Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Zero Force Motor Project

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    I am not aware of any material which can reflect magnetic lines of force or B-field. Also, the iron shielding cup shown in your diagram will shunt the magnet reducing or possibly eliminating the external field, ie render the magnet ineffective.

    It might look more like this. Notice the shielding cups or sleeves along
    the bottom of the magnets used to reflect stray fields back toward
    the work or shall I say this method will intensify the field on the opposite
    end much like the magnet on your speakers.Yes it works.

    Here is an advanced builder. His name is Thane Heins and even tho this
    is not a photo of a ZFM the rotor design could be used. it also helps to
    hold the magnets more securely raising the level of safety.





    -----------------------------------------------------------






    ------------------------------------------------------------

    Comment


    • #62
      zero force and misc

      Originally posted by Matthew Jones View Post
      John was the one that told us that originally in the Bedini Monopole 2 group when he first showed that video of the motor with the iron pipe. Maybe 05, 06 time frame. Those groups have long since been shut down. But I remember it well because that was one of the few times I ever got straight answer out of him. He said there is no force exerted on the magnet, the magnet rides the flux lines on the side of the coil. He talked about the switching a little bit, switching direction at the center, then he never talked about the thing again until he started showing the printed models.

      Matt
      You're right about that, it rides the flux lines and the no force in this context is that it is not pushed or pulled in opposition or attraction at the end of the core like the SG or other common arrangements. But, it also may follow the "true" magnetic field.

      There is a difference between the lines of flux and the true magnetic field of the coils and they both have different relationships with the coil and different interactions with the permanent magnet on the rotor.

      One does not interact with the Bloch Wall and one does, hence the clover leaf pattern John has drawn for years.

      There are supposed to be possible gains with this motor and that isn't supposed to come from lines of flux that do not interact with the Bloch Wall.

      I also think it is important to study the original 2 pole version with a single north and single south. Their relationship with the coils is different from the 2 coil 4 pole version. To be more analogous to the original 2 pole version, it would have to be 4 poles with 4 coils. Then, we would be comparing apples and oranges.
      Sincerely,
      Aaron Murakami

      Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
      Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
      RPX & MWO http://vril.io

      Comment


      • #63
        zfm

        Originally posted by BroMikey View Post

        It might look more like this. Notice the shielding cups or sleeves along
        the bottom of the magnets used to reflect stray fields back toward
        the work or shall I say this method will intensify the field on the opposite
        end much like the magnet on your speakers.Yes it works.

        Here is an advanced builder. His name is Thane Heins and even tho this
        is not a photo of a ZFM the rotor design could be used. it also helps to
        hold the magnets more securely raising the level of safety.





        -----------------------------------------------------------






        ------------------------------------------------------------
        Thane Heins was shown to have measurement error by someone I know who is beyond competent in analyzing his machines, but Thane just won't accept the results.

        I don't believe there is anything in his work that can contribute to the ZFM project.
        Sincerely,
        Aaron Murakami

        Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
        Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
        RPX & MWO http://vril.io

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Aaron View Post
          Thane Heins was shown to have measurement error by someone I know who is beyond competent in analyzing his machines, but Thane just won't accept the results.

          I don't believe there is anything in his work that can contribute to the ZFM project.
          Hi Aaron
          It does seem to be the case that Thane excepts no outside input
          on his designs probably due to the constant battering over the years.
          Not by you or other good designers have done those things but others
          have, messengers who have an intent. The gov spends lots of money
          hiring people sent to drive a wedge so continuity is lost. One way or
          another division will stop projects from moving forward.

          These are the alphabetized agencies those lists are long. Thane is a
          wonderful soul, just like you are Aaron and Matthew, Dave, Peter, John.

          The experiment is all we have to follow, this is all Thane has to go on
          and his personality is gentle. He can't take it so to speak. Not tough at
          all. However Thane is a great man who is threading on thin ice as he
          looks for funding.



          Another group to follow are the wind turbine builders, they use laminates
          and practical designs that will hold up in the rain or high humidity.

