The Great Global Warming Swindle

[Danny B]

more deniers every day

I found some good posts on our warming problem.
"Interestingly, towards the end of this presentation Mr Corbyn, who has a first-class honours degree in physics from Imperial College, London, states that it was as hot in the 1930s and 1940s as it is now. Indeed, this is also what the unadjusted raw temperature data for many places in Australia shows. "
Unadjusted data,,, hell no, we can't have that.
Lunar Modulation of Weather and Climate: Piers Corbyn - Jennifer Marohasy
If the data doesn't agree with the models,,, throw out the data.
IOP: expecting consistency between models and observations is an ?error? « Climate Audit
Nigel Lawson, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0QTkYjwtFA

[Danny B]

Outlaw all volcanoes

"In the heart of Yellowstone National Park, a supervolcano releases around 45,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide each day. "

Read more: Yellowstone supervolcano eruption would cause 90k deaths and nuclear winter | Daily Mail Online

[Danny B]

Armstrong and cooling

Martin Armstrong has an enormous historical data base. Here is what he has to say about global cooling. Global Warming/Climate Change Guide for Dummies | Armstrong Economics

[aljhoa]

Volkswagen Chief Executive Officer Martin Winterkorn quit the German automaking giant on Wednesday,
saying while he had done nothing wrong personally in the widening scandal over fake emission controls in 11 million VW diesels,
he accepted responsibility as CEO and company needed a fresh start.

The move comes as criminal investigations and lawsuits grow around the globe in response to revelations by U.S. officials last week that
thousands of VW diesels were sold with software that could sense when the cars were being tested for emissions,
and turned off some of their pollution controls in everyday driving.

Al

[thx1138]

Orbital variations

It's rather amazing what a simple change of perspective yields.

If you take a longer term view (1.2 million years) the current warming is explained by variations in the earth's orbit around the sun.
Geologist connects regular changes of Earth's orbital cycle to changes in climate

The scary part about that is that someone may try to "correct" it - and tax us for doing so. Anthropomorphic orbit wobble, anyone?

While we're thinking about the earth's orbit we should probably start with the proper view. It is not a circle or an ellipse but a helix. He initially says vortex but later corrects that.
The Helical Model

And the solar system travels around the galactic center. This path is not a simple circle or ellipse either. One orbit is completed in roughly 226 million years.
The Helical Model part 2

And all the other solar systems are doing more or less the same thing.

Like the earth is affected by the solar wind, the solar system is affected by an interstellar wind.

The gravity of everything affects everything else. Gravity being exerted inversely relative to the cube of the distance between bodies also means that it never goes to zero.

And of course the galaxy is traveling through space all the while some galaxies are growing closer together and others farther apart.

Does anyone suppose all of that is included in the "climate change" models? My guess is no.

[Danny B]

Gag order

You can study the weather. Just don't talk about it;
Government Implements Illegal ?Gag Order? On National Weather Service And NOAA Employees » Government Implements Illegal ?Gag Order? On National Weather Service And NOAA Employees | Geoengineering Watch

[Peter Lindemann]

Paris Stunned As Scientists Debunk Climate Change Hysteria

Hey Folks,

Here's a Blog Post on what happened in Paris that the main media outlets didn't carry:

An international team of scientists have stunned attendees at the UN’s climate change conference in Paris recently by debunking claims that global warming [is happening and that it] is man-made.

The scientists say that while the science refutes the UN’s claim that man-made carbon emissions are to blame for global warming, they claim that the UN is pressing ahead with its sinister ‘climate regime’ agenda, which includes: destroying industrial civilization, propping up kleptocrats with Western tax funds, and seizing control of the global economy under the guise of regulating the immensely beneficial “gas of life,” also known as carbon dioxide.

