The Physics of the Primary State of Matter

[sucahyo]

YouTube - EV Gray Understanding
Im trying

Unfortunately I can't access youtube today , maybe tomorrow. Thanks for the bigger picture, can see it clearly now .

Holy Smokes .
NO ONE SHOULD MISS SEEING THIS VIDEO.
There is more to this universe than our current physics tells us
and that is what we are looking for.

This kind of thing make me wonder why western people do not believe the existance of ghost or human and ghost interaction yet. Human can eat glass, body torn apart and put together, heart removed without dying, man create fire, create lightning, I guess this video should give alternative view for skeptic.

Governmentium has 1 neutron, 12 assistant neutrons, 75 deputy neutrons, and 224 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312. These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons.

Since governmentium has no electrons, it is inert. However, it can be detected as it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact. A minute amount of governmentium causes one reaction to take over four days to complete when it would normally take less than a second.

Confusing . Isn't this a proof that current atom theory is broken?

[Vortex]

Governmentium is a joke

From Dale Pond's website:

Next time do a little research before posting.
See 2nd item listed in a google search

You should provide a link to the source of the information, not copy/paste it without providing the source.
If you are copy/pasting, that should be place into a quote box so others are aware you are not using your own words.
check out the icons above the message creation box ..
First highlight something and then click an icon, those allow you do the things I'm speaking about.

Governmentium is not a real anything.

You really confused sucahyo about your post, I hope he reads this one.
Had me looking, did a couple searches... sucahyo was too busy ..

Have a good day.

[Vortex]

More non-Nuclear transmutations

Transmutations validate there is more going on than current Physics has any clue about.
Since the current physics can't explain transmutations.
This must mean alchemy that is REAL, not just a fantasy.
Something has to give.

Source Link

Singh, M., et al., Verification of the George Oshawa Experiment for
Anomalous Production of Iron From Carbon Arc in Water.

Production of Fe (Iron) from C (Carbon) and O (Oxygen)

Transmutation from Na (Sodium) to K (Potassium)

The Fe which is produced by this transmutation is stainless
(apparently this isn't stainless for the same reason table ware is)

[sucahyo]

Governmentium is not a real anything.

Thanks for that .

@barbosi, Maybe you should let us know or notice that it is posted in Dale Pond's website in the jokes section:
Zen of Sarcasm

Transmutations validate there is more going on than current Physics has any clue about.
Since the current physics can't explain transmutations.
This must mean alchemy that is REAL, not just a fantasy.
Something has to give.

It is also interesting that succesfull transmutation is done in water. Maybe transmutation can also happen without 200 degree constrain in cold fusion or spark in bingo fuel. What Schauberger mention about shaking a carbon dioxide in a water container to make hydrocarbon should be studied more.

[Bodkins]

Electromagnetic Anisotropy
great stuff.
Im still trying getting up to speed .

Been on the northerns light plane yesterday!
I didnt see the green glow (it showed itself but not on my side of the plane)
but I saw the graymist, which is the oposite charge matter hitting the pole yes that right if the matter coming from the sun is the wroung pole it (they say) bounces off into space, also the green glow has dark lines in it!
(think crookes tube).
I cant help thinking that our preseption is off, Our body does not need the extra info to survive, that the dark lines are the Frames per second. But this i can show you with the stracc effect(stripes) with a light tude(will do a video)

We got up real high and i could see the arc of the earth real good we had all the light off, the sky was............more than i have ever understood before bigger more beautiful........

One thing I found out that hit me like a ton of bricks is the north star!!
if you get a camera on the north star with a very long expo.time the HOLE sky with draw a cirle around the north star, it does not move. Now i find that very interesting lets say the cosmos is a vortex spiral and the north star is the top of it and we are 2/3 down the spiral, then if you have a pyramid on the dimenstions of the cosmos the energy will focus 2/3 down the middle!
Well its just a idea.but i like it
ASD Planetarium: The Reasons for the Seasons
half way down a picture

[Vortex]

the cause of vortex movement

Glad you are back Bodkins and Sorry to hear you saw no green lights.

The north star.. is it not only visible from the northern hemisphere? It's the north star .. it's North.
At some point on the southern hemisphere you are not going to see the north start, how did they navigate the seas without a visible north star?
For reference see link given us by Bodkins for ASD Planetarium: The Reasons for the Seasons.

Electromagnetic Anisotropy, Perspective or the location of the viewer, yes.
Motion and movement, for example,
a pendulum moves back and forth in a straight line or in a simple spiral or a vortex depending upon your reference point, the location of the viewer in space.

And below I go off on a wild tangent wondering ...
A straight line movement from one view point would appear as a a spiral or a vortex from another view point .. think about it.

