Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Aromaz Radiant Energy Joint Research Group

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    The case or resurrected 3055’s

    2n3055 is a NPN transistor which means there are two N wavers separated by one P waver where the P that acts like a permeable dielectric. Now this is where the conventional vs reality current flow becomes an issue again. In relation to my circuit:

    Conventional: The switching current (thus electrons) flows from the Collector to Base (I=cb) and the power current flows from Collector to Emitter (I=ce). There is nothing wrong with this and it makes perfect sense – and probably part of my ‘mistake’ to have this circuit behaving like it does. Two currents (Switching = low and Power = high) are passing into the Base and then moving in the same direction through the P waver until they split to Emitter (N1 waver) and Collector (N2 waver). What comes in is going out, flowing hand in hand until the separation. That could also be why we get HV on the 2222 base – going out, right?

    Reality: The switching current (thus electrons) flows from the Base to the Collector (I=bc) and the power current flows from Emitter to Collector (I=ec). Now immediately we can see there is a collision! Emitter is coming from the left, Base is coming from 90 degree off and both wants to turn down the same Collector waver. This collision of electrons cause a bit of confusion and in that confusion some of the electrons gets trapped in the P waver. It is working like a cascade – the more electrons trapped, the more they cause confusion and trap more other electrons. The end result: Transistor seems to fail.

    This is also the explanation I have why I sometimes find the transistor acting like a coil – ringing. Why there are sometimes frequency residue in the transistor when power is removed, as I have seen on the scope.

    For video #030 - this will then help to explain why we have such high voltage on the base - and also why the 2222 acts like an antenna to suck energy in, and why it oscillates and why many things.

    Now keep this in mind when you view my next videos #029 and #030:

    Also keep in mind: I am just me, not an expert - thus I might still be wrong;
    BUT until me or someone else can come up with better explanation........

    YouTube - Aromaz2012's Channel - Video 029 - Transistor Basics

    Video #030 are still being trimmed form 58 minutes to 10 minutes!
    Last edited by Aromaz; 01-14-2009, 07:35 AM.
    Therefore we need to find NEW ways, NEW experiments and NEW lines of thoughts.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by jibbguy View Post
      Although i may be a "forum ghost" currently when it comes to doing the actual "wet work" needed for Free Energy experimentation (hopefully this will change in 2009 ); i would offer my services in any other way i could to help in this great endeavor. This could include doing web research, fact checking, helping to design Test Plans, or simply recording it for posterity
      @jibbguy: Thank you for the kind words and the very welcome offer.
      I hope we will see you soon as an co-experimenter too!
      Therefore we need to find NEW ways, NEW experiments and NEW lines of thoughts.

      Comment


      • #48
        Mu !!

        Originally posted by Electrotek View Post
        Here's another one:

        Radiant Energy has an affinity with water. Water can carry this energy into a substance. Then, when the water evaporates, the energy remains as interstitial energy. This is why dirt clods.

        This came from The Cosmic Forces of Mu (Lemuria), by James Churchward. This civilization predated Atlantis by several thousand years.
        It is very interesting to see the info leaking about Radiant! I will work on it after my visitors left, so please keep on theorize here - for now!

        Ahh, now there is a very interesting subject on its own. Off line here, but still an item we can consider elsewhere. Where was Mu? Who build these big megaliths all over the world, the biggest destruction ever seen on earth - Paciffic ocean...... OK. STOP!
        Therefore we need to find NEW ways, NEW experiments and NEW lines of thoughts.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Inquorate View Post
          Mu was in australia. I've often thought atlantis used tesla technology and gave anti-gravity to egyptians.

          @ Electrotek have you read 'the biggest secret' by david icke? I sent bodkins a copy as pdf. My computer is dead but he may email it to you?

          You'd be surprised how far our history goes..
          I stand to be corrected; BUT: Australia was a peripheral (suburb) of Mu, Mu was in fact where there is a big hole in the earth - between Philippines and Hawaii, South of Japan, north of Papua. Yes, I do also believe they were in fact responsible for lost antigravity knowledge, not only use by Egyptians (who were not the same as today’s Egyptians - the royals of Egypt were remnants of Mu people, same physics as Aztec, same practices, same architecture) but also by South American Indians, Tibetan Buddhists and Japanese. Their antigravity was by sound effects……

          STOP! Don't get me going HERE on this subject I studied over period of 27 years; including number of personal travels! I did work and will return to that with separate thread later – AFTER this one is done/completed. Success or failure.
          Therefore we need to find NEW ways, NEW experiments and NEW lines of thoughts.

          Comment


          • #50
            new tech

            For those interested,

            Some of this research reminds me of Moray.
            Hopefully this its not to far off topic.


