On Strategic Free Energy Operations [Part 1]
Hey Jib,
Thanks for starting a great thread. However, I agree with some of the others and also you in a different way. I don't believe in "activism". Never been a protestor. I don't bother to write my senators and congresstwits on anything because it's not as if they actually represent me or will shift from their agenda. Total waste of time.
One thing we can bank on, though: Politicans are *****s and cowards. They go with what is popular and retains them in power, so, yes, you do have to take your fight grassroots. At the same time, the "mainstream media" is so full of ----- that there's no point dealing with them.
I believe in the doctrine of the indirect assault as it was taught to Ike's generation. It is significantly different from Sun Tsu and Clausewitz. But, basically, no good ever comes from attacks upon well held castles. What we fight is a fortress. Its pit bosses are like casino mobsters. And so you don't go fighting a castle like that in the open nor even on the attack. You don't renew attacks upon previously well-failed lines.
What's the typical pattern of the free energy inventor?
Patent.
Ignored patents.
Attempts to fundraise.
A few investors.
Lost money to investors.
No market.
Perpetual marginalization in the "free press".
What's the typical pattern of the free energy activist?
Stuff you're proposing. No offense. Letter writing to those who don't listen and have no stones. Begging of the corrupt and cowardly. Begging the bought to go against those who feed them. It's like Galileo hoping to change the establishment by taking his arguments to the Church and government. Never works.
...Same tired old renewed lines of attack upon the castle as we enslaved serfs. We bang at the walls. They shoot arrows at us and dump flaming manure atop us each time. With such small and scattered forces, you can't even engage in a good seige. They just laugh. Whole war looks hopeless. With widespread demoralization, people don't join on with a losing war. That castle has to be on fire with its inhabitants starving and in complete division and chaos. You have to get inside Troy's walls with your Trojan Horse after first drawing out the bulk of their forces into unsound positions and ambushing them -- leaving only the women and children in defense of the castle along with a few diehards easy to squash.
You break a castle like that from rapid attack, rapid retreat, allowing the enemy to follow, stretching out his lines, rapid motion to their flanks, and continuing the circular motion until there are no more.
But, more importantly, you always offer terms of peace before your fights. You never let that castle's inhabitants think you're some crazy radical "activist" who wants them all dead and enslaved ("Down with The Man!!" Down with the Oilies! Down with the grid power!! Free energy for all, dude!!!) -- just taxed and ruled fairly. As you raid that castle, the enemy needs to know you will deal with them fairly when they surrender, otherwise they will fight with desperation. You don't want them digging in the heels. It's all psychological warfare all the way through. You want the sword dropped from the enemy commander's hand through complete destruction of his will to fight before you even make a fight. You want his forces in mutiny and prefering to fight on your side; Prefering to topple their own leadership and be commanded by your side. And you always offer them fair share of the plunder for having done so.
You never attack from a line that is expected. You never fight without ruthless, completely unfair advantage and overwhelming momentum. Even the avenues of retreat that you leave for the enemy must always be further ambush, and you must always leave them an avenue of retreat. Always a means of respectable surrender and retention of dignity and plunder.
The basic maxims are many, but those are some core motions.
The advantage we hold is at the level of Grand Strategy which is basically Freedom for all. Energy Independence. Energy Security. Commerce. But, that is a weakness for us; for it competes with existing business. You have to eliminate that problem and make it so the pitt bosses want to be part of the new business scheme. You have to leave them not losses, but more potential for gains. And to provide that truly with no deception.
But, you must also win their hearts, minds, and visions -- making them want to surrender -- even where they are these ruthless New World Order bankers. How so? By giving them a vision of future New World Order that they have been dreaming about since kids. As somewhat covered in the Stan Deyo thread, we need to focus less on free energy and more on the future of a real space program. Anti-Gravity and far more wild spacecraft are possible for us to make. This forum alone is filled with genius inventors who deal in free energy all the time. You are perfectly capable of making things float from the information in here and what I have added lately.
When you do that, the world watches in awe. The most Conservative of people who hate all your greenie talk and activism...their imaginations run wild. Nobody gives a hoot about "The Environment" and "Climate Change". It's all a racket. What the hell do I care? It's folly. By 2036, we're looking at the probability of massive climate change and losses from an asteroid strike alone. And the world is screwed if we can't find a way to shift that rock in its orbit. We can't fire rockets and all the world's nukes against it. I did calculations on a 17 mile diameter asteroid orbital adjustment over 15 years ago. You'd have to catch it years early. You'd have to fire oodles of rockets and nukes...and maybe...just maybe you might do it. But, as crazy as it sounds, if you could put probes on that rock or inflict other means to negate just a bit of the gravitational pull between Earth and the rock...you can get it to miss.
You can activist scream against the world's energy racket and nobody cares. Ah, but, when you make things hover....everyone listens. Everyone likes that!
They start dreaming of the Starship Enterprise possibilities in spaceflight. The b.s. on "overpopulation" is killed ruthlessly. Even the world's most wicked of bankers and fuedal lords start dreaming of ruling their own planets.
