I just discovered some PDF's on the site of NASA:
NASA: Advanced Energetics for Aeronautical Applications:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...2003038530.pdf
VOL II:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...2005172301.pdf
Volume II has some 40 pages about ZPE and free energy. It mentions
Lindemann, Tesla and EV Gray.
With respect to Grays tube, I think I have an idea about how it works.
As you probably know, it consists of a thin rod surrounded by a copper
grid. The rod is being charged across a spark-gap, according to the
NASA document to a voltage of about 3 kV. Prof Meyl says the Maxwell
equations, the basics for electro-magnetic engineering, allow for
longitudinal waves to exist. However this is disputed by Bruhn:
http://www.scientificexploration.org...15.2_bruhn.pdf
... on the assumption that no free charge particles exist in vacuum.
Edit: The original pdf appears to be gone. It is still available at:
http://web.archive.org/web/200701241...15.2_bruhn.pdf
Still, Eric Dollard shows in his videos that longitudinal waves *do*
exist (and they are also mentioned in the NASA report), so there must
be free charge particles available in the vacuum. Now Quantum theory
says that electron-positron pairs are constantly popping in and out of
existence in the vacuum and that these pairs are "short-lived". See
for example the following article by Apollo astronaut Dr. Edgar
Mitchell:
Quantum Theory, The Quantum Hologram and Zero Point Energy
"The Heisenberg uncertainty principle unambiguously demands that
short-lived virtual photons pop in and out of existence (along with
positron-electron pairs). The inability of Helium to solidify even at
absolute zero temperature is attributed to zero-point energy. "
So, longitudinal waves *do* exist *and* most likely the the free charge
particles those waves are being transmitted trough are
positron-electron pairs popping in and out of existence.
Now, in nuclear power plants what you basically do is smash an
atom-nucleus with a big hammer, so it dis-integrates and energy is being
released. Now, if there are a large number of positron-electron pairs
(temporarily) floating around in vacuum, couldn't you just give a
similar smash to these, so they are separated from each other and do
not eliminate one another after a short time?
Well, I'd say a single, strong longitudinal wave-front could do the
trick. If you would be able to emit a *single* pressure wave front
from the core rod, then you might be able to separate a significant
number of positron-electron pairs, and capture them with a copper
grid hence delivering energy, more energy then you put in, just like
in a nuclear power plant.
So, how could you make a single, strong longitudinal wave front?
Well, you would need to get a sudden rise of the potential of the core
rod, without too much of electric waves going back and forth trough
the core. So, you basically don't want any current going trough the
core rod, just a sudden rise of potential. That means that pulling
sparks out of a coil probably won't work, since a coil doesn't deliver
a constant potential but a constant current. Therefore, I would say a
discharge capacitor would probably work better then a coil.
Since you want the electrons in the rod to move as little as possible,
you'd have to arrange your setup to pull a spark of a duration as
short as possible and you don't want the voltage to be too high,
because then you'd probably get all kinds of waves going back and
fourth trough the core rod, which might disturb the single wave front
we want.
To sum it up: you want to just "ping" the rod, so that its potential
rises sharply (and stays high for a while), but you don't want to hit
it with a "large hammer" causing all kinds of vibrations and waves,
because then you might not be transmitting a single "pressure" like
wave-front anymore, which might kill the whole effect.
Looking forward to your thoughts on this,
-- Arend Lammertink --
NASA: Advanced Energetics for Aeronautical Applications:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...2003038530.pdf
VOL II:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...2005172301.pdf
Volume II has some 40 pages about ZPE and free energy. It mentions
Lindemann, Tesla and EV Gray.
With respect to Grays tube, I think I have an idea about how it works.
As you probably know, it consists of a thin rod surrounded by a copper
grid. The rod is being charged across a spark-gap, according to the
NASA document to a voltage of about 3 kV. Prof Meyl says the Maxwell
equations, the basics for electro-magnetic engineering, allow for
longitudinal waves to exist. However this is disputed by Bruhn:
http://www.scientificexploration.org...15.2_bruhn.pdf
... on the assumption that no free charge particles exist in vacuum.
Edit: The original pdf appears to be gone. It is still available at:
http://web.archive.org/web/200701241...15.2_bruhn.pdf
Still, Eric Dollard shows in his videos that longitudinal waves *do*
exist (and they are also mentioned in the NASA report), so there must
be free charge particles available in the vacuum. Now Quantum theory
says that electron-positron pairs are constantly popping in and out of
existence in the vacuum and that these pairs are "short-lived". See
for example the following article by Apollo astronaut Dr. Edgar
Mitchell:
Quantum Theory, The Quantum Hologram and Zero Point Energy
"The Heisenberg uncertainty principle unambiguously demands that
short-lived virtual photons pop in and out of existence (along with
positron-electron pairs). The inability of Helium to solidify even at
absolute zero temperature is attributed to zero-point energy. "
So, longitudinal waves *do* exist *and* most likely the the free charge
particles those waves are being transmitted trough are
positron-electron pairs popping in and out of existence.
Now, in nuclear power plants what you basically do is smash an
atom-nucleus with a big hammer, so it dis-integrates and energy is being
released. Now, if there are a large number of positron-electron pairs
(temporarily) floating around in vacuum, couldn't you just give a
similar smash to these, so they are separated from each other and do
not eliminate one another after a short time?
Well, I'd say a single, strong longitudinal wave-front could do the
trick. If you would be able to emit a *single* pressure wave front
from the core rod, then you might be able to separate a significant
number of positron-electron pairs, and capture them with a copper
grid hence delivering energy, more energy then you put in, just like
in a nuclear power plant.
So, how could you make a single, strong longitudinal wave front?
Well, you would need to get a sudden rise of the potential of the core
rod, without too much of electric waves going back and forth trough
the core. So, you basically don't want any current going trough the
core rod, just a sudden rise of potential. That means that pulling
sparks out of a coil probably won't work, since a coil doesn't deliver
a constant potential but a constant current. Therefore, I would say a
discharge capacitor would probably work better then a coil.
Since you want the electrons in the rod to move as little as possible,
you'd have to arrange your setup to pull a spark of a duration as
short as possible and you don't want the voltage to be too high,
because then you'd probably get all kinds of waves going back and
fourth trough the core rod, which might disturb the single wave front
we want.
To sum it up: you want to just "ping" the rod, so that its potential
rises sharply (and stays high for a while), but you don't want to hit
it with a "large hammer" causing all kinds of vibrations and waves,
because then you might not be transmitting a single "pressure" like
wave-front anymore, which might kill the whole effect.
Looking forward to your thoughts on this,
-- Arend Lammertink --
Comment