Anti-gravity

[vidbid]

Equivocation Fallacy

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmIqWT7qMj4[/VIDEO]

CRITICAL THINKING - Fallacies: Equivocation [HD] - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmIqWT7qMj4

Equivocation Fallacy

Cheers

.

[aljhoa]

"Dead-Weight Load" - The dead load includes loads that are relatively constant over time, including the weight of ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_load

"Compressible fluid", e.g. flatulence.
"Incompressible fluid", e.g. mercury with standard moisture content at STP

In most circumstances atmospheric pressure is closely approximated by
the hydrostatic pressure caused by the weight of air above the measurement point.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_pressure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressure#Fluid_pressure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydros...fluids_at_rest

Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God:
because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

IV = the New Testament implies the Earth is round.
DV = Quran states that Earth is flat.
CV = Bible states that Earth is flat and under a dome.

On the Earth of the New Testament,
An Atmospheric Pressure Next To Vacuum Without A Barrier Separating The Two Does Exists because,
vacuum doesn't suck and the atmosphere interacts with the "Ball" due to aether.

You just can't make up sh*t as you go, man!

NOTE that sealed aneroid [from Ancient Greek ἀ- (a-) + νηρός (nērós, “wet, damp”)] bellows
contain a compressible fluid calibrated to react an "incompressible" fluid column of 29.92 in Hg or about 10 m H2O @ Standard Temperature and Pressure.


VIDBID:

Is vertical deflection of bellows, shown above, of a barograph "measuring" a "Dead-Weight Load"?

Is a "Dead-Weight Load" exerting a "uniformly distributed load" on the walls of the above sealed bellows filled with a fluid?



Al

[vidbid]

Dead-Weight Load - The dead load includes loads that are relatively constant over time, including the weight of

That looks like an equivocation fallacy. Your using a term in one field which may or may not be used in another field, and which may or may not have the same meaning. In fact, it may have a different meaning if used in another field.

The term "dead-weigh load" is used in structural engineering.

The dead load includes loads that are relatively constant over time, including the weight of the structure itself, and immovable fixtures such as walls, plasterboard or carpet. The roof is also a dead load. Dead loads are also known as permanent or static loads. Building materials are not dead loads until constructed in permanent position.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_load

Barometers and Barographs are the purview of meteorology. Those devices measure barometric pressure. Is there any evidence for using the term "dead-weight load" in the field of meteorology?

If you have such evidence, please provide a citation for it, and please demonstrate it in action.

Otherwise, if you are unable to do so, it would appear that you are attempting to commit an equivocation fallacy in your argument.

The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument. Examples: I have the right to watch "The Real World."

Source: https://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/r...ivocation.html

.

Cheers

.

[vidbid]

Dead-Weight Load Equivocation Fallacy

Stop trying to conflate your flatulences by indiscriminately hodgepodging structural engineering terms for mechanisms, devices, concepts or ideas with meteorological terms for mechanisms, devices, concepts or ideas.

Stop trying to create an equivocation fallacy.

Dead loads are also known as permanent or static loads.1 The barometric pressure is not static. It varies. In fact, it varies all of the time.

Hence, that is why we need a barometer.

If barometric pressure was static, you wouldn't need a barometer or a barograph, would you?

No.

Of course, not.

.

Cheers

.

1.

The dead load includes loads that are relatively constant over time, including the weight of the structure itself, and immovable fixtures such as walls, plasterboard or carpet. The roof is also a dead load. Dead loads are also known as permanent or static loads. Building materials are not dead loads until constructed in permanent position.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_load

[vidbid]

Necessary Antecedent

Is there any evidence of gas pressure existing without the necessary antecedent of a container for the gas to press on?

.

Cheers

.

[aljhoa]

Is there any evidence of gas pressure existing without the necessary antecedent of a container for the gas to press on?

Scare quotes (also called shudder quotes,[1][2] sneer quotes,[3] and quibble marks) are quotation marks that a writer places around a word or
phrase to signal that they are using it in a non-standard, ironic, or otherwise special sense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes

"Dead-Weight Load" - The dead load includes loads that are relatively constant over time, including the weight of ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_load

"Compressible fluid", e.g. flatulence.
"Incompressible fluid", e.g. mercury with standard moisture content at STP

In most circumstances atmospheric pressure is closely approximated by
the hydrostatic pressure caused by the weight of air above the measurement point.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_pressure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressure#Fluid_pressure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydros...fluids_at_rest

Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God:
because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

IV = the New Testament implies the Earth is round.
DV = Quran states that Earth is flat.
CV = Bible states that Earth is flat and under a dome.

On the Earth of the New Testament,
An Atmospheric Pressure Next To Vacuum Without A Barrier Separating The Two Does Exists because,
vacuum doesn't suck and the atmosphere interacts with the "Ball" due to aether.

You just can't make up sh*t as you go, man!

NOTE that sealed aneroid [from Ancient Greek ἀ- (a-) + νηρός (nērós, “wet, damp”)] bellows
contain a compressible fluid calibrated to react an "incompressible" fluid column of 29.92 in Hg or about 10 m H2O @ Standard Temperature and Pressure.


