High Voltage from Thin Air?

[Inquorate]

@ DrStiffler - was there a difference between the spectral analysis for the L3 coil with 25.8mhz vs 8.3, 12, 12.5 and 19.8 mhz?

I only ask because i saw some little peaks to the right of the main peak being emitted by the sig gen . I didn't write down the Fq's at the time but suspect they were multiples of fz or thereabouts. using white noise i see more peaks to the left. There was not as much Va dbm as with stimulation at the SRF of the coil but the SRF Fq spectral analysis didn't show any evidence of lattice stimulation. (i assume the sig gen would have put more power into the coil at this frequency due to lower impedance or something.)

i also found the absence of harmonics at 25.8 curious also.

I have been winding coils and will be looking at them in the next week/s as well as hopefully with an sec15 setup.

[DrStiffler]

@ DrStiffler - was there a difference between the spectral analysis for the L3 coil with 25.8mhz vs 8.3, 12, 12.5 and 19.8 mhz?

I only ask because i saw some little peaks to the right of the main peak being emitted by the sig gen . I didn't write down the Fq's at the time but suspect they were multiples of fz or thereabouts. using white noise i see more peaks to the left. There was not as much Va dbm as with stimulation at the SRF of the coil but the SRF Fq spectral analysis didn't show any evidence of lattice stimulation. (i assume the sig gen would have put more power into the coil at this frequency due to lower impedance or something.)

i also found the absence of harmonics at 25.8 curious also.

I have been winding coils and will be looking at them in the next week/s as well as hopefully with an sec15 setup.

@Inquorate

was there a difference between the spectral analysis for the L3 coil with 25.8mhz vs 8.3, 12, 12.5 and 19.8 mhz?

This is the generator driven response of the L3 coil tested. The coil was swept at 100kHz increments measuring relative emission from the coil. As indicated in the resulting table, at certain 1MHz increments a second signal was detected and the generator adjusted to obtain maximum emission and the frequency notes. This means that at 8MHz a second response was seen at 8.3MHz. There is no harmonic relationship between 8 and 8.3MHz. This is also how the other secondary peaks were resolved. The 'srf' Spatial Resonant Frequency for this coil is 25.8MHz and does not relate to 8.3, 12.5 or 19.8MHz. Also note that 8, 12 and 19MHz also are not sub harmonics of 25.8.

stimulation at the SRF of the coil but the SRF

SRF and 'srf' are not the same thing. Self Resonant Frequency is measured in a totally different way. So I will assume you were talking of 'srf'?

Like I have been trying to say, there are particular frequencies and groups thereof that will cause a lattice response and the procedure in the latest table for me, appears not to contain a needed set. The test was to show the response of a typical L3 when swept from a generator with 1V emf input. This is a requirement of the paper to stop all this guess work about how it is just chance that the L3 is 39mm in length (look back and see the discussion), it is necessary so that someone does not pick some random frequency say 13.6 and say they can not duplicate or this is the reason it may be happening. These interjections are locking into or trying to make these points of some significance and they as a single frequency are not. L3, L2 or whatever, alone will not produce these effects.

The SEC Exciters in combination with all components generate a UWB signal that does indeed influence L2 and L3 and all together cause with tuning a proper set of excitation frequencies so that the lattice is vibrated to the extent needed for coherence. Of one does not first understand the significance of a tire on a vehicle, would not wonder why the ride were bumpy when one goes flat?

Now we have a post here that brings every name in history into the mix and we should all gather round and connect the dots. I'm trying to stay civil, yet sometimes the BS and misdirection is beyond belief. Why has not one of the current greats connected the dots? Anyway I hope I have helped clear this up.

Oh yes, I don't really like the White Noise business because you are unable to specifically say what is the root factor. When yo get an Exciter going and I add more to the paper, it will improve.

[lamare]

Now we have a post here that brings every name in history into the mix and we should all gather round and connect the dots. I'm trying to stay civil, yet sometimes the BS and misdirection is beyond belief. Why has not one of the current greats connected the dots? Anyway I hope I have helped clear this up.

Dear Ron,

Let me first thank you for all you have shared with us. It was you who thaught me how to build HF devices like this and I thank you for that.

I did not and do not intend to tell anyone what they should or should not do. I just offered you and the readers of this thread the opportunity to take the insights I have uncovered and collected by studying the work of others that walked similar ways into consideration, because I think they are probably beneficial for deepening your understanding and insight of the phenomena you are investigating. Whether or not you choose to do so is completely up to you.

So, I'm afraid your reaction tells more about you than about me or the contents of the material I referred to.

-- Arend --

[DrStiffler]

Dear Ron,

Let me first thank you for all you have shared with us. It was you who thaught me how to build HF devices like this and I thank you for that.

I did not and do not intend to tell anyone what they should or should not do. I just offered you and the readers of this thread the opportunity to take the insights I have uncovered and collected by studying the work of others that walked similar ways into consideration, because I think they are probably beneficial for deepening your understanding and insight of the phenomena you are investigating. Whether or not you choose to do so is completely up to you.

