Aromaz Radiant Energy Joint Research Group

[sucahyo]

It is interesting to see how different frequency can have different effect on our circuit. Even if it's just at sub MHz range.





Currently use it for charging battery maybe similar to what Bodkin do (still asking the frequency that Bodkins use).


Running a 2N3055 at KHz range would be enough to make it very very hot in short moment at only 12V 1 Amp. I had burn in my finger when checking that very hot transistor temperature.

[Bodkins]

Tesla's Single Wire Circuit and Energy Shuttling

Tesla's Single Wire Circuit and Energy Shuttling
@sucahyo
mine never got hot under .300amps tune it by adding the ground/metal and the amps should drop.
As you see in the picture the light gets brighter.
think about 90 degree angle from the singlewire
checkout bearden
Tom Bearden Website Announcement
got it here
The Tom Bearden Website

good luck

[Bodkins]

time to start studying gentlemen

http://www.cheniere.org/references/TeslaOSC.pdf

the dipole never get destroyed

[Rectified]

Currently most of us are playing with Hz, kHz and few enter to realm of MHz.
There are two higher frequencies to tackle:

How in the world will it ever be possible to reach an oscilation or resonance
in the Terra or Pico Hertz range. In other words: 10 with 12 or 15 zeros added?

The only options I can think of now is to somehow use the natural frequencies
of gemstones (crystals) - but how to get that enhanced into applications
of ElectroMagnetic waves?

Yes, I know - we are talking of UViolet range of frequencies.

Aromaz

It will never be done with coils of wires that’s for sure. Scientists are having a difficult time now with computers and circuits in the Giga range. Shielding problems and even a wire trace on a PC board can not have sharp turns at such high frequencies. Microwave transmitters require reflective horns to focus such small wave length signals at dish receivers and are limited to line of site short distances. Wires are becoming a thing of the past as fiber optics and Laser beams are required in the labs to experiment. Nano biological programmed circuits or should I say cells, that communicate telepathically in Tera seconds are discussed already in research labs. I’ve spent many many thousands of dollars on lab equipment for my research over the years and still way short on what is required for much higher frequency research. I don’t remember the last time I spent less than 16 or more hours each and every day in my lab. After purchasing a High Voltage Electomulecular system a while back, I didn’t sleep for days it does become addicting. To utilize that energy we all seek I’m convinced requires getting to a much higher frequency rang and even then will only be a lower harmonic of what is really there.

Rectifide

[Aromaz]

It will never be done with coils of wires that’s for sure. ........ I’m convinced requires getting to a much higher frequency rang and even then will only be a lower harmonic of what is really there.

I am afraid our findings are the same.
BUT - it must be possible.
As with all the rest of this dream, we will have to get thingking out of the box.

It is like waking up in the middle of a sand desert at 12PM and not know which way to go for water.

[boguslaw]

Energy could be taken from Earth magnetic field and it's extremally easy. Look at compass needle. It has two features :
- it tends to stick to N-S direction
- when disurbed it returns to N-S direction doing work


That's all we need to know. Now what is happening here. We have a small weak magnet which IS FORCED TO ORIENTATE in Earth magnetic field IF is not bound by any other external force. It must rotate freely.

What we could learn about that ? Well...seems that FREE MAGNETIC FIELD tends to orientate in Earth magnetic field in N-S direction !

But it must be FREE, not related with inductor, not tied to it !

Hmm...I see one situation when it happens, and ...it's collapsing magnetic field when power source is completely cut off. Inductive spike !

Now what about N-S orientation. If you have two magnets, strong but small one and weak but huge one, and they are stick together - the field is coupled. If you have collapsed such field you will get inductive spike which is sum of both fields coupled together. Because weak magnet is weak (and huge) additional energy is small - but here it is !

Now you know there is energy added by Earth in the shape of additional spike energy or tendency to rotate to N-S position.

To use such energy we have to use one or two ways :

- replicate collapsing magnetic field many times
- use very short time magnetic field collapse

maybe there is also another option which I don't know.

To replicate collapsing magnetic field we must use strange CLOSED circuits where initial impulse is flowing in CIRCLE. Energy is accumulated.

To replicate fast collapse we must use spark gap method or another sharp closing / opening circuits - way Tesla found observing effects on HV DC dynamos.

