Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Quantum Key, 5th Edition by Aaron Murakami

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    The Quantum Key

    Rex,

    It is more of a simplified unified field model based on the aether with
    no math and common sense analogies. Was written more for the
    metahpysical minded person that doesn't have a technical background.

    A Course in Mind Power goes more into the spiritual side of things including
    showing how the mind is a non-equilibrium thermodynamic system and how
    it is another reflection of natural systems that operate just like the
    real free energy systems.

    Thanks for asking!
    Sincerely,
    Aaron Murakami

    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

    Comment


    • #47
      Hey Aaron,

      If you had a round, flat, piece of heavy lattice material, such as lead
      laying on the ground, would you have aether energy PROJECTING from
      around it upwards?

      Thanks

      Comment


      • #48
        gravity shield

        From the positive potential of the flux, I believe it would be pushing
        down on the lead with a certain amount being deflected over the edge
        and down instead of upwards. The positive potential is imparting a push
        on the mass of the lead.

        I have been told, but cannot confirm, but seems there may be some
        'gravity wells' which are like an upside down bowl made of dense materials
        with interesting properties that "shield" gravity - or more accurately,
        deflect the downward pushing potential around it so that inside of the well,
        gravity is negated or at least reduced.
        Sincerely,
        Aaron Murakami

        Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
        Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
        RPX & MWO http://vril.io

        Comment


        • #49
          Thanks for the reply Aaron,

          I wonder then, if we could set up these gravity wells or get in close proximity
          to the potential differences in the aether (flux?) created by the wells or heavy
          lattice material to capture it better in the Bedini circuit or something else not
          yet known? If what you say is true, then why not just put a piece of lead or
          one of these bowl shapes above a Bedini machine to create an aether vortex
          or GATE to collect from???? Maybe this could be proven by using a Gray tube
          to see if there would be more VISABLE radiant energy available??

          Thanks
          Last edited by Littleremnant; 02-25-2011, 05:26 PM.

          Comment


          • #50
            non linear field

            I don't know if that kind of gravity well even exists. That was told
            to me by someone I trust but I haven't seen it. It is more than
            just having a dense element - there was a mixture supposedly.

            But you can put a magnet on one side of the coil to offset the
            magnetic symmetry of the coil when it pulses off and on. I showed
            this long time ago but thought it was doing something else.
            I think Bedini described how a magnet can maybe offset the bloch
            wall for a more non linear field.
            Sincerely,
            Aaron Murakami

            Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
            Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
            RPX & MWO http://vril.io

            Comment


            • #51
              Hi Aaron, I think that in order to rule the etheric flow of polarizing must advance to the field in order to make it work in unison, which makes next experiment is to generate a rotating electromagnetic vortex...thanks
              must first understand the nature .... and then imitate

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by antigraviticsystems1 View Post
                Hi Aaron, I think that in order to rule the etheric flow of polarizing must advance to the field in order to make it work in unison, which makes next experiment is to generate a rotating electromagnetic vortex...thanks


                Uploaded with ImageShack.us

                Uploaded with ImageShack.us
                must first understand the nature .... and then imitate

                Comment


                • #53


                  Uploaded with ImageShack.us
                  must first understand the nature .... and then imitate

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Plasma Ignition

                    Last edited by Aaron; 12-22-2012, 08:51 PM.
                    Sincerely,
                    Aaron Murakami

                    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      The Quantum Key

                      Yesterday, 12/21/12, the 5th Edition of The Quantum Key launched.



                      Two new chapters added. One elaborates on the difference between
                      energy and potential since all the classical textbooks on this give
                      erroneous definitions. The other new chapter highlights a simple experiment
                      that demonstrates clear and simple violations of the 1st and 2nd "Laws"
                      of Thermodynamics. There are also violations of the 3rd Law of Motion
                      and the Law of Conservation of Momentum. There is no such thing as
                      conservation of momentum in a cyclic system that regauges itself.

                      The chapter on practical applications is revised with some of the
                      technologies removed and some added to reflect some of the more
                      recent developments.

                      The Quantum Key
                      Sincerely,
                      Aaron Murakami

                      Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                      Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                      RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Aaron View Post
                        Hi Everyone,

                        It describes in very simple explanations and diagrams what the virtual photon potential is, mass, intertia, why gravity is a push and not a pull and what causes the push, time and other related topics.
                        First Aaron thank you for your efforts regarding this forum, in helping to bring the 'fringe into the fold'

                        Secondly do you have a 'reader's digest' version of why gravity is a PUSH and not a PULL?



