Bodkins,
I was testing that design a couple months ago...
I'm thinking is like a hybrid between Bedini and Adams, looks normal when you've built Adams motor and Bedini Mechanical Osc, can be very efficient like the BMO + Bonus better torque on low rpm without sacrifice so much amp drawing, but in my test at least, adjusting Reed's position, can be necessary a oscilloscope to adjust it in higher eff. The idea here is make the oscillation permanently when the magnet is near to core, no totally switch on, that create many pulses but avoid high amp draw. (Like the Big Bedini Vertical two Rotor + 8 coils on DVD?)
The first inconvenient is to find a Reed with good high amp contacts, so, for me is better get update this design using Reed + Zener + MOSFET. But the use of transistor is a tricky in this design because is not Common Emitter. This advantage allow uses the energy produced by magnet pass, because Ie=Ib+Ic. Another idea that I’ve in my mind would be uses twice MOSFET like a half H-Bridge, this avoid us take completely the Radiant energy by using a FWR BRIDGE diodes without drain current from the source directly. This setup + Reeds setup by Ossie Callanan, would be catch totally the Radiant Energy without use twice copper wire.
On the attachments the design by me, and obviously many designs on the web or by Bedini and others is like this, including some design post it by radiant-1 some moths ago, but design by radiant-1 was a Bifilar coil, that design take power from the source directly like a wall transformer, the only way to isolate totally the coil form the source and take all Back EMF and radiant energy is using half bridge, and high speed switching mosfets. The only detail on my schematics is the problem to switch on and off with high precision both mosfet so using oscilloscope is possible correct that inconvenient or well using a mosfet driver.
So what do you think???
I was testing that design a couple months ago...
I'm thinking is like a hybrid between Bedini and Adams, looks normal when you've built Adams motor and Bedini Mechanical Osc, can be very efficient like the BMO + Bonus better torque on low rpm without sacrifice so much amp drawing, but in my test at least, adjusting Reed's position, can be necessary a oscilloscope to adjust it in higher eff. The idea here is make the oscillation permanently when the magnet is near to core, no totally switch on, that create many pulses but avoid high amp draw. (Like the Big Bedini Vertical two Rotor + 8 coils on DVD?)
The first inconvenient is to find a Reed with good high amp contacts, so, for me is better get update this design using Reed + Zener + MOSFET. But the use of transistor is a tricky in this design because is not Common Emitter. This advantage allow uses the energy produced by magnet pass, because Ie=Ib+Ic. Another idea that I’ve in my mind would be uses twice MOSFET like a half H-Bridge, this avoid us take completely the Radiant energy by using a FWR BRIDGE diodes without drain current from the source directly. This setup + Reeds setup by Ossie Callanan, would be catch totally the Radiant Energy without use twice copper wire.
On the attachments the design by me, and obviously many designs on the web or by Bedini and others is like this, including some design post it by radiant-1 some moths ago, but design by radiant-1 was a Bifilar coil, that design take power from the source directly like a wall transformer, the only way to isolate totally the coil form the source and take all Back EMF and radiant energy is using half bridge, and high speed switching mosfets. The only detail on my schematics is the problem to switch on and off with high precision both mosfet so using oscilloscope is possible correct that inconvenient or well using a mosfet driver.
So what do you think???
Comment