Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Aromaz Radiant Energy Joint Research Group

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Some interesting experiments - off track but still valid

    For those with inquisitive minds and an itching hand, here are some proven and very interesting experiments to do by Dr. Antonio de Queiroz in Brazil.

    Mostly based on old technology but some are real interesting and applicable to electrostatic energy.

    Electrostatic Machines
    Therefore we need to find NEW ways, NEW experiments and NEW lines of thoughts.

    Comment


    • Old technology is what most current science ignore, I think it is not a problem for relearning old science. Dale Pond mention that science prior to 1900 should be learn since most of the information unknown today is already explained.

      From Meyl:
      Originally posted by A. Schneider: Energien aus dem Kosmos, Jupiter-Verlag 1989, S. 44
      <ii>: ,,Faraday in his experiment did let rotate a copper disc above a resting cylinder magnet; as expected in a loop of wire a tension voltage was created (F-machine). Than he let the magnets rotate, and the disc stood still; now again a tension voltage should have resulted - but there was no voltage. In the third experiment the magnet rotated with the disc in the same direction and with the same speed. Because there was no relative motion between both, an induced tension voltage wouldn't have been expected - but it was measurable! (N-machine, see fig. 16.1).

      What does that mean? If the relative movement between magnet and disc is not always crucial for the formation of an induced tension voltage, then also
      the absolute movement has to play a role - because something has to move, for a current being formed. But an absolute movement according to the
      theory of relativity can't be detected - thus Faraday's experiment proves Einstein wrong! Therefore you won't find anything about this experiment in
      the textbooks".
      Taken out of the article: Faraday widerlegt Einstein, PM-Magazin 11/ 1998, P. 133

      Comment


      • Hello,
        I found a nice Page about the Ur-Theorie.
        Maybe it gives an other understanding.

        Übersetzte Version von http://eurobier.com/wasserauto/Grundlagen.htm

        It is a german Page translated and just a rest of a Pice, who know, how long it will be still up.
        So here are some missing Parts.
        movements aufluden static = movements get a static load
        frequency eddy hochtransformiert werden (Teslatransformator), hochtransformiert be (Tesla transformer) being transformed up to high Voltage
        formed from a Energetisierungsstärke = Energetic intensity(strenght?)

        But its not with gurantee to build a OU now.
        There is the Ether a plasma.
        But its anyway not to much worth for me to think about a lot about the Ether. It doesnt looks like,
        it hold the 'universal Energie' where you just can get it out.
        Maybe a point to do some calculation with it, but nothing else.
        I think its nothing more like a Static field.
        But even the Ocean is somehow Static, and can get dynamic, when a Wind blows.

        About the flying Saucers what been seen at the US-bases.
        At the time around 1940-45 Viktor Schauberger worked at flying Disks for the Germanmilitary.
        He was an Austrian Forester and he said, he learned a lot from Nature.
        And what i ve read, he made few Saucers flying.
        It was his Repulsine.
        They look pretty similar to this one, what are at the Picure from this Reports.

        But i got an other View of Things about Ufos, since i found the Disclosureproject.
        There are 200 Peoples from Armys, what discloser her Observations.
        The Disclosure Project - Home Page
        Looks like, there is a bit more then only some Experiments from some Military researcher.
        Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

        Comment


        • Aromaz I think your hunch is right, that we are dealing with "photons" but not entirely the ones dealt with in EM. If I think about it it's not even the frequency that matters much in experiments. But the very high tensions. The frequency just allows you to have the effect manifest continuously. I believe this will give rise to an another form of EM waves just like phase diagrams show abrupt phase transitions...

          http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...ater-phase.jpg

          Or how superconductors have an abrupt change in characteristics when you hit a certain temperature.

          http://teachers.web.cern.ch/teachers...y/tc_graph.gif

          Nature is not continuous, certain things happen abruptly when you hit a certain point. And I believe that point in this case is the high voltages which means high amplitudes for the EM waves.

          Comment


          • Tesla AC or DC lab

            @All: My energy is low - in the minus range now. I did lots of theoretical work today - and that drains me more than a full 100 hours of experiments.

            Please help me out on this one, it seems I am too tired or too blind o clear it out.

            TESLA: In his later life - says after 1908, did Tesla go back to using DC power or did he use AC in his experiments? Question is about something I started tobbing about the coils. We know the Tesla pancake coil is OK with DC, but incredible with AC power.

            Regarding the 'Anti-Gravity' issue - it was consieved in 1888-1893's ? That time he was exclusively working with AC power.

            Are we on the right track with our coils and DC power?
            Therefore we need to find NEW ways, NEW experiments and NEW lines of thoughts.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Aromaz View Post
              @All: My energy is low - in the minus range now. I did lots of theoretical work today - and that drains me more than a full 100 hours of experiments.

              Please help me out on this one, it seems I am too tired or too blind o clear it out.

              TESLA: In his later life - says after 1908, did Tesla go back to using DC power or did he use AC in his experiments? Question is about something I started tobbing about the coils. We know the Tesla pancake coil is OK with DC, but incredible with AC power.

              Regarding the 'Anti-Gravity' issue - it was consieved in 1888-1893's ? That time he was exclusively working with AC power.

