Radiant Matter

[Bodkins]

dmonarch
will be back soon lifes to busy!!

[dmonarch]

Useless Theories

Tell that to all the greats who came before you. Faraday, coulomb, newton, tesla, einstein.

Who cares about all that . Concentrate on making something and stop with those useless theories.

[dankie]

Tell that to all the greats who came before you. Faraday, coulomb, newton, tesla, einstein.

Lol , comparing yourself to those people ?

[dmonarch]

Aether/chi compression

I was thinking then that if aether/chi is uncompressible to a degree then the sun could be creating aether waves outwardly which then compress out the outer rim of our solar system which then cause any further aether waves to bound back creating null points and so orbits for planets. If this is correct it would then mean that the sun dictates our orbit and that ii is not steady and indeed possible for it to just dissapear. This would explain the not so rounded shape of our planet.

[dmonarch]

Justification not needed

At what point did you gain the qualifications to put others thoughts down. As far as i know the job of God is already taken. Two weeks ago I would have been hurt by what you said, but now i just think your a silly little person. I wasted a long time because of listening to what other people say. When i lost my vision nearly completely i realised that what such people had to say was of no value. They would not listen to reason and only enjoyed putting others down. Since geting my vision back partially I am not going to let anyone such as yourself stop me. I will listen to reason but it seems you have none. You have offered up nothing of value on this thread when all along what i had put up was for discusion. That was the whole idea. It is a topic which needs to be addressed. I have checked throughout the forum and it would seem the other threads went into scalar technology being related to dialetrics. I am here to learn like everyone else that is the point of a forum. This forum appears to be at the foreground of such discussions and has a wealth of experience people on it. It is the perfect place to talk about the fringe of science.

Lol , comparing yourself to those people ?

[dankie]

Sorry for your loss...

Ok Ok ... you are right ... I am a big ******* .

You are one of my favorites here dmonarch , dont feel so bad ...

I actually liked this particular post , I know things are tough now , I sometimes get depressed by the lack of organisation of these posts I read thats all...

[Sephiroth]

What is inertia?
i dont have a problem with it. why do we think being still is the natural state.
everything in the cosmos moves nothing stands still.

Thought I would bring this back up since I just found it

I like your way of thinking... but it leads me an area where the line between sceince and philosophy starts blurring...

How can we tell what objects are in motion and which are still? For an object to be in motion there needs to be an object that it is moving in relation to.

Imagine a... I don't know... a cat... hurtling through space at a thousand miles an hour. We know it is going a thousand miles an hour because Gordon Brown had a speed camera on Andromeda and it snapped a picture of the cat as it hurtled past.

Unfortunately, the flash of the speed camera was made from an experimental filament that inadvertantly caused a chain reaction that instantaniously destroyed all mass in the universe as it took the picture (damn you Gordon Brown!), though the cat (having nine lives) survived and carried on its journey uninterupted.

This is getting a bit silly... shouldn't have used a cat as an example really, but anyway...

Now that all mass, other than our speeding cat, is absent, is the cat still in motion?

[Inquorate]

motion

If there's aether left, yes. Mass moves thru aether like sound moves thru a steel beam.. So there is a universal reference point, and relativity is flawed... So if the cat were to suddenly change speed or direction, the whorls in aether (like vibrating atoms on our steel beam) will want to continue tunneling thru the atoms in the cat in the same way, as aether is elastic and thus resistance to change. This makes what we call inertia. So, sudden stop would overstress the atomic bonds in the cat, and... Well, err. Poor kitty.

[dmonarch]

You took the words out of my mouth

Inquorote you took the words out of my mouth. All you would need to do is take a look at the aether at location and the record of what has happened to it would be there. An example physically doing this would be the Hodowanec gravity wave detectors. Lets say you have a pendulum with mass at the end and start it swinging the detector will pick up the moments where the mass changes direction at the top of each arc which when you think about kinda resembles a small scalar packet. It can also pick up the beating heart of someone entering the room. The detector is able to pick up the signal even moving miles away in a car. Heres the info on Hodowanec and his devices.
Gregory Hodowanec: Rhysmonic Cosmology (Index of Articles). So i guess we can not tell you atleast now if something is moving but instead if it was moving.

[dmonarch]

Scalar wave

When you look at what the requirements for the ssg coil are to work you realise that you are creating a pendulum event and so a scalar wave. If you look at this document from the same group i posted you will see the direct correlation where the play between time and the inertia in the aether along with its slight uncompressibility. There is a big picture its just that everyone uses different language
Gregory Hodowanec: Cosmology Note (3-18-88) Gravitation (Rhysmonic Cosmology)

[Bodkins]

Thought I would bring this back up since I just found it

I like your way of thinking... but it leads me an area where the line between sceince and philosophy starts blurring...

