Energy for Mobile Home

[dmonarch]

Suppression

Hi Shamus. Shore the big companies are suppresing the information and your dead right it is probably due to how our economy is run and the throw away nature of things.
That said there is nothing stopping the inventors of these devices from getting the information out to the public. Nothing at all and yet all we get is little bits of information and we are told that it is in our best interest to work the rest out for ourselves. That is just plain hui
All it would take is one inventor and there have been many to release all the details on how to make a unit and it would be all over for the companies whether they like it or not. This just dosnt happen though.
I mean comeone. It is long past the due date for such technology. I myself trie reproducing teslas radiant energy using a magnetically snuffed spark gap and still was unable to reproduce it. I have only heard of one person today that has reproduced it and that is John Bedini and he refuses to release any details. Someone has to stand up and say enough is enough. Someone has to make the sacrifice. Its a hard choice but thats life.
The person doing the releasing can do it anonomously if it so pleases him/her. The really is no reason at all to with hold such information except for greed. One would have to assume that everyone so far is a greedy bugger.

[dambit]

Hi Dmonarch,

The basic SG's are not designed to be usefull for anything other than teaching the principle of the tech, how it works and maybe charging small dry cells. In order to get usefull charging and performance the devices need to be scaled up and used in combination with other tech. Solar for example. My grandad built an RV a couple of years ago and has now refit it with a radient enegizer (that I built and he "borrowed" and hasn't returned yet ) He has linked in his solar setup to run the enegizer, therfore charging the batteries. He only resorts to battery swapping if there is no sun (which is a rare event in outback Australia )

Also, I think the reason everone may appear a little non-descript about the exact setup they use (although I think everyone here is very open about there setups), is because each energizer is built to purpose. My setup may not be suitable for your setup etc.


Cheers,

Steve.

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, monarch lets not blame the victim, because for the most part inventors have been, i notice a few comments in mainstream articles lately are blatantly stated things like "this isn't some corporate conspiracy" well then what else could it possibly be. who pray tell has the power to prevent these technologies and it sure isn't the inventors. I understand what your saying but it is only part of the story, this is a story after all, one big drama. Yes there has been this ' it builds character mentality' on this planet as if we should all re-invent the wheel or fully understand every technology we use which obviously is not the reality. hardly anyone probably understands air conditioning yet use it all summer, does that mean since they don't understand it they shouldn't be allowed to use it. It reminds of some people I know who think, hey if I'm suffering you have to suffer also, which gets us absolutely nowhere. I think you may see the contradiction here, although these thoughts and mentalities has been fostered by the forces against freedom and freedom technology. I know one thing for sure if any inventor expects money from these types of technologies there either delusional or greedy buggers because after all they forget, its not their invention its our creators and therefore its all of humanities for free.

[dmonarch]

Well Said

Well said skywatcher

[wpage]

corporate conspiricy vs. capital

There is no real corporate conspiracy. However profit drives the system of energy. If there is more gain in making products a certain way. Capitalism which is a gain based system will produce it!
Some items are designed to fail. So you will buy another one. This was the US carmakers philosophy prior to the invasion of foreign cars in the 60's and 70's that slowly changed that.

The veil between R&D and marketplace is shrouded by board members and marketeers. In the end they must do what shareholders demand...

The almighty Buck.

Thats why we are here on the forum. Lets not confuse business with what is righteous



W

[dambit]

Some items are designed to fail. So you will buy another one. This was the US carmakers philosophy prior to the invasion of foreign cars in the 60's and 70's that slowly changed that.

Car makers are still doing this. Hyandai lace there dashboard materials with an acid so that it will crack and split within a couple of years causing it to be replaced. They were caught out on this with the Excel model. I would estimate that 90% of all electrical and mechanical consumer products are designed to fail. Usually just after the warranty period is up. A good example of this is FERAG. They manufacture large scale printing equipment for newspaper etc. Most of there parts are cheap plastic designed to break, which is a good thing most of the time due to the speeds at which the machines operate. However, only FERAG manufacture the spares, no one else. I know because I used to repair them.

So for better or worse, failure is almost certainly built in to everything. It's just good business.

A poor excuse!!!!

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, I think my point should be clear to those who care about humanity and not profit or greed. And although everyone makes choices as to what ideas they will focus attention on and accept there are still some problems with the train of thought that corporations are some how only interested in profit. I would say based on what I can see in this world the facts contradict that theory. If I were to run a business would i not want to build a better product that would outlast all other competition and thereby eliminate the competition which they so love to do. So can we see a contradiction here. If I were to make a house fan that lasted 20 years I want you to honestly ask yourself, and thats what this is all about after all being honest with ourselves is it not, would the forces that exist whether they be corporate aligned with government or whatever, do you really think they would allow it as that would make there products instantly obsolete. So since I have no direct proof of this conspiracy other than looking at the facts of the reality I would say to accomplish such a thing would need cooperation from almost all large corporations and with help from government. And by definition this cooperation is called a conspiracy, two or more people in alignment with the same goals whether hidden or not. So you have the choice of supporting freedom=abundance or control=slavery. Choose wisely.

[mlurye]

Permanent magnet heater

Hi guys. I'm new to this forum and in couple of days already found tons of interesting ideas Could any of you share information on how to build "Permanent magnet heater". I did attach Patent documentation on how to build one. But easy to follow guide would be greatly appritiated

Thank a lot,
Mike

[SkyWatcher]

Hi folks, hi mlurye, yes i've built a magnet heater similar to that patent mine was based more on Troy Reeds designs. The best design to go with is neo magnets sandwiching a thick plate of aluminum or other conductor with the magnets unlike poles facing each other in attract relation. If wanting to heat fluids like water of that youd have to set something up like copper tubing soldered to the center plate somehow so not to interfere with magnet plate interaction to extract the heat. By the way this same setup except replacing the aluminum plate with thin coils will give you a heck of an efficient motor, i know cause i built one and it is the best running motor I have ever built and I've built many other types of motors. that means air core coil and since the magnets are in compression in attraction there is no flux deflection and no cores are needed to get high performance and efficiency and maybe a few other added benefits with that design.

peace, love, light