VIDBID:

1. Is vertical deflection of bellows, shown above, of a barograph "measuring" a "Dead-Weight Load"?

2. Is a "Dead-Weight Load" exerting a "uniformly distributed load" on the walls of the above sealed bellows filled with a fluid?

3. The 14.7 lbs is a "dead weight" at sea level of: MERCURY in a 1x1-inch 29.92-inch long vertical tube and AIR in a 1x1 inch 30-mile long vertical tube.
What is the internal "uniformly distributed load" acting on the six walls of this 30-mile long 1x1-inch tube if placed horizontally, while both its ends were capped in vertical position trapping 14.7 lbs of air?



Al

[vidbid]

Scientific Evidence

Is there any evidence of gas pressure existing without the necessary antecedent of a container for the gas to press on?

Is there any evidence of gas pressure existing without the necessary antecedent of a container for the gas to press on?

So, far no one has presented any evidence of gas pressure existing without the necessary antecedent of a container for the gas to press on.

Scientific evidence is evidence which serves to either support or counter a scientific theory or hypothesis. Such evidence is expected to be empirical evidence and interpretation in accordance with scientific method. Standards for scientific evidence vary according to the field of inquiry, but the strength of scientific evidence is generally based on the results of statistical analysis and the strength of scientific controls.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence

Your belief, without the scientific method, is not evidence.

It's just an unsubstantiated claim.

.

Cheers

.

.

[Mr_Pither]

This WAS a good thread....

....until Vidbid douched it up.

Where's the ignore feature?

[vidbid]

Clarification Requested

1. Is vertical deflection of bellows, shown above, of a "measuring" a "Dead-Weight Load"?

Before I can answer your question, please remove the equivocation fallacy intrinsically built-in to your question. Also, please re-phrase the question without the use or misuse of scare quotes, shudder quotes, sneer quotes, or quibble marks.

2. Is a "Dead-Weight Load" exerting a "uniformly distributed load" on the walls of the above sealed bellows filled with a fluid?

Again, before I can answer your question, please remove the equivocation fallacy intrinsically built-in to your question. Also, please re-phrase the question without the use or misuse of scare quotes, shudder quotes, sneer quotes, or quibble marks.

The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument. Examples: I have the right to watch "The Real World." https://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/r...ivocation.html

Scare quotes (also called shudder quotes,[1][2] sneer quotes,[3] and quibble marks) are quotation marks that a writer places around a word or phrase to signal that they are using it in a non-standard, ironic, or otherwise special sense.[4] Scare quotes may indicate that the author is using someone else's term, similar to preceding a phrase with the expression "so-called";[5] they may imply skepticism or disagreement, belief that the words are misused, or that the writer intends a meaning opposite to the words enclosed in quotes.[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes

3. The 14.7 lbs is a "dead weight" at sea level of: MERCURY in a 1x1-inch 29.92-inch long vertical tube and AIR in a 1x1 inch 30-mile long vertical tube. What is the internal "uniformly distributed load" acting on the six walls of this 30-mile long 1x1-inch tube if placed horizontally, while both its ends were capped in vertical position trapping 14.7 lbs of air?

Do you have a particular 30-mile tall, vertical standing pipe in mind?

What is the name of it, and where is it located?

Unless you are referencing an actual and existing vertical structure that is also hinged to rotate to a horizontal position, then I believe you are committing a reification fallacy in your argument.

Reification (also known as concretism, hypostatization, or the fallacy of misplaced concreteness) is a fallacy of ambiguity, when an abstraction (abstract belief or hypothetical construct) is treated as if it were a concrete real event or physical entity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_(fallacy)

.

Cheers

.

[vidbid]

This WAS a good thread.. ..until Vidbid douched it up.

Actually, you just douched it up when you posted your douche comment.

Facepalm.

Where's the ignore feature?

Yeah, that works.

.

Bye!

.

[aljhoa]

So, far no one has presented any evidence of gas pressure existing without the necessary antecedent of a container for the gas to press on.

"thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace"



Al

[vidbid]

thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace

Likewise.

.

Cheers

.

[aljhoa]

"thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace"
Al

Notice that I have quoted the words of
the "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last"
and VIDBID has removed the quotation marks,
so what is he wishing for?

Answer:

Likewise.

Al

[vidbid]

“ ”

You can have these.

[aljhoa]

"On Bull**** is a 1986 essay, reprinted as a 2005 book, by philosopher Harry G. Frankfurt
which presents a theory of bull**** that defines the concept and analyzes the applications of bull**** in the context of communication.
Frankfurt determines that bull**** is speech intended to persuade without regard for truth.
The liar cares about the truth and attempts to hide it;
the bull****ter doesn't care if what they say is true or false,
but rather only cares whether their listener is persuaded."

"Alberto Brandolini, an Italian programmer, the bull**** asymmetry principle (also known as Brandolini's law[14][15]) states that:
The amount of energy needed to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."

Al