Aromaz Radiant Energy Joint Research Group

[Aromaz]

Electrical Atom

Everything in the universe is made of atoms. When looking at the atom, we have identified a few particles:

The center body (sun) is the nucleus which consist of Protons and Neutrons. The protons are positive charged and Neutrons has no charge value. The nucleus is tightly bonded and to break it apart cost lots of energy – and will yield much more energy – Atomic Bombs.

Around the nucleus we find Electrons - which are negatively charged. They are smaller than the protons and moves in an orbit around the nucleus (Planets around the sun). Opposites attracts. The positive charged Protons holds the negative charged electrons in position. In the same manner, the electrons are all negative, thus they repels each other – and try to stay as far away as possible, therefore they can not bond to the nucleus.

The neutrons caries no charge, thus they are neither attracted nor repulsed by the protons or electrons.
(Note: Changing the number of neutrons in and atom causes change in its radioactive (isotope) value. More neutrons make such atom super radioactive.)

Usually there are the same number of Electrons and Protons – the balance of nature. Hydrogen for instance has one electron and one proton with no neutron. The electrons are in certain orbits (called shells) around the protons. The inner most orbit is the strongest and can hold only two electrons, the next orbit can hold four electrons but their holding force is a bit less, the third orbit can hold up to eight electrons and their holding force is weaker than the second orbit – obvious because they are further away from the protons. Currently there are assumed to be up to seven orbits (shells) in an atom.

“Old news”, so why do I bring this elementary lesson up here? Because we need to understand how electricity works!

Universe = Material

Solar system = Atom
Proton = Sun
Neutron = Solar gas
Electron = Planets

Free Electron = Asteroid

What happened is that a magnetic force can cause an electron to loose its grip on the proton and become ‘free’ – exiting the atom. When a magnetic force comes so close to an electron that the flux force of that magnet is stronger than the force of the proton, it causes the electron to break away from its atom – becomes free. Now, remember electrons are Negative charged, so if the magnetic force is Positive, the electron will break away in the direction of the magnet. If the magnetic force is negative – it will push the electron away.

Now we start getting a chain reaction. When the electron breaks free, its movement also speeds up; very much like an asteroid. As it enters into the orbital (shell) space of another atom, its negative charge is the same as the electrons in that atom, but a combined effect of its movement force and negative charge kicks another electron out of orbit and takes its place. That is then a whole chain reaction. The flow of current is in fact not a flow, but a chain reaction of kicking – same concept of the seven hanging pendulum balls.

Have you seen the experiments with a few magnet nodes? Each with three steel balls on the one side and two on the other. Releasing a trigger ball to bump hard on the side with two balls, it releases one of the balls on the other side – a chain reaction. BUT important is that each new ball moves faster than the previous one. I will place a video of this on later stage.

So how does this now apply to what we need to know here?

A: Electrons are parts of atoms which can be caused to move from one atom to another by a magnetic force. When a free electron enters the space around a nucleus with force, it will cause another electron to slip off and move on……

B: Electrons can be free from and atom. Thus Negative charged minute matter can float free. Positive charge protons can not be free, they are part of the nuclei of the atom, to set them free is what is called ‘splitting the atom’.

C: Electrons only reacts to the forces of magnetism. Magnetic force is needed to free them from their atom.

D: When an electron moves away from an atom, it leaves a vacuum, un-balanced atom, excitement in that that atom. The same when it enters another atom, it creates excitement, un-balanced atom and another electron has to move away. That atom then becomes positive and is forced to ‘seek’ another electron to fill the void and balance again.

E: Neutrons can be added or removed from an atom….it affects the isotope – radioactivity but not he electrically charged level.

[Inquorate]

Evidence tesla made free energy device

New Energy Generator That "Would Not Consume Fuel" - Tesla's Letter to Robert U. Johnson

[Aromaz]

Photon

The following is not my personal writing but a series of clips from various items I have. Forgive me for not stating the original authors, they are 'lost' in my studies.
The photon was originally called a light quantum by Albert Einstein. The modern name photon derives from the Greek word for light and was given in 1926 by Gilbert Lewis. The photon is massless, has no electric charge, and does not decay spontaneously in empty space. A photon has two possible polarization states and is described by exactly three continuous parameters: the components of its wave vector, which determine its wavelength λ and its direction of propagation. The photon is the gauge boson for electromagnetism and therefore all other quantum numbers are zero.

