Anti-gravity

[robur]

Note

I had idea before to glue graphite and lum powder in layers onto a test disk.
But not for mechanical experiment
For another.

I have neo magnets but they are without holes.
Only with holes have ferrite squares.

Have you considered that if your bolts that have magnets are made from steel or other metal that is magnetic - magnetized bolt heads distort field?

[robur]

SORRY

I got carried away with that PM and totally forgot to ask what is AEROGEL?

[spacecase0]

SORRY

I got carried away with that PM and totally forgot to ask what is AEROGEL?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerogel

[robur]

Aerogel Note

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerogel

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Super-Lig...1c4acd2c5794fc

This is most interesting. It has temperature range of max 650c.
Interesting if this can be covered in liquid metal that has melting point lower then 650c
Only the problem is as it is 99% air - would this air inside heat up and explode/expand from molten metal heat.

Thank you Spacecase0 for link.

I be back in some days after I have a think on reading Gambeir sent me so my next message be more constructive.

Good day All

[Gambeir]

First off let me clear this up because in discussing the Alexey I tried to show the believers in electrons that there is a conventional explanation for the behavior of at least my little toy design. I cannot say that Spintronics might also explain the Alexey but then that's not my fault is it?
http://www.energeticforum.com/317890-post14.html

The conventional explanation for the behavior of the tetrahedron can be explained using spintronic's/spinwave theory, or at least it appears to me it does, and that was why I posted it. So spintronic's plus the known behavior of mineral/materials reactions to a motonal magnetic field might also explain the Alexey.

I have little interest in explaining what anyone else should themselves be able to readily work out for themselves using present and conventional science thought (*not that I agree with it). All you have to do is read what today's existing conventional science says and figure it out yourself. If you believe in it then you should be telling me how it works instead of the other way round. I posted the information which I feel makes the connections to materials, motional magnetic fields, and the theory of electron orbits, and so that it could be assembled to complete a conventional understanding. I do not think it's correct because it isn't the full story and is almost certain to be founded upon flawed concepts probably intentionally invented in the first place.

I don't know that you can use that to understand the Alexey or even the ARV but you can use it to form some sort of understanding of how a tetrahedron /black triangle might work; notice I say might. It's not that the information is necessarily wrong but it clearly isn't all the information either and if people would only listen to Wheeler a little more that would become apparent.


Now about the toy.

I tried to take a video of the shuttle effect, but the odd thing is that holding the plate seems to assist the effect. Maybe it's because you're grounding to the earth and all the magnets I have are South Pole facing up. I have taken a couple pictures. All I have to do now is to figure out how to email them to myself. Not sure this phony phone for old people will do that so I might have to try digging out the cables to try a transfer to the computer from the phone. Right now I can't find a way to send them to my email address and I'm sure as hell never going to buy or own a smart phone.

Remember this little toy was created to test paper covered in lead from a pencil, which is graphite, and it did show that it does work to some degree. It's not a substitute for pyrolitic graphite but it is reactive to a magnetic field and that's all I set out to find in the beginning. However, I recommend using a pop/beer can for the V shape glide. Aluminum works as well or better and is far easier to construct and more durable.

The Guide tent can be made from ordinary paper or with graphite covered paper. Right now I'm using graphite covered paper with an aluminum V shaped tetrahedron. The graphite covered paper acts as a lubricant and assists the whole contraption.

Apply the other information known to material science plus half of the US GDP and my guess is that pretty soon you're talking a real space ship.
http://www.energeticforum.com/317890-post14.html

Now this whole post is not what I wanted to write> I should not have to hold the hands of people who call me a pile of crap saying I have no proofs when what I previously posted comes from the very sources they believe in: Namely conventionally socially approved science with PHD stamps applied. My point is you can explain some so called phenomena using socially approved science. I tried to do that already, which is something I shouldn't have to do, but I have and I guess that wasn't noticed or understood?

[Gambeir]

OK I deduced how this phone technology works so here's a couple images. The images aren't very big but hey it's a $30 dollar phone so you can't expect too much. Remember I'm not claiming anything other than that it appears to have some forward propulsive power. It's impossible to verify with this arrangement since you have to hold the plate on an angle to get some motion and by tapping on the plate or the back side edge of the plate. Screw around with this and I think you will see what I'm talking about.

