Aromaz Radiant Energy Joint Research Group

[Aromaz]

Research and joint experiments with relation to the RADIANT ENERGY FROM THE UNIVERSE. This thread has the purpose to continue the work already done and shared on "~Imhothep~ Radiant Oscillator"

Everybody is welcome to read, post, share and in particular - EXPERIMENT – provided you maintain a polite and friendly environment of cooperation.

This thread is ultimately to share our experiments and to theorize.

I trust towards the end we will reach the ultimate goal of reaching out to spacetime and extract the 'mystical' energy needed for our existance.

[Aromaz]

This space I will try to maintain as sort of INDEX to the main points we discover. Should this thread becomes big, we can use this to find historical milestones easilly.

#1 - Start of this thread.

[Aromaz]

What Are We Working With?

I think it is time for us all to sit together and get definition out on these energies. Maybe if we do this exercise we will come to realize the different forms of energy. This will be a community project and we will all need to contribute our pennies here. Let us try to get a list establish first:

A: Magnetic
B: Light
C: Electric
D: Static
E: Nuclear – Strong
F: Nuclear – Weak
G: Radiant
H: The elusive one: Vacuum /Aether
I: (Gravity as affecting force)

It is very possible that the ultimate energy we think we are getting might not fall in any of above
– or it might be a combination or it might only be a ghost!

Any more to add, or some to take off and join?

If we are able to put all our knowledge of each item together and we can properly define each with their properties – then maybe we will also be able to better understand the research we have to do?

Yes, we should refer back to the standard and alternative descriptions; but we should also consider the possibility that here are other options and the high probability that some of the old notions are in fact erroneous.

I learned last week that even Einstein's famous E=mc2 Relativity Theory - the foundation of science for 103 years - is now challanged and it seems there are universal conditions that defies this application.

[sucahyo]

I think radiant should be treated as the same as vacuum or aether or ether or static. Something not visible but can electrocute you when it's low frequency, will be harmless but can be felt when at medium frequency or completely undetected when high frequency.

And magnetic should be treated as the same as radio frequency or light or nuclear. Magnetic at different frequency.

I think the difference between radiant and magnetic maybe described with shielding property of them. If it can be shielded with copper or glass material or other normal shielding material we categorize it as magnetic. If it isn't then we categorize it as radiant.

[mlurye]

@Aromaz: I'm not sure where static electricity will fit in here.
Here are some of my ideas. Here is schema with regular antenna that everebody is familiar with OS:Radiant Energy Antenna System - PESWiki. And here is little twist to it Radiant Energy Diatribe. Espetially important part is "Conditioning the Cable". Combination of conditioned cable and Testatika could be very interesting.

[Inquorate]

Gravity

We can take gravity out of the equation, it's just motion imparted by streams of longitudinal compression waves in aether which is given to negative pole of atom's dipole, same reason for atom's perpetual motion. T t brown got motion from hv dc to one side of disc and hv ac to the other. Dc draws in aether, ac terminates it, which makes thrust at high frequency. As moray said, a specific frequency will cancel the gravity effect. This is also why more dense things want to go down. More atoms, more motion imparting interactions with the aether.

Electromagnetism effect is in my opinion caused by sideways oscillation of electrons, we measure this with our meters. Actually, there is the longitudinal compression waves moving thru the atomic latticework also, thru the medium of the aether. Just like when you push hands palm out from chest when in water, longitudinal movement makes waves in the water. Push quickly and you get a 'spike' or big splash initially, cause water doesn't want to move forward, so must go up... This is why tesla said hertz had failed to take into account the damping effect of air in his circuit. Without the longitudinal comp waves, ' electromagnetic ' waves would not be set up.

Aether is solid, mass is not. Mass moves thru aether just like sound thru a metal beam. And just like the sound vibrated the metal beam creating heat, so can aether create excess electrons. Hence earth is negative hence 'gravity'

Virtual particles and indeed actual particles are just standing waves in aether. Imagine a river bed with a large stone in it. The water creates a wave which wants to go upriver but gets pushed downriver at the same rate.

That's my contribution for now

[Inquorate]

Harmonic resonance theory

YouTube - artynz's Channel

How to make a universe part 1 2 3a 3b

[Vortex]

@Aromaz: I'm not sure where static electricity will fit in here.

Gee isn't this just static electricity guys?
What are the characteristics of static electricity that are not found in
normal electricity? What are the strange things found in static electrcity
making it different than electricity, I saw that once but didn't read it.

Pavel Imris: Optical Electrostatic Generator -- 900% Efficiency

Do the strange effects fit static electricity characteristics?
Can electrical parts loose there ability to function only to be OK later?
Does static electricity travel through wood? Lighting strikes trees.
Human touching the Fluorescent bulbs .. like a Plasma Globe.

More importantly, What effects have been observed that
do not fit static electricity characteristics?

