Electrons exist ?

[boguslaw]

Something to consider :

1 Scientists state that each electron has the same charge,mass, spin and so on
but they cannot explain why there are so many electrons with the same parameters.

On the other side : if you have a wave of certain parameters , it's only one wave, and by superposition of many such waves you can create a wave package which behave like a particle.

2 Some OU devices suggest that electrons may create stationary waves.But what if such a waves are really natural and just a metallic conductor is a imperfect path for them and a lot of wave reflections cause electrons to pop up as a wave packages ?

3. Scientists call static electricity as impractical, but did you ever saw how bright sparks can create your sweater at night if made of some non-natural material ? Do you know that such spark can jump to ground by touching metal radiator ?

4. HV arc can make a hole in glass or other dielectric, but Tesla experimented with HV sparks which tend to flow over the surface of the glass like a glowing mass. They were harmless and cold to touch.They sometimes tend to grow in time when circuit was properly adjusted and powered.Stationary waves without back reflections...Pure electricity

[sucahyo]

I don't even know what light is. But I am sure electron exist, even if it's in different nature than current description. There is no reason to call it by other name.

Electron is part of particle that create molecule. Which has negative polarity. Even if it is actually a nothingness, consist of smaller part, or can disolve or can be made or undestructable, contain neutral particle, I will still call it electron.

For static, for now I would say that if you can prevent static electricity generated by electron variable movement from converting to magnet, you can harness it.

What is fire? what is spark? What if spark or fire consist of smaller part than the term we currently use like electron, proton, positron, neutron? We have to invent a new way of calling them.

What if spark consist of an electron positive particle, or negative particle, or neutral particle? Which can bombard neighboring proton and change it to something else because the proton now has too much negative or neutral particle and explode into two separate particle?

Too much that I don't know.......

[jibbguy]

I think that if electrons didn't exist, you would have to to think up a whole nuther explanation for... Chemistry Specifically valence rings.

[boguslaw]

Ok,maybe I didn't stated it clearly. I think that electron is a wave and particle model is a wave package only created by reflections. But sometimes there are no reflections and wave is pure.It's potential or voltage as we call it. It flows at speed light and even at open wire it immediately pops up electrons due to reflections of electron wave from the end and walls of wire and from crystal structure.They cannot flow because the boundary is stable.

Just an idea...

[boguslaw]

For example it could be that by changing resistance of open circuit positions of electrons and maybe amount could be changed.However I cannot imagine how we could test it in open circuit, except by some way to count electrons inside wire

[aljhoa]

Cola plasma reactor with pure plasma

"the electron (being a mini-plasma originating from the neutron plasma)"
"A further fundamental prediction was that plasmas can be created in very simple ways, even at room temperature and without pressure conditions."
Welcome to the Keshe Foundation website
"Hydrogen atoms by having one proton and one electron are the lightest element in the universe; it is one of the most common elements used for creation of plasma."
Keshe energy Plasma Reactors
"One of most simple static plasma reactors is the Cola Bottle."
Creation of electricity in a reactor with only plasma
Al

[sucahyo]

Keely and "Occult Chemistry" writer believe that Hydrogen contain more than two component. And all of them are in equal size althought it's building component maybe a lot smaller than what currently agreed.

[Tehnoman]

Ok,maybe I didn't stated it clearly. I think that electron is a wave and particle model is a wave package only created by reflections.
[..]
Just an idea...

Have you heard anything about quantum physics? In such description there is particle/wave duality - electron acts like nothing but a wave, although it can have only one amount of charge, that is characteristic to particles.

Wave theory part doesn't explain why electron have this elementary charge (experimentally no other results are obtained).

Particle theory part doesn't explain how electron behaves, why there is such "forbidden" zone, why they can interfere.

Nobody has come up with a better description, so in present it is believed that quantum physics holds key to future. Of course, theory is far from complete and TOE (theory of everything) is yet to be formulated.

[aljhoa]

Nobody has come up with a better description, so in present it is believed that quantum physics holds key to future. Of course, theory is far from complete and TOE (theory of everything) is yet to be formulated.

Plasma Physics is more likely the key.
"the electron (being a mini-plasma originating from the neutron plasma)"
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post61204

Also, see Bob Dean's presentation in Barcelona, he mentions what type of physics area 51 is researching.
http://www.energeticforum.com/genera...html#post62979
Al

[quantumuppercut]

I believe electrons exist to a certain extent. Electrons are aether that swirled in a vortex fashion at really small radius of curvature. The swirling created an inertia field detected as mass and its overall motion detected as spin. Now what I think is that proton doesn't quite exist. It is the magnetic energy concentration created by electron orbiting motion. This lead me to the conclusion that the sun is hollow. Inside the sun is a very intense magnetic field contribute by plannets rotation.

[Tehnoman]

Plasma Physics is more likely the key.
"the electron (being a mini-plasma originating from the neutron plasma)"
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post61204
[..]

Well, plasma physics is plasma physics. I can't see any reason, why we should use it if we got no plasma whatsoever. If we want to redefine term "plasma", then it is whole different question.

And all in all - it is not important to what we believe, in physics it is the description that matters, and all arising practical consequences.