In physics, the photon is an elementary particle, the quantum of the electromagnetic field and the basic unit of light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation. It is also the force carrier for the electromagnetic force. This force is easily visible human-scale effects and applications, from sunlight to radiotelephones, are due to the fact that the photon has no mass and thus can produce interactions at long distances. Like all elementary particles, the photon is governed by quantum mechanics and so exhibits wave-particle duality: that is, it exhibits both wave and particle properties. For example, a single photon may undergo refraction by a lens or exhibit wave interference, but also act as a particle giving a definite result when its location is measured.

Photons are emitted in many natural processes. For example, when a charge is accelerated it emits synchrotron radiation. During a molecular, atomic or nuclear transition to a lower energy level, photons of various energies will be emitted, from infrared light to gamma rays. A photon can also be emitted when a particle and its corresponding anti-particle are annihilated.

In empty space, the photon could move as fast (even suspected to be faster) than the speed of light.

(From: Fermi Telescope Makes First Big Discovery: Gamma Ray Pulsar | Universe Today )

Fermi's Large Area Telescope scans the entire sky every three hours and detects photons with energies ranging from 20 million to more than 300 billion times the energy of visible light. The instrument sees about one gamma ray every minute from CTA 1, enough for scientists to piece together the neutron star's pulsing behavior, its rotation period, and the rate at which it is slowing down.

The pulsar in CTA 1 is not located at the center of the remnant's expanding gaseous shell. Supernova explosions can be asymmetrical, often imparting a "kick" that sends the neutron star careening through space. Based on the remnant's age and the pulsar's distance from its center, astronomers believe the neutron star is moving at about a million miles per hour — a typical speed.

HOW DOES PHOTON AND ELECTRONS COME TOGETHER?
An exciton is a bound state of an electron and an imaginary particle called an electron hole in an insulator or semiconductor, and such is a Coulomb-correlated electron-hole pair. It is an elementary excitation, or a quasiparticle of a solid. In current research, the bound electron and hole pairs (excitons) provide a means to transport energy without transporting net charge.[1]

A vivid picture of exciton formation is as follows: A photon enters a semiconductor, exciting an electron from the valence band into the conduction band. The missing electron in the valence band leaves a hole (of opposite electric charge) behind, to which the electron is attracted by the Coulomb force. The exciton results from the binding of the electron with its hole. As a result, the exciton has slightly less energy than the unbound electron and hole. The wave function of the bound state is hydrogenic (an "exotic atom" state akin to that of a hydrogen atom). However, the binding energy is much smaller and the size much bigger than a hydrogen atom because of the effects of screening and the effective mass of the constituents in the material.

The probability of the hole disappearing (the electron occupying the hole) is limited by the difficulty of losing the excess energy, and as a result excitons can have a relatively long lifetime. (Lifetimes up to several milliseconds have been observed in copper (I) oxide) Another limiting factor in the recombination probability is the spatial overlap of the electron and hole wavefunctions (roughly the probability for the electron to run into the hole). This overlap is smaller for lighter electrons and holes and for highly excited hydrogenic states.

The whole exciton can move through the solid. With this additional kinetic energy the exciton may lie above the band-gap.

The exciton propagating through molecular crystal is one that is of greatest concern. Several mechanisms have been proposed in the literature. Two are important. The first one is exciton energy dissipated due to interaction with phonon bath. The other one is energy carried away by radiation. Combination of the two has also been studied.

Much like molecular systems that have well defined resonances, excitons can undergo internal conversions from energetically higher lying states to lower lying states by coupling to vibrational or electronic degrees of freedom. Internal conversions usually take place of a time scale of a few to tens of femto seconds. Also, intersystem crossings are possible when adequate spin orbit interactions are present in the material, and usually take place on a time scale of a few to hundreds of picoseconds.

Imagine a certain piece of metal that, when you put ultraviolet light on it, you can measure the energy of some electrons 'escaping' from the metal. From the very basic wave mechanics, one would expect that if you increased the 'intensity' of the light you would see more energetic electrons pulling off from it (picture a little paper boat in a lake where you make some waves - the more 'intense' you make them, the more the boat will jump up with greater velocities).