So, I'm afraid your reaction tells more about you than about me or the contents of the material I referred to.

-- Arend --

@lamare
Please say off my thread!

You are another discrediter IMHO, because of how you phrase your rebuttal.
If you have the answers and have connected the dots, then by all means please save the world with the answer.....

If you indeed feel the answer is present by directing people to read hundreds of volumes of data from the time of Archimedes, then it must be your direction to tie up the community so it goes no-where, because your suggestion is not possible.

I have for so many years heard such statements as; Tesla, Moray, Meyer, Bearden, Sweet, Tim Buck To, have all obtained and performed the magic, so where is the magic?? Why are you not absorbing all the great answers and offering information? Gee! I have it wrong again, just a crusty old man that does not share his marbles.

You have been sharing this directon on almost every thread I read, but it is not needed here, we enjoy our own game and direction.

Please no response, you have pissed me off and I know full well that was your intent.

[lamare]

@lamare
Please say off my thread!

You are another discrediter IMHO, because of how you phrase your rebuttal.
If you have the answers and have connected the dots, then by all means please save the world with the answer.....

If you indeed feel the answer is present by directing people to read hundreds of volumes of data from the time of Archimedes, then it must be your direction to tie up the community so it goes no-where, because your suggestion is not possible.

I have for so many years heard such statements as; Tesla, Moray, Meyer, Bearden, Sweet, Tim Buck To, have all obtained and performed the magic, so where is the magic?? Why are you not absorbing all the great answers and offering information? Gee! I have it wrong again, just a crusty old man that does not share his marbles.

You have been sharing this directon on almost every thread I read, but it is not needed here, we enjoy our own game and direction.

Please no response, you have pissed me off and I know full well that was your intent.

This will be my last post in this thread then.

I can only say I honestly did not intend to piss you of and honestly think the stuff I posted is of interest to you. I tried to extract the essence of the things I referred to in my posts, so you don't have to go trough volumes of data to find out how Tesla designed his system and that the top Sphere is not supposed to radiate, because the energy is supposed to go around the ground connection, for example.

And I know, it sounds weird to say Einstein was wrong and his relativity theory is BS, but doesn't everyone out there say the same thing about what you are doing?

[DrStiffler]

This will be my last post in this thread then.

I can only say I honestly did not intend to piss you of and honestly think the stuff I posted is of interest to you. I tried to extract the essence of the things I referred to in my posts, so you don't have to go trough volumes of data to find out how Tesla designed his system and that the top Sphere is not supposed to radiate, because the energy is supposed to go around the ground connection, for example.

And I know, it sounds weird to say Einstein was wrong and his relativity theory is BS, but doesn't everyone out there say the same thing about what you are doing?

AMAZING!!!

Another instance of what appears to be a well educated individual that has to have the last work and fails to understand English, sorry I guess that is not your language.

My point is proven, you could not leave it where it was, you needed to stay in the fray.....

I can't but laugh when someone does this as I kept remembering the phrase, 'What part of NO! do you not understand?'

Edit:

but doesn't everyone out there say the same thing about what you are doing?

Your a funny man, maybe you picked the wrong direction in your life and should have been a comic. Indeed they do not, I believe the ones of which you speak are from your circle of friends.

[DrStiffler]

Current in progress paper

For those following the paper on the integration of or explanation by the Znidarsic Transition Velocity, the paper name has been changed. To obtain a link to the paper please send an open email to Stiffler Scientific (not a PM to this forum) and if I know you I will forward you the link.

[Inquorate]

YouTube - Spatial resonance of coil dependent on more than you'd think.

[NickZ]

@ Inquorate:
Firefox can't open the link to the YouTube video on Spatial Resonance of coil.
NickZ

[Inquorate]

@ Inquorate:
Firefox can't open the link to the YouTube video on Spatial Resonance of coil.
NickZ

just go to ‪Inquorate's Channel‬‏ - YouTube

the link is for mobile devices so maybe it can't process that

@all DrStiffler can't login, may have been banned? So watch his site and YT for updates.

[wizofid]

Thanks - I would ask that whoever is in charge of fixing this, please do so. I was following this.

BTW - thanks for the note on the Vids, I did not recognize the file extensions and the pc just hung on them.

Best regards -

[MonsieurM]

‪Spatial resonance of coil dependent on more than you'd think.‬‏ - YouTube

[wizofid]

Thanks MM.

[Lidmotor]

Replication of Dr. Stiffler's latest experiment-(capacitive plastic terminal strip)

@Dr. Stiffler

Here is a replication of your latest experiment:

‪SEC -18 experiment replication (the capacitive terminal block).ASF‬‏ - YouTube

I found this very interesting. I never knew that these plastic terminal strips had capacitance. Thanks for showing that to us.

Lidmotor

[Inquorate]

I remember seeing something similar a couple year ago. I had a diode into a cap (virtually a dead stop electrically) into a load. So long as there's a virtual ground wire off the load, very little stimulation is sometimes required to operate the load.
All very interesting something appears to happen to the local space.
@Lidmotor, you may be interested in the discussions that have been continuing at heretical