          I have tried cutting block board, I have a piece that after a couple of
          years has turned to dust. Hardwood is fine at SG speeds, not at 10,000
          RPM's especially if the rotor is 1" in dia. The stress at these speeds could
          be life threatening so these mechanical designs are more about safety
          rather than promoting one man's personal agenda.

          Last edited by BroMikey; 10-18-2017, 07:30 PM.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Turion
            I have published this before, but here is a crappy drawing.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyoxymethylene
            I use Delrin

            Holes on both sides of rotor, opposite each other. Magnets attracted to each other through thin layer of plastic. Also epoxied in place.

            The BEST drawing, the magnets are also epoxied in place, but if you think THOSE magnets are going to come out, even when you want them to, you are WRONG!!
            Oh yeah i almost forgot that design, gonna post a dia when I get time.
            That's so i don't keep forgetting.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Turion
              I have published this before, but here is a crappy drawing.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyoxymethylene
              I use Delrin

              Holes on both sides of rotor, opposite each other. Magnets attracted to each other through thin layer of plastic. Also epoxied in place.

              The BEST drawing, the magnets are also epoxied in place, but if you think THOSE magnets are going to come out, even when you want them to, you are WRONG!!
              is that how your ZFM is now? No shielding?


              http://www.ebay.com/itm/DELRIN-PLASTIC-SHEET-1-2-THICK-12-X-12-/332155273889?hash=item4d55ff42a1:g:zBYAAOSw4CFYyV~ q:sc:USPSPriority!66006!US!-1





              http://www.ebay.com/itm/Delrin-Sheet-White-750-Thick-x-12-Width-x-12-Length-1532-/121716367649?hash=item1c56dc6121:g:QKAAAOSw-3FZE~UE



              http://www.ebay.com/itm/Delrin-Acetal-Plastic-Sheet-1-x-12-x-12-White-Color-/142529600781?hash=item212f6d1d0d:g:HRkAAOSwG-1WxUxL



              --------------------------------------------------------------
              Last edited by BroMikey; 10-15-2017, 11:11 PM.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Turion
                I don't have shielding on mine. But that's me. I m seeing what I need to see out of the machine without shielding which just weights down the rotors.

                EDIT:
                I use Delrin 9/16 thick. Magnets are 1/4 thick. Space between magnets is 1/32 thick. This allows epoxy 1/64" of space between magnets and rotor without the surface of the magnet extending beyond the surface of the rotor. It also means that 1/64" of epoxy + 1/32" space + 1/64" epoxy totals 1/16 of solid mass between magnets once epoxy has dried.
                Sweet rotor design guy, thank you Turion-Man

                Comment


                • #68
                  https://hackaday.com/2016/03/03/materials-to-know-acetal-and-delrin/

                  What is a good solvent to use as epoxy on this stuff? Most plastics
                  can not be glued.



                  Delrin

                  Delrin, Acetal, and its many trade names is a material properly known
                  as Polyoxymethylene or POM. It is one of the strongest plastics and is
                  a good go-to material when you want the best properties of plastic,
                  and don’t need the full strength of a metal part. It was originally
                  formulated to compete with Zinc and Aluminum castings after all.

                  I won’t go too deep into the numbers behind POM. If you need the
                  Young’s Modulus, you probably don’t need this guide. This is intended
                  to be more of a guide to its general properties. When you’re looking
                  for something to fit an application it is usually easier to shift through
                  the surface properties to select a few candidates, and then break
                  the calculator out later to make sure it will work if you’re uncertain
                  about the factor of safety.

                  The most popular property of POM is its ease of machining. While
                  doing this research every single site I came across referred to it as
                  the most machinable plastic. That’s about as objective as subjective
                  praise can get. It doesn’t tend to grab tools like, for example, HDPE.
                  It also chips nicely unlike UHMW and Nylon. Some plastics, like UHMW,
                  have the unfortunate tendency to render the dials on a mill or
                  lathe meaningless as the plastic deflects away from the tool.
                  POM does not do this as much. Of course these other plastics
                  have their strengths as well, but if any plastic will do, and you’re
                  machining, POM is a very good choice.

                  POM also laser cuts extremely well. We have a two part series all a
                  bout it. Part 1: Drawbacks of Lased Delrin and How to Slip Around
                  them. Part 2: How to Build Anything With Delrin and A Laser Cutter.

