About JB 10kW generator

[dankie]

The jim Watson replication was done over 20 years ago... Since then nobody has achieved overunity with the bedini design. So little proof OR info of this that i doubt it was even true . As you may know perpetual motion never relates to Overunity and cant do any useful work. Stan Meyer said that himself

Since then ... Zero success whatsoever ...

What is the failure rate of everybody who raplicated anything Panacea related ??? You guessed it 100% failure rate ...

[Matthew Jones]

What is the failure rate of everybody who raplicated anything Panacea related ??? You guessed it 100% failure rate ...

Whats the failure rate of someone trying to spell while insulting others???

You guessed it 100% failure rate ...

Now was that statement needed at all???

Matt

[Jules Tresor]

Many people have replicated Bedini

Hello,

The basic and complete data to reproduce Bedini overunity motor/generators is in public domain since decades.

He went public with Bearden to sell a small version of such on overunity energizer in the 80's but was stopped, with a gun on the face, as he told on forums and elsewhere. It was called a G-Field; see:

"This is a picture of a small G-Field Generator built by Bedini Electronics 1984."
http://radiant.100free.com/zpe_bedini_gfield.jpg

His energisers have been reproduced by few persons, like Tilley (http://radiant.100free.com/zpe_tilley.html) and Yaldiz (http://radiant.100free.com/zpe_yaldiz_energiser.html).

It's "easy" but tricky to adjust, as said Bedini; all is in the adjusting of the rotation RPM, to create the best pulses to recharge the battery(ies) while supplying the motor ...

You can find info on Bedinis' energizers here also:
http://radiant.100free.com/zpe_bedini_energizer.html
http://radiant.100free.com/zpe_bedini_energizer2.html

He said all already, since a long time, but he get menaced of death ... he is not the only one to know how, but ... it can't be sold to the public, energy lobbies are making trillions by selling electricity !

But it's true that things are changing now, energy is so much needed by new developing economies, and we are so many to push around and to spray the knowledge, that finaly we can get it ready soon ... if we keep believing and working HARD !

It's possible, and a joint effort like here on Energetic Forum and on Panacea BOCAF, with well organised and motivated guys will certainly bring the all thing out to the users, to those who need it the most ! Time is with us !

Good luck,
MDG

[ren]

The jim Watson replication was done over 20 years ago... Since then nobody has achieved overunity with the bedini design. So little proof OR info of this that i doubt it was even true . As you may know perpetual motion never relates to Overunity and cant do any useful work. Stan Meyer said that himself

Since then ... Zero success whatsoever ...

What is the failure rate of everybody who raplicated anything Panacea related ??? You guessed it 100% failure rate ...

Thats because there is no such thing as overunity. How can you have more than there is already? Straight up, its a bad word to use full stop. Work done @ unity or a COP of over 1! That is all there is. And thats been done plenty of times.....

What is the budget for most of the home builders here? What sort of tools do they have access to? I am working on a window motor currently, Im up for $500 bucks for a rotor to be machined, and it comes out of my pocket because I believe in the cause. I will probably be building it for the rest of my life at this rate. My point is, no one thinks there is anything to this tech, because no one replicates it in its entirety, no one understands it. How many replications have you seen that even come close to anything professionally built?

[ren]

I would offer a simple proof of concept schematic, that even a little girl could build...

lol. Gold.

[dambit]

Many people have had success with this tech. We just don't feel the need to go out and tell every media person we can find. Besides, after having built many variations of these machines I can honestly say that they are doing what they are intended to do. It charges batteries, and uses less power to do it than normal techniques.

Criticism is fine, but insults don't wash.

[Aaron]

Bedini circuits

If nobody ever achiever over 1.0 with the Bedini chargers, it is only 1 possible benefit compared to the PROFOUND implications of being able to save batteries from the graveyard. Save a handful of batteries and it has paid for itself. After that, its all in the black...that is over 1.0 financially.

I have achieved over 1.0 on the Bedini circuits to the best of my ability to measure the work I got from the batteries after charging and the most impressive was with large cap banks dumping to batts with a mechanical switch. The battery kept charging up by itself for almost an HOUR after I turned the power off. It wasn't some phantom voltage, it lit lights and powered my scooter and I even drove that thing down to John's shop. Bearden says it is the lead ions momentum keeping them going. I don't know...I think there is aetheric entrainment as well.

