Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Conservation of Charge violated?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    pulley size

    Hi Mart,

    For adjusting voltage above battery, change diameter of pulley that the shaft is turning. You really want mechanical switch for this method.
    Sincerely,
    Aaron Murakami

    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

    Comment


    • #47
      RE: Pully

      Originally posted by Aaron View Post
      Hi Mart,

      For adjusting voltage above battery, change diameter of pulley that the shaft is turning. You really want mechanical switch for this method.
      Oh,

      I meant for the SS. I am considering switching from Jetijs shematic for my monopole to the cap discharge system., since what Peter has said about the cold triggering system, I am interested in that too, because someone on the old yahoo group mentioned that was a very good way to trigger.
      See my experiments here...
      http://www.youtube.com/marthale7

      You do not have to prove something for it to be true. However, you do have to prove something for others to believe it true.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Sephiroth View Post
        FWBR? Sorry, what is fwbr?

        I don't know what that is but one of the most siginficant things that stands out to me is the AWESOME size of the caps involved (which I think can be substituted with smaller caps on desktop sized models but still relativly large... testing is required!) and the interesting way the recovery coils are wired... in SERIES!

        You mentioned the Daftman's setup... the most significant thing about daftmans energizer is that he has TWO recovery windings in series on each coil... after some thought, this made sense in that it would actually USE the energy put in to energize the coil... normally, since it is a one to one transformer and that the charging voltage is usually above the input voltage, the joules used in energizing the coil woudl go wasted... with the recovery windings wired like this or like in Daftman's setup would allow for the charge AND discahrge of the coil to be used. It may have other effects but without testing I cant be sure.

        also there is the method of discharging the cap... I have alway thought that discharging the cap throught a physical contact would out perform an scr... for that reason I have always used relays...

        the pieces of the puzzle are falling into place and I have alot of theories to test! on top of that, I have just recieved my first MJL21194 transistors.... ooooooooo, I am going to have fun this week!
        Sephiroth look this:

        When I was studying learnt that one ampere is equal to one volt passing throught resistor one ohm at rate one coulumbs per second.

        Q/seconds=V/R

        sounds logic?

        That means to reach at least one watts radiant energy conceptually speaking we need charge one capacitor one Q size per second to one volt?

        Per example: 1 Farads to 1 volts?

        Mathematically seems logic but, sounds erratic Conservation of Charge???
        Last edited by patmac; 08-21-2008, 03:47 PM.
        Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people's thinking. Don't let the noise of others' opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.

        Steve Jobs. Apple CEO

        Comment


        • #49
          Very cool video

          YouTube - Free Electrical Energy

          I have not tried this, but it looks like Seph's testing...

          Mart
          See my experiments here...
          http://www.youtube.com/marthale7

          You do not have to prove something for it to be true. However, you do have to prove something for others to believe it true.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by theremart View Post
            YouTube - Free Electrical Energy

            I have not tried this, but it looks like Seph's testing...

            Mart

            Hi Mart,


            Thx for making us aware of this video.Sounds like this may be of some use to the guys in the watersparkplug thread.Thx for the input


            -Gary

            Comment


            • #51
              Another analysis

              Originally posted by Sephiroth View Post
              It gets worse!

              in the second example (with the 1000uf cap with 100v) 4.8 joules were sent out of the charged cap but the charging cap went up only 1.28 joules!

              so that is 26% efficient transfer of energy!

              then I tried

              1,000uf = 100v (5 joules)
              100,000uf = 12v (7.2 joules)
              Total = 12.2 joules

              and got

              1,000uf = 12.87v (0.0828 joules)
              100,000uf = 12.87v (8.281845 joules)
              Total = 8.364645 joules

              so 4.9172 joules left the charged cap and the charging cap recovered 1.081845 joules! Only 22% efficient transfer!

              and the average battery has to be many many times more farads then the capacitors above so if this model applies to batteries the same way it does for capacitors then the charging efficiency should be appauling with the high voltage cap pulser!
              Attached is an english translation from Das Kondensator Problem discussing the capacitor problem
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #52
                Charge condensator electrostatically using impulses throught large self-induction circuit , discharge by current path into smaller self-induction device at slower rate.

                Comment

                Working...
                X