Just
Randy

[Aromaz]

@sucahyo: I already did that; as stated in video I did much more than shown, but this circuit and energy does not conform to expectation – therefore I am back to basics to study this energy itself.
I made three small coils - #1 = 250turn single layer #26, #2 = 500turn bifilar Bedini style, #3 = 250 turn bifilar Tesla style. In all cases I played with same coils, changing them around the circuit and the following was the results:

1 - On Base of 2222 to ground – great increase in sparks but reduced frequency
2 – Prior to POS of ignition coil – great increase in frequency, reduction in power/sparks/lights
3 – Between HV from coil and CFL’s – slight increase of light, less spark, low frequency
4 – Between spare leg of CFL and ground – great sparks, increase frequency, drop amp.

It did not matter which coil, seems in all cases same result. None better or worse.
All coils are air core. These tests were still done with KSP2222A and STMicro 3055’s. I can already tell for today’s fiddling the Toshiba will probably yield different results.

@ALL:
I have some interesting and unconfirmed findings I want to share here.

A: The energy is definitely on the outside of the conductor. I will clip video with special attention to this today. That is why diodes around circuit do not have too much effect – on the ‘extra’ energy.

B: You do need current to chage the battery. Diodes do stop current from going 'wrong' way. Since I have diode out from POS on battery - the batteries run down in less thn 2 hours. Second time today (after charge on charger to full) down to 8.7V and 9.1V. Caught me by complete surprise. Now I removed the diodes, charged the batteries up and circuit is now on for almost 2 hours with voltage still above 12.10. BUT still had sparks both sides of diodes when they were on battery - i.e. video #026!!!

[Inquorate]

Videos 29 and 30

@ Aromaz - it's one thing to theorise, quite another to see evidence which seem to support said theory. Thankyou for your videos, now to work out how to build circuit components which operate with this energy, and circuits which can tap it... Love and light, Ben

[Aromaz]

Gee isn't this just static electricity guys?
Randy

@Randy: YES, we should add STATIC to the above list.
And YES; most properties does corespond with static.
But then, static is also responsible for lightning.

There is however:
A - One missing part; Static is created by method of separation. Good, we might be able to argue that such spearation can be generated by the square wave frequency. But then the next one comes in:
B - One present part; As soon as two materials are in touch of each other, there can be no static generation. In our circuits we have all parts at all times in direct contact.

Lastly and I think the most important one: Static can not penetrate or pass through other substances.

But, yes I do agree - we should look more into this.

Static added above,
Gravity faded,

[Aromaz]

@ Aromaz - it's one thing to theorise, quite another to see evidence which seem to support said theory. Thankyou for your videos, now to work out how to build circuit components which operate with this energy, and circuits which can tap it... Love and light, Ben

I agree and I am happy to say that I am doing both, all day long when my eyes are open; but only theory when I am otherwise 'occupied' or sleeping.

However, I am more balance to practical experiments - with open eyes. The theory is seeked when I do not understand what I am seeing.

[Aaron]

diodes

B: You do need current to chage the battery. Diodes do stop current from going 'wrong' way. Since I have diode out from POS on battery - the batteries run down in less thn 2 hours. Second time today (after charge on charger to full) down to 8.7V and 9.1V. Caught me by complete surprise. Now I removed the diodes, charged the batteries up and circuit is now on for almost 2 hours with voltage still above 2.10. BUT still had sparks both sides of diodes when they were on battery - i.e. video #026!!!

The diodes are voltage valves. I saw your vids. The diodes will prevent the battery from fully absorbing the radiant kickback. It will allow some but will shut of quick and the rest (most of it) will dissipate to environment.

Without the diodes, the input battery will be able to absorb quite a bit more of the radiant kickback.

Anyway, this is consistent with the gas model of the aether.

[Aromaz]

The diodes are voltage valves. Without the diodes, the input battery will be able to absorb quite a bit more of the radiant kickback.
Anyway, this is consistent with the gas model of the aether.

Happy to see you visiting us Aaron!

Yes, that is exactly what I found. Thus a big part for the low energy ‘consumption’ from the batteries is actually due to the continues replenishing from back EMF. It is working like a buffering – use 100 units and immediately give 99 back as BEMF. I am still looking more into this to see how far this effect stretches. If it works very well, can we then reach a state where the BEMF is much greater than the use?

However, there are some difficulties I have; more about that when I can figure out how to display it best. That is in relation to the big 1000 wind tube I used in part of video #028.

[Aromaz]

Dancing wires

As usual, per accident I noticed a definate effect. Trialed it out in few ways. Will add this in next video, but:

Standard system, HV from coil to Flourecent tube, none on other end. Coil around flourecent tube - both wires open.

Connect short lead wire to few places around circuit and did same test i.e. From coil pos, from battery neg and from pos, from 2222 base, from spark gap adjuster. The other terminal from this lead wire is held close to one of the wire tips of the coil around fluorecent tube - as soon as sparks starts jumping - the wire gets in montion / jumping - to and from like a pendulum. In other words the spark definately have a repulsing effect on the copper wire. Though with compass right beneath this contact point - no movement.

To sum it up:
There is a polarity charge, there is motion, BUT
There is no magnetic field, there is no current.