Thenewamerican.com reports:

Dubbed “Day of Examining the Data,” the conference featured numerous presentations, each one debunking multiple elements of theincreasingly discredited anthropogenic (man-made) global-warming theory (AGW). From explaining the myriad benefits of carbon dioxide to the environment and mankind to highlighting the ongoing 19-year pause in warming, no intellectually honest attendee could have left the summit still believing the “climate” hysteria pushed by various governments and international outfits. Indeed, practically every fear-mongering narrative pushed at the nearby UN climate summit was mercilessly debunked with facts, data, logic, and common sense. Later in the day, the film Climate Hustle brutally exposing the climate alarmism premiered at a nearby cinema in Paris, earning nothing but profuse praise from attendees.

Among the scientists speaking at the realist summit were Dr. Robert Carter, former chief of the School of Earth Sciences at James Cook University. “Global warming is not happening,” he explained, even noting that long-term cooling was predicted. Carter’s presentation was especially fascinating because it totally shredded the outlandish notion that CO2 — exhaled by humans and critical to life — is “carbon pollution” in need of regulation. In fact, he said, even at current atmospheric concentrations, the Earth and the plants it supports are “starving” for more CO2. And in the past, CO2 concentrations were some 10 to 15 times higher. “Attempting to stop climate change is an exercise in utter futility,” he added, noting in an interview with The New American that nobody would seriously consider trying to “stop” earthquakes or volcanic eruptions.

Also speaking at the summit was Dr. Willie Soon, an astrophysicist and geoscientist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), he explained, “is totally anti-science, and is harming science.” Emphasizing the massive role played by the sun in the Earth’s incomprehensibly complex climate system, Soon narrowed in on one particular claim in the IPCC report on the issue that he said made a complete mockery of science. “The IPCC is pure gangster science,” he explained. Speaking to The New American after his presentation, Soon said the vicious attacks against his character and family by global-warming alarmists had only motivated him to work harder. Rather than launching personal attacks, he said, critics should instead focus on the data and his conclusions published in the peer-reviewed literature.

Another top scientist at the summit was University of Virginia Professor Emeritus Dr. Fred Singer, founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP) and the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change. “There has been no statistically significant warming in 18 years,” he told the summit, showing a slide comparing observed temperatures with the various bogus predictions made by “climate models” relied upon by the UN, all of which predicted warming as CO2 increased. “The models don’t work. We should not use them to make policy.” He also noted that carbon dioxide — “the original plant food,” as he called it — is very valuable. “Plants are starving. They want more CO2,” Singer added.

Essentially, the internationally respected scientist continued, the climate has always changed due to natural forces — warming, cooling, and so on — from the beginning. And so, that means the obvious hypothesis that natural forces are still driving climate change, as they always have, must be shown to be false by proponents of the man-made climate change propaganda. In other words, the burden to show that the recent minor changes are attributable to mankind is on the alarmists who want to empower the UN, control CO2, and redistribute wealth. So far, though, the alarmists have failed, and they have a tough job ahead, Singer said.

“This is about money and power,” Singer told The New American in an interview, adding that governments had purchased the cooperation of many scientists on climate alarmism. “Science plays a small role, and mostly it’s being misused.” “It’s a matter of really trying to control things,” Singer said, noting that control of CO2 means control of economies and ultimately, people. What is being plotted right now at the nearby UN COP21 summit, he added, is a “direct subsidy to kleptocracies,” which are pocketing the climate loot and hiding it in their bank accounts. “It’s a matter of the poor in rich countries supporting the rich in the poor countries,” Singer concluded.

Also speaking at the summit was Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore, who gave a presentation thoroughly debunking the myth of “ocean acidification.” In the real world, he said, there is “no conceivable scenario” in which the world’s oceans would become acidic. “It is a complete fabrication with no basis in reality,” he said. In fact, CO2 does wonders for marine life, Dr. Moore showed, noting that the most productive area of the ocean, the Humboldt Current, is also the most “acidic.” “CO2 is fertilizing the oceans just like it is greening the Earth,” he said. In an interview with The New American after his presentation, Moore also identified the real agenda behind the UN climate summit: bringing down industrial civilization. If successful, he said, the lives of countless human beings will be lost as a result.