It's a very slow motion forwards at times, look's fake when it happens and it's a very odd thing, like someone else was faking you out with a magnet underneath, and at other times it sort of putt-putt's along, again very oddly for an inch or two, but sometimes it also seems to suddenly go jetting down and off the end of the guide. Reminds me of a V1 flying bomb because of the guide tent. The first tetrahedron was all paper covered in lead from a pencil on both sides and then 2 sheets were glued together. After that it was cut and glued to form a completely enclosed #3D Tetrahedron. Early on I simply place the tetrahedron on top of double rows of button magnets, but this was unsatisfactory as there was obviously something going on but I needed a guide to keep it on track, and so I realized that I didn't need a complete #3D shape to experiment with and that a simple V shaped tetrahedron would work, and I figured that based on what spintronics said about electron orbital changes and what should happen to create a counter magnetic field according to Maxwell; so I wasn't completely involved in what some might call Voodoo Science as a theory of operation. Most all of the ideas that formed this little toy are founded upon solid accepted notions of how things work.

Again, I cannot stress this enough; this is not going to drive itself down a track without either applied power and or the application of improved materials or both: That's clearly outlined in the post I made on page one. I created this in order to explore the potential of graphite covered paper.
http://www.energeticforum.com/317890-post14.html

Spinwave Material on Maglev tech.
https://www.vasantcorporation.com/do...levitation.pdf

Paper guide tent & Aluminum tetrahedron


Graphite covered paper guide tent & Aluminum tetrahedron

[Gambeir]

OK, so now maybe we get moving with something more important while you dink around with junk science and it's claims of how things work.

This

is found here
https://www.inverse.com/article/2657...-ufo-sightings

While a High Def Image is here; Which you might seriously consider saving BTW.
https://fsmedia.imgix.net/ea/d4/8e/7...from-1958.jpeg

This may be the most informative UFO photo ever taken from what I have seen. It is super HD. It is clearly showing a phase shift and other artifacts as well.
I don't know where this came from. I used tin eye to reverse the search an it shows up in 2014 with the release of CIA Ufo documents. That's all I know, but
it would be hard to deny this is not a real image since it has a some highly visible fields which are clearly connected to EM phase shift.

[Gambeir]

So now look at the image and listen to Wheeler. See if you can connect up what you're looking at is the idea.

Spatial compression (propulsion transducer) drive: Polarized Time & Gyromagnetic precession

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LZHdawjCQw[/VIDEO]

[v71]

Utron uses mechanical rotation not for lifting, but for accumulating static charge, cone or pyramid doesn't make much mechanical difference, its a matte of capacitance, when the cones or pyramids pass trhough the big coils, they get energized and the current induced is accumulated in the center.
Its a form of lifter, but as long as the rotation goes, the charge in the center increases.

[Gambeir]

Utron uses mechanical rotation not for lifting, but for accumulating static charge, cone or pyramid doesn't make much mechanical difference, its a matter of capacitance, when the cones or pyramids pass trhough the big coils, they get energized and the current induced is accumulated in the center.
Its a form of lifter, but as long as the rotation goes, the charge in the center increases.

Well let's just say that yours is a conventional interpretation of how physical reality works because it is a validated fact that a pyramid shape produces an effect when moved through or exposed to a motional magnetic field. That much at least was proven by Joe Parr's work. So if you take that message, along with the observed levitation, then it is manifestly apparent that there are direct correlations between shape interactions with Universe.

I have not put any great study into understanding the Otis Carr OTC-X1 but it is my understanding that the ultron's were high speed rotational hollow half cones, which as you say accumulated a static charge, and that charge would then produce what; an electromagnetic field? So you see even if only take that much into account you're right back to Joe Parr, and so what you imagine is happening, because that's the conventional explanation everyone is educated to understand, but which also doesn't really hold up to tested known facts demonstrated by physical experiments by the late Joe Parr.

In my mind the way the Otis Carr OTC-X1 worked makes a fair amount of sense but it's not the sense of conventional theory. If counter-space is a hyper~velocity field of inertial energy, and made up from disassociated energies, then it is a dielectric field of energies and which can be collected (accumulated). So what is actually taking place is there is a building taking place which links the accumulators of the OTC-X1 with that hyper~velocity energy field of counter~space, and this is what I surmise Joe Parr talked about as a bubble of energy; of very powerful energies which destroyed his creations.

In other words, the accumulator builds a connection with hyper-space; which is where static originates as a dielectric energy field, and from static it's producing a bubble around itself that insulates it from the gravity induction process, and that is in reality a process which produces magnetism in matter. It is clearly doing this in my opinion because there is a direct connection between the shape of the accumulators, which are cones/pyramidial forms and their motional effects when placed in the path of a magnetic field, and where these shapes then both gather the dielectric field of static which mimic's that of counter~space, and or taps into counter-spatial energies because that's possible too, but which in either event results in recreating an artificial counter`spatial bubble around itself, and this is due, evidently, to an ability to create a means to spin counter-space into a bubble around the vehicle itself, and which is related to the relationships between a motional magnetic field and or that of a pyramidal/tetrahedronal shapes interactons with a motional magnetic field and or the motion of a specific shape over/across/through a magnetic field to interact with the hyper-velocity field of counter~space. This is what Joe Parr proved and which shows there is a probable relationship between shape formations and the induction of energies which in crystalline formations give rise to an inducted dielectric field. I surmise that these shapes are then cross correlated to this production of a capacitance because they are macro formations of crystalline forms found in forms of matter which produce dielectric energy fields such as those produced in quartz and also more effectively in man made materials such as aerogels.

