Can a Mag Amp Produce Unlimited Gain from 1 Micro VDC?

[Vinyasi]

Mixed agreements/disagreements, here...

the results on the simulators are only defined in the limit of the simulators itself. the effects are only up to what the programmer understand in the reality that he is trying to "copy". If he missed one thing, the result can be a total loop or infinity. I speak of one who does programming as well. and Infinity or Loop is the thing we avoid/eliminate as It will cause the program to "Hang"..

Regardless of any simulator's limitations, Paul Falstad's electronic simulator has taught me - by way of setting an example - about the basics of overunity theory which is readily available on the internet, such as the concepts of: discontinuity along a transmission line, phase conjugation, ...

Reflections of signals on conducting lines - Wikipedia
Reflection and transmission of waves
An Intuitive Explanation of Phase Conjugation

... and the exclusion from the Law of the Conservation of Energy occurring under one loop hole....

is.gd - Shortened URL
Conservation of energy - Wikipedia

... and the epitome of fruitful gain: Eric's recipe for the synthesis of electricity as noted below.

At least Paul's simulator does not implement a policy of suppressing surges early on in their development such as Micro Cap does, nor prevent any buildup of electrical potential such as LTSpice does with its error message: "Floating Node".

Paul did have one annoying policy which I removed from my mirror of his simulator, that of arbitrarily assigning a limit to the current of diodes and transistors stating in his program source code that they tend to give 'weird' results which I assume he meant anomalous overunity, but is otherwise pure theory as imperfect as that is. The user certainly has to use his or her imagination to make up the difference. Namely, any of my simulations cannot be treated as if they are schematics to build from. Instead, they have to be interpreted by people like yourself who know better.

It would be better to call a simulation of overunity an indication of an alternate line of reasoning the details of which (except in Eric's case) is missing from our collective awareness. Someday, when public/corporate policy stops competing against our pursuit of learning, we'll have simulators more similar to the perspective of a Dollard, Bedini, etc. Until then, I have to make do with what's available, push the limits of convention to initiate reasoning along new threads of thought and hope that I leave my world in better shape than I found it. Sometimes, this is not accomplished by taking the direct approach of being a do-gooder, but by taking the opposite approach by being - what society more often than not deems to call such people: the outlaw (think: "Outlaw Josie Wales") - or rabble rouser.

but not in real life experiments.. I've designed and built circuits that was supposed to have "Infinite" gains according to my understanding but did not.. simply because I have not understood the reality completely..
but I learned from that..
and this is what I'm telling now.. It will show a "gain" but will start to decline if you do not sustain it from some source..

Discontinuities along a transmission line, of a closed loop geometry, can result in a rampant escalation of power towards infinity - despite the initial fixed amount of energy - based on the complex interaction of reflected (conventional absorption and discharge) and transmitted (possibly skin effect) waves interacting with an extremely low-level capacitor, or pair of capacitors, of 1pF or less between two transformers.

http://is.gd/lmdmod

This delayed Lenz Effect, resulting from Wave Discontinuity occurring in a closed loop, prevents resolution of wave splitting ...

http://is.gd/phase_conjugate_waveform
https://cdn.instructables.com/FPH/PF...E.jpg?crop=3:2
( from: http://is.gd/makewaves )

... and increases frequency at the expense of amplitude. With the help of mechanical switching, surges can be maintained, indefinitely. It is these surges which will add to the depletion of amplitude thus insuring the continuation of magnification of power to any degree desirable.

This is why a lot of my simulations required the constant reminder of a surge generated by an ON/OFF switch or a toggle switch, similar in concept to the initial surge at the beginning of startup, to constantly sustain an upwards rise of absolute magnitude....

http://is.gd/freebatteryenergy
http://is.gd/battcharvp
http://is.gd/highfreq

These and other circuits of similar construction are all underneath the menubar entitled...

Vinyasi.Cts / Analog Auto-Switching

one thing that I'm sure based on my previous experiments.. all the "Potential" go down to the equilibrium of the system, the "Imbalance" will balance, the rate of which this "Potential" returns to equilibrium with regards to the time It took to equalize in seconds is called "Energy". EPD has been telling that right?.. it's not some primary thing..
remember?..

