Aromaz Radiant Energy Joint Research Group

[Inquorate]

Pancake coils

Tesla has a patent where he supercools his pancake coils. Maybe there's something in that.

[Joit]

I did think about it, what would be, if the Current not runs straight throught the Wire, but in Spirals, and push the EM field around there. Go figure.

[sucahyo]

@Aromaz, do you believe in the theory bellow?

Paranormal Observations of ORMEs Atomic Structure

Within the central ellipsoid form and the valence structures are found smaller forms (and similarly so for the other element family shapes), which Phillips has managed to relate to protons, neutrons, quarks, and their components. Of course quarks, let alone baryons, leptons, omegons, etc. were unheard of when this information was first published. The smallest particles which make up the physical atom are referred to by Leadbeater and Besant as "ultimate physical atoms", since they seem to be the constituent particle from which all the subatomic particles are built up. They have called these "Anu", after the Sanskrit name for the ultimate particles of matter (it is the same root term used in Anima, "the size of an atom"). There are two types of these, termed + and -. The Anu "particles" are composed of whirls of energy which spin in opposite senses between the + and - varieties. These whirls of energy, when magnified under increasing power by yogic vision, are themselves composed of smaller spirals, and those of smaller spirals, and so on, down through 7 layers of nesting.

The Anu are many orders of magnitude smaller than the subatomic particles, and the subatomic particles are in turn many orders of magnitude smaller than the elemental physical atoms of the periodic chart. The Anu, and more complex particles, all move at enormous velocities, sweeping out the shapes that I am referring to, and the atom is an extremely active thing to see. It is ceaslessly throbbing, pulsating, spinning, gyrating and precessing with amazing rapidity and vigor when so viewed. Not at all like the billiard ball protons and neutrons with the spherical electron shells many would expect to see. But our dashed expectations are our own fault, rather than Nature's. Still, we are better prepared now than at any time before to understand the remaining secrets of atomic structure; we must only recognize that things are far more complex than we have ever previously supposed.(2)

[Aromaz]

@Suchayo;
Personally I believe in Electrons (& Positron), Protons, Neutrons, photons.
That is where I stop, as for the rest they can be named as they wish - we
are already 4 steps lower than what we could verify by any means. That is
FOUR levels of theories only

Gravity et all - for me is just coming down to the same thing called Electrons.
For the present, I do not need to work with any other things, these already
seems to give to me what I need. The more I read and experiment with this
as my basis, the more I become convinced we do not need to look much
further than electrons and photons.

It is very possible that there are MANY levels of smaller 'things' but that is
unlikely to be verified soon - other than mathematics.

What we have to look for is another means of utilizing electron energy; since
we do know all the current methods are very uneconomic.

[darkwizard]

Aromaz you always are right, a down to earth man.

[Joit]

Another interresting View and Explanation of Voltages, Watts, Amperes and Ohms. and few other nice Statements.

[sucahyo]

Thanks Aromaz . I guess I have to read the "occult chemistry" with that in mind.

[Joit]

@Darkwizard
Why are you sure, that negative Energy can be created, as you wrote at the other Thread.
When our Meters lie, as it seems like they do, its probatly positive Energy, what is created.

[darkwizard]

I don´t want to start a street fight or something else.

[Joit]

No, it was a serious Question, just wonder, what it really is.
Figure, when you can create positive Energy, you only would need to look, how you can 'burn' it again, that its gone again.

And as i postet earlier, when you build a galvanic Batterie, the Electrons are mioving from Magnesium to the Graphit.
The Magnesium will be weaker over time, and anyhow dissappear.
But the Meter says, Magnesium is the '-' Pol.

When it shows the same for negative Energy, then its actually positive one.

[Joit]

But, oh well, when you talk about the Energy between Peoples,
then, there is no Meter for that.

[darkwizard]

Yes, Negative energy doesn't exists, but it is the name that some guys had called it

I know what are you saying, Negative energy is a myth.

I can create energy because, the energy is only differential, when you have the difference you have energy.

The universe is asymmetric, entropy exists , negative entropy too.

Negative energy is a bad name, it is negative entropy energy.

To obtain free electrical energy, one has to condense negative entropy energy into a capacitor or a battery.

To obtain negative entropy energy , one has to pulse a coil.

[Joit]

Um, No, i dont say much about it.
And actually, i think, its the first Time, i did hear about.
But its anyhow deep into Sience for me, and seems like, this Energy is hard to access. Or we do allready in some cases, when we create Energy.

But from most what i know from the basic Stuff from Elektronic or Thermodynamic i do forget about it,
to get my head free for the real Things, and can observe unusual Things better.

[Aromaz]

Negative Energy explained

Allow me to give my explanation to this. First we will have to re-define science, else the confusion will just continue – in my usual commoners terms.

Electrons are negatively charged and in a battery they move in direction from negative pole to positive pole. Positrons are the same as electrons, but they are spinning in the opposite way and POSITIVELY charged. In case their energy fields are the same, both annihilate when positron meeting with electron; If their energy levels are not the same, then that amount of energy that are equal neutralize and the remaining (usually part of electron) remains as photons.

Thus taken in fact all universe (and electricity) is in fact NEGATIVELY charged – negative energy. To create the opposite – Positive energy – will just cause neutralization.

Now the non-science:
What some people call NEGATIVE ENERGY does not exist.; unless you include the black holes and particle accelerators! I herewith withdraw all my earlier references to this as well – if I did make it many months ago. It is the wrong understanding of this so called ‘negative energy’ that make so many people believe and chasing this phenomenon of OverUnity – including foolish me.

So, then what the heck am I doing here? By removing as much as possible electrons you will make such environment ‘hungry’ for electrons; which will cause free electrons to rush in to fill that void. This is what some people referred to as ‘negative’ energy.

THAT my dear friends; is exactly the only way we can make our dreams come true. That means the only thing we have to make is a sort of ‘transformer’ – and THAT was Nikola Tesla’s Tower.

Then how to do:
1. Get a material that can act like a capacitor.
2. Extract maximum possible electrons – by forcing that material to expel them, which you do again by reducing the electron charge until they pop off the shell. You get slow moving electron and photon. Expel electrons for example with Microwave or heat.
3. Now have another supply of electrons handy – could be just environment (so called aether) or it could be supply from another mineral – that can fill the space. Bombard this material which is now hungry with electrons.
4. The complete cycle starts all over again.

This will give you potential speed up to that of photons.
This will give you unlimited amount of energy.
The re-generation could be trillions of cycles per second.
Basically – THAT is how ion engines work,
and THAT is the fuel propelling deep space probes; today.

There is also the opposite procedure, which is what I am pursuing at present; that is to super saturate a material with electrons. Direct conversion of some nuclear emission are doing exactly just that!

[Inquorate]

Well put

I am of the same mind Aromaz. I posted some stuff in bodkins primary state of matter thread on page 3 about exactly the same principle, just different words. And I came across a theory of magnetism as well.