Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

David Bowlings Continuous Charger

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • David Bowlings Continuous Charger

    I seen this on another forum I thought it looked interesting.
    I'll be trying it today and let you know if it works.

    This circuit is by David Bowling's and the drawing was by Groundloop.
    Attached Files

  • #2
    'SPLIT THE POSITIVE'

    "I want you to watch what happens."

    As Lens activated the battery, a voltmeter gradually rose to 3,000 volts, At that point, Gray closed a switch and there was a loud popping sound. The top magnet hurled into the air with tremendous force and was caught by Hackenberger. A terrific jolt of electricity had propelled the top magnet more than two feet into the air --- but the magnet remained cold.
    "The amazing thing", Hackenberger said, "is that only 1% of the energy was used --- 99% went back into the battery."
    Gray explained, "The battery can last for a long time, because most of the energy returns to it. The secret to this is in the capacitors and in being able to split the positive."
    When Gray said "split the positive", the faces of two knowledgeable physicists screwed up in bewilderment. Normally, electricity consists of positive and negative particles. But Gray's system is capable of using one or the other separately and effectively.
    "He means we have to rewrite the physics textbooks", Hackenberger grinned. It has been the engineer's job in recent months to formulate gray's system and put it into writing.
    "That's not an easy job because this system actually defies everything I've ever learned."
    Gray said, "I never had no schooling in electronics or physics, so nobody told me it was impossible."
    The "impossible" part of the demonstration was the lack of heat generated in the magnet. Heat is one of the biggest problems faced by electrical technology. Also "impossible" is the fact that only the "positive" nature of the energy was used.
    "This thing is in its infancy", Gray explained. "When the full potential of American technology starts working with it, the results will astound everyone."
    A further proof that he has an unusual source of power with unlimited potential was demonstrated next.
    "We've been popping those magnets apart for the past 18 months with the same battery and it's still got a full charge. Now I want you to watch this?"
    Gray showed this Tattler reporter a small 15-amp motorcycle battery. It was hooked up to a pair of his capacitors which in turn were hooked up to a panel of outlets.
    He flicked a switch and the tiny battery sent a charge into the capacitors. He then plugged in six 15-watt electric bulbs on individual cords --- and a 110-volt portable television set and two radios. The bulbs burned brightly, the television played, and both radios blared --- and yet, the small battery was not discharging.
    "You couldn't get all this current out of that battery under ordinary circumstances", Gray said.
    "This is the most amazing thing I've ever seen!" exclaimed C.V. Wood Jr, president of the McCulloch Oil Corporation, who was also present at the demonstration. He began looking for hidden outlets from the wall.
    "May I prove it doesn't come from any wall plug?" Gray offered.
    A 40-watt light bulb screwed into an ordinary extension socket was plugged into the panel powered by gray's system. The bulb lit, then Gray dropped it into a cylinder filled with water.
    "What would be happening if this was getting ordinary power right now?" Gray asked, as he stuck his hand in the water with the glowing light bulb.
    "You'd be electrocuted and that thing would be popping and sputtering until the fuses blew", Wood replied.
    This reporter then put his finger into the water with the light --- no shock.
    "Gentlemen, this is a new manifestation of electricity", Hackenberger said.
    The engineer told the astounded onlookers that no laws of physics were being violated, but a new application of electricity has been discovered and put to work.
    Gray, one of 14 children, comes from Washington DC. As a small boy, he was fascinated by electricity, magnets, and gadgets in general.
    "I really got excited about electricity when they tested the first radar across the Potomac in 1936. I was 11 years old then and visions of buck Rogers danced in my head."
    He learned about radar during his World War II hitch in the Navy and "I've been messing around with coils and capacitors ever since".
    He learned to "split the positive" in 1958 and spent the next dozen years finding the funds to put his discovery to work.
    Any abbreviated explanation of Gray's system is an over-simplification of the technical aspects of this tremendous breakthrough, but some of the best minds in the US are now working with Gray to further improve his discovery.

    Comment


    • #3
      Slayer

      This circuit does produce interesting results. I speculate the "sparking commutator" may be the catalyst...

      The motor circuit that I published earlier demonstrated a very similar effect.

      Test Results -Start
      Battery 1 13.13v
      Battery 2 13.09v
      Battery 3 9.88v

      Test #1 15 minute duration
      15 min rest then collect standing voltage
      Battery 1 13.04v
      Battery 2 13.00v
      Battery 3 11.09v

      Test #2 45 minute duration
      45 min rest then collect standing voltage
      Battery 1 13.12v
      Battery 2 13.08v
      Battery 3 10.11v

      -Motor 7v dc
      -Load 12v auto lamp (never lit)

      Battery 3 is schizophrenic. Under load it may go down to 5v then while charging it may flash up to 12v, always settling around 10.00v. Note: These Batteries have never been charged with a Bedini style charger.

      120 minute test underway...
      Last edited by DavidE; 11-10-2008, 10:20 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        I tried to replicate it today but didn't have good results.
        He says the charge battery should be a dead battery that wont hold a charge.
        I didnt really have a dead battery but I had one with 0 volts in it.
        It charged to about 10v but at the expence of the other two.
        So a lot of it could be the charge battery he uses and the motor.
        Last edited by slayer007; 11-09-2008, 09:52 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by slayer007 View Post
          I tried to replicate it today but didn't have good results.
          He says the charge battery should be a dead battery that wont hold a charge.
          I didnt really have a dead battery but I had one with 0 volts in it.
          It charged to about 10v but at the expence of the other two.
          So a lot of it could be the charge battery he uses and the motor.
          Hi Slayer007

          Maybe your 0 Volt reading battery is shorted. A lead-acid battery is dead at11.9 Volts and a true deep cycle lead-acid battery is dead at 10.5 Volts. Bringing batteries at this state of charge can permanently damage them.

