lower Quadrant Negative Sine...very clearly INDICATING NORTH SPIN DIRECTION.

Completely Opposite Sine as that of a SOUTH POLE PROJECTION ON SAME CRT SCREEN VIEW WITH HORIZONTAL SCANLINE...(Please watch Video for details)

I believe this simple Image Unifies the whole Concept about this "ELECTRIC FLOW" from Positive to Negative Terminals of Coil, being CW, and ALSO, COINCIDING EXACTLY WITH NORTH POLE SPIN DIRECTION...

Note that, of course, the Coil Wire, winding direction, viewed from this angle...is also A CW WINDING DIRECTION considering we have STARTED TO WIND FROM THE POSITIVE TERMINAL.



Ufopolitics

Hi Ufopolitics, I mainly want to say to you how useful the video was. I also have some other thoughts and if you know or feel otherwise I'd like to be corrected.

As your work now demonstartes, the magnetic field flows in one direction only. It must therefore follow that any particles which are attracted towards this energy are required to follow the movement of the magnetic flow. This being naturally a matter of magnetic field strength in free space.

Particle physics demonstrates that it is the magnetic field which controls the direction of charged and or magnetic particles: A particle is not required to have an electrical charge to follow a magnetic field, but it is the magnetic field which controls the flow of particles regardless of their respective field charges, or whether or not they are even carrying a charge at all.

How a particle reacts to the magnetic field is related to the charge and it's relative attraction towards a magnetic field even if it has no charge at all. There is a relationship between the strength of magnetic field which is the charge carrier and the relative charge of a particle as well as to the matter of the particle itself. A particle may follow a magnetic pathway more easily because it is naturally attracted to the field even though it's charge may be less than that of another particle. This is not a simple matter of respective charges in particles. The particle itself is at least as important as the charge itself.

Charged particles moving in free space create their own magnetic fields, or rings through which they are propelled. Your own work validates this understanding and shows that electrical energies and magnetically attracted particles must follow a singular pathway forwards. They cannot reverse course back through the magnetic field which is projecting forwards other particles merely because those at the front are now depleted of a respective charge: they can only reverse course by once more self creating another electromagnetic field of likewise designed rings and through which they must flow in order to retrace a path back to a source. One could see this activity then as electro-magnetic tunneling of sorts since the action is to create another magnetic tube, constructed out of self creating rings once more, and through which these particles then flow.

There is not a reversal backwards. It's more like water coming out of the end of a hose and then coming back along the outside of the hose while making itself another tube to flow through. That's the way nature moves particles in free space when it is in a circuit.

In theory, as I understand it, in free space the flow of electromagnetic energy particles are accomplished by self organizing electromagnetic rings around the flowing energy field. These magnetic rings are responsible for the projection forwards and outwards in to freespace where this self creation process is repeated over and over.

Your work shows that this is the true nature of the magnetic field: That it is a spiraling flow which carries itself, and anything which is inside it, forwards in a singular spiraling direction. I feel your work is conclusive on these points and can now be applied usefully elsewhere.

[Ufopolitics]

Field Structure

Hi Ufopolitics, I mainly want to say to you how useful the video was.

Hello Gambeir,

I am glad my video was helpful in order to acquire more knowledge about the "Enigmatic Magnetic Fields"...

I also have some other thoughts and if you know or feel otherwise I'd like to be corrected.

Absolutely, no problem at all...

As your work now demonstrates, the magnetic field flows in one direction only. It must therefore follow that any particles which are attracted towards this energy are required to follow the movement of the magnetic flow. This being naturally a matter of magnetic field strength in free space.

Correct, except there is a particular property of Magnetic Fields which must be taken in consideration before concluding about its directional (one way) flow...

And that Intrinsic Property that applies generally to ALL Magnetic Fields, no matter if coming out from a permanent magnet or a Coil, and no matter if air coil core or ferromagnetic core coil...

No matter what, we are referring strictly to Magnetic Fields here, and that Property is the FACT that:

THIS MAGNETISM DYNAMIC FLOW EMANATES EXACTLY FROM THE VERY CENTER OF THE GENERATING EMBODIMENT CAUSING IT TO PROPAGATE IN SPACE, FROM THE VERY "MASS GRAVITATIONAL" CENTER OUTWARDS.

And so, no matter what the Geometry Volume would be creating the Field, it have a "built in mechanism" that "iso facto" reacts in this manner in the form of "Self Gravitational Center-Outwards Spatial Alignment"

Then we step into the Spatial Vortex of a Spiral Shape from Center Outwards. And this would be the CENTRIFUGAL FORCES ONLY, which configure this Primary Flow.

Particle physics demonstrates that it is the magnetic field which controls the direction of charged and or magnetic particles: A particle is not required to have an electrical charge to follow a magnetic field, but it is the magnetic field which controls the flow of particles regardless of their respective field charges, or whether or not they are even carrying a charge at all.