Hey Jib,
Thanks for starting a great thread. However, I agree with some of the others and also you in a different way. I don't believe in "activism". Never been a protestor. I don't bother to write my senators and congresstwits on anything because it's not as if they actually represent me or will shift from their agenda. Total waste of time.
One thing we can bank on, though: Politicans are *****s and cowards. They go with what is popular and retains them in power, so, yes, you do have to take your fight grassroots. At the same time, the "mainstream media" is so full of ----- that there's no point dealing with them.
I believe in the doctrine of the indirect assault as it was taught to Ike's generation. It is significantly different from Sun Tsu and Clausewitz. But, basically, no good ever comes from attacks upon well held castles. What we fight is a fortress. Its pit bosses are like casino mobsters. And so you don't go fighting a castle like that in the open nor even on the attack. You don't renew attacks upon previously well-failed lines.
What's the typical pattern of the free energy inventor?
Patent.
Ignored patents.
Attempts to fundraise.
A few investors.
Lost money to investors.
No market.
Perpetual marginalization in the "free press".
What's the typical pattern of the free energy activist?
Stuff you're proposing. No offense. Letter writing to those who don't listen and have no stones. Begging of the corrupt and cowardly. Begging the bought to go against those who feed them. It's like Galileo hoping to change the establishment by taking his arguments to the Church and government. Never works.
...Same tired old renewed lines of attack upon the castle as we enslaved serfs. We bang at the walls. They shoot arrows at us and dump flaming manure atop us each time. With such small and scattered forces, you can't even engage in a good seige. They just laugh. Whole war looks hopeless. With widespread demoralization, people don't join on with a losing war. That castle has to be on fire with its inhabitants starving and in complete division and chaos. You have to get inside Troy's walls with your Trojan Horse after first drawing out the bulk of their forces into unsound positions and ambushing them -- leaving only the women and children in defense of the castle along with a few diehards easy to squash.
You break a castle like that from rapid attack, rapid retreat, allowing the enemy to follow, stretching out his lines, rapid motion to their flanks, and continuing the circular motion until there are no more.
But, more importantly, you always offer terms of peace before your fights. You never let that castle's inhabitants think you're some crazy radical "activist" who wants them all dead and enslaved ("Down with The Man!!" Down with the Oilies! Down with the grid power!! Free energy for all, dude!!!) -- just taxed and ruled fairly. As you raid that castle, the enemy needs to know you will deal with them fairly when they surrender, otherwise they will fight with desperation. You don't want them digging in the heels. It's all psychological warfare all the way through. You want the sword dropped from the enemy commander's hand through complete destruction of his will to fight before you even make a fight. You want his forces in mutiny and prefering to fight on your side; Prefering to topple their own leadership and be commanded by your side. And you always offer them fair share of the plunder for having done so.
You never attack from a line that is expected. You never fight without ruthless, completely unfair advantage and overwhelming momentum. Even the avenues of retreat that you leave for the enemy must always be further ambush, and you must always leave them an avenue of retreat. Always a means of respectable surrender and retention of dignity and plunder.
The basic maxims are many, but those are some core motions.
The advantage we hold is at the level of Grand Strategy which is basically Freedom for all. Energy Independence. Energy Security. Commerce. But, that is a weakness for us; for it competes with existing business. You have to eliminate that problem and make it so the pitt bosses want to be part of the new business scheme. You have to leave them not losses, but more potential for gains. And to provide that truly with no deception.
But, you must also win their hearts, minds, and visions -- making them want to surrender -- even where they are these ruthless New World Order bankers. How so? By giving them a vision of future New World Order that they have been dreaming about since kids. As somewhat covered in the Stan Deyo thread, we need to focus less on free energy and more on the future of a real space program. Anti-Gravity and far more wild spacecraft are possible for us to make. This forum alone is filled with genius inventors who deal in free energy all the time. You are perfectly capable of making things float from the information in here and what I have added lately.
When you do that, the world watches in awe. The most Conservative of people who hate all your greenie talk and activism...their imaginations run wild. Nobody gives a hoot about "The Environment" and "Climate Change". It's all a racket. What the hell do I care? It's folly. By 2036, we're looking at the probability of massive climate change and losses from an asteroid strike alone. And the world is screwed if we can't find a way to shift that rock in its orbit. We can't fire rockets and all the world's nukes against it. I did calculations on a 17 mile diameter asteroid orbital adjustment over 15 years ago. You'd have to catch it years early. You'd have to fire oodles of rockets and nukes...and maybe...just maybe you might do it. But, as crazy as it sounds, if you could put probes on that rock or inflict other means to negate just a bit of the gravitational pull between Earth and the rock...you can get it to miss.
You can activist scream against the world's energy racket and nobody cares. Ah, but, when you make things hover....everyone listens. Everyone likes that!
They start dreaming of the Starship Enterprise possibilities in spaceflight. The b.s. on "overpopulation" is killed ruthlessly. Even the world's most wicked of bankers and fuedal lords start dreaming of ruling their own planets.
Comment