Dr. Christopher Essex, associated chair in the Department of Applied Mathematics at the University of Western Ontario, also spoke at the summit, taking on various myths about the “climate” that are being peddled by politicians and “journalists” who he said have no clue what they are talking about. Trying to explain the unfathomably complex nature of the climate system, Essex said the whole “climate” conversation was absurd. One of his slides comically noted, “Over 95 percent of the models agree: The observations must be wrong.” Essex built his first climate model in the 1970s, and in an interview with The New American said that humanity still has a lot to learn about the climate system and that much more research is needed.

After the scientists gave their presentations, a panel discussion highlighted the massive damage being done — especially to the poor — by so called “climate” policies. Among those speaking was Lord Christopher Monckton, a giant in the climate realist movement. Climate alarmists have “the money, power, and glory, but we have the truth, so they have nothing, and we have everything.” If the UN summit succeeds in its goals, though, millions of people will die, he said. In an interview later with The New American, Monckton said the real agenda was to create a communist-fascist-style global government that would end self-government, prosperity, the middle class, and liberty. Another expert who spoke on the panel, Dr. Wolfgang Mueller with the European Institute for Climate and Energy (EIKE), also explained that what the developing world needs is not “climate reparations” or CO2 controls, but affordable energy.

Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), chairman of the Senate Environment Committee, appeared at the summit via video link to provide encouragement to the realists. Noting that Americans are catching on to the climate-alarmism hoax, Senator Inhofe vowed that Congress and the American people would scuttle any pseudo-treaties negotiated by the Obama administration that may come out of the UN summit. “We already rejected [Obama’s] power plan, that’s done,” he said, speaking of Congress rejecting the centerpiece of what Inhofe called the administration’s “climate charade.” “You guys, here in this room, as you always have, just keep it up. Our progress would not have happened without you. You’re doing the Lord’s work, and we’re going to win this thing together.”

The summit was hosted by the Heartland Institute, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), and the Competitive Enterprise Institute. So far, despite the fact that thousands of “journalists” are in Paris covering the UN summit, virtually nothing has been reported by the press about the prestigious scientists and their conference. Also blacked out of the media has been the NIPCC report, in which scientists examined the peer-reviewed science and came to dramatically different conclusions from the UN IPCC. Heartland speakers noted that they often invite alarmist scientists to debate realists, but instead, the alarmist movement prefers to pretend that the “science is settled” rather than address the major holes in their theory. And at the latest summit, that was about as evident as it could be. Still, virtually everybody at the conference expressed hope that, eventually, truth and facts would prevail.

The original link to the Blog wasn't working when I originally posted this. It's working again, so here it is: Paris Stunned As Scientists Debunk Climate Change Hysteria | Your News Wire

Peter

[OrionLightShip]

Light is Rising Up

Awesome news indeed! As the dark clouds of corporate fascism gather overhead; there is more and more light springing up and punching holes in those clouds.

[BroMikey]

Hey Folks,

Here's a Blog Post on what happened in Paris that the main media outlets didn't carry:

An international team of scientists have stunned attendees at the UN’s climate change conference in Paris

The scientists say that while the science refutes the UN’s claim.........

........ sinister ‘climate regime’ agenda, which includes: destroying industrial civilization, propping up kleptocrats with Western tax funds, and seizing control of the global economy ..............................



Dubbed “Day of Examining the Data,” ............................. the ongoing 19-year pause in warming, no intellectually honest attendee could have left the summit still believing the “climate” hysteria pushed by various governments and international outfits.


Indeed, practically every fear-mongering narrative pushed at the nearby UN climate summit was mercilessly debunked with facts, data, logic, and common sense.

Among the scientists speaking at the realist summit were Dr. Robert Carter, former chief of the School of Earth Sciences at James Cook University. “Global warming is not happening,” he explained, even noting that long-term cooling was predicted..

Also speaking at the summit was Dr. Willie Soon, an astrophysicist and geoscientist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), he explained, “is totally anti-science, and is harming science.”.............

..Dr. Soon said the vicious attacks against his character and family by global-warming alarmists had only motivated him to work harder.re.