                  POM in many ways behaves like brass than compared to other plastics.
                  It’s naturally stronger and stiffer than other plastics. It has low
                  thermal expansion. It doesn’t absorb a lot of water, and therefore
                  stays dimensionally stable better than Nylon. POM is also very
                  hard and abrasion resistant. It doesn’t suffer from as much creep;
                  which is the tendency for a material to stay bent if left under a
                  stress for too long. You could make a plastic spring or compliant
                  mechanism and expect a useful service life, as long as the mechanism
                  rests in the sprung state.
                  Surprisingly, Delrin != Acetal

                  I once got in an argument with someone about whether or not
                  Delrin and Acetal were the same material. I thought they were
                  the same, I ended up being quite wrong. Acetal refers to the
                  pattern and shape of the molecule that makes up its building blocks.
                  Delrin, is an acetal homopolymer unless otherwise specified by Dupont.
                  When you buy acetal without a trade name attached, you are
                  usually purchasing acetal copolymer. These are the two most
                  common names for POM, but there are other formulations out
                  there under different branding and it will take some research to
                  figure out what you are buying.

                  There is a mechanical difference between homopolymer (Delrin)
                  and copolymer (Acetal). Delrin has a higher melting point, is a little s
                  tronger, and has a few other slightly more initially desirable
                  properties. The homopolymer is less uniform throughout its cross
                  section. In thicker sheets, blocks, or rods of homopolymer, there
                  will be little bubbles causing a less dense area which formed as
                  part of the manufacturing process in the center. If you are machining
                  a small hole through the center of an extruded rod of POM, the
                  copolymer may be a better choice in this case. The name brand
                  is usually more expensive. The copolymer is a little more elastic
                  as well, but if you’re pushing the plastic hard enough to see this
                  difference it may not be a good fit. It is possible that the
                  copolymer will have better stability over a longer service life.
                  Unless you are doing fancy stuff, just buy the cheapest, over
                  engineer it, and it probably won’t matter which one you choose.

                  Impervious to Common Solvents

                  POM is resistant to chemicals. It is generally unaffected by solvents,
                  fuels, etc. I couldn’t find a common lubricant that would damage it.
                  Here’s a really big and immensely useful list of things that will damage
                  it (and some other plastics). For example, chlorine is pretty bad for it.
                  It has stabilizers to help, but it isn’t impervious. So if you’re testing
                  your underwater ROV in a heavily chlorinated pool; your POM propeller
                  may suffer a failure after enough exposure. It has an excellent
                  resistance to beer, for what that’s worth.

                  One huge advantage to POM is its high lubricity. POM is often
                  mistakenly said to have self-lubricating properties. However, it
                  simply has a high abrasion resistance and a very low coefficient
                  of friction, making it appear to be self lubricating. POM can benefit
                  from correctly chosen lubricant. Properly lubricating a load bearing
                  POM part will lengthen its service life. A dry lubricant like Moly or
                  Graphite will work. Also a Teflon based grease such as Super Lube
                  is a good choice. You can also purchase it with exotic fillers like
                  Teflon or Moly, in which case it will be self-lubricating for a
                  much higher price.

                  My preferred place for purchasing POM is auction sites like eBay.
                  The prices are usually better if you’re willing to give up on
                  guaranteed accurate tolerances and formulations. However, if
                  I want to be sure about getting brand name plastic or a specific
                  formulation I’ll buy from a distributor to be sure of getting the
                  material I’m asking for.

                  Keep Away from Flame

                  One big downside to POM is flammability. POM is not-self
                  extinguishing. So once it starts burning it will continue to do so
                  until oxygen is taken away from it. The flame can be colorless and
                  with little smoke. A simple Class A extinguisher will put it out.
                  If your application could get uncomfortably on fire, choose a self
                  extinguishing plastic like PVC or ABS with a UL rated flame
                  retardant for your application range mixed in
                  (making it self-extinguishing). Even though POM is a good
                  dielectric, it is probably not a good choice for a lot of sparky
                  electrical applications.

                  Some glues claim to stick to acetal.