Well, actually experimental results tell you that this does NOT happens. When you increase the intensity of the wave, only the NUMBER of electrons emitted from the metal will increase - not its ENERGY. The observed result is that only when you increase the FREQUENCY of the light you are applying, then the energy of the electrons will be greater. That sounds really strange for the wave nature of light.


WHAT WE SHOULD KNOW:
A: Photons are weight-less, has no electrical charge, magnetic force.
B: Moves at the speed of light - or faster
C: Result of natuaral process i.e. nuclear reaction, annihilation
D: Photons is radiation with energy billions times that of visible light
E: Known effects of photons are typical electrical and light

[Aromaz]

Realization

This is the truth of the matter you were waiting for, this is the absolute real description of what many people call Radiant energy, Zero Point energy, Energy from the vacuum, Free energy......and by so many other names.

PHOTONS are THE UNIVERAL ENERGY

PHOTONS are RADIANT ENERGY

In other words, what we are trying to capture and convert is PHOTONS
- or rather the effects of them.

[Aromaz]

A can of Anacondas

All the methods we have done to this day, playing with coils, batteries, wires, transistors, HV and all is just that – playing. There is only one true test for COP >1 or OverUnity and that is where a device can run on its own. No external or additional form of energy, and it can produce a net result of energy.

Sorry folks, there is no way our coils and transistors will ever reach perpetual motion, forget about overunity. We are trying to run with one stick as legs. At best we can have a spike when a vacuum evacuated by an electron is excited by a photon that just happens to pass through at that spacetime.

This is how I see we should proceed:

A: Learn more about Photons.
B: See what the options of using Photons directly to excite electrons are - Doubtful.
C: See what the options of using Photons (or Electrons) to oscillate magnetic flux are – Possible
- and then use that oscillating magnetic flux to excite electrons. Sparky Floyd style.
D: See what the options are for building an ‘antenna’ system to capture the effects of photons – Possible. Tesla receiver style.

Whatever will be the success later, it will be a combination at least of two or more Magnetic Flux, Electric current, Photons, Gravity and/or Centrifigal.
FEPGC

This is the end of my road for now. Time to ‘think’ again!

Capture photons are not going to be possible, they move through everything imaginable, and FAST. Once we can capture light in a bottle and hold it there, it might be possible to think about capturing photons again.

Maybe there is an answer in creating some sort of vortex which can attract photons? Somehow, magnets should have an affect on photons or maybe electrons can back-electron the photons?

While we ponder this direction, lets get on playing with transistors – to learn more.

My next piece will be back to basics - Back EMF

.

[Inquorate]

@ all

Please read this summary of william lynne's dissertation on tesla's dynamic theory of gravity. Then buy, beg, steal, borrow his books,

I've read them. And that's how I know so much about the aether. ALL particles, all energy, and all forces are the result of forms ie vortices and stresses / polarization / movement of aether.

It's simple and profound.

Summation of Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity

I feel like chucking a tantrum because I can tell no-one has read it despite my many promptings.

I've shared some thoughts with Aromaz re what is happening with 'current' based on the model of aether outlined ibm the above link.

[Inquorate]

Here's one of his 3 books

Pentagon Ufo's by William Lyne | Scribd

[sucahyo]

Great idea for posting in section. It would make it easier to read . Although I am of those who use electricity without knowing what it is, I agree that knowing what electricity is can help us progress faster. So many what we don't know, what it is, what cause it, what it's effect is, what is it's behavior, how to make it behave like we want to, what item can be used, etc.

Just wondering, do atom really is the way current science know about?

About magnet, the middle part, between the opposing pole do not attract metal. Do this happen in electricity too? There are electricity that polarity can only be felt only at the pole?

Konstantin Meyl wrote that Tesla bifilar coil, flat spiral coil one, is a way to capture the photon (or neutrino as Meyl call it). It can be used to convert electron to neutrino or the opposite.

[Aromaz]

@sucahyo;About magnet, the middle part, between the opposing pole do not attract metal. Do this happen in electricity too? There are electricity that polarity can only be felt only at the pole?

