Perpetual Motion Holder | Edward Leedskalnin

[barbosi]

You guys admire Ed for wrong reasons

Ed was a curious individual and he read a lot of the electricity books at local library. What most of you consider PMH was Ed's discovery, I have news. PMH was discovered long before Ed's time. And now you all take it as his invention only because you did not know it from the school books.

While is still in the public domain, I recommend you to download this book (http://www.archive.org/download/davi...00davirich.pdf) and learn what is not thought in nowadays manuals. In the original document page 80 you will find the figure 54 with the PMH and on the next page you will read:

If, however, the armature is applied to the poles, and the flow of the current is stopped while it is attached, it will continue to adhere for weeks or months with great force, so as to be able to sustain one third or one half as much weight as while the current was circulating. But if once removed, nearly the whole magnetism will disappear, and the magnet, if of good iron, will not even be able to lift an ounce.

Note 1: For all of you truly interested in research, start with this manual; there are things not thought in nowadays manuals.

Note 2: Ed's genius was not the PMH as it was common knowledge in his time. He found it in the books and tried to make it a learning tool. As an example is the commonly known transformer (which BTW is not built as in old times on U+I shape core but rather E+I shape nowadays). I believe though he accomplished more than he described in his writings. We may never know what his patent application was all about. However, his genius took the PMH (again not his discovery) as a start point and found a way to fulfil his vision.

So just replicating an experiment considered common knowledge [at least] in 1842, won't put you on Ed's imagination. If you have yours, go nuts. At least this is what I try.

[rosco1]

Questions?

Is it possible that the flywheel Ed was using is in fact a T model Ford item, standing upright?

I ask as the engine block and crankshaft beneath have never been identified here to my knowledge, and they do appear to resemble the T model Ford items, without con rods and pistons.

Whilst reading other posts, a link was provided which took me to a site that sells the flywheel and magnets, and the images of those components did resemble the flywheel Ed was using.

[morpher44]

Magnets prevent AC flow in one direction

This is sort-of Leedskalnin notion.
Magnets can be used to prevent AC from flowing or enhance
it flowing depending upon polarity.

YouTube - ac magnet rectifier

[Joit]

Rosco yes it is from a Ford T Model.
Other Pictures shows another Part there, laying around. i did only wonder, why he had not coils there anymore.
But they probatly did remove some Parts there after Ed died 'suddenly' at cancer.

Thanks for the Pdf Barbosi, for my Part, i wil read it.

Morpher, maybe not the Theme here, but i did look since a while for this.
Is there any preferred Direction of the Poles at rectifying?
I found out lately, that facing the Southpole against the 'Plus' gives anyhow a good result at generating Current.
Funny, that Ceramicmagnets usual dont lead Current.

[rosco1]

A bountiful day...

[QUOTE=Joit;59998]Rosco yes it is from a Ford T Model.
Other Pictures shows another Part there, laying around. i did only wonder, why he had not coils there anymore.
QUOTE]

Thank you Joit.

While researching aspects of Ed's work today, I've stumbled upon several curiosities that weren't apparent to me on earlier visits.

Yes, I note the T model Ford flywheel, which he modified away from the standard "sweet sixteen" arrangement, thus turning it into the 24 magnet arrangement.

I also note that the first release T models had places cast into the bellhousing which apparently took magnets, which thus allowed these engines to run without gasoline, or so the story goes...

Upon closer examination of the wire coils Ed wrapped around the bottles, I note he's wrapped them all 1 way, that being the "right hand twist", which is un-natural to a right handed person.

At first I presumed Ed may have been left handed, but upon reading his writings, and comparing them to the DNA double helix as well as several other sources, I now know that all these use the same "right hand twist" approach deliberately.

This gives me cause now to ponder the possibilities of using this "right hand twist" arrangement in a set of copper tube spark plug leads.

Oddly, my copper tube leads were all wrapped "left hand twist", and while that may not seem to be a big deal, I have noticed that one of the cells on my battery has been overflowing for a few months now, which is quite puzzling as a cell ordinarily doesn't "make" electrolyte, thus it's a highly unusual occurrence.

If I remove the copper tube leads, the overflowing cell issue goes away.

I'm now wondering if this "issue" may be related to the left hand twist being used, rather than the right hand twist approach.

My plan now is to strip my leads and start again, wrapping them all the "right" way and watching that cell to see if the overflow issue has been remedied.