How a particle reacts to the magnetic field is related to the charge and it's relative attraction towards a magnetic field even if it has no charge at all. There is a relationship between the strength of magnetic field which is the charge carrier and the relative charge of a particle as well as to the matter of the particle itself. A particle may follow a magnetic pathway more easily because it is naturally attracted to the field even though it's charge may be less than that of another particle. This is not a simple matter of respective charges in particles. The particle itself is at least as important as the charge itself.

Charged particles moving in free space create their own magnetic fields, or rings through which they are propelled. Your own work validates this understanding and shows that electrical energies and magnetically attracted particles must follow a singular pathway forwards. They cannot reverse course back through the magnetic field which is projecting forwards other particles merely because those at the front are now depleted of a respective charge: they can only reverse course by once more self creating another electromagnetic field of likewise designed rings and through which they must flow in order to retrace a path back to a source. One could see this activity then as electro-magnetic tunneling of sorts since the action is to create another magnetic tube, constructed out of self creating rings once more, and through which these particles then flow.

Exactly, and here the governing law is based on Hierarchy based on Field strength and Volume to dictate the Overriding Flow to External or Internal (inside the core) Particles.

There is not a reversal backwards. It's more like water coming out of the end of a hose and then coming back along the outside of the hose while making itself another tube to flow through. That's the way nature moves particles in free space when it is in a circuit.

In theory, as I understand it, in free space the flow of electromagnetic energy particles are accomplished by self organizing electromagnetic rings around the flowing energy field. These magnetic rings are responsible for the projection forwards and outwards in to freespace where this self creation process is repeated over and over.

Well here you are right about the formation of "RINGS" which could be seen clearly by the use of FERROCELL LENS exposing the whole Field which consist of several perfectly aligned and spaced evenly...like a Sunflower is created by Nature, and so many other Natural forms of the Creation.

However, there is a "Discharge Flow" in every Magnetic Field, as a Secondary Stage, and it is reverse from Primary Stage...and, of course, if Field is Isolated (not under the Influence of any other Field or attraction to any Ferromagnetic Material which could "Distort" its shape considerably) the Magnetic Field would have exactly Two Stages at each of their Two Polarizations which come from the Center of the "Physical" Embodiment generating it...The First Stage we already went through...the CENTRIFUGAL FLOW...and so, like the saying "All that goes around comes around"...this Flow RETURNS EXACTLY TO THE CENTER as well, VIA THEIR CENTRIPETAL FORCES.

Your work shows that this is the true nature of the magnetic field: That it is a spiraling flow which carries itself, and anything which is inside it, forwards in a singular spiraling direction. I feel your work is conclusive on these points and can now be applied usefully elsewhere.

Thanks very much, and it was my complete pleasure that it has conveyed the "Message Within"...

I am still working on the second part to the CRT Video...where I would be using exactly FOUR ELECTRON BEAM, HORIZONTAL SCAN LINES, set at every 90º In 3D...Imaging the whole Magnetic Field in one shot at the Center of the "Stage"...which comprehends Front-Rear and both Right and Left Sides Views Simultaneously...This way we would have a full view of all Faces of the Spatial Volume swept by the High Frequency CRT Rastering Lines.


Kind Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

A Basic, Preliminary Video Test about Moving the Virtual Magnetic Fields...

Hello to All,

For those interested, find below and please, take a few minutes off your time...and watch the video:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHhT_7HnCqQ&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]

It is a Preliminary and very BASIC TEST plus Explanation about what this Thread is all about:

Moving Plus Increasing the "Change of Rate" (as recited from Faraday Laws of Induction) but ONLY off the...:

VIRTUAL, MASSLESS, WEIGHTLESS AND INVISIBLE MAGNETIC FIELDS

The Results at the end of Video, I believe are so very obvious to even those not too skilled in the Arts...


Enjoy


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Transferred post_1

This is a post from the Resonating Coils Thread from Aether Scientist, addressed to Mikrovolt in order to keep discussion here:

There is concern about a free energy device being disruptive
because the losers would want Utopian life for only a few.

If everyone could live in a middle class house in the suburbs
then solar panels would be enough however it appears
that conservation and alternatives and central power is here to stay.

Having a small device power your home such as Henry Moray, Steven Mark, Kapanadze was never demonstrated or replicated in enough hands to be a public proto-type.

I believe that tapping an unknown source would be a progressive discovery from a barely working design with advancement along the way.
The inventor would likely have a story about how it came about.

Let's say you tried to replicate a Steven Mark TPU, the device takes time to get up to speed, the device shakes when moved ect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHswoNpc0Tk

So how would those working principals be examined if someone actually got something to work even partially ? Not looking at a wall wart.
That is why I suggest using synchronous up regulator with those sense features if and when over unity does happen you will
more likely spot it quickly because the load will decrease and the controller error amplifier will adjust but also waveforms may change slightly
I found a cheap ebay regulator LTC 8730 but the inductor should be placed away from the transistors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0KHPxlFz6I

In physics the term resonance can be the synchronous vibration of a neighboring object.

