High Voltage from Thin Air?

[Inquorate]

There was an avramenko plug

There was an avramenko plug on the neon, but since it's three diodes?, attaching the foil or wire off any joining seems to increase energy Cohered.

So long as the strip of foil or wire is lengthwise to the field.

Odd.

[DrStiffler]

A new camera

YouTube - New Camera Looking at a Self Runner

[DrStiffler]

You just dropped a bombshell, and I can't believe this isn't garnishing a massive amount of attention. Do you plan on releasing the schematic for this setup? Even lighting 1 led at half brightness would be a milestone. Anyways excellent work! And people said the title of the thread on overunity was misleading...How wrong they were.

@Freezer

No circuit until I am positive it can be replicated without specific expensive test equipment. Currently the circuit is unstable in running very low power, micro-watts yes, but just....

I received answers to my call for people with SA's so this can be looked at and they are the only ones to see the circuit until we can be sure of replication. I am not going to damage my track record at this point in time.

I will say this, the circuit has been available for 2 years but guess what, no real dreamers out there.

What is new is what it is triggering off of, could be the Sun, could be HAARP, could be the Russians, or Lord knows at this time. It won't be to long and I think it can be exposed. Of course if this is driven by some Black Op's transmitter or some such thing, it would be worthless, right?

Hang in there, some good people gearing up to look into it.

[slayer007]

YouTube - New Camera Looking at a Self Runner

WOW.. I'd say thats more than a bombshell.

It's more like a Nuke

Very Very Nice Doc I can't wait to see more.

[DrStiffler]

WOW.. I'd say thats more than a bombshell.

It's more like a Nuke

Very Very Nice Doc I can't wait to see more.

@slayer007

I can give a bit more info. See and read the following link and then do a web search for additional information. All the puzzle parts are falling into place and the SEC Theory remains intact, except that group of frequencies that has bothered me so long, may be just over the next hill.

1980MNRAS.190P..73B Page 77P

This may be a bit deep for some but you all will get the general drift of where this all may end up.

[slayer007]

@slayer007

I can give a bit more info. See and read the following link and then do a web search for additional information. All the puzzle parts are falling into place and the SEC Theory remains intact, except that group of frequencies that has bothered me so long, may be just over the next hill.

1980MNRAS.190P..73B Page 77P

This may be a bit deep for some but you all will get the general drift of where this all may end up.

@ Dr Stiffler

Thank you for the link.It looks very interesting.

It looks like I have some searching to do.

Thank You

[Inquorate]

Excited popcorn sphere

@Dr. Stiffler - Regarding your video of the monstrosity,

YouTube - Need Some Replicators To Do This

You ask for replicators.. And mention there is something you want to say about the experiment.

I have somewhat duplicated the results

YouTube - nodes in excited mass

And wavefront101 has duplicated your results

YouTube - SEC 15-3 popcorn sphere

YouTube - SEC 15-3 popcorn sphere #3

YouTube - SEC 15-3 popcorn sphere #2

As has gbluer

YouTube - SEC Popcorn Ball

But I cannot find any further statements from you regarding this experiment.

Could you please elucidate?

Love and light

[DrStiffler]

@Dr. Stiffler - Regarding your video of the monstrosity,

YouTube - Need Some Replicators To Do This

You ask for replicators.. And mention there is something you want to say about the experiment.

I have somewhat duplicated the results

YouTube - nodes in excited mass

And wavefront101 has duplicated your results

YouTube - SEC 15-3 popcorn sphere

YouTube - SEC 15-3 popcorn sphere #3

YouTube - SEC 15-3 popcorn sphere #2

As has gbluer

YouTube - SEC Popcorn Ball

But I cannot find any further statements from you regarding this experiment.

Could you please elucidate?

Love and light

@Inquorate

This post must have remained in a time warp and just appeared

This question/request has been answered yes indeed by many and very well by those on the forum and in private, So I fail to understand why you ask this? We (I thought) have moved way beyond this, at least to the point that we should be able to close the door on the last denial wind that always blows.

If you think this is tied to the request for people with SA's, maybe you missed something, this is no longer a four legged beast, it has started to walk upright.

Hey I am happy with all that has been done here its all coming to mass

[Inquorate]

Just seeing if you'd say it outright

But that'll have to do


The beast may be walking on two legs, but I'm still studying exactly how your system works; hence the query.

It's one thing to see it walking, another to understand how it does it.

Love and light

[DrStiffler]

Just seeing if you'd say it outright

But that'll have to do


The beast may be walking on two legs, but I'm still studying exactly how your system works; hence the query.

It's one thing to see it walking, another to understand how it does it.

Love and light

@Inquorate

The point of "Understanding" that you request is one that will never sleep. As long as we have two or more humans available there will always be a question and a difference in understanding or at least decent. Are you comfortable with Newtons views, does the quantum view remove it, is Cosmology safe, is it Black Stars or Black Holes, is it Dark Matter or or is it a particle. Understanding is a relative and personal thing it is used by the mind to sooth the constant feeling of being lost and a grain of sand on the beach of life. Someone else may not understand as I understand, yet conditions may remain the same.

Therefore until I receive the opportunity to receive a square shake at peer review this shall remain as it is and continue to dribble as it does. I do not and will not use this type of forum to publish the last work I will produce.