I find Ed to be a highly interesting character, and it's pleasantly easy to lose an entire day looking here and there and following "leads".

[morpher44]

which polarity is which?

Morpher, maybe not the Theme here, but i did look since a while for this.
Is there any preferred Direction of the Poles at rectifying?
I found out lately, that facing the Southpole against the 'Plus' gives anyhow a good result at generating Current.
Funny, that Ceramicmagnets usual dont lead Current.

Hi Joit,
You know I didn't pay attention to which polarity was which, so some
experimentation is in order to figure that out.
I think rectifying is really the wrong word here.
There is current flow, regardless of magnetic polarity.
But, in one polarity direction the ac current flow is enhanced ... in the other
it is decimated. This flow is from a high voltage oscillating potential
to ground. AC flows back & forth and so you would expect symmetry,
but that is not what we see here.

This video is interesting with respect to so called free-energy
and magnetic PUSH:

YouTube - Psychic intuitive: Predicted medical advances and free energy

[morpher44]

Perpetual Motion Holder Clapper?

It occurred to me that Hendershot's Fuelless Generator may be using
a Leedskalnin idea. Here is an experiment along these lines:

YouTube - Hendershot meets Leedskalnin (Perpetual Clapper)

[Joit]

Hi Morpher,
My condolence for your Relais, and thanks for the Vid links, quite interesting.
I dont know the exactly Setup from Hendershots device, even, when i saw a couple Pictures from it.
But i did guess anything like that, because a coil with a Magnet is not for generating Current, its more for build up a EM Field.
But i think, the Idea of using the magnetpath through Iron is more often used, only fogotten or ignored.
Someone did post a Video at an other Post, where it did show, when he push 10 Amps through the Coils, there are still 6 Amps left at the PMH.
Not sure, if the Meter is crazy, and/or the 10Amps are accurate, because, 10 Amps, you need thick wires.
But with the Force, what you got at the ironbar, you can guess it, it is about that.
And Btw, i think, when you use more Ironsheets, where the Sheets are with the thin Side standing at the U, it maybe gives a better Field.
Because through each Sheet will run Current through. And there is Current inside running.

[handyandy]

I came across this series of papers while researching Leedskalnin:
F.D. Tombe aether theory
While some of it is hard to agree with there are answers to some questions I've had that were raised in my research.

Andy

[cody]

I have a new vid i would like to share. Basically it goes over what the pmh has taught me about cores when using dc applications. Some of you may already know this stuff, i still have much to learn and this device has taught me a lot. I dont go into what effect resonance has on it, more things to be tested. I hope this info will be be useful for designing coils, such as getting the right amount of inductance without killing your desired output effect.

YouTube - Ed Leedskalnin Magnet 4

[boguslaw]

free energy Steven Mark solid state generator video 2

[Joit]

Thanks for the Video Cody.
I think, it demonstrates well some basic Things,
what someone can keep in Mind to remember and consider it,
when building a Core.

[david lambright]

hi everyone...

just wondering...has anyone noticed a heat type distortion around an energized PMH?...i built a circular PMH, 1/2" steel rod bent into a 12" circle with a 1/4" gap...with one coil of wire near the gap,20 to 30 turns of transformer wire, i energize the PMH with a DC battery and the ring locks together, closing the gap and staying that way just like a U shaped PMH with a top bar....here is the thing....i can see what looks like a heat wave around the steel and the copper coil too...other metals seem to radiate this wave also, like gold and silver...this seems to work best when the other metals are ring shaped....i saw a video where a copper ring was influenced by a magnet, but the same size ring with a gap was not influenced by the same magnet....david

[Iotayodi]

@David:
What dc voltage and amps did you use?

[CosmicFarmer]

i saw a video where a copper ring was influenced by a magnet, but the same size ring with a gap was not influenced by the same magnet....david

Are you talking about a quick pass of a magnet over the ring? eddy currents.

It would be interesting to see the effects of a PMH constructed with a part of it as an iron or steel coil. The easiest part to replace would be replace the straight keeper with an iron/steel coil. Basically a regular pmh with a ferromagnetic coil AS a part of the iron/steel loop. Then you would have a kept magnetic current going around in a spiral, and you can put measuring devices in the middle of the ferromagnetic spiral to measure for anomalies.

By making the iron bar hollow you just direct the force away from the middle. By changing the element or adding gaps you reduce / eliminate the force's power.
The only real way to control the force is by construction and shape of your iron middle core.