Aromaz Radiant Energy Joint Research Group

[CosmicFarmer]

I got this circuit working with a 9 volt battery, but after less then 1 minute of testing it went from 10 volts to 8. Flattened !

I saw gadgetmall's claim of 1 AA battery lighting a CFL lamp for over 10 hours. He must feedback to source with resonance or something?

[sucahyo]

Glad to have you back Aromaz . Glad to hear that your experiment is a success .

Did you remember when I mention that I want get cold radiant? I partly achieve it and so I rarely do radiant electricity experiment now. I finally able to run my charger for long time, although for safety reason I usually turn it on only 7 hour a day to cool my drink.

[broli]

Aromaz I think this may be related to what you are doing. Take a look at this;

Welcome to the Keshe Foundation website
esp@cenet — results view

Basically he makes fun of nuclear fusion and the ridiculous things these scientists are trying to do. And then shows how it really should be done.

Besides energy creation it can also lift any mass up to anywhere. Apparently the technology is simple to build and use. He's also selling a book with the theory of it.

His patent is a wooping 126 pages long. It's packed with information.

[Aromaz]

Aromaz I think this may be related to what you are doing. Take a look at this;

Broli, thanks man. This is certainly very interesting, though I do not completely agree with his full explanation (Matter/Anti-matter/Dark Energy) on how the atom works, it does have merits and I will leave that notion open.

Lots of it makes sense; in particular on how and why the electron orbids the neuclei why the electron go loose and are captured.

For the first time in all of this learning I did, I found an explanation that holds water!!!!!

The way this man describes the functions and observation - I do AGREE 100% We have to get away from the 'proton/neutron/electron/quark/muan/colour
particle based idea and start realize it is all exactly just the same things - "wave energy"

Man, I watchd and read for hours and re-did all again.
Today will do his patent explanations again.
They are truely PACKED!

THANKS FOR THE HEADS UP!

[Aromaz]

electromagnetic field = aether

The best and most logical explanation I ever saw!

"Some interesting remarks are made by Nobel Prize laureate Wilczek related to the strange background processes in the quantum mechanical concepts. To Frank Wilzcek (arXivhysics/0511067-v2, dd 11 Nov 2005) "In modem quantum mechanics, an electron is no longer described as a particle in orbit. Rather, it is described by a vibrating wave pattern in all space ... In Schrdinger's account light is emitted or absorbed when the electron's vibrations set the electromagnetic field - aether, if you like - in motion, by the same sort of sympathetic vibration that leads to the emission of sound by musical instruments, when their vibrations set air in motion."


Read more:
esp@cenet — Description

[Inquorate]

Just had an idea, don't know if it'd work.

I'm building a flyback driver circuit, and was thinking how it'll be different front the ignition coil circuit because the primary and secondary won't be connected; so hv won't flow back thru the system's negative and destroy my 555 timer..

Which led me to wonder about the radiant oscillator circuit where it connects to the battery.

And I thought, what if one connected the two terminals via a 16 volt zener diode and a 104007, like
(+) -|<-- --|z- (-)

Of course, one may have to put the diodes over a cap, isolated from the battery, but I wonder if that would increase the overall efficiency, capturing the radiant spikes off the coil..

Maybe then pulse charge a charge battery from the intermediary cap, with a neon and scr

Love and light

[Inquorate]

On the misconceptions people have about tesla's understanding of the aether..

when I look at the above post by me, I wonder how I ever get anything useful done.

But slowly we learn..

I can't remember the forum username of the person who emailed me this stuff (and I don't know if he wants his name known so you know who you are..) but it was a real eye opener.

I've literally only read the bits I've put up on my blog, but it cleared the gunk out of my third eye..

Please read the 3 pages from 'harnessing the wheelwork of nature' - and keep in your mind just how much of what tesla was saying is 'lost in translation'.

Then read the other 4 pages because they hint at how to recreate lightning, and suggest that lightning takes energy from the zero point energy field to trigger.

The Aether, the ZPE, and how it is possible tap into virtual energy to re-create lightning. - Vox

Part two of previous post - Vox

Then, consider that what tesla was saying of how he manipulated the aether, he was really saying of the ZPE field. Just re create nature's lightning

So he was spelling out exactly how to stress and manipulate the ZPE when he was saying,

"Electricity, therefore, cannot be called etherin the broad sense of the term;but nothing would seem to stand in the way of calling electricity ether associated with matter, or bound ether;or, in other words, that the so-called static charge of the molecule is ether associated in some way with the molecule......."
"The spinning of the molecules and their ether sets up the ether tensions, or electrostatic strains; the equalization of ether tensions sets up ether motions or electric currents, and the orbital movements produce the effects of electro and permanent magnetism"

...and other pertinent remarks in his lecture on Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and Their Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination

In short, I'll be re reading his statements and patents with the view to keeping in mind that he is pointing out what to research on in order to harness the wheelworks of nature.

