Imhotep's Radiant Oscillator Video

[Kingman]

No Resistor Coil

ThereMart, I believe that Imhotep said that you want the ignition coil to "NOT" have a resistor. The old 1967 coil that he recomended does not have one and the coil I got doesn't have one. Good luck on your replication. It is fun.

Stephen

[**~Imhotep~**]

kingman is correct the balast resistor is not needed , and preferably you want a coil without the built in resistor .it might run with the built in balast resistor but with different results

[**~Imhotep~**]

0.25 amp draw 4 bulbs three 11watt one 7watt.
with one bulb its 0.40amps but around half the light if from the wall.

hope people find this use full
good lucky fork

I brought this circuit to the right forum!! I am so proud with how you guys are evolving this circuit. Im floored at the innovations. I had worked on so many circuits simotaniously that I did not have a chance to grow this circuit as quickly as having multiple researchers working on it. Peter Lindemann
multiple times tried to get me to think of this circuit in a much different way than mere coil collapse. As you are finding he was aboslutely right!! Excellent work. And i cant wait to start implementing some of your changes. EXCELLENT WORK!!

Here it is..

2 CFL's on 3 watt power:

YouTube - 3 Watt - Free Energy Radiant Oscillator Lite

I bet we could double the brightness by using another coil and keeping the draw to only 0.5 amp. This would definitely be usable lighting!!

I was going to try a dual coil setup bouncing it between the 2 positives. That is something that could be tried! I had to buy 2 coils because Peter made me test this with multiple setups to make sure it was not a fluke, so I had to buy multiple relays, coils,bulbs to be able to run 2 or 3 setups and we worked with it for 2 or 3 months before release to get the basic circuit down. But the work that you guys have done to it so far just is fantastic

It once again proves why the internet is the way for open source research collaboration. Bringing so many people together with so much vast knowledge in different areas! And again I cant wait to try some of the other setups you guys have come up with.

[waterhouse24]

I was going to try a dual coil setup bouncing it between the 2 positives. That is something that could be tried!

How could you use 2 coils and bounce it like you said?

Can you not connect them, say in parallel, so we're not increasing the voltage but increasing the draw to the bulb?

sorry for my lack of electrical experience.. I have all the theory in my head but not enough hands on stuff

[**~Imhotep~**]

How could you use 2 coils and bounce it like you said?

Can you not connect them, say in parallel, so we're not increasing the voltage but increasing the draw to the bulb?

What I was going to try was hooked the positive and negative of the primary's of the coil together so i would have one negative and one positive and run it off one relay and run bulb the bulb between the two towers, that might or might not work, I am not sure it was just something that was running through my mind while i was developing one of my other circuits, I am also enhancing Aarons water spark plug circuit, as well as the very simple radiant charger. As well as tutorials for the bifilar windings for the fans. As well as abut half dozen other ideas i have.

You guys doing this work is sooo huge of a help. I can never thank you guys enough!

This is an idea that i was toying around with, it is untested and might not work at all, but this is the way i would start to do if i was going to try and run them in series. Again this circuit is untried and untested. And might not work at all.



Another way you can try is just to build 2 circuits and parallel the primary's feed the two between the 2 towers which also might not work. Let us know how your results are.

I did try running 2 bulbs parallel with one circuit and when i screwed in the second bulb the first bulb went out, you guys ran them in series with much success!! Very well done!!

[Bodkins]

thank you for your comment imhotep i love working on this stuff,
only thing that is im going on holiday tomorrow,i wish i could stay at home and let the family go!!!!
But she would Kill me.
Waterhouse when i get back can i pick your brain of the about where you got the stuff (relay.ect)
Got another bloke at work in to this stuff,I worked with him yesterday morning and dumped all i new about free energy, ZPE, tesla, bedini,adams motor,imhotep and now his world has been conpletely different than 48 hours ago. Another joins the workforce

[Jetijs]

I just tried to light up four light bulbs in parallel. To do this I used my adjustable voltage/current power supply and pulsed the coil with a relay that was triggered with a function generator. I set the power supply at the max voltage but so that the current is limited to about 300mA. I used two 24w spiral type bulbs, one 15w cylindric tube and a 8w cylindric bulb. I connected them in series and attached the HV + on the one side of the string, I could easily connect the negative terminal between each of the bulbs. When I pulsed only one bulb, the light intensity was moderate, but when I pulsed all four bulbs in series, the light intensity was only slightly less at the same current draw. I think that I could easily light up three or four more bulbs in series, but I just have these four
I also tried my cheap high current solid state relay to pulse the bulbs, but it can not handle more than 10Hz.
Will try Imhotep's dual coil setup tomorrow. I still think that we need more voltage on the secondary to get the bulbs to full brightness.
Thanks

[**~Imhotep~**]