...the alarmists who want to empower the UN, control CO2, and redistribute wealth. So far, though, the alarmists have failed, and they have a tough job ahead, Singer said.

“This is about money and power,” Singer told ...............


What is being plotted right now at the nearby UN COP21 summit, he added, is a “direct subsidy to kleptocracies,”



After the scientists gave their presentations, a panel discussion highlighted the massive damage being done — especially to the poor — by so called “climate” policies.


Climate alarmists have “the money, power, and glory, but we have the truth, so they have nothing, and we have everything.” If the UN summit succeeds in its goals, though, millions of people will die, he said.

“We already rejected [Obama’s] power plan, that’s done,” he said,.............. called the administration’s “climate charade.”


Also blacked out of the media has been the NIPCC report, in which scientists examined the peer-reviewed science and came to dramatically different conclusions from the UN IPCC.


Heartland speakers noted that they often invite alarmist scientists to debate realists, but instead, the alarmist movement prefers to pretend that the “science is settled” rather than address the major holes in their theory.

The original link to the Blog doesn't seem to be working. I'll post it here if it starts working again.

Peter

Thanks Peter

I am not surprised at all to hear the above. I have shortened the original
post by you from that site and I hope the site comes back on. Hopefully
the FED's didn't move in with "THEIR" swat teams to threaten, intimidate
and annihilate those who oppose "THEIR" NWO.

France is America's friend but the BIG WIGS want us to kill one another so
the media "BLACKOUTS" will continue so as to squelch the voices of reason
and common decency.

Great to hear that France and many others are not fooled by the big bad wolf NWO flunkies.

Nice to see you again Peter.

[BroMikey]

Global Warming Non-Sense

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbfu-ps32aI[/VIDEO]

[David G Dawson]

Peter,
Thankyou for the information on the Paris Climate Change Conference and much as expected.

NASA, by not showing us what it is that we are all living on has in reality, opened the door to much experiment and this is just one and includes the Flat Earth theory and the fact that we are not rotating and why we are not allowed to go to the 'South Pole'.
Also included is the distance the Sun actually is from Earth as I believe it is not the 93 million miles we are being told it is.
I am ex RF/Navy/NASA Tidbinbilla Space Track.

Sun Distance 4th December 2015:
Measuring Station:
31,54,39.6S
152,27,14E
Taree, NSW, Australia
Amongst the trees - Nature

Sunrise 05:37 am
Sunset 19:43 pm
Middle of Day or Sun Apogee at 12:40 pm
Sun Angle 80º Direction Magnetic 350º 338ºT
Distance from source baseline right angle = 600 + 1630 - (1630 * 74/91) = 2230 - 1325 = 905

Sun Vertical Distance = 2230 - 1325 = 905 *Tan 80º (5.6713) = 5130 miles 8255 km

Again cloud in the way but reading confirmed from either time side.
Slightly less distance now which is suggesting a closer point back into November and this may tie in with an increase in thunderstorm activity.

Series Progression:
18th August corrected 2,772 miles 4461 km
1st September 3,030 miles 4876 km
28th September 3,545 miles 5705 km
10th October 3,840 miles 6180 km
26th October 4,603 miles 7408 km
16th November 5314 miles 8553 km
4th December 5130 miles 8255 km

Cloud here is something of a problem as we have this guy here (me - Reich/Constable - that keeps making rain and makes it virtually impossible on some days and can go on for weeks.
Landscape, however locally looks sensational for this time of year going into what is being predicted as a hot Summer with a 'Godzilla El Nino' also at play.

Questions are continually being raised by this experimentation and one is the bearing which indicates being not due North and these are worked on as they arise.

A call from the people to remove the United Nations and its corrupt working organisation and install something that is truthful and is able to help those in need.
All those involved with this disgusting hypocrisy are living in abject splendour and have no effect at the front line which to them, is just a name on paper.