Such spikes are not normal current, they msut flow like very high frequency waves ON SURFACE or IN specially constructed conductors like human nerves. Tesla patented such conductors


What else i can say ? Look at every free energy circuit you could get and finally you will find first or second way to get energy from Earth magnetic field. No mystery. Ancients knew that, many know that today....but yes it's forbidden knowledge and there is much more about this which I didn't figured yet (stationary waves, resonance, negative and positive radiant energy , methods of conversion to normal current with or without using capacitors,magnetic fields and so on)

All above is only my theory.. to prove that I must have too specialized and complicated tools :-( but remember that even weak response is strong if is repeated million times...

[Aromaz]

Maybe answer

I felt like "EUREKA!! "in the middle of the night; but then could the
answer really be so simple?

Extreme frequency will give extreme energy, but to reach that
extreme frequency ????

Then how can we get a circuit to oscillate at frequency in the UV range?

Think logical: A UV light emits a lot of energy at very high frequency,
yet it only uses few watts at mere 12/120/240 V and 50 to 60 Hz!

What is the frequency of that UV light?
Why do the light oscillate at UV range; though supply is less than 60 Hz?

I TOLD YOU – so many times; we have to think outside of the box!

Why can we not come up with a system where we use the combination
of different gasses to generate controlled extreme frequencies. THAT
is the answer, to have the LIGHT from such gas mixtures OSCILLATE.
YAAWWW! Absolute free control over the frequency! No diodes, no
Timers, no transistors…..

Why do we need to use conductors; did we not find for sure that electricity
even runs outside of the conductors? Then why not use metal only as channels?

Can it be done? YES IT CAN. To a certain extend I already did it with
The fluorescent tube where I wound the copper wire around it! Though
That is not the ideal, that is the pointer to say “It can be done”.

OK, so what should we look for:
1. What gasses will generate what frequency – in other words, if we take
a certain mix of gas, how to make it faster or slower. Sure, this info is in Public Domain;
after all, don't we get different lights bulbs with different light values?
2. Then we have to determine how to super saturate that gas with electrons.
3. Then we have to cycle that gas around a tube in vortex style. This is
where we will get the slow pulsing on the outside pushing the gas to the
center – at the outside the pulse move say 10cm per second, closer to the
center it will move faster = higher pulse rate because of less distance to complete a circle.
4. Then how to ‘pump’ more electrons into the gas.
5. And how to get that electrons out and use the extreme frequency.

I think the concept is simple, and I do think it will even be possible to
produce such device on low budget.

Common folks, start thinking! Still need answers on #4 and #5 above.

[sucahyo]

OK, so what should we look for:
1. What gasses will generate what frequency – in other words, if we take
a certain mix of gas, how to make it faster or slower. Sure, this info is in Public Domain;
after all, don't we get different lights bulbs with different light values?

Are you thinking of utilizing different concentration of mercury gas?

[Aromaz]

Are you thinking of utilizing different concentration of mercury gas?

Most likely, but it will also be a variaty of different gasses. Does not
have to be mercury, it only got to be able to move with magnetism.
Unless off course we can make the gas completley electron based and
still restrict their flow in a tube.

Maybe a tube of gold? Does electrons pass freely through gold?

[Aromaz]

Dreamworld ?

In a PM it was said I am "fantasizing", LIVING IN A DREAM WORLD

Then, how about this:

Ionize hydrogen gas by either stripping an electron off of each hydrogen (or Helium) atom, or by allowing each hydrogen atom to capture an extra electron. When hydrogen gains electrons it forms anions; when hydrogen atoms lose electrons they form cations.

Accelerate the anions by using a traveling wave type particle accelerator - Vortex. In this kind of ion accelerator, the negative ions are released inside a cylindrical ion acceleration chamber. This chamber has an electrode with an alternating electric charge of high voltage.

These stages happen:-
1. While the charge on the electrode is positive, the ions (From Hydrogen or Helium) are attracted to the negative charge on the electrode, and thus bunched around it.
2. The alternating voltage switches the charge to negative on the accelerating electrode.
3. The negative charged electrode repels the negative ions and accelerates them to near the velocity of light.
4. The resulting high energy beam of anions passes through a chamber filled with low pressure gas (Mercury? Fluor? Nitrogen?).
5. There, collisions with the gas strip the extra electrons from the anions, and thus make the particle beam neutral to cycle back
6. The free electrons are applied as EMF.

Cyclotron particle accelerators, linear particle accelerators, and synchroton particle acclerators can accelerate positively charged ions until their velocity approaches the speed of light, and each individual ion has a kinetic energy range up to 1000 MeV.

