Moving that "Massless, Weightless" Magnetic Field - PART 1

[Ufopolitics]

The Learning Curve...til it gets "straight"...

Hello to All,

I have been conducting several testings...and I mean several, as they involve all kind of different cores and coils sizes and gauges...different winding methods, etc,etc.

All along this development I have faced downward curves (disappointments) as going up curves which give me some hope...until I start riding a straight line going up and up...that is where I am now.

Like I mentioned on my latest video...Exciter Coils are wound in a very different way...than conventional means, all leading to improvement, where we use the MINIMAL ENERGY to excite STRONG CHANGING FIELDS.

And so, I finally refined the way the "Collecting Coils" or "Secondaries", or "Induced Coils" are wound AND CONNECTED.

Secondaries are wound also different than conventional, in order not to have amps losses (Decay) to gain higher voltages as pulsations increase (which translate to "FIELD CHANGES RATIO")

I built two secondaries with same number of turns, same gauge...same resistance, but one being "conventional" and the other one "improved"...In order to compare results, and the difference is outrageous.

When I write conventional related to Secondaries, I meant layers back and forth along core length, following same direction of winding...this conventional method tends to decrease amps as I split wires to read out at different layers. EVEN if all turns are wound same direction, the currents directions fluctuate from one extreme of core to the other in every layer, if we look at "translation along core axis vectors", which renders a constant opposition of vectors from identical spinning of currents flow directions.

Therefore, I made it in order that just one directional flow is wound through different layers acquiring induction...then all "return" conductors between layers, travel in a fashion which do not get induced by field changes since they are not "turned" around core, but straight.

I also refined the whole device as to make it as compact as possible...and of light weight as possible.


You will see the whole thing soon...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Bob Smith]

You will see the whole thing soon...

Looking forward to it, UFO!
Bob

[Cornboy 555]

Looking forward to it, UFO!
Bob

Love to see exactly what you mean, also.

Warm Regards Cornboy.

[BroMikey]

Hello to All,

I have been conducting several testings...and I mean several, as they involve all kind of different cores and coils sizes and gauges...different winding methods, etc,etc.

All along this development I have faced downward curves (disappointments) as going up curves which give me some hope...until I start riding a straight line going up and up...that is where I am now.

Like I mentioned on my latest video...Exciter Coils are wound in a very different way...than conventional means, all leading to improvement, where we use the MINIMAL ENERGY to excite STRONG CHANGING FIELDS.

And so, I finally refined the way the "Collecting Coils" or "Secondaries", or "Induced Coils" are wound AND CONNECTED.

Secondaries are wound also different than conventional, in order not to have amps losses (Decay) to gain higher voltages as pulsations increase (which translate to "FIELD CHANGES RATIO")

I built two secondaries with same number of turns, same gauge...same resistance, but one being "conventional" and the other one "improved"...In order to compare results, and the difference is outrageous.

When I write conventional related to Secondaries, I meant layers back and forth along core length, following same direction of winding...this conventional method tends to decrease amps as I split wires to read out at different layers. EVEN if all turns are wound same direction, the currents directions fluctuate from one extreme of core to the other in every layer, if we look at "translation along core axis vectors", which renders a constant opposition of vectors from identical spinning of currents flow directions.

Therefore, I made it in order that just one directional flow is wound through different layers acquiring induction...then all "return" conductors between layers, travel in a fashion which do not get induced by field changes since they are not "turned" around core, but straight.

I also refined the whole device as to make it as compact as possible...and of light weight as possible.


You will see the whole thing soon...


Regards


Ufopolitics

Only 1 wire is connected to source but the meter forms a dead short by
using the amp shunt.?? Too cool.

[Ufopolitics]

A Module Configuration...

Only 1 wire is connected to source but the meter forms a dead short by
using the amp shunt.?? Too cool.

Hello BroMikey,

Ok, the Exciter is made of Two Windings, Two strands of wire, but wound opposedly related to each others, as explained on the video, in order that both have their start point at each extreme of core.

Now, only ONE(1) Pulsed Signal is sent to just one of the starting points (Let's call it Start 1)and end connected to ground (-).

The other start and end are looped into an LC Tank which does a mirror from BOTH PULSES, one Pulse is the real signal sent to Start 1, and other as the mirror (opposed, offset)...So, this LC Tank amplifies BOTH Magnetic Field Fluctuations, while we only need to send, spend in one signal...

Secondaries are wound like I wrote before...one way layers which get their returns outside of Field Influence, simply because they are not wound in Turns around Core.

This is the simple set up...it will get more complicated after I add other secondaries to the same exciter...where all these returns will actually connect to other secondaries, ALL made of one way layers, so, secondary circuit is closed around exciter embodiment. Then returns serve as connectors between them.

1-One Secondary is set at Inner Center of Exciter.

2-Other is set at Outer Center of Exciter.

3-Then Two more Secondaries which are set on each side of exciter.

Meaning A MODULE will have One Exciter Assembly (1 Signaled (Directly Excited) Coil and the other as an LC Mirror) plus FOUR Secondaries wound around its Geometry.

Remember Magnetic Fields are 360 Spherically and Spatially surrounding Exciter Assy.

Having Secondaries added ALL AROUND Exciter System is an advantage that only can be done to Static Generators...can't do it with rotary ones...so they loose all these Spatial Influences.

I know it may sound complicated...but just one of my drawings will reveal the whole thing...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[BroMikey]

Hello BroMikey,
can't do it with rotary ones...so they loose all these Spatial Influences.

I know it may sound complicated...but just one of my drawings will reveal the whole thing...


Regards


Ufopolitics

goodness sakes, you have been busy. So i take it that unless the exciter
coil set is opposing winds it does not do well.

