@ sucahyo;
You ALWAYS should keep time and knowledge in perspective. During the time
both Tesla and Moray remarked on "radium merely retransmits energy that which it receives, that it converts the cosmic rays into electrical particles"
they did not know or understand the concept of Radioactive/Nuclear Decay.
BUT: Such radioactive decay is exactly, precisely and only the same as the
general COSMIC RAYS. Radiation/nuclear decay = Cosmic Radiation; both ways. So their statements are in fact valid to the full extend; except the source of photons/electrons is the Radium neuclei itself and not from another external source.
Further: Physics can in fact "quence radioactivity" and they can modify it. Only question remaining is WHY they do not do it? Radioactive radiation can generate electrical current directly; thus the same material used in an 'hot' reactor like Uranium 235 can be re-used once it is considered nuclear waste - Radium-235 -to generate more continues electricity.
You ALWAYS should keep time and knowledge in perspective. During the time
both Tesla and Moray remarked on "radium merely retransmits energy that which it receives, that it converts the cosmic rays into electrical particles"
they did not know or understand the concept of Radioactive/Nuclear Decay.
BUT: Such radioactive decay is exactly, precisely and only the same as the
general COSMIC RAYS. Radiation/nuclear decay = Cosmic Radiation; both ways. So their statements are in fact valid to the full extend; except the source of photons/electrons is the Radium neuclei itself and not from another external source.
Further: Physics can in fact "quence radioactivity" and they can modify it. Only question remaining is WHY they do not do it? Radioactive radiation can generate electrical current directly; thus the same material used in an 'hot' reactor like Uranium 235 can be re-used once it is considered nuclear waste - Radium-235 -to generate more continues electricity.
Comment