Then the resulting high energy protons can capture electrons from electron emitter electrodes, and be thus electrically neutralized. This creates an electrically neutral beam of high energy hydrogen atoms, that can proceed in a straight line at near the speed of light.

The pulsed particle beam emitted may contain up to 1 gigajoule of kinetic energy. The speed of a beam approaching that of light (300,000 km/sec).

Tesla 1934: Acknowledgements that the following were accomplished:An apparatus for producing manifestations of energy in free air instead of in a high vacuum as in the past. A mechanism for generating tremendous electrical force. A means of intensifying and amplifying the force developed by the second mechanism. A new method for producing a tremendous electrical repelling force. This would be the projector of the invention.

In 1937, Tesla composed a treatise entitled "The Art of Projecting Concentrated Non-dispersive Energy through the Natural Media". This treatise is currently in the Nikola Tesla Museum archive in Belgrade. It described an open ended vacuum tube with a gas jet seal that allowed particles to exit, a method of charging particles to millions of volts, and a method of creating and directing non-dispersive particle streams (through electrostatic repulsion).

Tesla worked on plans for a directed-energy weapon between the early 1900s till the time of his death. Records of his device indicate that it was based on a narrow stream of atomic clusters of liquid mercury or tungsten accelerated via high voltage (by means akin to his magnifying transformer). Tesla gave the following description concerning the particle gun's operation:

"send concentrated beams of particles through the free air, of such tremendous energy that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 200 miles from a defending nation's border and will cause armies to drop dead in their tracks".



Various theories persist regarding the nature of this device and the whereabouts of Tesla's complete schematics for it. In fact, with the realization I have now about the potential for this technology – should it be developed as a weapon – I doubt that Tesla ever wrote it down. After all, he was aware of numerous attempts to steal his inventions and/or documents. Such a device will make nuclear and proton bombs look like kindergarden toys.

So my dear pesimistic friend; does my theory still sound like a fantasy?
P.S. Thanks for that PM; that actually prompted me to search and see
if I am really alone on this thought path; leading to more clear definitions of
this thought pattern.

[Aromaz]

Tesla, Laboratory and Cost

We are so stupid, locked in our simple grooves, boxed away in a closet.

People, do you realize that we today can replicate any of Nikola Tesla's experiments
at a fraction of the cost it was to him? AND we can do so much more.

A simple instrument to measure Volts and another to measure Amps in the days of Tesla
probably cost him an arm and half a leg. For us - it is even cheaper and a resonable meal!

WHY oh Why are we so stupid?

This morning I picked up the phone and ordered a cylinder of Liqued Nitrogen,
one of Helium, one of Hydrogen, two of Oxygen and one of Fluorine - in Thailand.
It is arriving this afternoon. All together it is costing me less than US$ 620!
Just imagine how difficult this would have been to Tesla and co 110 years ago!

[Bob Smith]

Bodkins,
I think your observation about the dipole not getting destroyed is important. The aether/vacuum self-oscillates. How can we tap into it with an open system, or provide the configuration for it to resonate a receiver and be transduced into useable electrical impulses?
Can't say much more now, - it's late and I gotta get up for work tomorrow.
Aromaz - perhaps gas may be one such receiver/converter.
B

[Aromaz]

Aromaz - perhaps gas may be one such receiver/converter.

Question is: What frequency?
I am talking of Terrahertz - which is way beyond the ability of any circuit on earth.

[Bob Smith]

Aromaz:
Good question. I don't know the answer. However, I suspect that we have to think in terms of electrodynamics, perhaps in terms described in some of Bearden's work on the vacuum, and apart from solid state circuits, which, as you note, have limited frequency-producing capabilities.

I think gas-filled tube is a good place to start. I was just about to roll into bed, when your eureka moment tugged at my imagination. Next thing I know, I'm down in the basement getting my head covered with spider webs, leaning into a corner with a multimeter, trying to see how many millivolts a 48 inch fluorescent tube might pull in, even if by parasitic inductance from the wires in the walls. My multimeter is dying, and I can't get a good reading. However, it's a start, and a gas-filled tube may not destroy the dipole.

Now, I'll go to bed, if I can get the gas out of my brain )
B

[Inquorate]

That really is cheap

Relatively speaking - cause that's still 3 weeks rent for me.

I like how tenaciously you follow your ideas Aromaz; I'll be keeping watch of your progress :-)