Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wireless and single wire electrical system

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Tesla was received well in London and had gotten the attention of scientist in Europe so he wrote a book for them. It was and still is the corrupt faction
    that caused Tesla problems and used propaganda to squash his efforts.
    People follow blindly to that covert faction.

    The book is found in pdf online.
    Experiments with alternate currents of high potential and high frequency.
    1905 McGraw Hill publishing

    The frequency was approximated by well calibrated comparison.
    The fundamental combined with known frequency standards adjusted direct read dial.
    to a slow beat his ear trained to recognize 2 cycles per second while looking at a clock.
    Tesla was an instrument builders. In the book you will see the emphasis on the effects
    and how to reproduce effects. He knew scientist did not need mathematics for understanding effects
    and reasoning on proportionality is much greater value in understanding electricity.
    Last edited by mikrovolt; 03-01-2018, 07:23 AM.

    Comment


    • #17
      @mikrovolt What do you mean by ''reasoning on proportionality''? Can you explain to me what that is?
      I always thought that mathematics is not that important to science, for one can be the greatest mathematician and still be insane. Proof? nowadays ''scientists''.

      Comment


      • #18
        Tesla was a great mathematician was interested in effects and many good math teachers include proportionality as a discipline for problem solving. The difference between synthetic geometry and analytical geometry is useful to understand space time or length and time proportionality. The great Dutch physicist, mathematician, astronomer and inventor Christiaan Huygens and other great men before him made use of proportionality to bring about concepts using observation for example:

        https://youtu.be/2QW_BlnGBlk?t=3510

        Follower, Sometimes we cannot to see the proportionality in architecture until someone points it out.
        #4 circles was more popular but Huygen was interested in #6 having importance but ignored by most.
        The video compares and contrasts the parabola to the catenary they point out a finite adjustment or narrow gap.

        https://youtu.be/EU4Fx5R0Ows?t=145

        Tesla project
        Possibly the end goal is a continuous constructive interference gain in current.
        There could be a relationship centered around the right parameters.
        Last edited by mikrovolt; 03-01-2018, 06:58 AM.

        Comment


        • #19
          Buddhafollower - If you have a spark-gap powered coil, you will still achieve a certain amount of neutral wire (ground) output, but it isn’t going to be precise and controllable. - With resonant coils with a very high Q factor (which is what you want) they have an extremely sharp resonant frequency. Thus you need and accurate method of controlling frequency to the primary tank circuit.

          There is the fabled Tesla “stinging charge” and it has always irritated me, that it hasn’t been reliably reproduced by anyone... - But if it were so able, I wonder just how much more dynamic and ground penetrating the Tesla coil apparatus would then become??


          Originally posted by dR-Green View Post
          Cute chickens by the way!
          "Doesn't matter how many times you kick the coyote in the head, it's still gonna eat chickens". - EPD

          Comment


          • #20
            Good day,
            I thank you for the great advices.
            I will build bigger transformers than those two. I will keep testing them and building until i will have the required informations.

            Thank you very much for your understanding.

            Comment

            Working...
            X