Dielectricity , Magnetism, Space & Time
Mass, Temperature, Space & Time

Magnetism surrounded by a changing electrostatic field.
The LMD module alters the dielectric line of force, tied at both ends to the dielectric of two capacitors, over time through which it passes one of each inductor per LMD module to give infinite build up of overall energy within its coils....

For example...

http://is.gd/infinite_watts
http://is.gd/infinitewatts

CMF files are simulated in...
https://sourceforge.net/projects/circuitmod/
...with Java installed on the computer...
http://java.com/

[ricards]

disagreement

This is old video but a bit related,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-B2Fwo_k9ss

those light bulb are wired the same as you have wired those inductors, I've figured I could go as much as power more and more light bulbs but it will get dimmer and dimmer as I add more, very simple because they are now wires in series, I tried to put inductors along the circuit and found that to be beneficial, put transformers and manage to light bulbs while having output...
then I got excited and tried to loop it back to the source to try to maintain the "Energy" while powering the load..
nothing can be further from the truth..
as soon as I rectify the output and dump it into the cap threw it back into the source, I've got reduced amp draw, when I try to switch the source it slowly dies.. ok that's that...

but what about the gain?.. well I have more light.. and an output while having light.. instead of just a single bright light.. a bit lousy reasoning but that is how I understood it, and I didn't bother to accurately measure..

going back to "infinite watts" circuit.. let say you manage to get a "gain" from that circuit.. the backemf / lenz law increased the current all throughout the circuit... EVEN AT THE PRIMARY COIL CONNECTED TO THE 60hz GRID.. now what would be the limit of the current?... I would say it will depend on that inductor with the "Infinity" symbol... since it has no load it serves as a ballast.. since all your transformers have lenz effect in them cancelling the magnetic fields and increasing the current..

phase conjugation do exist.. but still, your circuit (inductor-Cap-Inductor-Cap loop), connection is a series one... series circuits have same current flowing in it.. the current that will induce the 3rd stage and 4th,5th and so on will be the same as the current in the first stage (ideal components)... sad to say, but in reality there are still loses..

the circuit might say an infinite current will build-up at the last coil.. but that's just not happening. at least in my circuits. it could have been better If it were powering loads at each stage. instead of just running transformers only.. It could have atleast show some gain.. but currently no..

the theory is interesting but.
I think the simulator is not compliant to reality.

[Vinyasi]

So, there's no electrostatic lines of force passing through each transformer coil?

This is old video but a bit related,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-B2Fwo_k9ss

those light bulb are wired the same as you have wired those inductors, I've figured I could go as much as power more and more light bulbs but it will get dimmer and dimmer as I add more, very simple because they are now wires in series, I tried to put inductors along the circuit and found that to be beneficial, put transformers and manage to light bulbs while having output...
then I got excited and tried to loop it back to the source to try to maintain the "Energy" while powering the load..
nothing can be further from the truth..
as soon as I rectify the output and dump it into the cap threw it back into the source, I've got reduced amp draw, when I try to switch the source it slowly dies.. ok that's that...

but what about the gain?.. well I have more light.. and an output while having light.. instead of just a single bright light.. a bit lousy reasoning but that is how I understood it, and I didn't bother to accurately measure..

going back to "infinite watts" circuit.. let say you manage to get a "gain" from that circuit.. the backemf / lenz law increased the current all throughout the circuit... EVEN AT THE PRIMARY COIL CONNECTED TO THE 60hz GRID.. now what would be the limit of the current?... I would say it will depend on that inductor with the "Infinity" symbol... since it has no load it serves as a ballast.. since all your transformers have lenz effect in them cancelling the magnetic fields and increasing the current..

phase conjugation do exist.. but still, your circuit (inductor-Cap-Inductor-Cap loop), connection is a series one... series circuits have same current flowing in it.. the current that will induce the 3rd stage and 4th,5th and so on will be the same as the current in the first stage (ideal components)... sad to say, but in reality there are still loses..

the circuit might say an infinite current will build-up at the last coil.. but that's just not happening. at least in my circuits. it could have been better If it were powering loads at each stage. instead of just running transformers only.. It could have atleast show some gain.. but currently no..

the theory is interesting but.
I think the simulator is not compliant to reality.

