If it's one thing I've learned from over a year and a half of simulations is to segregate the voltage source of a circuit from its current source to safeguard the former by draining only the latter.
I can't decide what thread to post this message under, so I've started this one instead. It concerns the use of an aerial -- not so much for its potential use as a voltage source, so much as -- for its use as a topload. But unlike the use of toploads on top of modern day Tesla coils acting as a voltage reference (not an aerial) for their circuits, my use -below- is as a current reference due to their immediate connection to a current coil of very low self-induction: just a few turns of stout wire (using a larger than normal AWG number). Any stray voltage picked up by its aerial -- although useful -- is not what would be its intended goal since there's only a stray amount of aerial voltage, anyway.
I have to thank someone, whose name -here- I can't remember, who alerted me to C. Earl Amman. For it is his use of a hollow (bronze) sphere as his pair of aerials that turned me on to the possibility of its use as an FCC-friendly method of shaping an aerial so as to hopefully eliminate any undue radio broadcast interference from any eager builds of budding enthusiasts hoping to amass enough energy in their "free energy" circuits to become a veritable broadcast station of static interference -- especially if these spheres are insulated only on their outer surface. I suspect that the focal point (of a hollow sphere acting as an aerial) will be at its center if its diameter is appropriately sized per its intended wavelength. I'd venture to guess that the curvature of the outer surface will scatter the direction and phase angle of any waves emanating outwardly sufficient to cross cancel each other and be left with no local interference of any noticeable degree? Perhaps....
Early on in the first video, below, I share an insight in which I have reason to believe (I forget what those reasons are; sorry) that it is not the magnetic field of a coil which is getting transferred through the magnetizable core of a transformer. Instead, it is a coil's electric field to which the transformer core is magnetically reacting at a 90 degree angle of reaction. So, it is the primary coil's electric field which transposes into a magnetic reaction within the transformer's core, and it is the secondary's electric field which absorbs the release of the transformer's magnetizable core.
https://vimeo.com/vinyasi/convertnewman
alternative...
https://youtu.be/HzHb5LFvqJM
errata...
https://youtu.be/pLinigAX2s0
alternative errata...
https://vimeo.com/vinyasi/newmanerrata
LTSpice simulations talked about in the videos, above...
http://vinyasi.info/circuitjs1/texts...erce-Arrow.zip
alternate download location for zip files...
https://archive.org/download/TeslasP...erce-arrow.zip
Source for my citation of Ossie Callanan suggesting the use of dead batteries for converting reactive power into usable power.....
http://vinyasi.info/circuitjs1/texts...20Callanan.pdf
I can't decide what thread to post this message under, so I've started this one instead. It concerns the use of an aerial -- not so much for its potential use as a voltage source, so much as -- for its use as a topload. But unlike the use of toploads on top of modern day Tesla coils acting as a voltage reference (not an aerial) for their circuits, my use -below- is as a current reference due to their immediate connection to a current coil of very low self-induction: just a few turns of stout wire (using a larger than normal AWG number). Any stray voltage picked up by its aerial -- although useful -- is not what would be its intended goal since there's only a stray amount of aerial voltage, anyway.
I have to thank someone, whose name -here- I can't remember, who alerted me to C. Earl Amman. For it is his use of a hollow (bronze) sphere as his pair of aerials that turned me on to the possibility of its use as an FCC-friendly method of shaping an aerial so as to hopefully eliminate any undue radio broadcast interference from any eager builds of budding enthusiasts hoping to amass enough energy in their "free energy" circuits to become a veritable broadcast station of static interference -- especially if these spheres are insulated only on their outer surface. I suspect that the focal point (of a hollow sphere acting as an aerial) will be at its center if its diameter is appropriately sized per its intended wavelength. I'd venture to guess that the curvature of the outer surface will scatter the direction and phase angle of any waves emanating outwardly sufficient to cross cancel each other and be left with no local interference of any noticeable degree? Perhaps....
Early on in the first video, below, I share an insight in which I have reason to believe (I forget what those reasons are; sorry) that it is not the magnetic field of a coil which is getting transferred through the magnetizable core of a transformer. Instead, it is a coil's electric field to which the transformer core is magnetically reacting at a 90 degree angle of reaction. So, it is the primary coil's electric field which transposes into a magnetic reaction within the transformer's core, and it is the secondary's electric field which absorbs the release of the transformer's magnetizable core.
https://vimeo.com/vinyasi/convertnewman
alternative...
https://youtu.be/HzHb5LFvqJM
errata...
https://youtu.be/pLinigAX2s0
alternative errata...
https://vimeo.com/vinyasi/newmanerrata
LTSpice simulations talked about in the videos, above...
http://vinyasi.info/circuitjs1/texts...erce-Arrow.zip
alternate download location for zip files...
https://archive.org/download/TeslasP...erce-arrow.zip
Source for my citation of Ossie Callanan suggesting the use of dead batteries for converting reactive power into usable power.....
http://vinyasi.info/circuitjs1/texts...20Callanan.pdf
Comment