I realize that is a mouthful and a half. I may see glaring errors after a few hours of sleep but right now it's the best I can do. Capacitance may or may not have a role in the creation of a protective bubble or shield but it seems certain that it would be a natural product of that creation. It is not a matter of capacitance. It is a matter of interdiction with the hyper-velocity energy field of dielectric counter~space because it is that field which gives rise to magnetism which is the de facto causation of gravity.

Finally, in conclusion, what this form of levitation seems to be about is how to spin up counter~space so as to form an insulating bubble around oneself such that there are no inertial dielectric hyper~velocity energies passing through yourself or anything else around you, and once this is achieved the effects of so-called gravity are nullified, along with possibly some others and which I have not given a great deal of thought too but should. Lastly, as an afterthought, I would point to the illustrations of the Vril Craft whose features are in keeping with these ideas and then there are the words of inventor John St. Clair who said that the shape of hyper-space is a pyramid/tetrahedron.




It's too bad that Cladestine Disclosure.com basically folded because they used to have the plans online for download.
I did find this on the net.
http://www.bluestarenterprise.com/wp...C-X1-plans.pdf

[aljhoa]

I realize that is a mouthful and a half. I may see glaring errors after a few hours of sleep but right now it's the best I can do. Capacitance may or may not have a role in the creation of a protective bubble or shield but it seems certain that it would be a natural product of that creation. It is not a matter of capacitance. It is a matter of interdiction with the hyper-velocity energy field of dielectric counter~space because it is that field which gives rise to magnetism which is the de facto causation of gravity.

The Solar System Is Not A Vortex, But It Might As Well Be




Al

[v71]

I have built a small otis carr disc in 2012 , the rotation hollow pyramids were made of alluminium, after the initial startup, the machine went into stationary speed, after 15 minutes , the central capacitor started to ozonize(sp??) the air surrounding to a considerable distance, electric devices like mobile phone started to behave erratically after 30 minutes a dark corona effetc started to appear in a 2.5 meter range, after 60 minutes , the machine was levitating like a baloon in water.
I concluded that the electric charge changes the grip of an object in to this reality moving in a lesser dense state where things are lighter and are easily movable with a gentle push
Mine are not conjecture, i always build before i make claims

[vidbid]

The Solar System Is Not A Vortex, But It Might As Well Be




Al

The solar system might as well be a vortex? How so?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWmlimH7laY


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-V8Ks_DMS8

[Gambeir]

I have built a small otis carr disc in 2012 , the rotation hollow pyramids were made of alluminium, after the initial startup, the machine went into stationary speed, after 15 minutes , the central capacitor started to ozonize(sp??) the air surrounding to a considerable distance, electric devices like mobile phone started to behave erratically after 30 minutes a dark corona effect started to appear in a 2.5 meter range, after 60 minutes , the machine was levitating like a balloon in water.

First let me make it clear that I am grateful for you injecting yourself into this thread. Whenever I am confronted with someone of your experience it forces a refinement and clarity to be developed in ones' own thinking. As I said previously, after a few hours sleep I see that I might have put things another way, but hopefully nothing too bombastic and offending was tossed in your direction.

My main point to you specifically was that the ultrons have a physical connection in shape and in material composition which is known to be associated with the dielectric field of counter~space. This is one reason that aluminum is commonly referred to as an AG metal; with AG standing for Anti~gravity. Whereas the pyramidal shape is proven to have direct cause and effect including levitation (*Joe Parr).

After this comes the rotational velocity of the quasi~pyramidal shapes, and after that comes the accumulation of static energy, after which comes the storage or capacitance. In thinking about this once more it would seem logical that capacitance has an apparent direct cross correlation to the dielectric energy field of counter~space and so perhaps then this is something somewhat balloon like in nature in that the stored energy (capacitance) behaves as a trapped counter~spatial field. So it is no wonder that capacitance is so connected to thought process in how gravity works, but which only comes into play once there is a rotational effect put upon that capacitance, and the reason for saying that is because if we assume that the dielectric storage of energies via a capacitance is in a way mimicking the surrounding dielectric counter~spatial field, then it follows that a rotation must therefore be effected in order to replicate the mechanism by which counter~space does itself produce a magnetic field, and as we know that incoherent magnetism exists in virtually all matter, even diamagnetics, it is this field of magnetic induction which we mistake for gravity. In other words, gravity is magnetism by shorthand, and what that does then is produce an independent gravitational induction in matter in the Otis Carr OTC-X1. Provided of course that these conditions are fulfilled and probably one or two more as well. Such conditions might then be seen by examples in the previous posts and in aljhoas post, because if what Wheeler is saying is correct, and it is, then movement through space is produced by altering the precessional movement. In a way this is akin to how a helicopter changes the precession of moment to alter the pitch angle of it's rotorblades.

