Transients are a Potentially Useful Source of Freely Available and Reusable Energy

[Vinyasi]

Free Crypto-Current, pt8 - Work!

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGQ_Ugcuxps&list=PLKsHv1AWvDXNyaNGlJvhQ_wc AdSVIkZQC&index=46&t=0s[/VIDEO]

[BroMikey]

I am not done yet watching all of the video footage (great mind)
but I want to say I enjoyed it all so far. Sounds like you are aware
of obvious past experimental data from Eric that I have never seen
covered. Until now.

Someone might give you $300 for the hell-of-it so you can see it run
well so we can all see it run.

Happy Sabbath

[BroMikey]

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGQ_Ugcuxps&list=PLKsHv1AWvDXNyaNGlJvhQ_wc AdSVIkZQC&index=46&t=0s[/VIDEO]

Forget the peanut gallery, they don't know their back from their front.
Talk more about the 7805 circuit and substitutions that lead back to
Eric D and Heavyside

[Vinyasi]

What is a 7805 circuit?

..... 7805 circuit and substitutions that lead back to
Eric D and Heavyside

Huh?

[Vinyasi]

Free Crypto-Current, pt8b - Work!

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TogTqfwF9ps&list=PLKsHv1AWvDXNyaNGlJvhQ_wc AdSVIkZQC&index=18&t=0s[/VIDEO]

[Vinyasi]

Free Crypto-Current, pt9 - capacitor stress

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzZ7-mRRnjo&list=PLKsHv1AWvDXNyaNGlJvhQ_wcAdSVIkZQC&ind ex=19&t=0s[/VIDEO]

[Vinyasi]

Free Crypto-Current, pt10 - early beginnings

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxVnO3TMYL4&list=PLKsHv1AWvDXNyaNGlJvhQ_wc AdSVIkZQC&index=20&t=0s[/VIDEO]

[Vinyasi]

Free Crypto-Current, pt11 - exploitation of cosmic resources

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X7oLz-pxbw&list=PLKsHv1AWvDXNyaNGlJvhQ_wcAdSVIkZQC&index =21&t=0s[/VIDEO]

https://www.facebook.com/vinyasi/posts/2892094424199361

[Vinyasi]

Why, or how is it, that my circuit splits an A/C wave into 180 degrees of separation?

Telegrapher's Equations

[VIDEO]https://youtu.be/sVBFdYgBre4?t=463[/VIDEO]

I learned about this while researching an answer to a question on Quora...

How much power is required by the motor to run the car (electric car) in watts?

[Vinyasi]

Free Energy is Easy to Understand and Demand from Commerce

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbaqX6M7psw[/VIDEO]

[Vinyasi]

BroMikey, this one's for you!

From where does black money come from?

mirrored copy at Scribd...
https://www.scribd.com/document/4234...oney-Come-From

mirrored copy at Archive...
https://archive.org/details/fromwher...kmoneycomefrom

[BroMikey]

From where does black money come from?

mirrored copy at Scribd...
https://www.scribd.com/document/4234...oney-Come-From

mirrored copy at Archive...
https://archive.org/details/fromwher...kmoneycomefrom

I will check this one, thanks for the read

[Vinyasi]

Here's another attempt at reaching out to our collective ignorance on this subject...

A different approach...

https://archive.org/details/istudyfreeenergy

mirrors...
https://www.scribd.com/document/4237...dy-Free-Energy

http://vinyasi.info/energy/I%20Study...e%20Energy.pdf

[Vinyasi]

What is Energy?

What is Energy?

Energy – all energy, does not exist as a singularity. Instead, it is a process whereby energy is taken apart, its amplitude is either increased or decreased, and then these ingredients of energy are put back together again. That's it; simple and elegantly charming.

The ingredients of energy are called: reactance, and putting energy back together is called: power factor correction. But, the taking of energy apart is not called “splitting the atom”. It is called: inverting voltage polarity out-of-phase with current by one-half cycle of 180° separation. And time dilation is merely shifting the phase of current relative to voltage, or vice versa, by simply inverting the polarity of either one, or the other, but not both. It is this time dilation which supersedes the Conservation of Energy. For, this Law is predicated upon a constancy of time.

All of these steps are effortless requiring as much energy as it takes to operate a crystal radio set from the early 1920s to early 1930s and far less than it takes to light an LED.

And all of this is possible due to the fact that the formative forces which comprise energy straddle both worlds: the world of change and the world of non-change.

Change is the consequence of non-changing, complimentary singularities coming together and interacting. Non-change is the field of timelessness wherein the formative forces of two complimentary reactances exist in time without any space. These two complimentary forces are called: capacitive and inductive reactance. Space, electricity, matter, gravity and its analogue of inertia – all of these are the consequences of the formative forces of energy uniting to create all of these correlative features to energy.

But when we look at these formative forces whenever they are not united, but existing separate from one another, then these features of a changing world – which we take for granted – are seen for what they are: illusory. For space and matter are the consequences of energy – not the other way around.

To reiterate...

Energy does not arise from a “void” unless we define this void to be timelessness devoid of space: the eternal now. Then, we could say it is a void. But the problem with the use of this term, void, is that if it cannot be seen, then how do you know it is there? Or, even know enough to inquire? This stance places (and subtly implies that) space, the non-void, is on a footing superior to void which is falsely derived from our experiential existence, aka. our five senses. Nothing could be further from the truth. For, time has always existed apart from, and independent of, space, while space is totally dependent upon time to have any meaning. Ergo, time is inclusive of space (as a consequence of time), yet space is a perspective which is clueless about time all by itself without any space to qualify it. Without space, time has no reference frame. Thus, it is timeless. But this does not mean that time, all by itself, does not or cannot exist. Our reactance formulae vindicate that not all of our science is predicated upon our direct experience. Nay... Some of our science has to be inferred.

Take the square root of negative one. No one has ever seen it, nor touched it, nor tasted it, nor heard it emit any sound. Yet, a mathematician several centuries ago had to fantasize its existence in order to solve certain problems in mathematics which could not be resolved any other way.

See the point? Even with the sciences, sometimes objectivity has to take a back seat to belief systems which, although they demonstrate their reliability time and time again, still remain belief systems. The fact that we upgrade these beliefs to the status of a Theory held in common among us all does not inject any proof of its existence. It still remains a theory, aka belief.

Religion is not far behind every theory. In other words, there may be no proof for a God or for my definition of energy, but does it hold up to experience despite our lack of direct perception with our five senses?

http://is.gd/reactivemotor

[BroMikey]

You got one runin? Is this a virtual motor model?
Do you run a simulator for your designs, hypothetically.

There is no doubt you are superman on technical terms.
I like to hear you rattle them off. I am sure you are working on it.