In fact there are more than the two poles N and S in a magnet. For instance there is another 'smaller' magnet located at the tip of the N-pole and another at the tip of the S-pole = both of which is the reverse of the full magnet.

Then there is another complete magnetic flux around the center of the magnet. Thus the complete magnet does attract magnetic material, but in the center there is a point of balance where attraction and repulsion becomes equal - thus appearing to be not attracting.

Electromagnetism is in many ways similar, like a coil but in a long conductor it is different where the polarity is 'around' the wire. I have not seen nor read about the same effects as magnet with poles - yet' but that study is for expansion on a later stage.

Konstantin Meyl wrote that Tesla bifilar coil, flat spiral coil one, is a way to capture the photon (or neutrino as Meyl call it). It can be used to convert electron to neutrino or the opposite.

Photon is different from Neutrino in such that a pair of neutrino's forms when photon decays (breaks down) in a strong magnetic field. Though this is still pure 'theory'. Others again say that photons are the products of annihilation of neutrinos which is the primary source of ultra high cosmic rays - and a cascade of photons. Very confusing except that they concur - Photons and Neutrino are different particles.

Electron to Neutrino or visa versa does not stick - yet. The possibility that Tesla's bifilar coil acts as magnet or converter of either electron or neutrino are somewhat difficult - Because both neutrino and photon are said to be mass-less; no weight - thus no attract or repulsion.

BUT all this said, I am still investigating and will not say above is correct. There are just too many things that does not add up - yet, that is why I did not expand on it previously.

Sometimes I wish there was a feature to add graphics here. Probably will make a video later on with graphics to explain it easy and simple. Surprising how complex things can appear until you scratch their surface and see how simple they are.

[Bodkins]

Please read this summary of william lynne's dissertation on tesla's dynamic theory of gravity. Then buy, beg, steal, borrow his books,

I've read them. And that's how I know so much about the aether. ALL particles, all energy, and all forces are the result of forms ie vortices and stresses / polarization / movement of aether.

It's simple and profound.

Summation of Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity

I feel like chucking a tantrum because I can tell no-one has read it despite my many promptings.

I've shared some thoughts with Aromaz re what is happening with 'current' based on the model of aether outlined ibm the above link.

what did you say, people take there own path!!!!
you now no how i feel.

[Inquorate]

@ bodkins

Consider me suitably chastised

[Aromaz]

Game of words, Puzzle of facts

Please read this summary of william lynne's dissertation on tesla's dynamic theory of gravity. Then buy, beg, steal, borrow his books ..........

My dear friend, I have read two of his books - "Space Aliens from the Pentagon" and "Occult Ether Physics". I discarded them because that gent is a fraud; I knew a similar person in South Africa by the name of Harry Sferopolous whom I wrongfully called a friend for some time.

I am reading the “Pentagon Aliens” version now - for incase there are some facts I might have missed - and only because you so strongly stand behind him.

However let me give you first some background.
I personally am definitely on the opposite side of the fence when it comes to the CIA. For 16 years of my life I was an operative for a South African agency which you can compare with the CIA. I know how much of the problems in Africa was actually the results of CIA work, the problems in my own beautiful country was created and fueled by the CIA. I have absolutely NO love for the CIA.

BUT: There is also another fate I have, probably due to those years of never stopping training and sieving of information. I seek truth and facts, even through tons of garbage; we were trained to seek out facts. Thus, though I hate the CIA with a passion, I do also know how they operate.

Back to W.R. Lyne;
First fact he has absolutely wrong –the CIA was never allowed to operate within the USA borders, especially during the time period he is referring to. That was the domain of the FBI, and believe me the FBI was very serious about their turf. In best case scenarios the CIA might use the services of the NSA (National Security Agency) but that was unlikely. Going back to the earlier years John Edgar Hoover would have (and did) throw a 6year old tantrum if he ever found the CIA active within the USA – and he was the Director of the FBI from 1935 till his death in 1972.

Secondly: W.R. Lyne was never ‘hunted’ for his books or theories, but he was very well locked up because of land scamming and fraud. Now he is using that tribulation as shield for the conspiracy theory. Neither was his books suppressed, there is just not enough interest in them and though my English is not that good since it is only my second language – his is worse, his wording and hammering on the establishments are way out bad.