I also came across these sites which were fairly good attempts by the authors to bridge the language barrier caused by einstein's relativity theory, and also the pointless? experiments of michelson and morely.

Summation of Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity

x

Anyway, just thought I'd share a growing realisation that Tesla had licked quantum physics.

Love and light

[Inquorate]

Penny dropped thismorning

What tesla is saying is that a voltage difference causes stress in the aether / zero point energy field.

The 'stress' warps the virtual photon field surrounding the electrons.

In a conductor with more mobile electrons, the zero point energy field seeks to balance the warping, by causing electrons to move.

This is why Tesla laughed at Einstein's 'gravity is a warping of space and time' theory; because he (tesla) knew that the aether/ZPE would stabilize any such warping almost instantly.

So, the aether / sea of virtual particles is /are the initial motive source for the electron flow, and any gravitational change will cause deviations of capacitance, just as tesla claimed.

Now, what to do with this realization, apart from taking seriously tesla's suggestion to investigate electrostatics?

L&L

[boguslaw]

What tesla is saying is that a voltage difference causes stress in the aether / zero point energy field.

The 'stress' warps the virtual photon field surrounding the electrons.

In a conductor with more mobile electrons, the zero point energy field seeks to balance the warping, by causing electrons to move.

This is why Tesla laughed at Einstein's 'gravity is a warping of space and time' theory; because he (tesla) knew that the aether/ZPE would stabilize any such warping almost instantly.

So, the aether / sea of virtual particles is /are the initial motive source for the electron flow, and any gravitational change will cause deviations of capacitance, just as tesla claimed.

Now, what to do with this realization, apart from taking seriously tesla's suggestion to investigate electrostatics?

L&L

Investigate Don Smith resonant free energy devices based on Tesla knowledge. Get videos pdf and try to replicate.

[Aromaz]

Electrostatics, Gravity and The Light

So, the aether / sea of virtual particles is /are the initial motive source for the electron flow, and any gravitational change will cause deviations of capacitance, just as tesla claimed.

Now, what to do with this realization, apart from taking seriously tesla's suggestion to investigate electrostatics?
L&L

Look further than 'electrons' and you will find electrons are just one of a few manifestations of the 'real energy'. It has always been said, and even written in so many places. We just fail(ed) to relize this.

What exactly are electrons? What do they consist of? How do they come to exist at all? In one of my last experiments before this earthy life forced me to take back the management of the boat factory - I found and shown in video that energy actually 'flows' around the conductor as well as inside it - but under disruptive pulses - that energy outside is more than the energy inside the wires!

Not to waste much time, I will state the following:
- Electron is a combination of Photon(s)
- Photon(s) = Light.

And God said "LET THERE BE LIGHT" - BEFORE the sun, moon and stars!
You will find this simple statement in all of the 7 major world religions (AND a great number of pagan too) - when talking of THE BEGINNING.

Everything is from The Light - first came Hydrogen, then from H came to existance the whole universe.

Now, more interesting - Light(Photons) are non-magnetic. So magnetic force came after Light - thus how come we got magnetism.

How could two H molecules form Deuterium? Only by means of ? Gravity ?
Yes, maybe - Spin forms gravity ... Is light really affected by gravity?
This tells me that Gravity and Magnetism must be somehow related - or maybe Gravity eventually 'bonds' to form magnetism!

We know for one fact; No magnetism, no electricity.
Even lightning does form magnetic forces.

Then we have to look where, what, how, why is GRAVITY, which will explain to us MAGNETISM - and then ELECTRICITY is in our hand to CREATE from absolutely nothing but Photons.

Because we still do not know the cause of gravity, nor magnetism...
- we will for ever dance in darkness.

[Aromaz]

Smoke and Light

Last night I made an ancient joke of mine about computers from the old days when I was 20 years younger and had a big computer shop in South Africa: "Computers works on smoke nothing else - guaranteed."

I dare anyone to prove me wrong. I can prove it to you that I am right. See, whenever something goes wrong and the smoke comes out from a component on your computer I assure you - that part seized to work.

I am telling this with two reasons.

