Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Perpetual Motion Holder | Edward Leedskalnin

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Keeping on the subject of the ED in ed, as a symbol. I dont find it for a symbol for PMH but it did inspire me. To the left of the flywheel motor there is a pipe that goes into the ground. In magnetic currents ED said that to make a better coil put it in a pipe. Connect coil core to a metal plate and insert into pipe. A cross section of that would be an "E" . The pipe is big enough to cover both the super norths and souths briefly. So you would get a super south, then both, then the super north in succession from the flywheel/motor. All ringing that pipe (ring twice) which is now outer core of the coil.
    I may be wrong, but charging the pipe with the north, and then balancing with the 2 potentials (PMH) and then changing the potentials again with the south lays along the same lines as we are discussing in the Big Bedini motor.
    Correct me if im wrong please.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by uusedman View Post
      I will buy the Flashing and the ally plate today. Also, I need to buy 10 lbs of 16 gauge of copper wire for the original PMH. [/url]
      @all Should we use copper or magnet wire

      I would like to pulse the solenoids that means I need the field to disappear instantly which wire would be best.
      Last edited by Dave45; 12-04-2010, 11:23 PM.
      Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question

      Comment


      • Today at Ace Hardware I found insulated steel wire. Coated just like magnet wire. It came in 50 ft roll. Kinda cheap at $2.50 a roll. Will try to make coil and see if results are that much better than equivalent size/length copper wire. May try a glass bottle if results are good.

        Comment


        • Great find

          Hi redrichie, that is a great find. I have been looking for some coated iron wire also. Is your wire steel or iron? I found a roll of coated steel wire in a craft store but it was so stiff it was really hard to wind a coil with it. Is the wire you found stiff or soft? We have a Ace hardware in town so I can check Monday and see if they have any of that wire also. Thanks for sharing your find.

          Carroll
          Just because someone disagrees with you does NOT make them your enemy. We can disagree without attacking someone.

          Comment


          • Steel is Iron but with a different chemistry makeup. High Iron content only has around 17% electrical conductivity. Steel with a higher carbon content etc is about 3 to 15% electrical conductivity. Copper is 100% conductive.
            Magnet wire is copper with a thin insulation. Never pulsed but I would think using larger wire with fewer turns would collapse quicker just because of the shorter path or length of wire. If you want a higher current flow use copper.

            @Redrichie. If you get that steel wire I would like the stock number so I can check its remanence.

            Comment


            • Thanx Iotayodi
              I realized that after I googled it, should have googled it before asking a dumb question.
              Dave
              Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question

              Comment


              • Ed wrote,
                "Maybe you think that it is not fair to use iron wire to demonstrate how magnetic currents are made, but I can tell you that if I do not use iron core in the coil I can make more of the magnetic currents with soft iron wire coil than I can with copper wire coil, so you see it is perfectly good to use iron wire to demonstrate how magnetic currents are made."

                Comment


                • Not sure if it was posted before, but a very interesting experiment, indeed.
                  Wait for the shorted coil part...

                  YouTube - Transformer core tests part 1

                  part 2

                  YouTube - Transformer core tests part 2

                  ABC
                  Last edited by ABCStore; 12-05-2010, 01:44 AM.

                  Comment


                  • ABC,

                    I came across those vids a long time ago and never could find them again. Great find, thanks for posting them! Very cool effect.

                    cody

                    Comment


                    • It's a very interesting test.
                      Looks to me like the secondary has some current running in it which is trying to oppose the primary field direction...somehow causing the field to dam up before dissapating in the coil.
                      By opening the secondary and closing the primary, the excess mag current takes the path of the primary to dissipate through it.

                      I wish i could try that out but I don't have a similar core.
                      Would be good to use a meter to see the currents at work.

                      Comment


                      • YouTube - Gravity Key 137 / Antigravity found / Gravity unified with magnetism / Gravitomagnetics
                        Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question

                        Comment


                        • I posted the first 3 videos of different ideas of PMH.

                          1.
                          YouTube - PMH Video #1

                          2.
                          YouTube - PMH Video #2

                          3.
                          YouTube - PMH Video #3

                          more to come!

                          Comment


                          • uusedman,

                            video #2. thank you. With my setup its hard to notice that effect as it always recharges the opposite way with gravity holding my keeper on top. But there is that moment where the field crosses zero that the bar momentarily releases. I noticed this effect before but now i see the effect may have potential for use. Thanks for helping me see this.

                            cody

                            Comment


                            • Hey uusedman,
                              Ed wrote in his notes to connect the coils so that the currents are running in both coils at the same time.

                              This means that you connect the start of one coil (a) to the end of the other (d)...and the end of the first (b) to the start of the other (c).
                              The coils remain closed...then you just connect your battery to (ad) and (bc)

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Loadstone View Post
                                Hey uusedman,
                                Ed wrote in his notes to connect the coils so that the currents are running in both coils at the same time.

                                This means that you connect the start of one coil (a) to the end of the other (d)...and the end of the first (b) to the start of the other (c).
                                The coils remain closed...then you just connect your battery to (ad) and (bc)
                                This setup totally skipped my mind. I will try it and probably make a movie.

                                @Cody, You are most welcomed. Your videos have been tremendous and incredible in advancing the ideas of ED. When you use bigger models you actually can notice results that normally you cant notice on smaller models.

                                I am almost convinced the PMH is a resonance capacitance device. I would like to see how we can pulse the PMH in high FREQ and low FREQ. Also, need to start building a flywheel to toy with.

                                Peace.

                                Abe

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X