Pace Up
You are getting somewhere - no doubt on that. IMHO
OTOH:
It's wise to visit wallmart all often: You would be surprised what wallmart might already been selling :
There are those "plastic clip" cell phone cells rejuvenators around here for RSD100 (EUR 1 ? or less)
Put a cell that won't anymore and as long as You charge it with it, it gives juice back ;-)
Is it called 'trickle' or 'pulse' charger?
It has a single "13001" transistor ad gives the battery square pulses (sharp gradients)
Have You lately used a 'car light stick' with a neon tube?
"Bang4buck" factor?
If we want progress, we should be 'in front of' something?
Don't take this as "we are wrong", please :-). I want just to point out there is A LOT of road ahead, we are not even near - we are closer to beginning here than we might be aware of?
That's mine point here only.
When I started this project over as year ago with the " Imhotep Radiant Oscillator Lite" we were drawing 3 amps at 12volt to get the amount of light that I showed in the video. That was OK because Peter Lindemann and Imhotep had set up an energy recovery circuit on the back end. Alot of people have worked hard to get us to the point where we are today. These aren't like "el cheapo China made gadgets" but I guess to some that is what they look like. I wonder what they will cost when they hit the Wal Mart shelf.
Lidmotor
We should rather be careful there:
In China there is a whole lot of people, many very talented no doubt. just having a different capitalism-model doesn't necessarily make them incompetent in RE research.
IMHO.
OTOH, as most of it (RE research) is open on the internet (mostly), they (some of them at least) might already been contributing and following just a footstep behind.
Taking in account Bedini is there (public) from the dawning of the 'www', where does that put them In Your Opinion (IYO)?
I "see" the little battery clip charger as a early (flawed) RE device
YMMV
AND
We shall pace up...
Originally posted by Lidmotor
View Post
OTOH:
It's wise to visit wallmart all often: You would be surprised what wallmart might already been selling :
There are those "plastic clip" cell phone cells rejuvenators around here for RSD100 (EUR 1 ? or less)
Put a cell that won't anymore and as long as You charge it with it, it gives juice back ;-)
Is it called 'trickle' or 'pulse' charger?
It has a single "13001" transistor ad gives the battery square pulses (sharp gradients)
When I said that the light circuit was drawing .75 amps at 8 volts that does not consider the lumens of light being produced nor the amount of energy being recovered at the charge battery.
"Bang4buck" factor?
If we want progress, we should be 'in front of' something?
Don't take this as "we are wrong", please :-). I want just to point out there is A LOT of road ahead, we are not even near - we are closer to beginning here than we might be aware of?
That's mine point here only.
When I started this project over as year ago with the " Imhotep Radiant Oscillator Lite" we were drawing 3 amps at 12volt to get the amount of light that I showed in the video. That was OK because Peter Lindemann and Imhotep had set up an energy recovery circuit on the back end. Alot of people have worked hard to get us to the point where we are today. These aren't like "el cheapo China made gadgets" but I guess to some that is what they look like. I wonder what they will cost when they hit the Wal Mart shelf.
Lidmotor
In China there is a whole lot of people, many very talented no doubt. just having a different capitalism-model doesn't necessarily make them incompetent in RE research.
IMHO.
OTOH, as most of it (RE research) is open on the internet (mostly), they (some of them at least) might already been contributing and following just a footstep behind.
Taking in account Bedini is there (public) from the dawning of the 'www', where does that put them In Your Opinion (IYO)?
I "see" the little battery clip charger as a early (flawed) RE device
YMMV
AND
We shall pace up...
Comment