            Nano-Antennas for Solar, Lighting, and Climate Control | EcoGeek - Clean Technology

            https://inlportal.inl.gov/portal/ser...tory=DA_144483

            -Gary
            Last edited by gmeat; 01-03-2009, 03:42 AM. Reason: another link added

            Comment


            • #51
              Conventional current vs electron current vs aetheric current

              @ Aromaz, here's something to think about; conventional current notation is backward, yes? So electron flow is actually opposite to notation, and we have seen in our experiments how we are able to pump up electrons from an earth wire, by creating a vacuum of electrons with a 'positive' source..

              Here's the pickle; electrons move thru a wire at the rate of an inch every hour, or thereabouts..

              So what is really happening in a spark gap?

              And our meters measure the sideways oscillations of electrons in a wire.

              What is making them swing side to side?
              Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.

              Comment


              • #52
                @Inquorate: I haven't read David Icke's book, but I'm aware of how far back the past goes. I know of one advanced technology artifact (an artificial opening into the surface of the universe) which is 200,000 years old. It looks like a ball of light, and has 23 equations which describe its behaviour.

                @Aromaz: I'm awaiting your next thread. As I've heard it, Hawaii itself is a remnant of Mu. The Aztecs had a very important symbal called "Sacred Fire".

                @gmeat: Thanks for the nanoantenna article. When it comes to ancient symbols, these bifilar spirals are about as old as we can get. I always thought they had something to do with power.

                @Inquorate: Confusion about electron movement is due to the way we've been misled about the EM waves. The electric potential flips back and forth as the density of the ether contracts and expands, relative to the ambient. However, the magnetic force points straight forwards with the positive, but tips to the side with the negative. That's why electrons spiral to the side as they move forwards, at around a few mm per second.

                Electric current can flow from negative to positive, with electron drift, or from positive to negative, in an ion solution such as a copper plating bath. And Tesla said that currents can flow both directions in the same wire, and at different frequencies. There is a lot which was once known that we have to rediscover.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Inquorate View Post
                  My relay surprised me by being a stronger source of it than the coil, or at least in the direction I 'looked' in...
                  Maybe because it is the collapse point? so radiant enegy leaked more there?

                  It would be great if we can find out people who can see aura and make them look at our device. If the aura they see is the same as radiant energy we create, they should be able to measure, and give hint about how to amplify it.
                  Last edited by sucahyo; 01-03-2009, 04:34 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    @ Sucahyo

                    Maybe...... I'll do more testing on that circuit soon, now that I can measure the 'gas' leaks :-)
                    Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Relay more radiant than coil

                      Had a thought; the relay in imhotep's video wired same as mine made 400volt spikes. I don't have Oscilloscope but from memory my meter showed 20 volts ac and almost nothing dc. It was using 0.01 amps.

                      400 volt spikes? / 0.01 amps = 40,000

                      The coil - just guessing, will do a voltage divider circuit from coil and measure it later - makes say 10,000 volts, and used 0.6amps

                      10000 volts? / 0.6 amps = 16,666

                      So, since we know radiant energy is caused by pure voltage surge before current catches up, the relay would create a purer radiant stream......

                      Hence why the detector shows a stronger emission.

                      I'll check the frequency the coil and the relay are running on too.

                      Addendum - coil has a metal tube casing which would absorb radiant and make an electron barrier for the radiant, so it might come out of the top thru the dielectric??

                      I'll test that too, and see what happens when coil casing is grounded.
                      Last edited by Inquorate; 01-03-2009, 06:23 AM.
                      Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        can make computer fan turn

                        I think there is amp in the circuit. Since when on open loop condition there is amp in collapse point and voltage at positive source.

                        When you attach another coil, the back EMF should be powerfull. In my case it is able to charge two battery and a normal computer fan. In this video I serie battery, HHO cell and computer fan:
                        YouTube - charging battery, powering HHO cell and powering fan using Imhotep radiant oscillator

                        See all of it in picture, the meter showing 0.10 Amp. The fan is 0.14 Amp and the battery is charging .

                        I think my unit is still COP < 1. Although the energy flow do work in unconventional way. powering something indirectly where the coil become power source........
                        Attached Files
                        Last edited by sucahyo; 10-26-2009, 09:02 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          A chicken coup

                          Yes, you read that right. I'm building one (for obvious reasons) and realised I can use it as a faraday cage as well. So I'll be able to see if my detector is picking up EM waves or just radiant.

                          Here's a link that describes faraday cages quite well

                          Faraday cage@Everything2.com
                          Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            A Faraday cage is an excellent idea!

                            I've noticed that fluorescent starters are now using a neon which is completely silvered on the inside. This compensates for the fact that the can is now made of plastic.

                            This is part of our National Treasure. There's all kinds of Alt Science components disguised as every day items, or parts thereof. A good example is the ceiling fan, at least the older, artistic ones. And have you ever seen a cotton candy machine?

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Ok, I'll bite..

                              decorative ceiling fan?
                              Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                The older ceiling fan blades had decorative inlays which produce ions, with an applied biphasic field. The motor turns at just the right speed to spin these ions outwards, for aerodynamic effects.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X