          Michel

          Comment


          • #6
            Thats one half of a Tesla Switch, Shown on Bedinis site and the free energy guide.

            You have to have functional batterries to make it work, and high efficiency motors do a terrible job of charging the third batterry. Best to use an old crappy electric motor.

            And you really don't need the switch to make it work, but I suspect a better charge if you use it.

            The biggest point to make is it does not send current to ground. It is creating a potential between 2 potential. This is a big key factor in conserving energy or acheiving overunity.

            Matt

            Comment


            • #7
              Latest info on this...

              Battery 3 must not be able to take and hold a charge.

              Once Battery 1 & 2 are charged, coupled with battery three the load is to be moved between batteries 3 and 2 (between the negatives). If battery 3 does not hold a charge, the load can be powered without diminishing batteries 1 & 2.

              Or at least, that is how DavidB claims it works.

              Comment


              • #8
                I am pretty sure you will still lose energy from batts 1 and 2.
                I have played with this circiut for quete a while, in different forms. Although extremly conservative if you don't generate power from the shaft of the motor you are going to lose over the long term.
                I can't say I have ever put a dead battery on it but I will dig my motor out and give it a whirl.

                Matt

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Matthew Jones View Post
                  I am pretty sure you will still lose energy from batts 1 and 2.
                  I have played with this circiut for quete a while, in different forms. Although extremly conservative if you don't generate power from the shaft of the motor you are going to lose over the long term.
                  I can't say I have ever put a dead battery on it but I will dig my motor out and give it a whirl.

                  Matt
                  according to David battery 3 has to be a bad battery.
                  One that will take a charge but loose it sitting over night.

                  He says all three batterys try to stay at the same voltage.
                  But battery 3 looses power faster than the other two.
                  So the other two keep geting charged up.

                  I dont have a bad battery so I realy cant try it just yet.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I do. I am building a switch for the motor now. I should have some results by morning tommorrow.

                    The thing I don't understand is what charges the first 2 batts. Unless the dissipating current from the third can travel accross the ground to induce holes on the ground side that draw in nondivergent energy.
                    Buts thats a mouth full. Its not impossible but....

                    We'll see
                    Matt

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Matthew

                      The thing I don't understand is what charges the first 2 batts.
                      Well that is easy to explain. The Free Energy Fairy of course.

                      I don't believe that is where the value is based on David Bowling's claims. Keeping Battery 1 & 2 at a steady state (or better), while catalyzing new energy at the point the switch is on the drawing (between negatives). At the moment, although I do believe the motor does have some effect on the circuit... I believe (for the moment) the larger effect is the unbalanced state of the batteries... and the resultant mechanism that does its best to achieve equalibrium in the system (seen and unseen).

                      Just a few minutes from my next test... will publish results!

                      Note: Using 12v auto bulb in the place of the motor, and battery #4 in place of the switch.
                      Last edited by DavidE; 11-10-2008, 07:30 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Used 12v auto bulb in place of motor.
                        12v battery in place of the switch.

                        Test #1 30 minute duration
                        30 min rest then collect standing voltage
                        Battery 1 12.51v/12.37v (loss .14)
                        Battery 2 12.50v/12.40v (loss .10)
                        Battery 3 2.25v/2.25v
                        Battery 4 11.28v/13.15v (gain 1.87v)


                        Used 7v-dc motor as noted in schematic.
                        12v Battery in the location of the switch.

                        Test #2 30 minute duration
                        30 min rest then collect standing voltage
                        Battery 1 12.37v/12.36v (loss .01)
                        Battery 2 12.40v/12.39v (loss .01)
                        Battery 3 2.01v/1.75v
                        Battery 4 11.26v/12.25v (gain .99v) (important: + to - of Battery 3, - to - of Battery 2)

                        Preliminary results suggest less loss (Battery 1&2) per gain with the setup that included the 7v dc motor charging a battery.





                        Note: Dead battery 3 is a 12v 85Ah battery. Battery 1&2 are 12v 7.2Ah. Battery 4 is a 12v 5Ah.
                        Last edited by DavidE; 11-10-2008, 09:51 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Who is David Bowling? Why does he take claim to this circiut?
                          Tests didn't work.
                          I have several shorted batterries but none that are just really sulvated which is what he is calling for. Loses charge over a period of time.
                          I'll try to find one.
                          I did do it with a good batterry thoug but thats nothing I have had functional Mechanical Tesla Switch for a while. I followed the Free energy guide to build it. http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter6.pdf PAGE 6-25

                          This page has been on Bedini's site for along time. Explaines the operation of charging the batterry this way.
                          THE TESLA SWITCH

                          It really works well if you switch the banks of batterries back and forth between parrallel and series. Depending on the motors frequency you can sustain charge in the battery. Older crappy motors work better than new efficient ones.

                          A one way circuit like this just sooner later will disipate energy.

                          Matt

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Matthew

                            Directoryavid Bowling's Continuous Charging Device - PESWiki

                            Really its Gods circuit, but we are honoring David for his research work. He also has
                            a thread over at underunity.com forum.

                            David Bowling's Continuous Charging Device
                            Last edited by DavidE; 11-10-2008, 11:39 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I feel like I am repeating myself causse I ask this elswhere, but how fast is he switching the motor. I read no mention of it in the article.

                              If you can find out?

                              Matt

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X