                        It is a topic I have discussed on another forum here:
                        Science-Based Discussion Is Gravity still a mystery? Do you support this proof of the Millennium? - Page 6
                        Unified Discussion The OX TOE - Page 8

                        cheers,

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by antigraviticsystems1 View Post


                          Uploaded with ImageShack.us
                          Your prototype looks similar to the one in the images I am offering below.
                          What I am putting on the table is a nearly perpetual motion machine,

                          i.e. a model of the 4.6+ billion year old SUN...

                          note that your model is 'symmetrical' but in the images we see below, there is clearly an asymmetry.




                          Very interesting book.
                          The Terracotta Warriors by Maurice Cotterell.

                          selah V
                          Last edited by Raphael37; 04-14-2013, 01:58 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            gravity is a push

                            Originally posted by Raphael37 View Post
                            First Aaron thank you for your efforts regarding this forum, in helping to bring the 'fringe into the fold'

                            Secondly do you have a 'reader's digest' version of why gravity is a PUSH and not a PULL?



                            It is a topic I have discussed on another forum here:
                            Science-Based Discussion Is Gravity still a mystery? Do you support this proof of the Millennium? - Page 6
                            Unified Discussion The OX TOE - Page 8

                            cheers,
                            Thanks, actually yes in several places throughout this forum over the years. Just search for my username and the right keywords - something will come up.
                            Sincerely,
                            Aaron Murakami

                            Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                            Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                            RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Aaron View Post
                              Elias,

                              I certainly believe the fundamental potentials involved in all of this are not only connected but are the same.

                              A lot of my understanding in the book comes from my learning and experiences working with some "free energy" technologies but it revealed to me a lot more than that.

                              The book is really for people on both sides of the equation... free energy "overunity" sciences as well as spiritual minded people and to those who are balanced in both.

                              There are some powerful distinctions that I point out that really shine some light on some "mysteries" of the universe.

                              One of the oldest concepts in philosophy/thinking/science, etc... is "Can a machine/system put out more energy that you have to put into it?" The answer is absolutely yes.

                              Anyone practicing the Laws of Attraction are going to draw to them more than they put out to the universe.

                              Anyone operating a machine with a COP over 1.0 is causing more work to be done than they had to pay for on the input.

                              How can this be possible and not violate the laws of physics?

                              Have more output implies that there is input into the system but it doesn't necessarily have to come from the operator...if it is an open system, it could come from any number of potential sources: consciousness/matrix, time, gravity, light, wind, water, vacuum potential, love, etc...

                              Equilibrium Thermodynamic vs non-Equilibrium Thermodynamic systems are only 1 distinction in the book written so that hopefully just about everyone can understand the difference and this is only one thing pointed out in the book.

                              Much of the book is inspired from what I learned by being friends with John Bedini for the last 7 years and Peter Lindemann for about the last few years and intensely studying Tom Bearden's writings in relation to vacuum energy potential... taking all of this and having my own intuition/logic/imagination meld them together into a model that links it all together.

                              Some is based on hardcore science and known accepted fact, some is hypothesis, some theory and some wild speculation but I think that anyone who reads it and sees how it all comes together will have to admit that it is a very interesting concept. I don't believe there is another book quite like it.

                              This is the first in a 3 part series that is my original intention. The Quantum Key is the foundation the other two build on. The next is more focused on the mind/thinking/consciousness/the thinking thing and the thinker/intention/synchronicity/a model of divination/etc... The third is more focused on the physical body. Both the second and third directly tie back to the first book as it is the foundation from what everything springs from in my opinion.
                              hi Aaron, nice meeting you here. i have my bedini sg replica well made and assembled but it seem not to work. the transistors get hot as i connect both terminals of the input battery(primary battery), my NE-2 bulb does not light-up but there is an induce current in the magnetic wires and the core materials(the iron welding rods). do help me out if there is something i did not do to get it started.
                              thanks

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                SG problems

                                Originally posted by aaksimms View Post
                                hi Aaron, nice meeting you here. i have my bedini sg replica well made and assembled but it seem not to work. the transistors get hot as i connect both terminals of the input battery(primary battery), my NE-2 bulb does not light-up but there is an induce current in the magnetic wires and the core materials(the iron welding rods). do help me out if there is something i did not do to get it started.
                                thanks
                                Hi, there are other threads for that but if you can post some pictures of your build with specs of your parts, how they're hooked together, etc... I'll see if I can find anything obvious.
                                Sincerely,
                                Aaron Murakami

                                Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                                Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                                RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X