Great post above Microvolt!!

Let's say you tried to replicate a Steven Mark TPU, the device takes time to get up to speed, the device shakes when moved etc.

That is exactly a "property" that most of these devices have...Humming, or a vibration feeling, like Jack Durban (Steve Marks Asst) mentioned..."it feels like the stators of a running motor"...There is a simple explanation for that, High Energy Currents Flow, back and forth (for example, As Figuera Concept, but it could also be a spin feel) which develops the fast moving virtual magnetic fields within device through the coils-cores config.

The Device I am perfecting at this time, does exactly the same effect.

if and when over unity does happen you will more likely spot it quickly because the load will decrease and the controller error amplifier will adjust but also waveforms may change slightly.

The load will decrease the output, of course...but there will always be a Remanent power left over, even if I short-out output terminals to read full output-amperage, there will still be some millivolts voltage remaining at output (never drops to Zero!!)...and more amazingly...output coils will not even rise one degree of temp when shorted or whenever disbursing Higher Load power.

But it is a great idea to use a regulator to do this compensation electronically, as per "load request" disbursement of output power...thanks!!

In physics the term resonance can be the synchronous vibration of a neighboring object.

Yes!!...Thanks for that as well!!...very different than Electric Resonance...in Physics, the resonance applies better to an Electro-Magnetic device, which ends up in a Magnetic Field...so, the more I increase that "neighboring vibration", the higher it would be reflected on the "receiver neighbor" end, and NOT too much because it will brake the glass...

In Electrical Resonance, there is a limitation point which becomes static and is NOT Progressive (Dynamic Range) like in Physics takes place (E.g: Electromagnets)!!

I will set an example here: Say I have an Exciter Coil of 20 awg, and according to config (AT, Dia, Core size,etc) it consumes around 30W...but this exciter is "neighboring" (or we could say "Interlaced" or Cross-winded) a closed looped LC Tank Circuit Coil...which have coarser gauge...and more turns (AT)[it will work perfectly well with same exact AT's, as same wire gauge]...so, the operating wattage transferred by "physical resonance Induction" from primary exciter to that secondary exciter is Higher than Input operating wattage DEPENDING UPON the FREQUENCY of this "Vibrations"...And Signals on Scope show clearly this fact...(here takes place an INVERSE Network Comm between Primary-secondary, meaning, the higher the frequency, the higher the wattage of sec exciter, while the decrease of Input Power to primary exciter takes place-here a regulator will work as well-)...but, the point here is that the secondary exciter...would be the one diminishing its power when load is present at output coils, and NOT the Primary Input Exciter...comprende?

Resuming above, the LC Circuit (secondary exciter) will form a "Mirror Field Vibration-Movement" which in turn assists Primary Exciter Field SO, TWO Exciting Fields WILL Induce Main Output Coils...but the Mirror Field (LC Tank) becomes HIGHER AT HIGHER FREQUENCIES...and SO, it will be the one serving as LOAD DISBURSEMENT...and NOT from the Primary Field Exciter.


Thanks and Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Transfered post 2

asynchronous wound armatures, a different animal yes you are right good job.

Exactly, good example about that "vibrating feeling"

Find the 8730 try Searching " LTC3780 High Efficiency, Synchronous Buck Boost "

or " ebay LTC3780 12 DC to DC, lifting Synchronous Buck Boost "

board topology the inductor should be moved away from the 4 transistors.

I will get it, yeah, moving away toroidal inductor will prevent from magnetic interference in board...plus even adding some heat sink to FET's...

I am also building a simple 12V PWM, 555 Timer Astable Pos. of just ONE Single Square Wave (do not need two inverse anymore), where I could regulate the duty cycle(ON Time/OFF Time length) PLUS the Frequency Speed, in order to replace the Motor-Comm Rotary Switch by that simple pulse device...Motor Assy is too expensive, as far as Watts...BUT, ONLY after am done with Primary-Secondary design Topology in one module, where I will get most out of it.

Right now, I am doing OU, but only if we calculate Input-Output between Exciter(s) and Output Main Coils, leaving motor watts out. So, the OU is like a 21 W Out versus like 12 In...but am only working -as of now- on low voltage (12V) and just about one amp Input. However, the System is designed to INCREASE this OU relation percentage as I increase Input Wattage.

But then again, results above are based on a single Module, which is Two Exciters and just one Output Coil...where I could add Three more coils for output at different spatial geometrical positioning.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[mikrovolt]

I am writing this with references in order to be more clear.
There are simulation tools available.
https://youtu.be/G6B-d8Wi0oI?t=239

Concider the term Energy Flux and the faster transient curves and timing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_current

Simulation subsets can be modeled that will speed future developments.

The long hand efficiency calculations will no doubt be scrutinized.