How can we tell what objects are in motion and which are still? For an object to be in motion there needs to be an object that it is moving in relation to.

Imagine a... I don't know... a cat... hurtling through space at a thousand miles an hour. We know it is going a thousand miles an hour because Gordon Brown had a speed camera on Andromeda and it snapped a picture of the cat as it hurtled past.

Unfortunately, the flash of the speed camera was made from an experimental filament that inadvertantly caused a chain reaction that instantaniously destroyed all mass in the universe as it took the picture (damn you Gordon Brown!), though the cat (having nine lives) survived and carried on its journey uninterupted.

This is getting a bit silly... shouldn't have used a cat as an example really, but anyway...

Now that all mass, other than our speeding cat, is absent, is the cat still in motion?

So if the universe stoped moving is it still moving.... is the universe still moving in somethin? I think everythin is sound so its allways moving to be matter, and as you saay the lines between sceince and philosophy starts blurring. this need to happen because logic will not give the anwsers to all the questions. Poor Cat all on his our!!!!

[Sephiroth]

So if the universe stoped moving is it still moving.... is the universe still moving in somethin? I think everythin is sound so its allways moving to be matter, and as you saay the lines between sceince and philosophy starts blurring. this need to happen because logic will not give the anwsers to all the questions. Poor Cat all on his our!!!!

I like the answer Inquorate gave

According to relativity the object will not be in motion as there is nothing for it to be in motion relative to.

but lets say it took 1 kilojoule of energy to get teh cat moving at 1000km per hour. If the cat is now stationary then where is the energy that it took to put the cat in motion in the first place

I personally believe that the energy used in putting an object in motion isn't so much as moving the object, but rather creates a condition where the aether is being pulled/pushed from one side of the object to the other. A dipole, if you like, where the aether at one side of the object is at a high potential and the aether on the other side is at a low potential.

What is kinetic energy? Is it an energy that is stored in the mass that propels it? No. Kinetic energy is a condition of the space surrounding the object. It is a wave in the aether.

So despite relativity, the cat is still in motion because the "kinetic dipole" in the aether still exists.

But here is where philosophy starts getting mixed in I don't think the cat was ever in motion at all since it is the space surrounding the cat that is in motion.

Just a random opinion from an unqualified amateur, so don't take my word for it

[Bodkins]

I didnt see Inquorate answer (busy at work) Hes always right when it comes to the aether movement,interaction.
Ive seen somewhere animation of the aether movement around a moving object and your right with the potentials.
So, potential difference in the aether is inertia?

[Bodkins]

When you look at what the requirements for the ssg coil are to work you realise that you are creating a pendulum event and so a scalar wave. If you look at this document from the same group i posted you will see the direct correlation where the play between time and the inertia in the aether along with its slight uncompressibility. There is a big picture its just that everyone uses different language
Gregory Hodowanec: Cosmology Note (3-18-88) Gravitation (Rhysmonic Cosmology)

Brilliant
need time to readup i like it

[Inquorate]

Inertia

Kinetic energy 'stored' as a space change in the aether in a sort of a dipole...
Kind of. Movement of mass thru aether sets up a particular resonance in both aether / object. We can visualize lots of little whirlpools on surface of slow moving river water.. If a leaf is pulled by a string with the water flow, it will move across quite smoothly. Dragged the other way, against the whorls set up by the current and there will be turbulence or more tension on the skin of the water where the leaf touches.

When mass moves thru aether it sets up whorls in the surrounding aether that can freely oscillate without resistance. Try and change the rate of spin of these aether vortices or spin direction however and the neighboring vortices supply resistance to this change, just like how little whirlpools on water skin support each other's movement..

And this is why a spinning top which sets up a stable rate of change of motion is so resistant to falling over.. It's rate of change of motion is causing a standing wave of 'inertia'.. The aether acts more 'solid'

Work out a way of artificially changing the direction or rate of aether spin, and you can impart immediate motion to an object, and cancel out the inertial resistance therein.

Why, you'd have built a 'ufo'...

Hint: early 'ufo' sightings the craft glowed. Much like high voltage corona discharge.. The early ones used to wobble on their own axis when motionless. They fixed that issue in the late 50's when they realised Tesla's flying engine was just a stabilizer, to set up some inertial resistance inside the craft.

There, I said it... Now I feel better ;-)