[Inquorate]

No offence intended

@Inquorate

The point of "Understanding" that you request is one that will never sleep. As long as we have two or more humans available there will always be a question and a difference in understanding or at least decent. Are you comfortable with Newtons views, does the quantum view remove it, is Cosmology safe, is it Black Stars or Black Holes, is it Dark Matter or or is it a particle. Understanding is a relative and personal thing it is used by the mind to sooth the constant feeling of being lost and a grain of sand on the beach of life. Someone else may not understand as I understand, yet conditions may remain the same.

Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water.

Mastery of the mind is a subtle thing.

//Therefore until I receive the opportunity to receive a square shake at peer review this shall remain as it is and continue to dribble as it does. I do not and will not use this type of forum to publish the last work I will produce.

-I respect your choice. Peace be with you.

[DrStiffler]

Why I am as I am!

@All

Steam Blow Off - not directed to anyone and to all.

It gets me so damn mad at the general population when they hide behind pseudo-names and faked generalized and constantly changing email addresses and their never ending desire to hurt people because they themselves are not happy with life that I have indeed wondered why I ever became involved with the public and each and every day increases the volume of that question ringing in my mind.

Once a person honestly enters this type of public domain, fellows there is no! return. Why, well look around at what you see; lurkers, plants, dissenters, disenfranchised, money mongers, government and cooperate watchdogs. Once you mire in the bog you are unable to pull free without losing something valuable.

Here is the bone I pick. Everyone wants to know where the energy comes from, that is so damn simple, its everywhere, its you yourself. All I claim is that I am able to tap it in a productive way. I do not violate laws or understanding, the water is there, drink from it.

You can not count on your fingers and toes the number of unknowns that have told me they indeed support my findings "BUT" not a one will attache his/her real name and position to it and make it public, is that strange or not?

In this great world we live where it appears money rules (strange we still seeing increasing population growth, secondary desire) its not a quest for knowledge any longer or self pride, its $.

Here is a typical result from three people that I do indeed believe have the required equipment and procedural knowledge to present factual and convincing results. "Doctor, I did it for you. I can not be involved because of where I work, you can use what I have found it is yours" REALLY! Or "You know my position here is very good and the other Prof's would attack me and gee I have a wife and kinds and all. Hey I will give you all the data, I did it for you". BET ME!

Or "Sorry I don't have any credentials, but its real, you have found it for sure. I will support you all the way, but of course it can't be known who I am." HOW DARE ME!

I am committed, I chose to go this way and after the OU.com BS and waste of time I came to EF, albeit it now appears as many of the same people and subjects have migrated here so its not as interesting as it was at first.

If some want to try and corner me, so be it, try, I have nothing to gain. Guess I just had the thought I could leave something around when I left that had some meaning, but life is life is it not and the games go on.

You get what I want to give and not more or no less, at least until I give up and accept it just ain't worth it folk.

Now back to work, I feel better after that.

I'll come back later and see all the screams.

[DrStiffler]

Just seeing if you'd say it outright

But that'll have to do


The beast may be walking on two legs, but I'm still studying exactly how your system works; hence the query.

It's one thing to see it walking, another to understand how it does it.

Love and light

@Inquorate

In simple terms, what is needed for an oscillator to oscillate? Feedback, positive in phase feedback and able to overcome internal loss?????

Is there a prescient that requires that this bee feedback from the oscillator itself, of course not, any injected signal of proper phase and intensity will allow a circuit to go into oscillation.

Now if you have a coil and allow it to be at a high impedance and monitor the activity of the coil (parasitic coupling - small) will you not see oscillations within the coil which is triggered by background noise? Of course..

Now if that coil is tuned to one set of strongest oscillation points and the back ground under certain conditions can overcome the loss of the coil and the coil is connected to an AV Plug powering some device that will produce feedback at the correct frequency, have we done magic or not, no we have not, but we get oscillation, thanks to that cluster of specific noise that kicks us into run mode.

[Inquorate]

@Inquorate

In simple terms, what is needed for an oscillator to oscillate? Feedback, positive in phase feedback and able to overcome internal loss?????

Is there a prescient that requires that this bee feedback from the oscillator itself, of course not, any injected signal of proper phase and intensity will allow a circuit to go into oscillation.

Now if you have a coil and allow it to be at a high impedance and monitor the activity of the coil (parasitic coupling - small) will you not see oscillations within the coil which is triggered by background noise? Of course..

Now if that coil is tuned to one set of strongest oscillation points and the back ground under certain conditions can overcome the loss of the coil and the coil is connected to an AV Plug powering some device that will produce feedback at the correct frequency, have we done magic or not, no we have not, but we get oscillation, thanks to that cluster of specific noise that kicks us into run mode.

That makes sense to me. I've been sitting here in the dark, joining strings of diodes; avramenko plug to LED, with a virtual ground via inductor to the negative or positive plug (the other having mass), and another avramenko plug from that 'ground'..

Tomorrow I'll try make a daisy chain.

And re-read your last post.

Thankyou for sharing your knowledge on this forum, I have learnt much from you, and you have helped connect many dots.

Love and light

[quantumuppercut]

@Inquorate

The point of "Understanding" that you request is one that will never sleep. As long as we have two or more humans available there will always be a question and a difference in understanding or at least decent.

Amen

I saw your new camera on youtube. Very nice. Looks like you're the first one to step out of the tunnel on broad daylight.