Anatomy of a Surge in Slow Motion and the Synthesis of Electricity

[Vinyasi]

Current does not maintain itself along a series circuit as evidenced by Eric's video.

This is old video but a bit related,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-B2Fwo_k9ss

those light bulb are wired the same as you have wired those inductors, I've figured I could go as much as power more and more light bulbs but it will get dimmer and dimmer as I add more, ...

Obviously a TEM arrangement. Not the same as mine.

...very simple because they are now wires in series, I tried to put inductors along the circuit and found that to be beneficial, put transformers and manage to light bulbs while having output...
then I got excited and tried to loop it back to the source to try to maintain the "Energy" while powering the load..
nothing can be further from the truth..
as soon as I rectify the output and dump it into the cap threw it back into the source, I've got reduced amp draw, when I try to switch the source it slowly dies.. ok that's that...

but what about the gain?.. well I have more light.. and an output while having light.. instead of just a single bright light.. a bit lousy reasoning but that is how I understood it, and I didn't bother to accurately measure..

going back to "infinite watts" circuit.. let say you manage to get a "gain" from that circuit.. the backemf / lenz law increased the current all throughout the circuit... EVEN AT THE PRIMARY COIL CONNECTED TO THE 60hz GRID.. now what would be the limit of the current?... I would say it will depend on that inductor with the "Infinity" symbol... since it has no load it serves as a ballast.. since all your transformers have lenz effect in them cancelling the magnetic fields and increasing the current..

phase conjugation do exist.. but still, your circuit (inductor-Cap-Inductor-Cap loop), connection is a series one... series circuits have same current flowing in it.. the current that will induce the 3rd stage and 4th,5th and so on will be the same as the current in the first stage (ideal components)... sad to say, but in reality there are still loses..

Series circuits is not relevant. What's relevant is: "Does the circuit in question exhibit the predominant character of a TEM arrangement or an LMD? This will determine the outcome.

the circuit might say an infinite current will build-up at the last coil.. but that's just not happening. at least in my circuits. it could have been better If it were powering loads at each stage. instead of just running transformers only.. It could have atleast show some gain.. but currently no..

the theory is interesting but.
I think the simulator is not compliant to reality.

The simulation is compliant to Eric's demonstration caught on video tape by Peter....

Current does not maintain itself down the length of a TEM or an LMD as is demonstrated by Eric's heat measurements of the coils and capacitors in his experiment using his hands for sensors...
https://youtu.be/6BnCUBKgnnc?t=30m40s

That's the fact. Now for my speculation derived from Eric quoting Tesla's claim that Tesla achieved 50 times faster than the speed of light with his LMD experiments. I suspect this occurred when Tesla bounced an LMD wave off the moon. It's entire trip was much longer than that traveled by the LMD waves in Eric's experiment. Eric merely achieved one half pi times the speed of light: an acceleration of about 57% faster. Since I further speculate that LMD waves behave the opposite of TEM waves, then this explains how Tesla achieved such a miraculous feat. What is this difference between LMDs and TEMs?

LMDs speed up as they travel through a compressed medium or through a vacuum since both mediums offer LMDs the same characteristic behavior: they allow shock waves to travel through them and an LMD is a shock wave, not a ripple wave such as a TEM.

Of course, TEMs slow down as they travel through a lengthening of their medium of a conductive pathway.

The mystery of accelerating current is to first accelerate an LMD by reducing capacitance to ridiculous levels (in proportion to the level of inductance of an LMD's coils).

This reduction of capacitance will pragmatically require a greater distance for an LMD to travel through the dielectric of a capacitor relative to its surface area. This increased distance will accelerate an LMD.

Furthermore, Newton's Cradle is a mechanical analog to how longitudinal waves actively translate into transverse waves.

The stationary spheres in the center are passing longitudinal shock waves through them just as Tesla passed the same type of waves through bedrock emanating out of Wardenclyffe and also through the medium of empty space en route to the moon and back.

