Sagnac Effect

[vidbid]

The Sagnac Effect - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk0RvzaHq_Q

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk0RvzaHq_Q[/VIDEO]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk0RvzaHq_Q

Proof of the Aether

[mikrovolt]

Raising questions has also got some to think.

If there is no Ether how can we talk about light being a wave?

https://www.physicsforums.com/thread...-a-wave.15764/

Should the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics be questioned ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIyTZDHuarQ

Earlier Tesla suggested that William Crookes "Radiant Matter" showed
that Crookes came closest to understanding. After Given credit for fundimentals of
atomic theory what happened ? Did chemist carry on by shelving equipment necessary
for understanding. There are so many different waves that interact with Aether.

Sagnac addresses none of the waves that are really relevant.
Many cannot understand importance of preserving our past accurately.
They have been running ahead without a basic skill set.

The Turn Of The Century Electrotherapy Museum Tesla Library

[Duncan]

for your consideration --

Charles (Joe) Flynn -- Parallel Path Technology

[vidbid]

The true implication is the earth is flat (and it's also square.)

https://www.youtube.com/user/freeanergy

[lotec]

I stopped clinging too tightly to views, when the universe stopped having the decency to conform to them.

I like it when people challenge the common views. Earth is flat, Earth is a ball, the earth revolves around the sun, the cosmos revolves around the earth, but now not only is it flat, it is square ? Some people might say you've reached too far this time, but I think we've only just scratched the surface.

How about we backtrack a bit. Does the earth rotate fast enough to act like a centrifuge? A quote from stack.

..........

"The force that acts on an object in a centrifuge is called the centripetal force, and more specifically it is the centripetal force for uniform circular motion. It's usually more convenient to work with the force per unit mass, which we call the centripetal acceleration, and as the Wikipedia article explains, this is given by:

a=ω2r (1)

where r
is the distance to the centre and ω

is the rotation speed, or more precisely the angular velocity of the rotation.

In your question you specify that the rotation speed is constant, i.e. ω
is constant. In that case equation (1) tells you how
the centripetal acceleration a changes with the radial distance from the centre r. The force on an object of mass m is then simply F=ma."
............



Here the enquirer attempts to paraphrase to see if he has the jist of things and isnt corrected.

.........
"I took it that the heavier the object is and the bigger the radius, then at the same number of revolutions it is pressed harder against the outer wall of the centrafuge. "
.........

Without knowing the right unit of measurement to plug into the contstants its hard to do the actual math. Althought the revs are very slow at one per day, the radius is very big. Gee I wish Feynman was still around, he made stuff sound so believable.


Feynman "Not how clever we were to have found it out, but how clever she was to pay attention to it."

[vidbid]

Michelson-Morley & Sagnac

GEOCENTRISM-Sagnac's experiment - an animated explanation - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWmlimH7laY

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWmlimH7laY[/VIDEO]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWmlimH7laY

Michelson-Morley proves the earth is stationary.

Sagnac proves Aether exists.

It's that simple.

[vidbid]

The earth is flat - a simple proof - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQRp9KAOBHA

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQRp9KAOBHA[/VIDEO]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQRp9KAOBHA

The earth is not a globe.

[vidbid]

Cyclical Linear Space



We live in a Pacman-type of reality: Cyclical linear space.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cw6uiKDE48A

[vidbid]

UTM map



Original image link: http://www.rambler-info.org.uk/gps/utm_zones.jpg

Hidden in plain sight.

[vidbid]

Barrow to Longyearbyen





Interesting.

So, exactly how far is Barrow from Longyearbyen?