I just tried to light up four light bulbs in parallel. To do this I used my adjustable voltage/current power supply and pulsed the coil with a relay that was triggered with a function generator. I set the power supply at the max voltage but so that the current is limited to about 300mA. I used two 24w spiral type bulbs, one 15w cylindric tube and a 8w cylindric bulb. I connected them in series and attached the HV + on the one side of the string, I could easily connect the negative terminal between each of the bulbs. When I pulsed only one bulb, the light intensity was moderate, but when I pulsed all four bulbs in series, the light intensity was only slightly less at the same current draw. I think that I could easily light up three or four more bulbs in series, but I just have these four
I also tried my cheap high current solid state relay to pulse the bulbs, but it can not handle more than 10Hz.
Will try Imhotep's dual coil setup tomorrow. I still think that we need more voltage on the secondary to get the bulbs to full brightness.
Thanks

excellent work, please remember i have not tested the dual coil setup, so it might not work and it might destroy parts im not sure. In theory it should work though and hit it with twice the wave. But its worth a go
thank you all again for your contributions and research. Shiva is collecting all the youtube links of the replications and placing them in the FAQ so they are in a easily found area

[Peter Lindemann]

Buck-Boost

What I was going to try was hooked the positive and negative of the primary's of the coil together so i would have one negative and one positive and run it off one relay and run bulb the bulb between the two towers, that might or might not work, I am not sure it was just something that was running through my mind while i was developing one of my other circuits, I am also enhancing Aarons water spark plug circuit, as well as the very simple radiant charger. As well as tutorials for the bifilar windings for the fans. As well as abut half dozen other ideas i have.

You guys doing this work is sooo huge of a help. I can never thank you guys enough!

This is an idea that i was toying around with, it is untested and might not work at all, but this is the way i would start to do if i was going to try and run them in series. Again this circuit is untried and untested. And might not work at all.



Another way you can try is just to build 2 circuits and parallel the primary's feed the two between the 2 towers which also might not work. Let us know how your results are.

I did try running 2 bulbs parallel with one circuit and when i screwed in the second bulb the first bulb went out, you guys ran them in series with much success!! Very well done!!

Imhotep,

This is a GREAT idea. But I agree with you, this little schematic you show WON"T work. The reason is that the polarity of the two coils is the same. You need to turn one of the coils around. So, for instance, if you take the top coil and connect the POSITIVE of the battery to the (-) connection of the ignition coil, and then connect the (+) connection back to the (+) connection of the bottom coil, THEN the polarities of the HV sections will be opposite, and the voltage across the CFL will be double!

This ought to work great!

Peter

[hh1341]

Bodkins

Nice work Bodkins.

Looks like he was using a 555 timer instead of a relay.

Sure would like to get the info to replicate that circuit.

Carl

[mikkyo]

Nice work Bodkins.

Looks like he was using a 555 timer instead of a relay.

Sure would like to get the info to replicate that circuit.

Carl

Bodkins said here
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post25497
he was using this circuit
555 Noise-Maker Kit > Maplin
which the specs, parts list, schematic and layout are all online here
http://www.maplin.co.uk/Media/PDFs/N41FL.pdf

[**~Imhotep~**]

Imhotep,

This is a GREAT idea. But I agree with you, this little schematic you show WON"T work. The reason is that the polarity of the two coils is the same. You need to turn one of the coils around. So, for instance, if you take the top coil and connect the POSITIVE of the battery to the (-) connection of the ignition coil, and then connect the (+) connection back to the (+) connection of the bottom coil, THEN the polarities of the HV sections will be opposite, and the voltage across the CFL will be double!

This ought to work great!

Peter

thank you for the correction Peter i drew this in a hurry this afternoon when shiva approached me with the question . again THANK YOU!!!!!!!! for ALL your work..

[**~Imhotep~**]

Imhotep,

This is a GREAT idea. But I agree with you, this little schematic you show WON"T work. The reason is that the polarity of the two coils is the same. You need to turn one of the coils around. So, for instance, if you take the top coil and connect the POSITIVE of the battery to the (-) connection of the ignition coil, and then connect the (+) connection back to the (+) connection of the bottom coil, THEN the polarities of the HV sections will be opposite, and the voltage across the CFL will be double!

This ought to work great!

Peter

Heres the updated schematic with Peter's corrections.



Peter,
Do you think it would be too much of a stretch to assume we could charge a second battery off the top coil? Just wondering what your thoughts would be on that.

[ren]

found this for those interested in solid state.

[waterhouse24]

Imhotep,

This is a GREAT idea. But I agree with you, this little schematic you show WON"T work. The reason is that the polarity of the two coils is the same. You need to turn one of the coils around. So, for instance, if you take the top coil and connect the POSITIVE of the battery to the (-) connection of the ignition coil, and then connect the (+) connection back to the (+) connection of the bottom coil, THEN the polarities of the HV sections will be opposite, and the voltage across the CFL will be double!

This ought to work great!

Peter

Thanks for this and thanks for the updated Schematic.. I'm off to the scrap yard tomorrow. I have another relay setup..

I'm going to go down the 555 timer route but only after I have tried dual radiant oscillation

p.s. (I'll stick with this forum, as it seems you're all friendlier than the ou forum )