The moving spheres on either end are exhibiting transverse wave behavior in as much as they will be the cause of this toy slowing down and eventually coming to a complete stop due to thermodynamic losses.

The boundary between the moving spheres and the stationary spheres is analogous to the boundary between the dielectric and the conductive plates on either side of the dielectric material in a capacitor.

But for anyone who wants the complicated stuff, see pg. 9 and continuing of...
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_...geticForum.pdf

"...the smaller the space (the more counterspace) the more Dielectricity that can be stored..." - from pg. 14, ¶ 4.

Hence, the increase of space across the dielectric of a capacitor is also the decrease of counterspace and the acceleration of a longitudinal wave passing through it.

Since space is the inverse relation to counterspace, the more the space the less the counterspace and vice versa.

The less the counterspace, the less is the transit time for a longitudinal wave passing through both despite the increase of space.

Space and counterspace are directly proportional for the inductance of a coil (resistors, such as lamps, notwithstanding). This has the effect of increasing resistance and dissipation (as heat) for the transverse wave within a coil whose wire has been lengthened.

Space and counterspace are inversely proportional for the dielectric of a capacitor. This has the effect of decreasing transit time in counterspace and accelerating the rate of motion in space of a longitudinal wave when the span across the dielectric is increased.

Eric says it best...
https://is.gd/spacerel

PS--
https://youtu.be/cCJcU7INwnU?t=3h45m15s
http://is.gd/spacedisjunction

[ricards]

so If I use light bulbs instead of coils its considered transverse?..
If I use a battery dc source instead of ac source its considered transverse?..

As far as I know, when the capacitor is placed to isolate the source from the load/coil, it should be considered Longitudinal as the phase conjugate electricity is powering the load, as one plate of the capacitor becomes LESS negative, the other side tries to be MORE negative.. and vise versa.. I see it as a natural reaction to pressure (voltage) changes..

on TEM, LMD dispute.. in both our circuits, they both have transverse waves that radiates away due to conduction current, and Longitudinal waves that is happening in the capacitors or wherever there is a conductor-insulator-conductor arrangement and this is due to the electric potential build-up..

in a circuit..
whenever there is a CAPACITANCE there should exist a Longitudinal wave..
whenever there is a CONDUCTOR there should exist a Transverse wave..

I really see it as simple as that...

and why do you make it sound like conduction current is Transverse?..
that is like saying a water flowing in the pipe is transverse..

of all this what is the relevance of it to our discussion which is the "Unlimited Gain" ??..
I know it's relevant to transmission..

[Vinyasi]

Are the light bulbs in Parallel? Not in Series?

so If I use light bulbs instead of coils its considered transverse?..

those light bulb are wired the same as you have wired those inductors,

Obviously a TEM arrangement. Not the same as mine due to light bulbs are in the wrong place. They should be in parallel; not in series to be an LMD configuration. Only capacitors may be in series. Otherwise, it's a TEM arrangement.

...very simple because they are now wires in series

Besides, are resistive loads, ie lamps, equivalent to inductive loads, ie coils and transformers?

[ricards]

I should've drawn the circuit instead

Back_N_Forth_Circuit.PNG

vinyasi,

see diagram above, that is the basic concept of that circuit, It charges a capacitor through a load, and discharges the capacitor through a load as well..

when the switch flips at Pt. A current will flow that can be calculated using Load1+Load2 resistance and source voltage.. so does when the switch flips at Pt. B...
so is the circuit Transverse only?.. or Longitudinal Only?.. if so how?..

I have answered that both wave exist in the circuit and so does to yours. and I've explained how I perceived it..
I hope you could answer...

as to the series and parallel disagreement..
If you will look at it closely, when the switch flips at Pt B. not only everything is in SERIES LOOP connection, capacitors and Load/Inductor is also in parallel..
and this is why I'm saying your Inductors are in series.

that circuit in my video,.. It's main purpose was to show and prove the existence of that "Phase Conjugate" to MYSELF that I'm willing to share....
I'm not comparing Inductors to resistors, what I'm trying to say is, that current in your circuit will not go to "Infinity" as what you are claiming.
and please don't make it sound like I only tried with "lamps".. the build has terminals I can switch to Inductive loads whenever I wish.. (which I already did).. I even tried to use a short piece of wire.. to prove that what I'm saying that the circuit is in "SERIES LOOP" still a series connection that we can add all the resistance and determine the current flowing in it..

whatever it is that your seeing in the simulators are not what I'm seeing in real life circuits.. that is the fact.. proven by experiment.