And to ground? Wow that is interesting. I take it you mean EARTH.

[Ufopolitics]

goodness sakes, you have been busy.

You have absolutely no idea how busy I have been over this development...

So i take it that unless the exciter
coil set is opposing winds it does not do well.

All relates to generate IDENTICAL, BUT OPPOSED MAGNETIC FIELDS by each Coil wind along the Core Axis.

And to ground? Wow that is interesting. I take it you mean EARTH.

My bad...I meant Negative, that is why I set a (-) next to the word "ground"

The main exciter receiving the signal which is a pulsating Positive while Negative from source is FIXED...that is what I meant Mikey.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

HES (Holcomb Energy Systems)

Many Patents Granted plus Applications filed....one of them below:

SOLID STATE MULTI-POLE AND UNI-POLE ELECTRIC GENERATOR ROTOR FOR AC/DC ELECTRIC GENERATORS

A Breakthrough Tech, now, 2022...just based on the Virtually Moving of that Massless, Weightless Magnetic Field!!!

Cheers Dr. Holcomb!!

As You all can see...I was working on these ideas for a while back...


Cheers


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Ok Ladies and Gentlemen...


RE: Dr Holcomb Breakthrough



I have researched directly into the USPTO Patent Applications Database...which is the FULL Patent App...including all images and FULL Descriptions, basically about the Application Number 20190238011
Which is about a Non Moving Rotor, as what "moves" are the Virtual Magnetic Fields...


SOLID STATE MULTI-POLE AND UNI-POLE ELECTRIC GENERATOR ROTOR FOR AC/DC ELECTRIC GENERATORS


Dr Holcomb uses an ELECTRONIC SWITCHING SYSTEM based on MOSFET Gating Circuit, plus a Programmable Logic Control (PLC) System, Excitation Board, fed by Batteries and a Control Board...which is in charge to send the ALTERNATE AND SEQUENCED EXCITATION SIGNALS to INDEPENDENT COILS in each Slot of the Basic Rotor Core.


These Alternate Signals excite by groups of Four Coils on one end, to another four coils in the opposite end of rotor...and so on it will jump from the first coil of the 1,2,3,4 to do 2,3,4,5, then 3,4,5,6...while same takes place at 180º following a rotation sequencing.


Like I have mentioned before, Dr Holcomb uses a DC EXCITED VIRTUAL ROTATION OF DC MAGNETIC FIELDS which acts as the INDUCER of the outer "Stator", which could be single phase, two phase, or three phase....


Here I will just post Image #23 from App, where it shows the main wiring Diagram to Rotor and all the Exciter and Control Board circuitry...so you have an idea of the basic Invention.




#23 Image shows the basic wiring of a Rotor consisting of 16 poles to the Controller Components (Output Stator is not shown here) what you see contouring Rotor are just the way it is wired to each Chanel from a total of Eight -8- Chanels.




23.png


Respectfully






Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello,

To put it in simple words...

The HES Tech is about the development of a ROTOR for a GENERATOR, which does NOT MOVES physically and still induces electrical power on the output coils...as this Rotor could be inserted in ANY Generator Outer Stator Core-Fields...Single Phase, 2 phase, three phase...and works beautifully.

Of course, it requires all the Electronic FET's Controls plus Logic Boards in order to "spin" the Massless, Invisible, Weightless Magnetic Fields...generating power without any Lenz reactive forces...like I have said back in 2017...just because Lenz acts on the Moving Steel Core from rotor...NOT on the Virtual Fields moving, it just can not!!...as Dr Holcombs calls this..."Rotor with Not Reverse Torque".


Cheers


Ufopolitics

[blackchisel97]

Hi Ufo,

It's been a long time, but It is good to see you again after 10 yrs. I left you PM but you're likely very busy.

I've been thinking, would CD4017 counter/divider coupled with Mosfets work for you? It divides the input (signal generator) by 10 and you could cascade two (or more) together for 16 sequential outputs.
I've been using these Johnson dividers in simplified version of Tesla Switch and they work great, not to mention subtle power draw, when compared to mechanical switching.
Just an idea.

Cheers
V

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

It's been a long time, but It is good to see you again after 10 yrs. I left you PM but you're likely very busy.

I've been thinking, would CD4017 counter/divider coupled with Mosfets work for you? It divides the input (signal generator) by 10 and you could cascade two (or more) together for 16 sequential outputs.
I've been using these Johnson dividers in simplified version of Tesla Switch and they work great, not to mention subtle power draw, when compared to mechanical switching.
Just an idea.

Cheers
V

Hello old friend!!

Sorry I missed your message...

Yes, definitively interested on a better switching system!!!

Basically I have learned a lot over the few weeks...mistakes I was making when building this setup...but there is always time to correct them...now better that all knowledge is there to be shared!!

Warm regards Blackchisel!!


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Hi Ufo,
interesting wiring diagram that Fig. 22. Did you notice that the + & - from each channel is shorted where connected to the circular conductors?
bi

[Ufopolitics]

Yes, I did notice that...a typo?...or a grapho?
Patents are never "perfect", probably the graphic designer don't know jack sh*t from circuits...guessing

[blackchisel97]

Hello old friend!!

Sorry I missed your message...

Yes, definitively interested on a better switching system!!!

Basically I have learned a lot over the few weeks...mistakes I was making when building this setup...but there is always time to correct them...now better that all knowledge is there to be shared!!

Warm regards Blackchisel!!


Ufopolitics

Let me know what you'd like to have when comes to switching and I'll try to come up with something. Programmable chips could be utilized but coding them isn't my field of expertise.

BTW, I admire your mechanical switch. Real beauty!

All the best

V