              Are we on the right track with our coils and DC power?
              If I remember correctly, he was using high frequency pulsed DC. He didn't turn his back on AC, but realized there was something special about pulsed DC.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Mutten View Post
                If I remember correctly, he was using high frequency pulsed DC. He didn't turn his back on AC, but realized there was something special about pulsed DC.
                Yeah, i come to the same conclusion.
                He got the Power from a AC generator, but at few from his Circuits he got spark gaps from relays.
                Just the Question, if he did transform Dc or AC but seems he did it with thinner Wire.
                Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

                Comment


                • Hum.. or maybe not ?
                  Übersetzte Version von http://62.99.160.169/erwin/tesla.html
                  Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Joit View Post
                    I don't think that's a smart source to use for information. That's a good example of the wrongful use of the Tesla setup. I'm I haven't forgotten Tesla didn't allow any oscillation in his primary circuit. It had to be BAM and then extinguishing the spark as fast as possible.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by broli View Post
                      I don't think that's a smart source to use for information. That's a good example of the wrongful use of the Tesla setup. I'm I haven't forgotten Tesla didn't allow any oscillation in his primary circuit. It had to be BAM and then extinguishing the spark as fast as possible.
                      Lol. Then SHAAME on this Guys.
                      Seems, it was more, that they made a Proof, that it Dont works.

                      But maybe the pulsed AC did restrict an oscillation.
                      I never saw anyhow a Diode at his Circuits.
                      Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

                      Comment


                      • On Light and Other High Frequency Phenomena

                        In that lecture Tesla shows different ways to achieves his disruptive discharges using DC AND AC. Scroll down to ON THE APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONVERSION. I'm still reading it and trying to make sense of it. The important figure is this one which I enhanced a bit...



                        Left AC powered circuits. Right DC powered.

                        Comment


                        • Detector experiments info

                          It seems simple is best; here's the knowledge I've gained from all of my experiments...

                          YouTube - Inquorate 23 detector

                          Ps check out the image on my blog, @ Sucahyo, it also shows my spark gap... @ all, the 'detector' in this image actually works better than the bigger one I made that looks like a jedi light-saber.

                          Keep it simple, stupid :-)

                          Deep thoughts
                          Atoms move for free. It's all about resonance and phase. Make the circuit open and build a generator.

                          Comment


                          • @Joit, nice link, the vortex theory seems logical.

                            @Inquorate, nice video, I see that the spark gap you use indeed is a needle and ball. Looks like alomunium foil help the neon light up better, nice finding. I read at panacea document:
                            Originally posted by EVGRAY research - Vibrator circuit By Gary Porter.pdf
                            Tesla stated the metal Aluminum reflected the Ether Gas, so you can now take advantage of this too and make the outer piece in your tube a concave shaped piece of Aluminum.
                            Alumunium do not stop BEMF from powering my HHO cell though, I just try it.


                            I get interesting phenomena when recording the frequency of my oscillator using computer microphone, From both wire coming out of transformer (I use transformer instead of coil), one has produce much louder sound. I suspect this has something to do with the BEMF going to one direction and it's voltage is multiplied in one direction too. The weaker sound from other cable should be the echo of the strong one.

                            Based from this finding, I think it is important for anyone using car coil to see if you will have more pronounce effect by reversing car coil primary polarity.

                            About wireless experiment, I think tesla single cable flat spiral coil should be experimented too since it is what he use in patent. Maybe at car coil HV secondary or LV primary. Also Tesla has patent in superconductivity that use this flat spiral coil (Meyl). This spiral coil has unique property of cooling down it self when running, when this coil is soaked in liquid nitrogen alike, it will keep that temperature because it would not heat up. Since super conductor float on top of magnet maybe this is part of what Tesla will use as anti gravity engine, IMO MAYBE.

                            Seeing that this tesla spiral coil enhance BEMF, I have opinion that this would increase spark too, maybe I should test it on vehicle ignition circuit. I currently use tesla flat spiral in series with primary coil of my joule thief. This should also be applicable to other variant of Imhotep Radiant Oscillator that have battery charging ability. My goal is to maximize the BEMF as much as possible and use it to power something.

                            About Tesla, I think he use PWM controlled pulsed DC. When this pulsed DC goes trough transformer, it will change to AC. We should use pulsed DC, the important part is the voltage signal from ON to OFF has to be as vertical as possible. Since the important part is only the part of signal going down, we can conserve power by reducing the length of ON signal in a way not reducing the height between ON and OFF.
                            Last edited by sucahyo; 01-16-2009, 02:32 AM.

                            Comment




                            • Note the middle curcuit on the left and the circuit all the way on the far right

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Chip Shorter View Post
                                Note the middle curcuit on the left and the circuit all the way on the far right
                                Can you explain your point more? I don't know what I should take note.


                                Edit:
                                Can anyone replicate experiment bellow?

                                We insert spiral coil before the collector of our oscillating transistor. Get high load and observe the temperature of the transistor. Is the transistor colder when it is the spiral coil center leg that connected?

                                Just wondering wether what I currently see is valid or not. If it is true, then next experiment would be to find out which one is harvesting energy.
                                Attached Files
                                Last edited by sucahyo; 01-16-2009, 09:26 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X