                  Another downside is a result of its upside. Due to its solvent
                  resistance and high lubricity you can pretty much give up on
                  adhering anything to it. Glue, Paint, Stickers, etc. All of them will
                  have a hard time sticking to POM. There are some glues that claim
                  to adhere to POM, such as Zap Poly-Zap. Even with these special
                  glues it is recommended to sand both surfaces before gluing and
                  to expect a weak bond. A silicone based adhesive has also been
                  mentioned to have similar success to specially formulated CA.
                  If you break your POM part or want to do a two part assembly i
                  t’s just not possible

                  If you need POM in a color other than black and natural, it has
                  been reported to dye well. Just like with nylon, any regular
                  technique for dying should work and give a good, if subdued,
                  color. However, if you are building something that is rated for
                  an engineering application it’s good to call the material supplier
                  to see if they have a color solution. Some dyes may have
                  adverse effects over time on the performance of the plastic.

                  I’ve used POM in projects and always found it to be a dream to
                  work with. It’s one of my favorite materials. When I’m in doubt
                  and need to try out an idea I like to reach for it, and it’s cheap
                  enough to keep a small stock. If you have useful information, an
                  error to point out, or anecdotes to add please do so. I’m excited
                  to learn more.
                  Last edited by BroMikey; 10-18-2017, 01:55 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    http://www.permabond.com/materials_bonded/how-to-bond-acetal/

                    How to Bond Acetal? Achieve success bonding Acetal

                    What is Acetal (POM – Polyoxymethylene)? Acetal is a popular
                    thermoplastic, therefore its use spans a number of industries.
                    Generally, acetal has a high surface slip lubricity which can make i
                    t difficult to bond acetal. This plastic is fairly low cost and has
                    good structural properties, consequently, it is often used instead
                    of metal. POM is very high strength, with good impact resistance,
                    low rate of water absorption, good chemical resistance (even
                    against solvents), high dielectric strength and good flame resistance.
                    How to Bond Acetal?

                    Permabond polyolefin primer used in conjunction with cyanoacrylate
                    adhesives offer the best strength.

                    Due to the high-temperature resistance of acetal, epoxies such as
                    Permabond ES5748 can be considered. To bond acetal, cure the
                    ES5748 at the low-temperature end of the cure schedule.

                    Another option is 2 part polyurethanes. Two-component polyurethanes
                    offer some degree of adhesion to acetal so they may be considered
                    for limited stress joints or potting.

                    To determine the best specific adhesive to bond acetal in your
                    application, please provide some detail to our technical team and
                    we will get back to you with a recommendation.

                    Or the following charts might help choose the best type of product.
                    Does your application require solvent or temperature resistance?
                    solvent-acetal

                    Acetal Bonding – solvent resistance
                    temp-resist-acetal
                    Acetal Bonding – Temperature Resistance

                    Note: Products can withstand higher temperatures for brief periods
                    providing the joint is not unduly stressed.
                    Tips for surface preparation:

                    1. Grit blast, wire wool, red Scotch-Brite or grit paper or emery cloth
                    can be used to help provide better adhesive keying.
                    2. Solvent wipe with Isopropanol or Permabond Cleaner A.
                    3. Permabond POP Primer in a combination with Permabond
                    cyanoacrylate adhesive have shown the best bonding results on
                    acetal.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Some what like a Zero Force Motor setup, the idea is not new.

                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfgzfl69Q20


                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Zfm

                        Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
                        Some what like a Zero Force Motor setup, the idea is not new.
                        That geometry is more similar to Babcock's motor.

                        John was building his first ZFMs in the 1970's - it most certainly wasn't new to John - nor did anyone say it was new.
                        Sincerely,
                        Aaron Murakami

                        Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                        Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                        RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Aaron View Post
                          That geometry is more similar to Babcock's motor.

                          John was building his first ZFMs in the 1970's - it most certainly wasn't new to John - nor did anyone say it was new.
                          Okay, I am just coming around to understand part. The thing that
                          sticks out is that the coils bypass the right hand rule? The coils are
                          not 90 degrees to the magnet. That is why they all look the same
                          to me. Some used air cores and some not.

                          If there are any other significant differences, help me out.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X