Getting a little tired, might be some errors as a result, but hopefully the gist is carried forwards. So then this business about there becoming a dark corona effect (invisibility/cloaking/blurring; all typical UFO behavior) may be expected as a consequence of the production of an independent magnetic body. Wheeler has shown the black hole and it is clearly visible using a ferocell and once you gather an understanding of magnetism: I'll find the Wheeler video later or maybe someone else can post that one. At any rate, what you're saying validates what I would expect to see once everything is understood sufficiently enough and so it is not as mysterious as it once seemed.

I concluded that the electric charge changes the grip of an object in to this reality moving in a lesser dense state where things are lighter and are easily movable with a gentle push
Mine are not conjecture, i always build before i make claims

Hopefully what I've said gives you new directions to look at but essentially I would say that the OTC~X1 produces an independent gravitational mass, understanding naturally that gravity does not exist as it is not a field, whereas magnetism is a coherent condensation of the energies which surround us as the so~called counter-space which Tesla called radiant energy, which Nick Cook made famous as Zero Point, but which a previous generation knew as the ether or aether.

See, Einsteinian Physics destroyed this understanding with the help the accomplice Prussian based industrial educational system along with the immense help given by propagandizing of this perverted Juden Science~ laughing....sorry couldn't help but to inject ~ Germanic Ancestory and all: Damnit, where is my armband and Frankenstein Helmet when I really need them? As you might have guessed I've just been itching to inject that into conversation, partly because there's a certain truth to it, and partly because I find it sort of humorous. However I would be a liar if I told you I thought Einsteinian Physics was simply the product of Albert Einstein.

It is interesting that this manifestly criminally inspired science came about largely around a time where there's a direct connection to the persecution of people who conversely were attempting to further real knowledge via their vocal activities on this topic of the ether theory in Germany, while at the same time the Nazi's under Adolf Hitler began an active persecution of these people, and which can only be understood as an active program to suppress this understanding of how Universe actually works, but this was of course not unique to Nazi Germany and had been on~going almost from the turn of the century with the rise of mass media and the study of propaganda as a mind control system (* See for example; "Propagand" by Edward Bernay's). However, since it was the Prussian Army which made public education what it is today as an industrial complex for mind control, which was it's original intended purpose among other things, we all have but lost any concept of there ever being any other understanding of how the Universe works. Certainly that was true for my own self and which only changed as a result of working on this topic. Today Einsteinian Physics would be laughable if only people actually understood what gravity actually is and for that you have listen and read Ken Wheeler's works.

I've shilled loudly for the late Henry Steven's because I think no one more concisely and accurately, especially given the time of his writing of his book "Hitlers Flying Saucers," has more accurately given a sweeping overview of the idea of what the ether was considered to be prior to the last Global war. A brief of which can be read in this account.
http://www.free-energy-info.com/Stevens.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...ppeller_Device

This is of course only the tip of an iceberg because to actually understand what this means is to understand magnetism as a coherent redndering of counter~space and to do that one has to have some comprehension of what and how magnetism actually works.
https://www.amazon.com/Uncovering-Mi.../dp/B00NQS0DM8

3rd edition freely given by Ken Wheeler
https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small/page/n14

In conclusion, there is a certain gut level truth to your own inclinations about what the Otis Carr OTC-X1 does do. So it's not that you're wrong at all only that there's more afoot to this game.

[v71]

Let me clarify the concept of 'field', obviously its my opinion and in no way the definitive answer to this subject.
A field like described in conventional physics is a region of space interested by line of forces , the flux of these lines can be divergent or convergent calcualted respect a closed surface.
My experiments showed me that :
There is no field, only particle movement.
Magnetic 'field' is always present , it is composed of particles , the electrons moving force the magnetrons to swirls around , just like a paddle in the water, magnetrons always close the circuit generated by the electron movement, ( so no free energy motor, at least based on magnetics in my opinion ).
All matter is magnetized, because of electron spinning, an electron spinning and not moving does not causes magnetic field, an electron moving at constnat speed generates a static magnetic field, and electron accellerating causes a wave, we call electromagnetic. The electric and magnetic field can exist separated by electron mass, which apparently current electromagnetic propagation theory doesn not even consider. Gravitational field is orthogonal to electric and magnetic field, and is the variation of an electromagnetic pulse, a time derivatie of the Poyintg vector.