I hope I have made myself clear to that.

[Vinyasi]

Since your circuit is both LMD and TEM ...

[ATTACH]20604[/ATTACH]

vinyasi,

see diagram above, that is the basic concept of that circuit, It charges a capacitor through a load, and discharges the capacitor through a load as well..

when the switch flips at Pt. A current will flow that can be calculated using Load1+Load2 resistance and source voltage.. so does when the switch flips at Pt. B...
so is the circuit Transverse only?.. or Longitudinal Only?.. if so how?..

Both. Transverse in the coils and Longitudinal in the caps. But which predominates? And which is the consequence...Decomposition or Synthesis?

I have answered that both wave exist in the circuit and so does to yours. and I've explained how I perceived it..
I hope you could answer...

as to the series and parallel disagreement..
If you will look at it closely, when the switch flips at Pt B. not only everything is in SERIES LOOP connection, capacitors and Load/Inductor is also in parallel..
and this is why I'm saying your Inductors are in series.

that circuit in my video,.. It's main purpose was to show and prove the existence of that "Phase Conjugate" to MYSELF that I'm willing to share....
I'm not comparing Inductors to resistors, what I'm trying to say is, that current in your circuit will not go to "Infinity" as what you are claiming.
and please don't make it sound like I only tried with "lamps".. the build has terminals I can switch to Inductive loads whenever I wish.. (which I already did).. I even tried to use a short piece of wire.. to prove that what I'm saying that the circuit is in "SERIES LOOP" still a series connection that we can add all the resistance and determine the current flowing in it..

whatever it is that your seeing in the simulators are not what I'm seeing in real life circuits.. that is the fact.. proven by experiment.

I hope I have made myself clear to that.

...then those factors are canceled. But another factor remains....

Do the capacitors accelerate current outside themselves in the rest of the circuit? Is the relationship between the capacitors and the inductors such that the inductors allow the capacitors to accelerate current in the inductors?

If the overall capacitance is high enough relative to the overall inductance, then nothing non-conventional will occur: electricity will decompose into its constituent parts of magnetism and electrostatic charge adding to thermodynamic losses, thus decelerating the circuit's current.

Yet, if the overall capacitance is low enough relative to the overall inductance, then electricity will synthesize from its component parts adding to its losses. And if it adds more than it loses, then overunity should manifest.

There are two quotes of Eric stating that mere coils and caps can synthesize electricity.

Here is one source...
last paragraph of page nine...
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Eric_Dollard_...geticForum.pdf

And somewhere in here is the other citation...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TttHkDRuyZw

The http:// is.gd/ acmotor simulation is not an LMD nor a TEM modular structure, yet the inclusion of the low level pair of caps alters the overall behavior since they are low enough in Farads to accelerate current against the resistance of the wire - especially the wire in the coils. And the coils lack sufficient resistance due to their moderately low level of inductance and thus fail to offer any significant resistance to the accelerative influence contributed by the caps.

The biggest problem in overunity is resistance in the wire: simple resistance and inductive resistance.

Eric mentions the ratio between the capacitance vs the inductance of a coil in this video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TttH....be&t=3h07m01s
...in which if those two factors are balanced in a solenoid, then you get a Monopolar Transformer.

It is this ratio that I seek by trial and error since I know no engineering and possess none of that skill. It's usually not precise in the simulator, but multiple windows of minimums vs maximums of the circuit's inductors and capacitors for overunity to occur.

