How can you be sure of something you haven't test yourself?! :/
despite of all clains since years and very motivated replicators, nothing occurs to be replicate-able after the claims of the first one
For me, none of them has been able to prove honest results, I mean "infakable" devices and indisputable devices.
There are several ways we can get extra little bits of energy but one that is confirmed is inductive kickback in a coil. It can be collected and reused and it also adds to the motive force of a motor. This alone is two outputs for one input. The fan is weak on motive force so does not make best use of this.
You mean using spark-gapes or fast rotating switches to create very short on and off to create picks by coupling with coils or even capacitors?
is not the overunity itself but the overunity in what I call mono-energy kind, conversions-like from electromagnetic energy to electromagnetic energy, or gravity to mechanical power, or caloric to caloric
This does seem to be significant. When we get overunity it always seems to be associated with changing the form of energy from one type to another. When we want to get the same type of energy out as we put in, it is more difficult.
But "what"? the "mono-" or "uni-" converters I was talking about?
I rather thinking that most have blind themselves otherwise they would have been able to explain much more clearly why their supposed working devices were working, and replications would have bring near no problem. But yes, for me it doesn't mean they were not in the right path and have not touched pertinent points, enough to look further in their directions.
Your wrong, Mike
No, sorry, the limit, but easily reach now, is 40%, and it's because of the "Stirling cycle" itself
Of course, you can say that now after having tried to replicate with not very conclusive results, but it were not the claims of Bedini and the others who claimed effective overunity; right?
So we know the problem, it is possible but it is not so simple to get substantial results. These more useful devices will be relatively expensive per Kw and at this stage we cannot say what the reliability is or the cost per Kwh but should we give up on it? I think not, remember the high cost per Kwh is offset by no input fuel requirement
Comment