A vortex from our view point is just a straight line movement from a another view point. .. So a vortex is straight line movement from point A to point B from a different perspective and why a vortex is so hard to visualize.
The shortest path is from point A to point B, the line of least resistance is usually a vortex. Is a vortex a straight line movement from point A to point B from a different location of view? Oh, I'm hurting my brain.

We could pretend that gravity and the magnetic field of the earth work together to create a vortex movement as the earth rotates on it's axis, but is it that easy to explain. Does that explain the movement observed?

Could an observed vortex movement be caused by a single force?
Yes it could if that force was being applied to our location as the viewer, was from another location outside of our view point.. A point in space.

A force, you could call it a friction or drag, between our location in space and some other location in space causes a vortex in our location or view point.
Some thing causes the vortex to happen in our location as the viewer.
Can gravity, magnetic fields etc from earth organize and maintain a vortex movement.

Perspective, we see a vortex. Is that vortex movement caused by a single force (name a force of your choice) between the standing still (space or whatever names) and the movement of the earth through space around the sun and rotation upon it's axis creates what we see as a vortex in our location in space as the viewer? Well DAH?!
The location of this force(s) (it's more like friction between here that where ever there is) that causes a vortex is where? Every where is the easy answer .. but is it the correct one?

I didn't get anything out of that except maybe a vortex motion could be caused by an unknown force.

ah, just
Randy

[john_g]

A picture to keep Bodkins happy - see the northern lights here!

[Vortex]

No wrong way

How Coriolis effect effects a vortex and what determines clockwise and counter clockwise rotation.
There isn't a wrong way vortex, they rotate in either direction in nature. I thought it might be otherwise.

Source link: Types of Vortices

* Wide range of spatial scales for vortices

o All require centripetal acceleration
o Magnitude of acceleration increases as spatial scale (radius) decreases

+ Centripetal Acceleration

o Impact of Coriolis felt primarily at larger scales

* Rossby Number Scale Ratio

o Measures importance of Coriolis relative to centripetal acceleration

+ For uniform rotating flow:

# Centripetal + pressure gradient + Coriolis = 0
# Gradient Wind Equation

o Ratio of Centripetal Acceleration to Coriolis Acceleration:

+ Ro = (V2/r) / (fV) = V / (fr)

o Radius of vortex is main source of variation

+ Radius ranges from meters to 1000s of kilometers
+ Velocities range from around 0.5 m/s to around 50 m/s

o Coriolis is weak force, only important for large scale flows

+ At 45oN: f = 1.03 X 10-4 rev/s
+ So fV = 5 X 10-5 m/s2 to 5 X 10-3 m/s2
+ Takes a long time to have a measureable impact

* Small Scale Vortices

o Ro >> 1 (r < 10km) - Cyclostrophic flow
o Coriolis not important so inward acceleration always caused by central low pressure
o No prererential direction for rotation
o Small scale vortices (e.g. dust devils) rotate either direction in either hemisphere and at equator

* Large Scale Vortices

o Ro << 1 (r > 1000km) - approaches geostrophic flow
o Slightly curved flow produced by small differences between Coriolis and pressure gradient
o Coriolis always deflects to right in Northern Hemisphere, to left in Southern Hemisphere
o Enforces preferential directions for rotation around central highs and lows

+ Counterclockwise around lows in Northern Hemisphere, clockwise in Southern Hemisphere
+ Clockwise around highs in Northern Hemisphere, counterclockwise in Southern Hemisphere

* Intermediate Scale Vortices

o Ro = O(1) (r = O(100km)) - Gradient wind flow
o Coriolis strong enough to enforce preferential directions of rotation

[Bodkins]

A picture to keep Bodkins happy - see the northern lights here!

Thanks John
Hope your finding the book insiteful sorry everyone my spelling crap!
great north star post Randy, you see it the way I do,Yes trying to think waaayyy out of the box will result in your brain hurting,
got some more water blowing uploading I did it last week,

YouTube - water blowing

john the picture is now my background

[Vortex]

Thanks John
Hope your finding the book insiteful sorry everyone my spelling crap!
great north star post Randy, you see it the way I do,Yes trying to think waaayyy out of the box will result in your brain hurting,
got some more water blowing uploading I did it last week,

YouTube - water blowing

john the picture is now my background

The "wind" is moving the water until the spark starts?
Two different stresses, the wind is replaced by the spark?

Do you smell ions? You can generally smell them if it is an ion wind.
Don't electrocute yourself trying to smell ions now.
Oh oh oh.. whoops it doesn't have to be ions.. water is diamagnetic
and is repulsive against a magnetic field, but that does not
explain the "wind" effect upon the water going away.. unless
the magnetic field weakens when the spark starts?
But the isn't a magnetic field unless the current if flowing, right?

[sucahyo]

Just watch your gray theory video Bodkins, I see similarity in Schauberger book that explain the water cycle. Water that absorbed by earth will sink deeper until it meet earth magma heat, where it will dissolve into H2 and CO. the H2 will rise upward and bonding every mineral/salt it meets on it's way to the top. This mineral/salt will supply nutrition to the plant at the top soil.