Parallel vs Series is shorthand for indicating which of the two constituents of electricity predominates if we have a daisy chain of modules: a classic Eric Dollard analog computer. But it's not always so clear cut as your circuit and my http:// is.gd/ acmotor circuit demonstrate. Then we have to be more accurate in our appraisal of the situation by admitting that parallel vs series has nothing to do with it. It's the longitudinal vs transverse which counts and that's determined by both the arrangement of coils and caps in a circuit, but also by the overall values of their inductances and capacitances contributing to the circuit, because the question still remains: is current accelerating or decelerating in the wires and the coils? The current in the coils will only accelerate if the cap's longitudinal wave in the counterspace dimension gets small. When this happens in a cap, the opposite effect occurs in the space of a cap's dielectric material in which the space, or distance, increases. In other words, the dielectric along the line of transit gets longer separating the cap's conductive plates vs their square area shrinks by comparison. Since the longitudinal wave will have less distance to travel in its counterspatial medium of the dielectric of a capacitor, the spatial dimension to manufacture that dielectric will have to do the opposite: fabricate a thick layer of plastic or aluminum oxide embedded in a ceramic material to increase the spatial distance of the dielectric lines of force stretching between the cap's conductive plates even though in the reality of counterspace the opposite is happening: the counterspatial transit length of a longitudinal wave traveling through the dielectric material of a capacitor shrinks. Then Nature balances this by making it appear to our spatial reference that the longitudinal wave inside a cap's dielectric material has accelerated when in fact all the wave did was have less distance in its medium of counterspace to travel to get from one conductive plate on one side of a capacitor to the other plate on the other side.

But at the boundary between the dielectric material of a capacitor and each plate on either side, a transition occurs: the longitudinal wave traveling across a dielectric medium converts into a transverse wave at either plate of the capacitor imparting all of the longitudinal wave's acceleration or deceleration to the transverse conversion of itself. This conversion makes it possible for the capacitor to accelerate or decelerate the current immediately adjacent to either side of its two terminal connections of the surrounding circuit.

Thus, the magic happens (the magic being anomalous unconventional synthesis of electricity) inside the caps if it happens at all while we don't appreciate this until it appears in the coils and wires where we can measure it, because counterspatial behaviors cannot be measured, but they can be inferred with the help of a concise dose of Eric's theories.

As a postscript...
A dielectric medium in our reference of space can be either of two extremes: the extreme compression of bedrock which Tesla set his ground transmission at Wardenclyffe into or the complete void of empty space. Either way, a longitudinal wave traveling through either of these two spatial mediums will behave the same way.

A transverse wave will only occur if molecules (for instance) occur at just the right intervals of distance between each molecule for a domino effect to occur, namely: the longitudinal wave can no longer travel through this impure medium of interspersed obstructions without being forced into a conversion of itself into a transverse wave and thus lose all of its force in a very thermodynamically predictable fashion. Transmission through wet soil will do this.

These two options gives us two choices for a dielectric medium within a capacitor. It also gave Tesla an opportunity to conduct a longitudinal experiment exceeding the dielectric capacity of manmade capacitors by sending a longitudinal wave to the moon and back through the medium of empty space. This is where: "Energy from the Vacuum" gets its relevance. That large distance in space resulted in a ridiculously shrunken distance in its counterspatial counterpart which had the distinct advantage of accelerating that transmission to a factor of fifty times faster than the speed of light - much faster than Eric's Borderland experiment in which Eric merely exceeded the speed of light by a factor of 57%, or one half pi times the speed of light.

violation of speed limit of light
https://youtu.be/6BnCUBKgnnc?t=47m23s

[ricards]

agreement

I guess we have come to an agreement there..
yes both wave exist but IMO neither predominates. current traveling in wires generates transverse, and voltage build-up on caps, generates longitudinal,..

decomposition or synthesis?.. my current understanding of "energy" led me to think neither, for me energy is a rate of imbalance returning to equilibrium, which we can quantify referencing to the "ambient" or "ground" with regards to electricity..

another look at "current accelerating on low capacitance"..
I see it more as Its "Instantaneous" since its a "Reaction" on the other side of the capacitor... (newton's third law of motion).

IMO electricity is much more understood mechanically by grasping the "Aether" concept. electricity to me makes much more sense with it. rather than the "Vacuum".