If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
....... Dr Stifflers SEC15-3. I haven't seen any action on this on overunity.com for a while. There are a lot of strange phenomena these circuits share.
@Mutten, I am a bit occupied for this weekend with Luc's. Do you have a link to the very possible site / diagrams / videos pf Dr. Stiffler's? Will appreciate time savings!
Therefore we need to find NEW ways, NEW experiments and NEW lines of thoughts.
@Mutten, I am a bit occupied for this weekend with Luc's. Do you have a link to the very possible site / diagrams / videos pf Dr. Stiffler's? Will appreciate time savings!
But I also should point out that he nearly died! The cap exploded, caught fire. And if that wasn't enough when he settled everything down and accidentally touched the remaining cap he got knocked out . I admire his courage though.
This experiment made me think about something. If the extremely high short current impulse was unleashed like that. Wouldn't you think it would destroy the the beginning of the cable and leave most of it intact? His experiment shows that the wire exploded all the way to the end. I don't think this is a current explosion. I think the coil in front of it had an insanely high BEMF and choked out the thin wire till it exploded.
I've got Scr's now so can work out a cap pulser to battery.. Got everything just need some time now to do it in :-)
Thanks to ren for the tl494 signal gen, and tips re sharp points for spark gap getting a longer spark.. Didn't know that.. and I've fudged together a 555 signal gen as well..
More from me soon, I'm going to spend ALL of tuesday in my lab.
Ben i have the Scr's with a neon pulsing two GIANT battery with the davidE thing going on Two.I only had sort time to do stuff so the balance with be all wroung but I just whated to get it going. I Use Nat diagram works a treat Cheers Nat.
Hello gentlemen,
i have managed to replicate the radiant oscillator circuit with 1 2N2222 and 2 2N3055s, an ignition coil, a modified CFL lamp and neon tube running from a 12 V lead battery. It was difficult to achieve the results of the kick-starter circuit, for some reason it would not work and after the trying it with a master 2N2222 for a while, i went back to the 3055-2-Trannies-only circuit and it worked (with a strong flickering of the lights however).
An interesting observation (that has been made in this thread before so better confirmation) is that the leads of the kick-starter cables had to firmly touch the wood plate on which i have built the circuit. Only then it would work and directly connecting the kick-starter cables would kill the lights, so wood has different material attributes related to radiant energy definitely.
I have been running the experiment for about 9 hours and had a voltage drop of about 1 Volt at the source battery. I could not measure the current due to my multimeter being fried for current measurements. (
I am sure that using shorter leads and introducing resistors for better voltage control at the transistors can improve the power-loss.
Maybe i should go with a MOSFET-setup for future experiments.
@gotoluc: Can you share your MOSFET-circuit (if i have not overlooked it)?
I don't have a stand-alone signal processor however.
I want to share here now a peculiarity that occured during the experiment:
After about 7 hours of the experiment, the bulb started flickering again.
Only upon touching it, the flickering would stop and the brightness would slightly increase.
I came to the idea to put a glass filled with himalalya salt and a crystal next to the ignition coil, hoping that they would create a comparable field to a human field , so i would not have to keep touching the bulb
And indeed it had the same effect as touching the bulb, so i was able
to exit the field of the experiment and the light remained bright.
Now 1 hour later i touched the bulb again and to my surprise the effect of
my touch had the opposite effect than an hour ago !!!
It introduced flickering and the bulb eventually turned off.
So something must have changed in the experiment, an effect over time related to the crystal/water that changed the stability of the CFL ignition or the polarity (?) of the effect of my touch.
Maybe that gives some of you guys some food for thought or maybe it is irrelevant
After about 7 hours of the experiment, the bulb started flickering again.
Only upon touching it, the flickering would stop and the brightness would slightly increase.
I came to the idea to put a glass filled with himalalya salt and a crystal next to the ignition coil, hoping that they would create a comparable field to a human field , so i would not have to keep touching the bulb
well done this is a really good idea,
I like the the term human field. what about doubling the salt and crystal once the first stage has past (you drop the light with your field)?
@ xenomorph - that's amazing. And very much confirmation that radiant events travel better through wood and people than air.
Very interesting that a crystal in salt water works. How about just the crystal, or just the water? I was going to put one of my baby chickens in a jar on my table
Perhaps this is why tesla said that crystals were a form of life?? I'll not look at one the same way again...
Thanks for sharing your observations, never irrelevant. Must admit, I'm stumped why your touch has the reverse effect, unless the crystal and you are absorbing and thus transmitting the radiant energy exactly out of phase, creating a null wave in the aether.. !? Maybe the crystal became 'conditioned' like the transistors do. Probably cause they're made of the same stuff. That might explain why 180 degrees out of phase?
@ everybody - Any ideas? More answers we get the clearer the picture becomes :-)
Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.
Comment