Repeat: In the UK, Piers Corbyn has a good take on Climate Change:

Welcome

I am here still asking that same old question - does radiation have anything to do with Climate Change and is the Carbon/CO2 angle just an agenda to shift the blame from Nuclear associations onto the consumers?
Both Walter Russell and Dino Kraspedon would definately think so.

Associated with the Sun distance is the new Japanese Satellite Himawari-8 that is being used by Australia/New Zealand for weather purposes and you can see the disc of the Sun reflecting off the Ocean.
If it were 96 million miles away, why do you actually see a disc and not a full coverage over the Earth's surface?
There is an anomaly attached with this as that disc will never reach the marked Tropic of Capricorn (Rockhampton, Queensland) with < two weeks to go to Summer Solstice SH as it appears to be static at this time and has been so for well over a month.

Satellite Viewer

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analemma

Smokey

[Danny B]

Peter, great post. I just want to add a couple of links. Climate change shock: Burning fossil fuels COOLS planet, says NASA | UK | News | Daily Express
Study: NOAA Overestimated US Warming by 50% - Breitbart
So, between cooling from fossil fuels and the approaching solar minimum AND geo-engineering, we are looking at a big reduction in bio-mass on land.

[rickoff]

update

Well folks, 2015 closed out with the fact that there has been zero global warming for 18 years. In spite of that fact, there is a huge push by the climate alarmists to smear "climate change deniers." Of course they had to change the name of the game from 'global warming' to 'climate change' simply because they realized there was no warming, and that people were catching on to that reality. And since the climate is continuously changing, who in their right mind would deny that there is climate change? So the new name is instead being used to imply that climate change is being caused by mankind, and that the results are extreme weather events. None of that is borne out by the facts, though, so they may already be looking for a new name for their game. In the meantime, though, anyone who disagrees with their false science is labeled a "denier," as if such denier is denying "true science," and is considered an outcast by the Agenda 21 supporting science community. This kind of repression is now also being seen in some states where legislators are calling for "deniers" to suffer some kind of punishment, and there is also a push to eliminate science textbooks and teaching guides that question the validity of climate change pseudo science or lend even a smidgeon of support to the dissenting opinions of other scientists. The Portland, Oregon school system is just one example of this effort to stifle dissent.

Here's an interesting bit of audio in which Physics Professor Dr. James Wanliss talks about the reasons why global warming is definitely not a settled science, and says, "What we have here with this whole global warming issue is a falsification of the actual hypothesis."

[gene gene]

If the UN and the Agenda 21 supporting scientific community had called this Global Cooling they would have had lots of real scientific data to back their claims. They bet on the wrong horse.

Here is another video showing real and altered data.
This Video-Article has 90 citations, with 124 more citations incorporated by reference.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ew05sRDAcU

The cycles of the sun seem to indicate that we are moving toward another little ice age.

There is an interesting graph at 7:50 in the vid showing who is giving money and where it's going. Money talks on both sides. Gene

[Ernst]

If the UN and the Agenda 21 supporting scientific community had called this Global Cooling they would have had lots of real scientific data to back their claims. They bet on the wrong horse.

Here is another video showing real and altered data.
This Video-Article has 90 citations, with 124 more citations incorporated by reference.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ew05sRDAcU

The cycles of the sun seem to indicate that we are moving toward another little ice age.

There is an interesting graph at 7:50 in the vid showing who is giving money and where it's going. Money talks on both sides. Gene

Thanks for the link!
Are we due for a mini-ice-age or are we due for the real thing?
The way I see it, it is a bit more than the last mini ice age in the 1850's (or thereabout).
We are also long overdue for a magnetic pole reversal and I think those two are linked.
If my interpretation is correct, the sun may stop shining for a few days during such a reversal which will cause a very severe temperature drop (as you can imagine). Then the unevenly distributed mass of ice may cause a shift of the entire earth crust relative to its rotational axis.
These things may have happened before.
Frozen mamoths were found with still green leaves in their stomach. They must have been frozen really quick. Continents have shifted, Antarctica was without ice, Egypt looked more like a rainforest...

Oh well, just keep a pair of extra socks handy.


Ernst.