It takes mass repetition of charge discharge then the extra shows. AND, it cannot be mentioned enough that most people have already achieved over 1.0 in their energizers if they account for the mechanical work done that is free. That wheel can blow air and that IS real work.

Heatpumps? 5.0 COP is no big deal and these ratings are even on the manufactuer's stickers. 5 times as much work done as what someone has to put into the system. Just demonstrating that an open system can allow extra to come in that isn't paid for.

[dankie]

Of course this hobby is expensive if you didnt know that by now you should find another hobby or save up for solar panels ...

Ya well i am dissapointed in Panacea's work , way too much failiure rate , no progress has been done on anything so far , No good research whatsoever on Meyers ... Very shallow research !!

The best info about Meyers i found here were quotes ...


My friend Stevie is still having problems with his Bob Boyce replication , something that Panacea claims to have been replicated many times successfully... Its funny when you actually try to find info about a replication there is none... I dare you to find some successful replication on google ... Some old buy with a truck and no measurements whatsoever and some unsuccessful experimenter .

YouTube - Bob Boyce Cell pt.1

Login

[ren]

Of course this hobby is expensive if you didnt know that by now you should find another hobby or save up for solar panels ...

Ya well i am dissapointed in Panacea's work , way too much failiure rate , no progress has been done on anything so far , No good research whatsoever on Meyers ... Very shallow research !!

The best info about Meyers i found here were quotes ...


My friend Stevie is still having problems with his Bob Boyce replication , something that Panacea claims to have been replicated many times successfully... Its funny when you actually try to find info about a replication there is none... I dare you to find some successful replication on google ... Some old buy with a truck and no measurements whatsoever and some unsuccessful experimenter .

YouTube - Bob Boyce Cell pt.1

Login

Off topic. Start your own thread Dankie if you want to talk about HHO.

And this hobbie isnt that expensive at all compared to other hobbies.

[ashtweth]

Guys he is talking about the one shown on energy from the vacuum series

[Dingus]

Does anyone have any idea where John Bedini lives?

[Aaron]

Bedini's location

Dingus,

Bedini's home is personal but his business address is on is websites. His shop is about 40 minutes from my home.

[bart]

hi ren may i ask what size of wheel are you turning up ?[I am new here so don t want to step on toes] i turned up a 13 inch last year started a concept then realized i need cir abilities so now i ll biuld my first sg [only 13 cause thats the biggest the little shop could do]. actually only found john s sites this year ... lovin it

[bart]

hi Aaron in those pis the wieght mass mo wheel looks like an old antique gas motor piece.

[ashtweth]

Of course this hobby is expensive if you didnt know that by now you should find another hobby or save up for solar panels ...

Ya well i am dissapointed in Panacea's work , way too much failiure rate , no progress has been done on anything so far , No good research whatsoever on Meyers ... Very shallow research !!

The best info about Meyers i found here were quotes ...


My friend Stevie is still having problems with his Bob Boyce replication , something that Panacea claims to have been replicated many times successfully... Its funny when you actually try to find info about a replication there is none... I dare you to find some successful replication on google ... Some old buy with a truck and no measurements whatsoever and some unsuccessful experimenter .

YouTube - Bob Boyce Cell pt.1

Login

Dankie, the two people we claim to have done it are Dave Lawton and Ravi, both who are registered open source engineers with the org. (Thats Meyers)I myself have two cells based on their instruction under construction ATM for the course document. I think you are a bit confused like your last statement about our doc mate. . We have a Bob boyce toroid wound and his circuit done, and are considering making some plates with the copper cores. At no time have i announced we have finished a Boyce replication. Plus i know that guy you posted, that Larry's BRUTE FORCE Bob boyce replication.
You seem to be making allot of un founded statements lately. I hope your not trying to pick on some one mate, this forum doesn't stand for any of that, just a heads up.

Ash

EDIT.

> dankie
>What is the failure rate of everybody who raplicated anything Panacea related ??? You guessed it 100% failure rate ...

Okay Dankie, i think we should have a little talk mate. First of all all our COURSE material has been replicated, GEET, Hydroxy, RV , Imhotep, Bedini and now MRA. Other over unity RESEARCH manuals have been done by the the original; engineers reports. We are in the process of validating them and then moving them up to courses. You on the other hand are a boarder line DISINFO person, saying things like that are clearly misleading.Thats the third time, strike THREE Dankie. I think i will ignore you from now on, as your obviously very confused, that's putting it mildly.