First - it is an example of TRUTH; but is it the right truth?
Secondly; when I made this joke (since we had a series of bad computer failures here) lately I suddently thought about my earlier posting - above.

Hey what happens when we have a nuclear explosion? Is it not true that it releases the most incredible LIGHT and... ElectroMagnetic waves! What happens when you take a 12v battery and short the two poles directly - I am sure everyone must have done this at some or other time. Light and EM wave! Things are anhilated - gone into other forms of matter; but there is a release of energy from the solid matter to ?????

Yes,yes I know all the usual scientific explanations;

Am I wrong or was N. Tesla more facinated by light than motion in most of his work?

[Aromaz]

Gravity

I am getting more and more amazed at how everything is linked. I am sure there is nothing in the universe that does not affect everything else.

I am still searching for reasons of certain phenomena found in this original circuit and later variations. Electricity and Gravity are linked, the one can not be without the other. Boy oh Boy, I can hear people shouting at me for this one.

So I am making a study, got most worked out in theory (Not mathematical) and did some experiments; it all seems to make more sense than the 'attraction theory'.

Most important: Gravity is NOT the pull of an object (like Earth) it is rather the PUSH of the whole cosmos. After all these years I do think Newton was right with his not-accepted review! Probably it failed because it can not be mathematically calculated.

Questions that set me off is: Howcome the moon is where it is; not closer, not further? Why does the moon not crash to the earth? Why are all the planets and their satellites on the same plane? Hey, howcome the electron remains in position with proton, the neutron et all. In all of these GRAVITY in current scientific understanding just does not make practical sence anymore.

So I went off searching for explanations about the atom; other than that which is current everyday. I found some, develloped my own ideas and found there were in fact other people at some or other times that had the same idea. Only, they were in the same position as I am - too small to make noise.

So here we go... soon on video. Gravity and magnetism are in direct relation to each other - and both together gives us electricity. So howcome then do we have electricity in outer space where there is no gravity? YEs, we do in fact have gravity everywhere. Already said to be caused by GRAVITONS some 400 years ago.

Gravitons, photons and LIGHT!!! Wave? Particle? or something else? How about it being just plain energy - radiant energy?

Quest: Gravity, magnetism, The Earth, The sun, Polar regions, Midnight aurora, solar radiation, neutrons ... put all of that together and see what you got.

[Joit]

Hi Aromaz again, after a while

I agree partially with Gravitation from outside, so far for me,
Gravitation really comes from top, not from bottom.
But this, because the Earth has a Magnetfield,
and at a Magnet, the Lines comes actually from the Poles, and atract all to the Body.
And i bet, the Quarks they did find once, are in real same Things as Magnetism.
But its the same on our Bowl here, whe are not dragged to the Ground, we are pressed.

Light, i did come to the conclusion, it must be transparent Particles,
they actually dont make it bright, but they let us see through the Darkness.
Moon, i only could figure, that its a part Earth, what crashed once away,
as a Meteor did hit the Earth, and it did go far away, as it can.
Maybe it has now a own Magneticfield, like the Earth has,
through the spinning, what it does, and it goes repelled from the Earth.
The spinning itself, its true, all is connected,
but we got dragged from the Sun through Space, and all Particles and Planets follow it.
Nassim Harameins Theorie, what sounds most logical.
And a must for you too, to watch it, even when its 5 Hours, but worth :P.

There are still some other Aspects, like Armageddon did post the inverse law of Squares
what looks controversial to other Theories.

[sucahyo]

I think we should try to make conclusion based on already published experiment on atom, without using current mainstream atomic model. It is hard to explain using current atomic model why electron glide on the conductor skin when moving along the length of it.

[Aromaz]

Mercury vapour

Just some interesting pointers

In my videos 22/23 I was using a fluorecent tube with HV pulses which is picked up by the copper wire coil around that tube - and in fact has higher energy than going into the tube.

So far I did experiments and found that I get the same with mercury vapour in a normal glass tube - thus eliminating all the other gas components.

Now the interesting part: Mercury is NON-magnetic, same as copper. In these experiments I have only the electric pulse through the mercury vapour but that still generates electricity in the equal non-electric copper coil around the outside of the insulating glass tube.

In 1963 H.C. Bertele was awarded a patent # 3,086,135 called "Mercury-Vapour electrical discharge apparatus" in which he describes with much details how to generate mercury vapour with low input - but he does not explain much about the electrical end results.

In the next experiments I want to use pulsed mercury vapour 'pockets' through a very long tube to see how much energy that will yield.