Then there are a lot more real facts that do not tally up with his statements; including some about out favorite Nikola Tesla. The Germans stole Tesla technology? Before 1935? Tesla was still alive then and he never committed the knowledge of the Death ray or Electric Flying Machine to paper, not even in his notebooks. BUT: Yes Tesla did GIVE some information to the Germans in the period 1922 to 1935 because America was not interested in it – then Tesla still believed he can stop war

German UFO technology and anti-gravity was not part of Von Braun (he liked roaring fire too much) – it has always been the baby of Gen Hans Kammler, who is suspected of gone East - to Russia in 1944/5.

Another matter I do know a bit about are the Secret Societies, like the Illuminati, Freemasons (wrongfully considered same as the Illuminati), Scull & Bones, Bilderberg. Yes, they do exist in some form or the other – but these names are the public face for a much more sinister Big Brother which stretches all over Europe and America. What Lyne pose as conspiracy is way out of text – collected from public mumblings. The real head of this snake is 2200 year old "The Enlightenment" which is Jewish based and already in place to control the entire Western world. Their ONLY problem is that the Western World is now weakened and they never brought Asia into their equations.

All that said, yes – there are many facts, but those facts you can find from much better and more reliable sources.

After all this W.R. Lyne must have been a genius? He builds his own radio from scrap parts when he was 8 years old? He was then so knowledgeable about Tesla that he could identify Teslatica amongst a heap of scrap his friend in the radio shop gave to him? Unless you have children of your own you might be forgiven to accept such a feat from an eight year old boy in a very small outback New Texas village. Common, I played with crystal radios when I was a boy – but that was surely not before the age of 12 years!

So what about the true facts given in Lyne books? Well, I can write a book with many big true facts - which are all obtainable from public domain, add a little bit of salt and few specs of pepper to flavour it - and so many people will take that as their dogma.

Ever heard of the biblical example? This man had a real urge to get an answer from God on what he must do. So in all earnest he went into fasting and prayer, pleading God to tell him what to do. He then took his well used bible, with closed eyes he opened it randomly, put his finger on a position and said "That is God’s instruction to me". Reading it he was shocked as it said "....and Judas Iscariot hanged himself from a tree". Oh, that must be a mistake, the devil moved my finger, so he prayed more and did the same procedure just to read "... go ye forth and do the same"

Benefit of the doubt: I am reading W.R. Lyne’s book again.

[Aromaz]

UFO Facts

Oh just to clear something that could be misundersood:

I believe the USA does in fact have Electric Flying machines which could be seen as UFO's; but that is from other more reliable people than Lyne.

Though sometimes there is a very small amount of doubt, I can really state that the works of Stan Deyo is far more creditable, scientific and reality than any other I found anywhere in public domain.

The doubt? Because Stan was an intelligence operator so he know how to use facts and present them as lies - and how to use lies to present them as facts. In general, I do not have any reason or proof to discredit anything I have seen of Stan and Holy Deyo - yet.

You can start of with Google "Stan Deyo" and from their website:

Welcome to The Millennium Ark

[sucahyo]

I see that you expanded your research to already . I also have this "problem" when I beginning to learn radiant energy. So many thing relate to each other. Trying to know radiant energy make me learn Keely - Dale Pond vibratory physics, anti gravitation, high COP motor, and even taichi or chakra or reiki.

According to Keely, atom is not the smallest part of particle. And everything coupled in three part. Plus, Minus and Neutral.

About Tesla bifilar coil, my experiment show that it can enhance BEMF better than tubular, I think we should explore this bifilar coil more.

Interesting link based on Möbius coil that according to Meyl has the same properties as Tesla bifilar coil, based from Prof Shinichi Seike literature,COP = 1.57, at 12 Volts :
http://jnaudin.free.fr/seike/gseav3.htm

Edit:
I try two kind of Moebius coil, both failed lighting up LED. I will stick with Tesla bifilar coil for now.

[Inquorate]

Lynne

I agree that the guy is far off on his conspiracy theory claims, etc...... It's the model of the aether I find interesting :-)