A Valuable Lesson? Debunking a non-"free energy" device with engineering

[bistander]

Ok

I gave reference to a patent on how to document new and useful. The intention of educating in case someone does need to introduce
something strange. (short answer: not much merit without documentation)

We say "replace with standard component"
this is an electrical engineer colloquial regarding his procedure.
I am also being sarcastic in saying that is an appropriate replacement.

Conflict of interest is insertion loss impedance again not an appropriate
replacement because the equivalence in no way is close.

What else could Jones do ? I feel his rant but out there somewhere
is someone with a need to show merit. So data sheet and document.

Thanks for the reply. I just do not see how the substitute inductor is not equivalent to a very high degree and how a minor difference in the impedance of the two inductors would invalidate the demonstration. To each his own opinion.

bi

[mikrovolt]

That t-shirt is awesome

What does negative feedback do in an amplifier or oscillator circuit? What is its benefit?

In contrast, what does positive feedback do?

I think the principle works just as well in the circuit as it does as an analogy in conversation and evaluation.

--

90% of the fake videos on youtube didn't get in the way of your finding useful information?

Sorry for the delay. In my own words. In semiconductor solid state electronics is a term "the feedback in an oscillator." If we are talking about the same thing, Also for anyone following this. Feedback is taking a sample from the output and sending it back to the input which is usually the base of the transistor with the intention of maintaining a stable fundamental sine wave capable of significant amplification.

Reference to the Barkhausen criteria.
oscillators-Barkhausen criterion - ECE Tutorials

I prefer using a signal generator followed by an amplifier
such as :
1 Watt Universal RF Amplifier

Small signal generators used in experiments can be clean
and powerful enough that test results can be subjectively improved.
Stability is beneficial. Imagine channel 1 being send and channel 2 being receive.
I don't worry about phase on channel 2 in an open system.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdylKN4bK4M

Arbitrary pulse is a separate subject. That is related to improving trouble shooting
methods signal injection and coupling match. The analog helps in developing a dedicated TMT.
Receiver side is first conversion safe then transmission worthy. For this reason
I suggest a 1 watt level is sufficient and may avoid hazards yet forgiving enough allow for
matching errors and insertion loss from modifications.

Keeping the receiver from not sending is better.
It is the communication interception that is the problem.

[mikrovolt]

Sometimes valuable lessons, sometimes progress.
Being well informed about what developers are doing has
helped to apply pressure by being involved in the awareness
of what industry is doing in alt energy, also what other
experimenters are coming up with.

People want faster charge times and life expectancy for lead acid batteries.
Looks like a safety pause may take time, wait and see.
https://youtu.be/ZMmi8mIy4NQ

On lithium cells UC San Diego physicist and Argonne labs found that
xraying cathode material after fast charge revealed cracks. This raised
the question about the material. It turns out that it was the
structure or ordering of the material at the atomic level.

https://www.energyharvestingjournal....tery-materials