This is book that explain some property of shape:
http://www.cosmo-energie.de/Heilige%...ShapePower.pdf, Dan A Davidson.


What if things that move water is diamagnetic air?

[Bodkins]

The "wind" is moving the water until the spark starts? YESTwo different stresses, the wind is replaced by the spark?YES

Do you smell ions?NO just bloody cold
You can generally smell them if it is an ion wind.NO only if sparks
Don't electrocute yourself trying to smell ions now. No burning skin smell
Oh oh oh.. whoops it doesn't have to be ions.. water is diamagnetic
and is repulsive against a magnetic field, but that does not
explain the "wind" effect upon the water going away.. unless
the magnetic field weakens when the spark starts?
But the isn't a magnetic field unless the current if flowing, right? I dont now

Sorry easy way of answering

[Bodkins]

Just watch your gray theory video Bodkins, I see similarity in Schauberger book that explain the water cycle. Water that absorbed by earth will sink deeper until it meet earth magma heat, where it will dissolve into H2 and CO. the H2 will rise upward and bonding every mineral/salt it meets on it's way to the top. This mineral/salt will supply nutrition to the plant at the top soil.

This is book that explain some property of shape:
http://www.cosmo-energie.de/Heilige%...ShapePower.pdf, Dan A Davidson.


What if things that move water is diamagnetic air?

Dan a. Davidson - Shape Power
a friend sent me this about the same time you put it UP

Schauberger book
I have so much to read its like learning EVERTHING all over again,I understand sucahyo that if water takes CO2 down,Oil maybe part of the CO2 cycle?

I feel that the science world in isolated from nature and sometime very isolated from the people of the world, Its like humanity has stop looking for truth, Once people understand(I love that word) or have a understanding of there connection to the ^Aether^/GOD/CREATOR things will change. Branden sent me the shape power doc. and he also sent me this Harmonic Energy Exchange Device - US 20080191580

Download it and read it! its all here the electet the sphere the earth,
The stuff hitting the planet from space/sun is radiant energy and like bedini said the energy we are working with is nerve energy, its the same stuff hitting the planet thats in your brain!!!!! the potential difference from space to the earth ground.
is just a bigger brain system, lighting is how we see it on the earth but its the same in your head. AS ABOVE SO BELOW.
as for as the northern light in people check out HIGH VOLTAGE photo of people, people have a different colour!
Kirlian and Aura Photography - Crystalinks

[Vortex]

Save this URL

Harmonic Energy Exchange Device - US 20080191580
[/url]

full patent found 20080191580, without a sign up required. bookmark this site !!
PAT2PDF - Free PDF copies of patents: Download and print!

[Vortex]

Shape and geometry

Sorry easy way of answering

Bodkins, sucahyo
About the Blowing water.
It follows PP that the "wind" would stop as the spark starts.
One stress gives way to another stress that takes it's place.
That goes along with different kinds of sparks, static and ions, different stresses..?
There are so many things that can be happening all at the same time.

I was wrong. I said you can smell ions.. No, you can smell Ozone.
I did not find cold or cool air related to ion lifters.
I've read some where that there is debate about if a lifter really is
moving air via an ion flow or is it something else moving the air.
A stress could be moving the air with some ions tagging along.
Knowing what it is or what it is the nature of it, might allow using that
information to increase strength or channel it.
This shows a lifter and the wind blowing out a flame.
UFO Lifter

OZONE and NEGATIVE IONS: Frequently asked questions
An air ioniser (or negative ion generator) is a device that uses high voltage to
ionize (electrically charge) air molecules. I'm curious what is being ionized in
an ion engine for space Ion Propulsion? (never mind..)
See this one Ion propulsion .. tesla-powered ion motor.

These are not lifters.
ion thruster IV
YouTube - ion thruster IV
YouTube - ion thruster III

If it is not ions and not magnetic .. knowing more about the properties would
be a good thing.
Ruling out diamagnetic/magnetic effect via a paper clip or something on a string
to test for magnetic field around non-sparking wire?
sucahyo showed video of paper being attracted to wire, that could be static
charge.

Could you not use a candle just as well as water?
If I remember correctly, a flame is diamagnetic also.. that's does get any
answers magnetically .. A flame has it's own little world of stress fields.
How does shape or the geometry of the HV effect the moving of water.
If the HV is a catalyst creating the wind or is it the direct cause of the
wind? If a shape changes the strength of the wind that might give clues.

Folding or taping AL foil to shapes might be good to test shapes.
Triangle, Sphere, pyramid, tetrahedron, Octahedron

Other shapes to feed your mind, eye-ball these.
Hypercube - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Simplex - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Convex regular 4-polytope - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cross-polytope - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do not stare too long at this image, it will warp your brain